A Critical Discourse Analysis of Framing Conflict and Power by Al Jazeera English and The New York Times: A Mixed Methods Study

محورهای موضوعی : تحلیل گفتمان

Nisreen Sadiq Mahmood ¹ , Nafiseh Hosseinpour ² , Salih Mahdi Adai Al- Mamoori ³ , Fatemeh Karimi ⁴

1 - Department of Foreign Languages, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of Foreign Languages, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, College of Education for Human Sciences, University of Babylon, Hilla, Iraq
4 - Department of Foreign Languages, Isf.C., Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1403/12/24 تاریخ پذیرش : 1404/02/29 تاریخ انتشار : 1404/03/17

کلید واژه: collective identity, critical discourse analysis, intertextuality, power dynamics,

چکیده مقاله :

The intricate relationship between media discourse and power dynamics is a vital area for exploration, especially as global media continues to evolve and influence international readers. This research examined how Al Jazeera English (AJE) and The New York Times (NYT) portray collective identities and power dynamics in their coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, employing Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of 200 articles published between October 2023 and October 2024. The study explored how these outlets use implicit messaging and intertextual references to either challenge or reinforce dominant narratives. A mixed methods descriptive design was used. For the qualitative analysis, Fairclough’s (2010) three-dimensional model guided the CDA. The quantitative analysis entailed frequency counts and inferential statistics (chi-square tests) to uncover relationships between variables identified in the qualitative phase. Results showed that AJE consistently emphasizes Palestinian victimhood and resistance, actively contesting dominant Western-centric narratives by strategically incorporating human rights organizations and Palestinian voices. Conversely, The NYT’s coverage, while acknowledging Palestinian suffering, tended to reinforce existing power structures by prioritizing Israeli security concerns and often minimizing Palestinian agency through specific framing and sourcing choices. A Chi-Square test confirmed a statistically significant association between the news outlet and the dominant narrative frame: AJE’s coverage showed a statistically significant emphasis on Palestinian victimhood and agency, while The NYT’s coverage disproportionately focused on Israeli victimhood and security. This study demonstrates that media discourse shapes public perceptions of complex geopolitical issues and contributes to a theoretical understanding of power dynamics in news reporting. Furthermore, the findings hold significant implications for CDA researchers, language and reading teachers, and CDA students and professors at MA and PhD levels.

چکیده انگلیسی:

منابع و مأخذ:

Amer, M. (2017). Critical discourse analysis of war reporting in the international press: The case of the Gaza war of 2008–2009. Palgrave Communications, 3, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0015-2
Amer, M. M. A. (2022). BBC and New York Times’ coverage of the May 2021 Israeli onslaught on Gaza: A critical discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 12(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v12n5p1
Ayoub, H. (2023). Assessing Palestinian public diplomacy: Realities, challenges and opportunities. Global Media and Communication, 19(2), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/17427665231184681
Baden, C., & Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K. (2018). The search for common ground in conflict news research: Comparing the coverage of six current conflicts in domestic and international media over time. Media, War & Conflict, 11(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635217740852
Bell, A. (1991). The language of news media. Blackwell.
Chen, G. M., & Zhang, K. (2010). New media and cultural identity in the global society. In R. Taiwo (Ed.), Handbook of research on discourse behavior and digital communication: Language structures and social interaction (pp. 801–815). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-773-2.ch051
Corneille, O., & Hütter, M. (2020). Implicit? What do you mean? A comprehensive review of the delusive implicitness construct in attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 24(3), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320911325
Cots, J. M. (2006). Teaching “with an attitude”: Critical discourse analysis in EFL teaching. ELT Journal, 60(4), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl029
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J.W. (2022). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage.
Cuhadar, E., & Kampf, R. (2015). A cross-national inquiry into the Israeli-Palestinian and Guatemalan scenarios in global conflicts. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 8(4), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12060
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. Edward Arnold.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Federici, A. (2023). Implicit meaning and gender ideologies in interwar Good Housekeeping magazine. English Studies, 105(1), 173–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2023.2255455
Gong, J., Firdaus, A., Ali, I., Alivi, M. A., & Xu, J. (2023). Intertextuality and ideology: Social actor’s representation in handling of COVID-19 from China daily. Journalism, 24(1), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849231157243
Gonen, Y., Tenenboim-Weinblatt, K., & Kampf, Z. (2020). Mediating the opponent’s news: A study of inter-media citations in the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Media, War & Conflict, 15(3), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635220953656
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers.
Grincheva, N., & Lu, J. (2016). BRICS summit diplomacy: Constructing national identities through Russian and Chinese media coverage of the fifth BRICS summit in Durban, South Africa. Global Media and Communication, 12(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742766515626827
Heliasz-Nowosielska, C., & Ogrodniczuk, M. (2019). Eksplicytność a implicytność w świetle analizy korpusowej (meta)tekstu [Explicitness and implicitness in light of corpus analysis of (meta)text]. Linguistica Copernicana, (16), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.12775/LinCop.2019.004
Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.
Hoskins, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2010). War and media: The emergence of diffused war. Polity Press.
Kazmierczak, M. (2019). Intertextuality as translation problem: Explicitness, recognisability and the case of “Literatures of Smaller Nations”. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 23(2), 362–382. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9182-2019-23-2-362-382
Keenan, E. L. (1971). Two kinds of presupposition in natural language. In C. J. Fillmore & D. T. Langendoen (Eds.), Studies in linguistic semantics (pp. 45–52). Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Kraidy, M. M. (2005). Hybridity, or the cultural logic of globalization. Temple University Press.
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in language: A semiotic approach to literature and art (L. S. Roudiez, Ed.; T. Gora, A. Jardine, & L. S. Roudiez, Trans.). Columbia University Press. (Original work published 1969)
Kryachkov, D. (2023). Intertextuality in media texts. Lege Artis, 8(1), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.34135/lartis.23.8.1.05
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Larson, J. F. (1984). Television’s window on the world: International affairs coverage on the U.S. networks. Ablex Publishing.
Lichtenstein, D., & Eilders, C. (2018). Lost in uncertainty: How the Euro crisis affected European identity constructions in national media discourses. International Communication Gazette, 81(6–8), 602–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518814357
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.
Norris, J. (2019). A walk in the park: A virtual workshop exploring intertextuality and implicit powers within texts. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 20(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708619885413
Rahayu, A. R., & Amalia, R. M. (2019). Intertextuality in online news opinion article on Industrial Revolution 4.0: Its type and discursive practice. Jurnal Bahasa Inggris Terapan, 5(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.35313/jbit.v5i1.1424
Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (1996). Seeking influence through characterizing self-categories: An analysis of anti-abortionist rhetoric. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01099.x
Sbisà, M. (2017). Implicitness in normative texts. In F. Poggi & A. Capone (Eds.), Pragmatics and law (Vol. 10, pp. 27–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44601-1_2
Shahariar, Md. G. (2023). Intertextuality in arts and literature: A postmodern phenomenon. South Asian Research Journal of Arts, Language and Literature, 5(6), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjall.2023.v05i06.001
Thussu, D., & Freedman, D. (2003). War and the media: Reporting conflict 24/7. Sage.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.
van Dijk, T. A. (2003). The discourse-knowledge interface. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 85–109). Palgrave Macmillan.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.
Wallace, C. (1992). Critical literacy awareness in the EFL classroom. In N. Fairclough (Ed.), Critical language awareness (pp. 59–92). Longman.
White, D. M. (1950). The ‘gatekeeper’: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27(4), 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769905002700403
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis (2nd ed.). Sage.
Wolfsfeld, G. (2022). Making sense of media and politics: Five principles in political communication (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Xiang, Y., & Wang, W. (2022). Discovering invariant rationales for graph neural networks [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.12872
Yarchi, M. (2016). Terror organizations’ uses of public diplomacy: Limited versus total conflicts. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 39(12), 1073–1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2016.1184064

اشتراک گذاری

آدرس مقاله

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Framing Conflict and Power by Al Jazeera English and The New York Times: A Mixed Methods Study

سکوی نشر دانش

پیوندهای سایت

مراکز مرتبط

پشتیبانی

صفحات رسمی