Relative density of sand in physical modeling using multi-curtain pluviator
محورهای موضوعی : Soil-Structure Interactionbehrad bakhtiari 1 , arash razmkhah 2 , faradjollah Askari 3 , hasan ghasemzadeh 4
1 - Department of Civil Engineering, TS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Civil Engineering, TS.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of geotechnical engineering, iiees university
4 - civil engineering, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: Sedimentation, multi-curtain, Models (Physical), Relative density, Traveling pluviator. Notations,
چکیده مقاله :
The physical modeling of homogeneous sand with specific relative density has an important role in studying the behavior of cohesionless soils in the geotechnical engineering. In this research, a new method i.e. multi curtain pluviator, based on the air pluviation method, has been developed. Traveling pluviator with one, two, three, and four longitudinal slits on pluviation plates, have been used to prepare large-scale sand specimens. The effects of different parameters such as the number of longitudinal slits, pluviator traveling speed, falling height of sand on the relative density of a Firuzkuh sand (#161) have been considered. In this method, a wide range of relative densities can be obtained. The comparison of results of tests on the plats with different number of longitudinal slits showed that the increase in deposition intensity in a constant-speed pluviator with an increasing number of pluviation curtains has an insignificant effect on the relative density. investigation of different separation distance of longitudinal slits it has been demonstrated that when pluviation curtains are separated enough, it is possible to achieve the target relative densities in a shorter time and provides reproducibility of target density.
The physical modeling of homogeneous sand with specific relative density has an important role in studying the behavior of cohesionless soils in the geotechnical engineering. In this research, a new method i.e. multi curtain pluviator, based on the air pluviation method, has been developed. Traveling pluviator with one, two, three, and four longitudinal slits on pluviation plates, have been used to prepare large-scale sand specimens. The effects of different parameters such as the number of longitudinal slits, pluviator traveling speed, falling height of sand on the relative density of a Firuzkuh sand (#161) have been considered. In this method, a wide range of relative densities can be obtained. The comparison of results of tests on the plats with different number of longitudinal slits showed that the increase in deposition intensity in a constant-speed pluviator with an increasing number of pluviation curtains has an insignificant effect on the relative density. investigation of different separation distance of longitudinal slits it has been demonstrated that when pluviation curtains are separated enough, it is possible to achieve the target relative densities in a shorter time and provides reproducibility of target density.
Abdollahi, M., and Bolouri Bazaz, J. 2017. “Reconstitution of Sand Specimens Using a Rainer System.” Int J Eng 30, no. 10 (October): 1451-1463. https://doi.org/10.5829/ije.2017.30.10a.05
Al-Salih, O. S., & Al-Abboodi, I. (2023). Assessment of a new pluviation system designed to prepare uniform samples of sand. Journal of King Saud University – Engineering Sciences.
Al-Yasir, A., & Al-Taie, A. (2023). A new sand raining technique to reconstitute large sand specimens. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 32(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0228
Arthur, J. R. F., and Menzies, B. 1972. “Discussion: Inherent anisotropy in a sand.” Geotechnique 22, no. 1 (September): 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1972.22.3.537
ASTM International. 2016. Standard test methods for maximum index density and Unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM D4253-16e. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4253-16E01
ASTM International. 2016. Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density. ASTM D4254-16. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1520/D4254-16
ASTM International. 2017. Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified soil classification system). ASTM D2487-17e1. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2487-17E01
Boushehrian, J. and Hataf, N. 2003. “Experimental and numerical investigation of the bearing capacity of model circular and ring footings on reinforced sand.” Geotext Geomembr 21, no. 4 (August): 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-1144(03)00029-3
Butterfield, R., and Andrawes, K. Z. 1970. “An air activated sand spreader for forming uniform sand beds.” Geotechnique 20, no. 1 (March): 97-100. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1970.20.1.97
Cresswell, A., Barton, M. E., and Brown, R. 1999. “Determining the maximum density of sands by pluviation.” Geotech Test J 22, no. 4: 324-328. https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj11245j
DeGregorio, V. B. 1990. “Loading systems, sample preparation, and liquefaction.” J of Geotech Eng 116, no. 5 (May): 805–821. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1990)116:5(805)
EI Shafee, O., Sasanakul, I., Abdoun, T., & Zeghal, M. (2024). Measurements of shear wave velocity for collapsible soil. Geotechnics, 4(2), 430–446. https://doi.org/10.3390/geotechnics4020024
Fretti, C., Lo Presti, D. C. F., and Pedroni, S. 1995. “A pluvial deposition method to reconstitute well-graded sand specimens.” Geotech Test J 18, no. 2: 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj10330j
Hansen, B. “The bearing capacity of sand, tested by loading circular plates.” Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Soil Mechanic Foundation, England, 1961.
Kolbuszewski, J. J. “An experimental study of the maximum and minimum porosities of sands.” Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 1948.
Kolbuszewski, J., and Jones, R. H. “The preparation of sand samples for laboratory testing.” Paper presented at the Midland Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Society, Birmingham, U.K, 1961.
Kuerbis, R., and Vaid, Y. P. 1988. “Sand sample preparation—The slurry deposition method.” Soils Found 28, no. 4 (December): 107–118. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.28.4_107
Ladd, R. S. (1974). “Specimen preparation and liquefaction of sands.” J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 100, no.10: 1180-1184.
Lo Presti, D. C. F., Berardi, R., Pedroni, S., and Crippa, V. 1993. “A new traveling sand pluviator to reconstitute specimens of well-graded silty sands.” Geotech Test J 16, no. 1: 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj10263j
Lo Presti, D. C. F., Pedroni, S., and Crippa, V. 1992. “Maximum dry density of cohesionless soils by pluviation and by ASTM D4253-83: A comparative study.” Geotech Test J 15, no. 2: 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj10239j
Miura, S., and Toki, S. (1982). “A sample preparation method and its effect on static and cyclic deformation-strength properties of sand.” Soils found 22, no. 1 (March): 61-77. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.22.61
Miura, S., and Toki, S. 1983. “Sample preparation method and its effect on static and cyclic deformation — strength properties of sand.” Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 20, no. 1 (February): A6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(83)91658-3
Razmkhah, A., Kamalian, M., & Askari, F. (2024). Physical Modeling of Sand Beds Using a New Approacha of Rainer System. Modares Civil Engineering journal, 24(6), 55-68. 10.22034/24.6.55
Mulilis, J. P. “The effects of method of sample preparation on the cyclic stress-strain behaviour of sands.” Technical Report No, HERC 75-18, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Earthquake engineering research center, 1975.
Oda, M. 1972. “Initial fabrics and their relations to mechanical properties of granular material.” Soils found 12, no. 1 (March): 17-36. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1960.12.17
Rad, N. S., and Tumay, M. T. 1987. “Factors affecting sand specimen preparation by raining.” Geotech Test J 10, no. 1: 31-37. https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj10136j
Shafiee, A., Dabiri, R., and Askari, F. 2017. “Dynamic Properties of Firoozkooh Sand-Silt Mixtures.” J Seismol Earthq Eng 19, no. 4: 273-284.
Silver, M. L., Tatsuoka, F., Phukunhaphan, A., and Avramidis, A. S. “Cyclic undrained strength of sand by triaxial test and simple shear test.” Paper presented at the seventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, 1980.
Stuit, H. G. “Sand in the geotechnical centrifuge.” Ph.D. thesis, Tech. Univ, 1995.
Tabaroei, A., Abrishami, S., and Hosseininia, E. S. 2017. “Comparison between two different pluviation setups of sand specimens.” J Mater Civ Eng 29, no. 10 (October): 04017157. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001985
Tatsuoka, F., Muramatsu, M., and Sasaki, T. 1982. “Cyclic undrained stress-strain behavior of dense sands by torsional simple shear test.” Soils found 22, no. 2 (June): 55-70. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.22.2_55
Vaid, Y. P., and Negussey, D. 1984. “Relative density of pluviated sand samples.” Soils Found 24, no. 2 (June): 101-105. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.24.2_101
Vaid, Y. P., and Negussey, D. 1988. “Preparation of reconstituted sand specimens.” In Advanced Triaxial Testing of Soil and Rock, West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1520/stp29090s
Vaid, Y. P., Sivathayalan, S., and Stedman, D. 1999. “Influence of specimen-reconstituting method on the undrained response of sand.” Geotech Test J 22, no. 3: 187-195. https://doi.org/10.1520/gtj11110j
