Sustainable Agriculture Network of Organic Jasmine Rice Production: The Model of Community Enterprise in Phayao Province, Thailand
محورهای موضوعی : Extension and EconomicWasna Pithakpol 1 , Bungon Sawatsuk 2 , Somchart Tana 3 , Yodsawat Kamsamut 4 , Chitnarong Sirisathitkul 5
1 - School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, The University of Phayao. Muang District, Phayao Province 56000, Thailand
2 - School of Business and Communication Arts, The University of Phayao, Muang District, Phayao Province 56000, Thailand
3 - School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, The University of Phayao. Muang District, Phayao Province 56000, Thailand
4 - School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, The University of Phayao. Muang District, Phayao Province 56000, Thailand
5 - School of Science, Walailak University, Thasala District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province 89160, Thailand
کلید واژه: Organic Farming, Jasmine Rice, Rice Production, Community Enterprise, Sustainable Agriculture,
چکیده مقاله :
Organic rice farming faces challenges of rising input costs and limited scalability. This study investigates a sustainable solution through the Dok Kham Tai Community Enterprise Model in Phayao Province, Thailand, which promotes a networked, community-based approach to organic jasmine rice production. The model emphasizes collective action and knowledge sharing among local farmers. Using field observations, in-depth interviews with 15 community members, and quantitative assessments, the study evaluates the impact of shifting from individual to group-based organic farming. Results show that the integration of technology and shared resource management led to an 11.10% increase in rice yields, while production costs rose by 10.89%, resulting in an overall net economic benefit for participating farmers. Additionally, collective marketing strategies improved product value and strengthened community identity. The findings underscore the potential of community enterprise models to enhance sustainability, reduce chemical usage, and improve livelihoods, offering a replicable framework for organic agriculture in similar rural contexts.
Organic rice farming faces challenges of rising input costs and limited scalability. This study investigates a sustainable solution through the Dok Kham Tai Community Enterprise Model in Phayao Province, Thailand, which promotes a networked, community-based approach to organic jasmine rice production. The model emphasizes collective action and knowledge sharing among local farmers. Using field observations, in-depth interviews with 15 community members, and quantitative assessments, the study evaluates the impact of shifting from individual to group-based organic farming. Results show that the integration of technology and shared resource management led to an 11.10% increase in rice yields, while production costs rose by 10.89%, resulting in an overall net economic benefit for participating farmers. Additionally, collective marketing strategies improved product value and strengthened community identity. The findings underscore the potential of community enterprise models to enhance sustainability, reduce chemical usage, and improve livelihoods, offering a replicable framework for organic agriculture in similar rural contexts.
1. Beiranvand, J., Ommani, A. R., Noorivandi, A. N., & Ardakani, M. (2024). Identifying and prioritizing the challenges of organic farming development among farmers in Lorestan Province. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems, 14(1), 25–35. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/ijasrt/Article/1033757
2. Bello, W. B. (2008). Problems and prospects of organic farming in developing countries. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management, 1(1), 36–43. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ejesm/article/view/41568
3. Bin Rahman, A. N. M., & Zhang, J. (2023). Trends in rice research: 2030 and beyond. Food and Energy Security, 12(2), e390. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.390
4. Chaiubon, A., Wiseansat, A., & Pensuk, V. (2020). Factors influencing the decision-making process among farmers in Ban Nong-Sok-Dao subdistrict, Nunsung district, Udon Thani province: Organic farming, good agricultural practices, or chemical rice cultivation. Udon Thani Rajabhat University Journal of Sciences and Technology, 8(2), 201–215. https://ph01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/scudru/article/view/243226
5. Er, A. C., Ahmad, H., & Manaf, A. A. (2021). Comparative cost benefit analysis of conventional farming and agroecological farming for paddy cultivation in Bachok, Kelantan. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 12(6), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijesd.2021.12.6.1338
6. Kupkanchanakul, K. (2000). Bridging the rice yield gap in Thailand. In M. K. Papademetriou, F. J. Dent, & E. M. Herath (Eds.), Bridging the Rice Yield Gap in the Asia-Pacific Region (pp. 146–156). FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific. https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/13c8a592-c184-4766-b3e6-fd2b7d43ad4e
7. Martínez-Megías, C., Pascual-March, C., Moratalla, J., Rochera, C., Picazo, A., Morant, D., Camacho, A., & Rico, A. (2025). Influence of conventional and organic rice farming on aquatic biodiversity and greenhouse gas emissions in a protected Mediterranean wetland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 393, 109835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.10983
8. Matemba, D. D., & Njera, D. (2023). Examining the impact of lead farmer approach on follower farmers’ knowledge and practice of conservation agriculture: A case study in Kalira extension planning area, Ntchisi District, Malawi. International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems, 13(4), 203–208. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/ijasrt/Article/1033734
9. Methamontri, Y., Tsusaka, T. W., Zulfiqar, F., Yukongdi, V., & Datta, A. (2022). Factors influencing participation in collective marketing through organic rice farmer groups in northeast Thailand. Heliyon, 8(11), e11421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11421
10. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. (2018). Summary of the project in accordance with the important policy (agenda) 15 projects: Conceptual project. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/36I0oef
11. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. (2023). Basic Information of Phayao Province, January 2023. Retrieved from https://www.opsmoac.go.th/phayao-dwl-files-451991791163
12. Mungkung, R., Sitthikipanya, S., Chaichana, R., Bamrungwong, K., Santitaweeroek, Y., Jakrawatana, N., Silalertruksa, T., & Gheewala, S. H. (2022). Measuring sustainability performance of rice cultivation in Thailand using Sustainable Rice Platform indicators. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 22(7), 1278–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2022.2105008
13. Nisak, F. F., Prayitno, G., Ari, I. R. D., Hidayat, Ar. R. T., Waloejo, B. S., Usman, F., Wijayati, W. P., & Onishi, M. (2025). Quantifying the synergistic effects of social and human capital in farmers’ decisions to adopt organic rice farming: A case study of Lombok Kulon village, Indonesia. Environmental Challenges, 20, 101204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2025.101204
14. Nguyen, L. T., Nanseki, T., Ogawa, S., & Chomei, Y. (2022). Determination of paddy rice yield in the context of farmers’ adoption of multiple technologies in Colombia. International Journal of Plant Production, 16, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-021-00173-1
15. OECD-FAO. (2021). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2021-2030. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19428846-en
16. Office of Agricultural Economics. (2023). Agricultural Economic Data: Production and Market Situation Details. https://oae.go.th/uploads/files/2025/05/20/c37d15eee7d25aea.pdf
17. Offermann, F., & Nieberg, H. (2000). Economic performance of organic farms in Europe (Organic Farming in Europe: Economics and Policy; No. 5). University of Hohenheim. https://projekte.uni-hohenheim.de/i410a/ofeurope/organicfarmingineurope-vol5.pdf
18. Panpakdee, C., & Khanbut, K. (2025). Definitions of resilience in organic rice farming in northeastern Thailand: Adaptation, diversification, resourcefulness, and adequate financial resources. Discover Sustainability, 6, 377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01200-1
19. Patra, S., Saha, A., Pal, S. C., Islam, A. R. Md. T., Halder, K., Srivastava, A. K., Pande, C. B., Islam, A., Costache, R., Alam, E., & Islam, Md. K. (2025). Highlighting the role of traditional paddy for sustainable agriculture and livelihood: Issues, policy intervention and the pathways. Discover Sustainability, 6, 181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-00989-1
20. Pithawat, E. (2019). Sustainable Development and Competitive Advantage in the Agricultural Food Industry: A Case Study of Organic Jasmine Rice: (Research Report). National Science, Research, and Innovation Policy Office.
21. Ruaykijakarn, N., Suwanmaneepong, S., & Kuhaswonvetch, S. (2018). Knowledge and attitudes towards marketing innovation of organic rice farmers in Sanam Chai Khet organic agriculture group, Chachoengsao province, Thailand. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 14(7), 1829–1842. http://www.ijat-aatsea.com/past_v14_n7sp.html
22. Safavian, R., Moosaei, M., & Rahimi Bagmalek, J. (2023). Investigating the effectiveness of farmers’ risk management strategies (Case study: Khuzestan Province). International Journal of Agricultural Science, Research and Technology in Extension and Education Systems, 13(4), 269–286. https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/ijasrt/Article/1033841
23. Stuart, A. M., Pame, A. R. P., Vithoonjit, D., Viriyangkura, L., Pithuncharurnlap, J., Meesang, N., Suksiri, P., Grant R. Singleton, G. R., & Lampayan. R. M. (2018). The application of best management practices increases the profitability and sustainability of rice farming in the central plains of Thailand. Field Crops Research, 220, 78–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.02.005
24. Suwannakit, C. & Prempree, K. (2016). The comparison of costs and returns between organic rice farming and chemical rice farming. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 9(2), 519–526. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Veridian-E-Journal/article/view/66930/54660
25. Tashi, S., & Wangchuk, K. (2016). Organic vs. conventional rice production: comparative assessment under farmers’ conditions in Bhutan. Organic Agriculture, 6(4), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-015-0132-4
26. USDA-FAS. (2015). THAILAND 2014/15 Dry Season Rice Area and Production Forecast to Decline (Commodity Intelligence Report). USDA-Foreign Agricultural Service. https://ipad.fas.usda.gov/highlights/2015/02/Thailand/index.htm
|
Sustainable Agriculture Network of Organic Rice Production: The Model of Community Enterprise in Phayao Province, Thailand
Wasna Pithakpol1, Bungon Sawatsuk2*, Somchart Tana1, Yodsawat Khamsamut1, and Chitnarong Sirisathitkul3
1School of Agriculture and Natural Resources, The University of Phayao. Muang District, Phayao Province 56000, Thailand
2School of Business and Communication Arts, The University of Phayao, Muang District, Phayao Province 56000, Thailand
3School of Science, Walailak University, Thasala District, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province 89160, Thailand
*Corresponding author’s email: bungon.sa@up.ac.th
O
Keywords Organic Farming, Rice Production, Community Enterprise, Sustainable Agriculture |
Abstract |
