Chat-GPT in Learning Environment in an Iranian EFL Context: EFL Learners` Perception
Shiva Farmoudi
1
(
Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Foreign Languages, Islamic Azad University , South Tehran Branch
)
Massood Yazdanimoghaddam
2
(
Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Languages, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar Branch, Retired
)
ali rabi
3
(
teaching English
)
کلید واژه: Transformative learning, adult learning, artificial intelligence, Chat-GPT,
چکیده مقاله :
based on the peculiarities of developing AI technology, learning English among EFL learners has become easier and the significance of studying the way English skills interact with AI technology such as Chat-GPT, and EFL learners’ internal and social factors have become highly important. Social factors include may greatly affect the problem-solving skills of the students. It might also lead to a decline in students' writing skills as they rely on the model to generate content rather than developing their own communication abilities. Social factors might include issues related to job or individual growth. Adopting a transformative learning ground, the present study attempted to use a qualitative-method approach to investigate how EFL learners experience AI, on one hand, and how they perceive Chat-GPT in this process through understanding changes in their job, attitudes toward themselves and etc, on the other hand. This study is based on a detailed investigation of the learning experiences of 46 Iranian EFL learners (intermediate and upper intermediate level) from Qom and Tehran provinces; selected based on convenience sampling procedure. Semi-structured interviews were used as the primary data collection method. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the recorded and transcribed data and theme extraction, which combined with an abductive approach helped derive broader meaning. The results indicated an overall positive perception of Chat-GPT among the participants
چکیده انگلیسی :
based on the peculiarities of developing AI technology, learning English among EFL learners has become easier and the significance of studying the way English skills interact with AI technology such as Chat-GPT, and EFL learners’ internal and social factors have become highly important. Social factors include may greatly affect the problem-solving skills of the students. It might also lead to a decline in students' writing skills as they rely on the model to generate content rather than developing their own communication abilities. Social factors might include issues related to job or individual growth. Adopting a transformative learning ground, the present study attempted to use a qualitative-method approach to investigate how EFL learners experience AI, on one hand, and how they perceive Chat-GPT in this process through understanding changes in their job, attitudes toward themselves and etc, on the other hand. This study is based on a detailed investigation of the learning experiences of 46 Iranian EFL learners (intermediate and upper intermediate level) from Qom and Tehran provinces; selected based on convenience sampling procedure. Semi-structured interviews were used as the primary data collection method. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the recorded and transcribed data and theme extraction, which combined with an abductive approach helped derive broader meaning. The results indicated an overall positive perception of Chat-GPT among the participants
Ahn, C. (2023). Exploring ChatGPT for information of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation.
AL-Qadri, A. H., & Ahmed, S. A. (2023). Assessing the ChatGPT accuracy through principles of statistics exam: A performance and implications. Retrieved from https://www.researchsquare.com.
Brookfield, S.D. (2000). Transformative learning as ideology critique. In J. Mezirow & Associates
(Eds.), Learning as transformation (2nd ed.; pp. 125–150). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Brauna, V. & Clark, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235356393_Using_thematic_analysis_in psychology.
Branshaw, D. (2009). The power of ‘e’: extending the ‘E’ in ACE. Australian Journal of Adult
Learning, 49(2), 365–381.
Buchan, J. F. (2011). The chicken or the egg? Investigating the transformational impact of learning technology. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v19i2.10355.
Bacow, L. S., Bowen, W. G., Guthrie, K. M., Lack, K. A. & Long, M. P. (2012). Barriers to adoption of online learning systems in U.S. higher education. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.22432
Cranton, P. (2011). A transformative perspective on the scholarship of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), pp. 75-86.
Chen, W., & Wei, H. (2021). Effect of an AI-Powered Writing Assistant on Writing Quality and Idea Generation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 84–97.
Cranton, P. & Torrisi-Steele, G. (2021). Transformative learning in an online environment. International Journal of Adult Education and Technology (IJAET), 12(4).
Estes, C. A. (2004). Promoting student-centered learning in experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(2), 141–160.
Fanning, R. M., & Gaba, D. M. (2007). The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning.
Simulation in Healthcare, 2, 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e3180315539.
Fleming, T. (2018). Learning careers and transformative learning. In Continuity and Discontinuity in Learning Careers. Sense.
Greenman, N.P., Dieckmann, J.A. (2004). Considering criticality and culture as pivotal in transformative teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(3), 240–255.
Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social enquiry, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Holt, C. S. (2010).“Mezirow’s Theory of Transformational Learning.” https://www.slideshare.net/tsholt/mezirows-theory.
Huang, R.T., Deggs, D.M., Jabor, M.K. & Machtmes, K. (2011). Faculty online technology adoption: The role of management support and organizational climate. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 14(2).
Hoskins, B. (2013). “Is Distance Learning Transformational?” The Journal of Continuing Higher Education,61(1), pp. 62-63.
Hoggan, Chad. D. (2015). “Transformative Theory as A Metatheory: Definition, Criteria and Typology.” Adult Education Quarterly 66, 1, 55- 75.https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713615611216.
Hinton, G. (2018). Deep learning—A technology with the potential to transform health care. JAMA, 320(11), 1101-1102.
Kegan, R. (2000). What “form” transforms? A constructive-developmental perspective on transformational learning. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives of a theory-in-progress (pp. 35–69). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kreber, C. (2012). Critical reflection and transforrnative learning. In E. W. Taylor, P. Granton) &: Associates. The Handbook of transformative Learning: Theory, Research, Practice (pp. 323- 341). San Francisco) CA: Jassey-Bass.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Maguire, L. (2009). The faculty perspective regarding their role in distance education policy making.
Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(1).
Mezirow, J., Taylor, E. W. (2012). Transformative learning in practice. Insights from
community, workplace and higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Meyer, K. (2013). An analysis of the research on faculty development for online teaching and identification of new directions. Online Learning Journal, 17(4).
Merriam, S. B., & Bierema, L. L. (2014). Adult learning: Bridging theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Mortari, L. (2015). Reflectivity in research practice: An overview of different perspectives, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406915618045.
Mälkki, K. (2019). Coming to grips with edge-emotions: The gateway to critical reflection and transformative learning. In T. Fleming, A., Kokkos, & F. Finnegan (Eds), European perspectives on transformation theory (pp. 59–73). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. http://doi.org 443.webvpn.fjmu.edu.cn/10.1007/978-3-030-19159-7_5.
Moran, C., & Moloney, A. (2022). Transformative Learning in a Transformed Learning Environment. Journal of Transformative Learning.
Nichols, M., Choudhary, N., & Standring, D. (2020). Exploring transformative learning in vocational online and distance education. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 24(2), 43 –55. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.630111207665001.
Orr, R., Williams, M.R., & Pennington, K. (2009). Institutional efforts to support faculty in online teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 34, 257–268.
Pomeroy E. and Oliver, K (2021). Action confidence as an indicator of transformative change. Journal of Transformative Education, 19(1), 68–86. doi:10.1177/1541344620940815.
Qadir, J. (2022). Engineering education in the era of ChatGPT: Promise and pitfalls of generative AI for education.
Rosebrough, T. R., & Leverett, R. G. (2011). Transformational teaching in the information age: Making why and how we teach relevant to students. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Tsimane, T.A. and Downing, C. (2020). Transformative learning in nursing education: A concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 7(1), 91–98.
Wang, Z. (2014). On-line time pressure manipulations: L2 speaking performance under five types of planning and repetition conditions. In P. Skehan (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 27–62). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017) Faculty perceptions about teaching online: exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework, Online Learning, 21(1), 15–35. doi: 10.10.24059/olj.v21i1.761.
