A Mixed Methods Study of Assessment Literacy among Iranian EFL Reflective Instructors
محورهای موضوعی : Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies
Mozhdeh Sultan Eshagh
1
,
Azizeh Chalak
2
,
Hossein Heidari Tabrizi
3
1 - English Department, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Professor of Applied Linguistics, Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 - Professor of Applied Linguistics, English Department, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
کلید واژه: Assessment Literacy, EFL Teachers, Reflective Teachers, Reflective Teaching,
چکیده مقاله :
Reflection, a significant aspect of English teachers' progress, could support the instructors in developing their language assessment practices. However, scant attention has been given to the assessment literacy of English teachers with different reflectivity levels. This study sought to investigate assessment literacy among Iranian EFL reflective instructors. The aim is to see if any significant differences exist among high-reflective, mid-reflective, and low-reflective teachers regarding their language assessment literacy. In order to achieve this objective, a total of 235 Iranian EFL teachers were chosen using convenience sampling from different private language institutes in Iran. Two questionnaires were used to gather the quantitative data: English Language Teaching Reflection Inventory and Assessment Literacy Inventory. The results of one-way ANOVAs showed that high, mid, and low-reflective teachers significantly differed in assessment literacy. Tukey's post hoc analyses revealed that high-reflective and mid-reflective teachers outperformed their low-reflective counterparts. Moreover, 36 EFL teachers (i.e., 12 teachers from each reflective teaching group) participated in a semi-structured interview, and their results aligned with the quantitative data analysis. Finally, the findings of this study offer valuable data that can aid teachers in enhancing their language assessment literacy.
Reflection, a significant aspect of English teachers' progress, could support the instructors in developing their language assessment practices. However, scant attention has been given to the assessment literacy of English teachers with different reflectivity levels. This study sought to investigate assessment literacy among Iranian EFL reflective instructors. The aim is to see if any significant differences exist among high-reflective, mid-reflective, and low-reflective teachers regarding their language assessment literacy. In order to achieve this objective, a total of 235 Iranian EFL teachers were chosen using convenience sampling from different private language institutes in Iran. Two questionnaires were used to gather the quantitative data: English Language Teaching Reflection Inventory and Assessment Literacy Inventory. The results of one-way ANOVAs showed that high, mid, and low-reflective teachers significantly differed in assessment literacy. Tukey's post hoc analyses revealed that high-reflective and mid-reflective teachers outperformed their low-reflective counterparts. Moreover, 36 EFL teachers (i.e., 12 teachers from each reflective teaching group) participated in a semi-structured interview, and their results aligned with the quantitative data analysis. Finally, the findings of this study offer valuable data that can aid teachers in enhancing their language assessment literacy.
Akbari, R., Behzadpoor, F., & Dadvand, B. (2010). Development of English language teaching reflection inventory. System, 38(2), 211-227.
Ani, M. (2017). Investigating the relationship between reflective teaching and teacher autonomy among Iranian EFL teachers. Retrieved from http://tellsi15.conference.riau.ac.ir/Files/News/Fani.pdf
Ashraf, H., & Zolfaghari, S. (2018). EFL Teachers' Assessment Literacy and Their Reflective Teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 425-436.
Babaii, E., & Asadnia, F. (2019). A long walk to language assessment literacy: EFL teachers’ reflection on language assessment research and practice. Reflective Practice, 20(6), 745-760.
Baird, J. A. (2013). The currency of assessments. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 20(2), 147-149.
Beauchamp, C. (2015). Reflection in teacher education: Issues emerging from a review of current literature. Reflective Practice, 16(1), 12-141. doi:10.1080/14623943.2014.982525
Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Burhan-Horasanlı, E., & Ortaçtepe, D. (2016). Reflective practice-oriented online discussions: A study on EFL teachers’ reflection-on, in and for action. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 372-382. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.002
Campbell, C., & Evans, J. A. (2000). Investigation of preserves teachers’ classroom. Assessment practices during student teaching. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(6), 350-355
Campbell, C., Murphy, J. A., & Holt, J. K. (2002). Psychometric analysis of an assessment literacy instrument: Applicability to preservice teachers. In the Annual meeting of the midwestern educational research association.
Clark, J. S. (2015). ‘My assessment didn’t seem real’: The influence of field experiences on preservice teachers’ agency and assessment literacy. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 6(2), 91-111. doi:10.17499/jsser.91829
Cole, A. L. (1997). Impediments to reflective practice: Toward a new agenda for research on teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 3(1), 7-27. doi:10.1080/1354060970030102
Costello, P. J. (2011). Effective action research: Developing reflective thinking and practice (2nd ed.). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Coyle, D. (2002). The case for reflective model of teacher education in fundamental principles module. Nottingham: University of Nottingham.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). Pearson.
Deygers, B., & Malone, M. E. (2019). Language assessment literacy in university admission policies, or the dialogue that isn’t. Language Testing, 36(3), 347-368.
Dorri, A., Heidari Tabrizi, H., & Lotfi, A. (2025). The impact of language assessment literacy enhancement (LALE) on Iranian high school EFL students’ knowledge of assessment as learning in writing. International Journal of Language Testing, 15(1). 10.22034/ijlt.2024.444115.1327
Fan, Y., Wang, T., & Wang, K. (2011). A web-based model for developing assessment literacy of secondary in-service teachers. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1727-1740. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.006
Farahian, M., & Rajabi, Y. (2022). An Investigation into the Level of Reflection and Barriers to EFL Teachers’ Reflective Practice. International Journal of Research in English Education, 7(2), 81-100.
Farrell, T. (2022). Reflective Practice in Language Teaching (Elements in Language Teaching). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781009028783
Farrell, T. S. C. (2012). Reflecting on reflective practice: (Re)visiting Dewey and Schon. TESOL Journal, 3(1), 7-16. doi:10.1002/tesj.10
Farrell, T. S. C. (2016). From trainee to teacher: Reflective practice for novice teachers. London: Equinox.
Farrell, T. S. C. (2017). Research on reflective practice in TESOL. Routledge.
Farrell, T. S. C., & Kennedy, B. (2019). Reflective practice framework for TESOL teachers: One teacher’s reflective journey. Reflective Practice, 20(1), 1-12. doi:10.1080/14623943.2018.1539657
Farrell, T. S., & Mom, V. (2015). Exploring teacher questions through reflective practice. Reflective Practice, 16(6), 849-865.
Farrell, T.S.C. (2008). Reflective Language Teaching: From Research to Practice. London: Continuum Press.
Farrell, T.S.C. (2015). Promoting teacher reflection in second language education: A framework for TESOL professionals. New York, NY: Routledge.
Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113-132.
Gobena, G. A. (2017). The attitude of school principals, supervisors, and mentees towards action research as reflective practices. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1), 3-20. doi:10.12973/iji.2017.1011a
Grant, A., McKimm, J., & Murphy, F. (2017). Developing reflective practice: a guide for medical students, doctors and teachers. John Wiley & Sons.
Homayounzadeh, Z., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2021). Examining'Assessment Literacy in Practice'in an Iranian Context: Does it Differ for Instructors and Learners? Teaching English as a Second Language (Formerly Journal of Teaching Language Skills), 40(2), 1-45.
Hudaya, D. W. (2017). Teachers’ assessment literacy in applying principles of language assessment. In Proceedings of the 1st Education and Language International Conference (pp. 247-260). Center for International Language Development of Unissula. Retrieved from [https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/ELIC/article/view/1238]
Inbar-Lourie, O. (2008). Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses. Language Testing, 25(3), 385-402.
Inbar-Lourie, O. (2017). Language Assessment Literacy. In E. Shohamy, I. Or, & S. May (Eds.), Language Testing and Assessment. Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp. 257-270). Springer, Cham.
Jamil, F. M., & Hamre, B. K. (2018). Teacher reflection in the context of an online professional development course: Applying principles of cognitive science to promote teacher learning. Action in Teacher Education, 40(2), 220-236. doi:10.1080/01626620.2018.1424051
Lam, R. (2015). Language assessment training in Hong Kong: Implications for language assessment literacy. Language Testing, 32(2), 169-197.
Larrivee, B. (2000). Transforming teaching practice: Becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice, 1(3), 293-307. doi:10.1080/713693162
Lee, J., Goldenberg, N., & Williams, D. P. (2023). Three stakeholders’ reflections on language assessment literacy. ELT Journal, ccad026.
Malmir, A., & Mohammadi, P. (2018). Teachers’ reflective teaching and self-efficacy as predicators of their professional success: A case of Iranian EFL teachers. Research in English language pedagogy, 6(1), 117-138.
Malone, M. E. (2013). The essentials of assessment literacy: Contrasts between testers and users. Language Testing, 30(3), 329-344.
Martini, J. (2020). Reflective Practice in ELT. TESL Canada Journal, 37(1), 90-92.
Mellati, M., & Khademi, M. (2018). Exploring teachers’ assessment literacy: Impact on learners’ writing achievements and implications for teacher development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(6), 1-18. doi:10.14221/ajte.2018v43n6.1
Mertler, C. A. (2003). Preservice versus in-service teachers’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid‐Western Educational Research Association.
Mertler, C. A., & Campbell, C. (2005). Measuring teachers’ knowledge and application of classroom assessment concepts: Development of the "Assessment Literacy Inventory.”Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
Moon, J. A. (2005). Teaching and learning: A guide for practitioners. London.: Routledge.
Odo, D. (2015). Improving urban teacher’s assessment literacy through synergistic individualized tutoring and self-reflection. Networks. An Online Journal for Teacher Research, 17(2), 1-12.
Ölmezer-Öztürk, E., & Aydin, B. (2018). Toward measuring language teachers’ assessment knowledge: Development and validation of Language Assessment Knowledge Scale (LAKS). Language Testing in Asia, 8, 1-15.
ORAKÇI, Ş. (2021). Teachers’ Reflection and Level of Reflective Thinking on the Different Dimensions of their teaching practice. International Journal of Modern Education Studies, 5(1), 118-139.
Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4-11. doi:10.1080/00405840802577536
Quilter, S. M., & Gallini, J. K. (2000). Teachers’ assessment literacy and attitudes. Teacher Educator, 36(2), 115-131. doi:10.1080/08878730009555257
Scarino, A. (2013). Language assessment literacy as self-awareness: Understanding the role of interpretation in assessment and in teacher learning. Language testing, 30(3), 309-327.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Sultan Eshagh, M., Chalak, A., & Heidari Tabrizi, H. (2024). Short-term impact of reflective practices on language assessment literacy among Iranian EFL teachers: A mixed-methods study. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 12 (51), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.30495/JFL.2024.1171871
Tsagari, D., & Vogt, K. (2017). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers around Europe: Research, challenges, and future prospects. Studies in Language Assessment, 6(1), 41-63.
Vogt, K., & Tsagari, D. (2014). Assessment literacy of foreign language teachers: Findings of a European study. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(4), 374-402.
Watanabe, A. (2016). Reflective practice as professional development: Experiences of teachers of English in Japan. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. (2017). University English teacher assessment literacy: A survey-test report from China. Papers in Language Testing and Assessment, 6(1), 133-158.
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149-162.
Yastibas, A. E., & Takka, M. (2018). Understanding language assessment literacy: Developing language assessment. Language and Linguistics Study, 14(1), 178-193.
Yazdani, H., Amerian, M., & Hadadi, A. (2015). The relationship between reflective teaching and EFL teachers’ evaluation of students’ achievement. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 9(3), 46-64.
Zolfaghari, S., & Ashraf, H. (2015). The relationship between EFL teachers' assessment literacy, teaching experience, and age: A case of Iranian EFL teachers. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(12), 2550-2556. doi:10.17507/pls.0512.16