EFL Learners’ Perceptions of the Use of Reading Poetry in Terms of Criti-cal Thinking
محورهای موضوعی :Mansoureh Akbari Nouri 1 , Massood Yazdanimoghaddam 2
1 - Department of TEFL, NT.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of English Language Teaching, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran
کلید واژه: Challenges, English language learning, Poetry, Students’ perception,
چکیده مقاله :
In this mixed-method study, English Language Department students' perspectives of poetry as CT are examined. Understanding pupils' perceptions affects their language learning and interest. Research has shown the importance of learners' viewpoints, but none have examined Iranian institution students' literary course perceptions. SPSS analyzes quantitative data, while thematic analysis analyzes qualitative data. This study uses upper-intermediate and advanced students' replies to a questionnaire including closed-ended, multiple-choice (quantitative) and open-ended items (qualitative). 75 literary students and 75 linguists were selected. In particular, 75 literature students completed the MPQ in the 2nd, 9th, and 16th weeks of the semester to share their per-spectives. Studies show that students' perceptions of poetry in English language teaching in-creased after the intervention. These benefits include increased vocabulary, reading comprehen-sion, poetry comprehension, and figurative language understanding. The data also show that most students like including literature in their study programs. It also shows how it improves their language, vocabulary, speaking, and reading. The most influential literary form on lan-guage development is poetry. The study showed that poetry can assist children improve percep-tion. Poetry also affects kids' reading comprehension.
In this mixed-method study, English Language Department students' perspectives of poetry as CT are examined. Understanding pupils' perceptions affects their language learning and interest. Research has shown the importance of learners' viewpoints, but none have examined Iranian institution students' literary course perceptions. SPSS analyzes quantitative data, while thematic analysis analyzes qualitative data. This study uses upper-intermediate and advanced students' replies to a questionnaire including closed-ended, multiple-choice (quantitative) and open-ended items (qualitative). 75 literary students and 75 linguists were selected. In particular, 75 literature students completed the MPQ in the 2nd, 9th, and 16th weeks of the semester to share their per-spectives. Studies show that students' perceptions of poetry in English language teaching in-creased after the intervention. These benefits include increased vocabulary, reading comprehen-sion, poetry comprehension, and figurative language understanding. The data also show that most students like including literature in their study programs. It also shows how it improves their language, vocabulary, speaking, and reading. The most influential literary form on lan-guage development is poetry. The study showed that poetry can assist children improve percep-tion. Poetry also affects kids' reading comprehension.
Abu-Malhim, A-R. (2009). Attitude of Jor-danian College Students towards Learning English as a Foreign Lan-guage. College Student Journal, 43(2), 682.
Akyel, A., & E. Yalçin (1990). Literature in the EFL class: A study of goal-achievement incongruence. ELT Journal 44(3), 174–180.
Arnold, J. (1999). Affect in language learn-ing. Cambridge: Cambridge Universi-ty Press.
Block, D. (1994). A day in the life of a class: Teacher/learner perceptions of task purpose in conflict. System, 22(4), 473–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)90004-3
Breen, M. P. (Ed.). (2001). Learner contri-butions to language learning: new di-rections in research. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Cubukcu F. (2001). Use of poetry for EFL purposes. (Unpublished article). DokuzEylul University, Izmir.
Davis, J. N., Gorell, L. C., Kline, R. R., & Hsieh, G. (1992). Readers and foreign languages: A survey of undergraduate attitudes toward the study of litera-ture. The modern language journal, 76(3), 320-332.
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculation about the nature and development of metacog-nition. In F. E. Weinert, & R. H.
García-Madruga, J. A., & Fernández-Corte, T. (2008). Memoria, comprensión & razonamiento en la Enseñanza Secundaria. Anuario de Psicología, 39(1), 133-158.
Hirvela, A., & Boyle, J. (1988). Literature courses and student attitudes. ELT Journal, 42(3), 179-184. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/42.3.179
Lazar, G. (1993). Literature and language teaching: A guide for teachers and trainers. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perkins, C., & Murphy, E. (2006). Identify-ing and measuring individual en-gagement in critical thinking in online discussions: An exploratory case study. Journal of Educational Tech-nology & Society, 9(1), 298–307.
Shakfa, M. D. A. (2012). Difficulties stu-dents face in understanding Drama in English literature at the Islamic uni-versity of Gaza. English Language Teaching, 5(9), 95–103.
Wenden, A. (1999). An introduction to metacognitive knowledge and beliefs in language learning: Beyond the ba-sics. System, pp. 27, 435–441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00043-3.
