Linguistic Strategies in Post-Conflict Governance: A Critical Discourse Analysis of Iraqi Presidential Speeches
محورهای موضوعی :
Inas Malik Mnaathar
1
,
Bahram Hadian
2
,
Hani Kamil Al-Ebadi
3
,
Mehdi Vaez Dalili
4
1 - Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic AzadUniversity, Isfahan, Iran
3 - English Department, College of Education for Humanities, University of Thi-Qar, Iraq
4 - Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
کلید واژه: Critical Discourse Analysis, Presidential Rhetoric, National Identity, Post-Conflict Governance, Iraq,
چکیده مقاله :
This study examines the evolution of Iraqi presidential rhetoric in response to shifting political landscapes, governance priorities, and societal expectations. Through a critical discourse analysis of presidential speeches, the research highlights how Iraqi leaders have transitioned from an exclusionary nationalist narrative to a more inclusive and pluralistic discourse, aligning with broader global trends in post-conflict state-building. The findings indicate a significant shift in the rhetorical strategies used to assert political legitimacy, moving from securitization and state rebuilding to democratic consolidation, governance reform, and anti-corruption discourse. Additionally, the role of religious references in presidential rhetoric has evolved from a tool for political unification to a cultural and ethical marker, reflecting Iraq’s efforts to balance its religious heritage with modern governance ideals. This study contributes to the understanding of the strategic use of discourse in post-conflict governance, illustrating the interplay between rhetoric, legitimacy, and national identity. The implications of these findings extend to political leaders, scholars, and media practitioners, offering insights into the role of language in shaping governance narratives. Future research should explore public reception of presidential rhetoric and its impact on national identity formation, as well as comparative analyses across different political institutions and regional contexts.
This study examines the evolution of Iraqi presidential rhetoric in response to shifting political landscapes, governance priorities, and societal expectations. Through a critical discourse analysis of presidential speeches, the research highlights how Iraqi leaders have transitioned from an exclusionary nationalist narrative to a more inclusive and pluralistic discourse, aligning with broader global trends in post-conflict state-building. The findings indicate a significant shift in the rhetorical strategies used to assert political legitimacy, moving from securitization and state rebuilding to democratic consolidation, governance reform, and anti-corruption discourse. Additionally, the role of religious references in presidential rhetoric has evolved from a tool for political unification to a cultural and ethical marker, reflecting Iraq’s efforts to balance its religious heritage with modern governance ideals. This study contributes to the understanding of the strategic use of discourse in post-conflict governance, illustrating the interplay between rhetoric, legitimacy, and national identity. The implications of these findings extend to political leaders, scholars, and media practitioners, offering insights into the role of language in shaping governance narratives. Future research should explore public reception of presidential rhetoric and its impact on national identity formation, as well as comparative analyses across different political institutions and regional contexts.
Ali, A. (2022). Political discourse and national identity in post-conflict societies: The case of Iraq. Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 34(2), 112–130. https://doi.org/xxxxx
Al-Harahsheh, R. (2021). Linguistic strategies in presidential rhetoric: A comparative study of Arab leaders. Discourse & Society, 32(4), 567–589. https://doi.org/xxxxx
Al-Maamari, A. (2022). Religious framing in Middle Eastern political discourse: A historical analysis. Journal of Political Linguistics, 45(3), 244–262. https://doi.org/xxxxx
Al-Mohammad, H. (2021). Critical Discourse Analysis and political narratives in the Middle East. Pragmatics and Society, 12(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/xxxxx
Al-Rawi, A. (2023). Media, discourse, and legitimacy: A study of Iraqi presidential speeches. Media & Politics, 19(2), 312–328. https://doi.org/xxxxx
El-Dahshan, M. (2022). Democratic transitions and the rhetoric of national identity: The cases of Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon. Comparative Political Studies, 55(7), 889–910. https://doi.org/xxxxx
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. Routledge.
Khalil, S., & Suleiman, R. (2022). State-building and governance narratives in post-conflict Iraq. Journal of International Political Analysis, 27(4), 411–432. https://doi.org/xxxxx
Qasim, M., & Hussein, T. (2023). The evolution of political rhetoric in post-conflict societies: A discourse analysis of Iraq and Jordan. Discourse Analysis & Society, 40(5), 523–540. https://doi.org/xxxxx
Rahman, Y., & Saleh, K. (2021). Corruption, transparency, and political rhetoric in Iraq: A CDA approach. Middle Eastern Politics Review, 18(3), 205–221. https://doi.org/xxxxx
Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. Palgrave Macmillan.
