MCGDM Using Generalized-Spherical Fuzzy VIKOR Technique for Sustainable and Optimal Foundation Crop Seed Selection in Agriculture
Haridas Mondal
1
(
Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, West Bengal, India.
)
Totan Garai
2
(
Department of Mathematics, Syamsundar College, Syamsundar, West Bengal, India.
)
Tipu Sultan Haque
3
(
Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, West Bengal, India.
)
Shariful Alam
4
(
Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, West Bengal, India.
)
کلید واژه: Multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM), Generalized-spherical fuzzy (GSF), Agricultural breeder seed selection, GSF-VIKOR MCDM methodology.,
چکیده مقاله :
In recent years, the VIKOR Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methodology has become one of the most popular techniques in the field of decision making, used to address various real-life problems. In this article, we extend this MCDM technique under the Generalized Spherical Fuzzy (GSF) realm, which provides an effective and robust framework for handling real-life uncertainty. Nowadays, sustainable agricultural practices have become essential for ensuring long-term food security, particularly in the context of increasing population pressures and growing environmental challenges. Therefore, this article aims to select the optimum high-yielding foundation crop seeds using the GSF-VIKOR MCDM technique, through dealing with real-world uncertainties and conflicting decision factors. A novel score and accuracy function have been proposed and employed with the MCDM technique in a fully neutrosophic approach to effectively manage real-life uncertainties encountered in the decision-making process. Several aggregation operators are used to handle and consolidate large data sets. The GSF-Dombi Weighted Arithmetic Aggregation(GSF-DWAA), GSF-Dombi Weighted Geometric Aggregation(GSF-DWGA), GSF-WAM, and GSF-WGM operators are incorporated into the selection process to properly manage the decision expert ratings for the decision-making. Additionally, the validity and superiority of the extended method have been verified and compared with the well-established TOPSIS MCDM techniques. The experiments have been conducted with the help of a constructed data set due to the lack of a real data set. The sensitivity and compatibility of the proposed technique have subsequently been investigated. Moreover, the advantages and limitations of the proposed method have been highlighted. Finally, the robustness of the technique has been investigated for large sets of uncertain data, and the reliability of outcomes has been compared with other existing methodologies.
چکیده انگلیسی :
In recent years, the VIKOR Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methodology has become one of the most popular techniques in the field of decision making, used to address various real-life problems. In this article, we extend this MCDM technique under the Generalized Spherical Fuzzy (GSF) realm, which provides an effective and robust framework for handling real-life uncertainty. Nowadays, sustainable agricultural practices have become essential for ensuring long-term food security, particularly in the context of increasing population pressures and growing environmental challenges. Therefore, this article aims to select the optimum high-yielding foundation crop seeds using the GSF-VIKOR MCDM technique, through dealing with real-world uncertainties and conflicting decision factors. A novel score and accuracy function have been proposed and employed with the MCDM technique in a fully neutrosophic approach to effectively manage real-life uncertainties encountered in the decision-making process. Several aggregation operators are used to handle and consolidate large data sets. The GSF-Dombi Weighted Arithmetic Aggregation(GSF-DWAA), GSF-Dombi Weighted Geometric Aggregation(GSF-DWGA), GSF-WAM, and GSF-WGM operators are incorporated into the selection process to properly manage the decision expert ratings for the decision-making. Additionally, the validity and superiority of the extended method have been verified and compared with the well-established TOPSIS MCDM techniques. The experiments have been conducted with the help of a constructed data set due to the lack of a real data set. The sensitivity and compatibility of the proposed technique have subsequently been investigated. Moreover, the advantages and limitations of the proposed method have been highlighted. Finally, the robustness of the technique has been investigated for large sets of uncertain data, and the reliability of outcomes has been compared with other existing methodologies.
[1] Borlaug NE. The green revolution: for bread and peace. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 1971; 27(6): 6-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.1971.11455372
[2] Mendel G. Experiments in plant-hybridisation. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1925.
[3] Hasibuan AM, Gregg D, Stringer R. The role of certification, risk, and time preferences in promoting adoption of climate-resilient citrus varieties in Indonesia. Climatic Change. 2021; 164(3): 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-021-03015-1
[4] Kim Y-J, Zhang D. Molecular control of male fertility for crop hybrid breeding. Trends in Plant Science. 2018; 23(1): 53-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.10.001
[5] Han Y-Y, Wang K-Y, Liu Z-Q, Pan SH, Zhao XY, Zhang Q, Wang S-F. Research on hybrid crop breeding information management system based on combining ability analysis. Sustainability. 2020; 12(12): 4938. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12124938
[6] Liao C, Yan W, Chen Z, Xie G, Deng XW, Tang X. Innovation and development of the third-generation hybrid rice technology. The Crop Journal. 2021; 9(3) :693-701. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2021.02.003
[7] Clapp J, Ruder S-L. Precision technologies for agriculture: Digital farming, gene-edited crops, and the politics of sustainability. Global Environmental Politics. 2020; 20(3): 49-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/glep a 00566
[8] Divya N, Deepthi S, Kumaar GS, Manoharan S. Modeling techniques used in smart agriculture. In: Application of machine learning in agriculture. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2022. p.159-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90550-3.00001-1
[9] Walkowiak S, Gao L, Monat C, et al. Multiple wheat genomes reveal global variation in modern breeding. Nature. 2020; 588(7837): 277-283. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2961-x
[10] Shah F, Wu W. Soil and crop management strategies to ensure higher crop productivity within sustainable environments. Sustainability. 2019; 11(5): 1485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051485
[11] Deepa N, Ganesan K. Decision-making tool for crop selection for agriculture development. Neural Computing and Applications. 2019; 31(4): 1215-1225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-017-3154-x
[12] Mishra AR, Rani P, Bharti S. Assessment of agriculture crop selection using Pythagorean fuzzy CRITICVIKOR decision-making framework. In: Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications. Singapore: Springer; 2021. p.167-191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1989-2 7
[13] Gunawan MI, Sitopu JW, Sechan G, Gunawan I. Optimizing Crop Selection: A Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Sustainable Agriculture. International Journal of Enterprise Modelling. 2024; 18(3):113-123.
[14] Mokarram M, Pourghasemi HR, Pham TM. Identification of suitable location to cultivate grape based on disease infestation using multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) and remote sensing. Ecological Informatics. 2023; 76: 102142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102142
[15] Biswas T, Majumder A, Dey S, Mandal A, Ray S, Kapoor P, Emam W, Kanthal S, Ishizaka A, Matuka A. Evaluation of management practices in ricewheat cropping system using multicriteria decision-making methods in conservation agriculture. Scientific Reports. 2024; 14(1): 8600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58022-w
[16] Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Information and control. 1965; 8(3): 338-353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
[17] Atanassov K. Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets as tools for evaluation of data mining processes. Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. 2018; 24(4): 190-202. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7546/nifs.2018.24.4.190-202
[18] Smarandache F. Multispace & multistructure. Neutrosophic transdisciplinarity (100 collected papers of science), Vol. IV. Hanko: North-European Scientific Publishers; 2010.
[19] Ashraf S, Abdullah S, Mahmood T, Ghani F, Mahmood T. Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2019; 36(3): 2829-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-172009
[20] Haque TS, Chakraborty A, Mondal SP, Alam S. Approach to solve multicriteria group decisionmaking problems by exponential operational law in generalised spherical fuzzy environment. CAAI Transactions on Intelligence Technology. 2020; 5(2): 106-114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/trit.2019.0078
[21] Yazdani M, Gonzalez EDRS, Chatterjee P. A multi-criteria decision-making framework for agriculture supply chain risk management under a circular economy context. Management Decision. 2021; 59(8): 1801-1826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2018-1088
[22] Mohanta KK, Sharanappa DS. A novel technique for solving intuitionistic fuzzy DEA model: an application in Indian agriculture sector. Management system engineering. 2023; 2(1): 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44176-023-00022-7
[23] Ashraf S, Abdullah S. Decision support modeling for agriculture land selection based on sine trigonometric single valued neutrosophic information. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science. 2020; 9(2): 60-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3958076
[24] Nguyen PH. Agricultural Supply Chain Risks Evaluation with Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Computers, Materials & Continua. 2022; 73(2), 4211-4229. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.030115
[25] alk A. A novel Pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection in the Industry 4.0 era. Soft computing. 2021; 25(3): 2253-2265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05294-9
[26] Luo X, Wang Z, Yang L, Lu L, Hu S. Sustainable supplier selection based on VIKOR with single-valued neutrosophic sets. Plos one. 2023; 18(9): e0290093. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290093
[27] Kutlu Gndodu F, Kahraman C. A spherical fuzzy extension of MULTIMOORA method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems. 2019; 38(1): 963-978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179462
[28] Kutlu Gndodu F, Kahraman C. A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application. Soft Computing. 2020; 24(6): 4607-4621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-04222-w
[29] Sharaf IM. Supplier selection using a flexible interval-valued fuzzy VIKOR. Granular Computing. 2020; 5(4): 485-501. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41066-019-00169-3
[30] Salamai, Abdullah A. An Integrated Neutrosophic SWARA and VIKOR Method for Ranking Risks of Green Supply Chain. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems. 2021; 41(1): 113-126.
[31] Khan S, Khan M, Khan MS, Abdullah S, Khan F. A novel approach toward q-rung orthopair fuzzy rough Dombi aggregation operators and their application to decision-making problems. IEEE Access. 2023; 11: 35770-35783. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3264831
[32] Ashraf S, Abdullah S, Mahmood T. Spherical fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and their application in group decision making problems. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2020; 11(7): 2731-2749. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-019-01333-y
[33] Opricovic S, Tzeng GH. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European journal of operational research. 2004; 156(2): 445-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
