Environmental impact assessment of conventional construction methods in low-rise residential buildings in northern Iran
محورهای موضوعی :Kiana Rasekh 1 , Seyedeh Mamak Salavatian 2 , Marzieh Kazemzadeh 3
1 - Department of architecture, Ra.C., Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
2 - Department of architecture, Ra.C., Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
3 - Department of architecture, Ra.C., Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran
کلید واژه: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Low-Rise Residential Buildings, Sustainable Construction, Conventional Construction Methods, Energy,
چکیده مقاله :
The construction sector is among the largest contributors to global environmental degradation due to intensive energy consumption and the depletion of natural resources. In Guilan Province, northern Iran, rapid growth in residential construction has raised concerns about long-term ecological impacts, yet systematic evaluations remain limited. This study addresses this gap by investigating the environmental consequences of residential buildings through the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach. A total of 384 residential building blueprints were manually examined to extract detailed information on material types and quantities. These data were statistically analyzed using SPSS software to identify dominant structural systems and material consumption patterns. Subsequently, the environmental impacts of concrete and steel frame systems were compared with the aid of the OpenLCA software package, considering multiple indicators including greenhouse gas emissions, resource depletion, and air and water pollution. The assessment covered the entire life cycle of building materials, from production to transportation and on-site construction. Results revealed that concrete frames significantly increase CO₂ emissions, contributing to global warming and depletion of non-renewable resources, mainly due to the high environmental cost of cement production. In contrast, steel frame systems were linked to elevated radioactive emissions, such as radon and tritium. Furthermore, transportation—particularly long-distance hauling of construction materials—emerged as a key factor in environmental degradation. These findings highlight the urgent need for integrating sustainability principles into residential construction practices in Guilan Province. Recommendations include promoting the use of local materials, optimizing logistics to reduce transportation distances, and adopting low-energy building technologies.
The construction sector is among the largest contributors to global environmental degradation due to intensive energy consumption and the depletion of natural resources. In Guilan Province, northern Iran, rapid growth in residential construction has raised concerns about long-term ecological impacts, yet systematic evaluations remain limited. This study addresses this gap by investigating the environmental consequences of residential buildings through the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach. A total of 384 residential building blueprints were manually examined to extract detailed information on material types and quantities. These data were statistically analyzed using SPSS software to identify dominant structural systems and material consumption patterns. Subsequently, the environmental impacts of concrete and steel frame systems were compared with the aid of the OpenLCA software package, considering multiple indicators including greenhouse gas emissions, resource depletion, and air and water pollution. The assessment covered the entire life cycle of building materials, from production to transportation and on-site construction. Results revealed that concrete frames significantly increase CO₂ emissions, contributing to global warming and depletion of non-renewable resources, mainly due to the high environmental cost of cement production. In contrast, steel frame systems were linked to elevated radioactive emissions, such as radon and tritium. Furthermore, transportation—particularly long-distance hauling of construction materials—emerged as a key factor in environmental degradation. These findings highlight the urgent need for integrating sustainability principles into residential construction practices in Guilan Province. Recommendations include promoting the use of local materials, optimizing logistics to reduce transportation distances, and adopting low-energy building technologies.
AbdolkhaniNezhad, T., Monavari, S. M., Khorasani, N., Robati, M., & Farsad, F. (2022). Comparative analytical study of the results of environmental risk assessment of urban landfills approach: bowtie, network analysis techniques (ANP), TOPSIS (case study: Guilan Province). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10513-x
Atashbar, H., & Noorzai, E. (2023). Optimization of Exterior Wall Cladding Materials for Residential Buildings Using the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGAII) Based on the Integration of Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) for Energy Consumption: A Case Study. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(21). https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115647
Barbhuiya, S., & Das, B. B. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment of construction materials: Methodologies, applications and future directions for sustainable decision-making. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02326
Chen, Z., Chen, L., Zhou, X., Huang, L., Sandanayake, M., & Yap, P. S. (2024). Recent Technological Advancements in BIM and LCA Integration for Sustainable Construction: A Review. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 16, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031340
Ding, Z., Wang, Y., & Zou, P. X. W. (2016). An agent based environmental impact assessment of building demolition waste management: Conventional versus green management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.054
Fallahi, S., & Ayvazian, S. (2016). The Analysis of the Role of Green Walls in Reduction of Heat Islands in Tehran. Space Ontology International Journal, 5(1), 31–44.
Guggemos, A. A., & Horvath, A. (2005). Comparison of Environmental Effects of Steel- and Concrete-Framed Buildings. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2005)11:2(93)
Gunathilake, S., Ramachandra, T., & Madushika, U. G. D. (2021). Carbon Footprint Analysis of Construction Activities in Sri Lanka: an Input-Output Table. 2010, 299–306. https://doi.org/10.31705/faru.2021.29
Hamidi, B., & Bulbul, T. (2014). An evaluation of life cycle analysis (LCA) tools for environmental impact analysis of building end-of-life cycle operations. Computing in Civil and Building Engineering - Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Computing in Civil and Building Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413616.241
Ige, O. E., Von Kallon, D. V., & Desai, D. (2024). Carbon emissions mitigation methods for cement industry using a systems dynamics model. In Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy (Vol. 26, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02683-0
ISO. (2004). Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework (ISO 14040:2006). British Standard, 3(1).
Iyer, A. V., Rao, N. D., & Hertwich, E. G. (2023). Review of Urban Building Types and Their Energy Use and Carbon Emissions in Life-Cycle Analyses from Low- and Middle-Income Countries. In Environmental Science and Technology (Vol. 57, Issue 26). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06418
Izaola, B., Akizu-Gardoki, O., & Oregi, X. (2022). Life Cycle Analysis Challenges through Building Rating Schemes within the European Framework. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095009
Jahandideh, F., Raman, S. N., Jamil, M., & Syed, Z. I. (2020). Carbon footprint assessment in the life-cycle design of concrete structures in the tropics: A case study of residential buildings in Malaysia. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.vol20no2.3
Mehra, S., Singh, M., Sharma, G., Kumar, S., Navishi, & Chadha, P. (2021). Impact of Construction Material on Environment. In Ecological and Health Effects of Building Materials. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76073-1_22
Mirashk-Daghiyan, M., Shahcheraghi, A., & Kaboli, H. (2021). Analysis of Building Energy Consumption Due to Transparent and Opaque Materials Used in Exterior Walls. Space Ontology International Journal, 20(3), 1–23456450. https://doi.org/10.22094/SOIJ.2021.1921321.1399
MohammadMoradi, A., Hosseini, S. B., & Yazdani, H. (2013). Principles of assessment and improvement of construction systems environmental sustainability in Iran (By Life cycle Numerical Parametric Measurement Approach) TT -. Iust, 23(2).
Moztarzadeh, H., & Nikounam Nezami, H. (2022). Social Sustainability Components & Improving the Physical Quality of Contemporary Residential Complexes. Space Ontology International Journal, 11(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.22094/SOIJ.2022.1962776.1503
Najjar, M. K., Figueiredo, K., Evangelista, A. C. J., Hammad, A. W. A., Tam, V. W. Y., & Haddad, A. (2022). Life cycle assessment methodology integrated with BIM as a decision-making tool at early-stages of building design. International Journal of Construction Management, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2019.1637098
Nouri, H., Safehian, M., & Mir Mohammad Hosseini, S. M. (2023). Life cycle assessment of earthen materials for low-cost housing a comparison between rammed earth and fired clay bricks. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-02-2021-0021
Oladazimi, A., Mansour, S., & Hosseinijou, S. A. (2020). Comparative life cycle assessment of steel and concrete construction frames: A case study of two residential buildings in Iran. Buildings, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings10030054
Oladazimi, A., Mansour, S., Hosseinijou, S. A., & Majdfaghihi, M. H. (2021). Sustainability identification of steel and concrete construction frames with respect to triple bottom line. Buildings, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11110565
Picardo, A., Soltero, V. M., & Peralta, E. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainable Road Networks: Current State and Future Directions. Buildings, 13(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13102648
Sandanayake, M. S. (2022). Environmental Impacts of Construction in Building Industry—A Review of Knowledge Advances, Gaps and Future Directions. Knowledge, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge2010008
Zolfaghari, S. M., Pons, O., & Nikolic, J. (2023). Sustainability assessment model for mass housing’s interior rehabilitation and its validation to Ekbatan, Iran. Journal of Building Engineering, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105685
