Framing Peace and Conflict: A Critical Analysis of Linguistic Strategies in Arab Media Coverage of Geopolitical Issues
محورهای موضوعی : Teaching
Hikmet Khaleel Talib Al-Shibban
1
,
Bahram Hadian
2
,
Salih Mahdi Adai Al-Mamoory
3
,
Atefesadat Mirsaeedi
4
1 - Department of English languages, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - Department of English languages, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, College of Education for Human Sciences, University of Babylon, Hilla, Iraq
4 - Department of English languages, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
کلید واژه: Media Framing, Peace Process, Conflict Representation, Critical Discourse Analysis, Linguistic Strategies,
چکیده مقاله :
This study conducted a critical discourse analysis (CDA) of Arab English-language online newspapers to examine how the Israeli-Lebanese and Israeli-Palestinian conflicts are represented. Employing Fairclough's three-dimensional framework, the research explored the linguistic, discursive, and socio-cultural dimensions of media narratives, integrating framing theory to investigate how these narratives shape public opinion and geopolitical discourse. The study’s design involved the systematic collection and analysis of 50 articles from prominent newspapers such as Al Jazeera English, Al Arabiya English, and Asharq Al-Awsat, selected for their diverse ideological perspectives. The findings revealed distinct ideological framings employed by each outlet, ranging from systemic oppression narratives to calls for regional diplomacy. These narratives are shaped by geopolitical affiliations, cultural identities, and the affordances of digital media, including the role of algorithms and user-generated content. The research highlights how digital tools and social media amplify and polarize discourses, influencing public sentiment and policy debates. By addressing gaps in the literature concerning Arab media’s linguistic strategies and digital affordances, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the interplay between language, power, and ideology in conflict representation. Implications extend to both academic discourse and practical applications, providing a framework for policymakers, peacebuilding organizations, and journalists to critically engage with and promote balanced conflict narratives. This interdisciplinary approach underscores the evolving role of digital media in shaping political realities, offering a nuanced lens for future research on conflict discourse.
This study conducted a critical discourse analysis (CDA) of Arab English-language online newspapers to examine how the Israeli-Lebanese and Israeli-Palestinian conflicts are represented. Employing Fairclough's three-dimensional framework, the research explored the linguistic, discursive, and socio-cultural dimensions of media narratives, integrating framing theory to investigate how these narratives shape public opinion and geopolitical discourse. The study’s design involved the systematic collection and analysis of 50 articles from prominent newspapers such as Al Jazeera English, Al Arabiya English, and Asharq Al-Awsat, selected for their diverse ideological perspectives. The findings revealed distinct ideological framings employed by each outlet, ranging from systemic oppression narratives to calls for regional diplomacy. These narratives are shaped by geopolitical affiliations, cultural identities, and the affordances of digital media, including the role of algorithms and user-generated content. The research highlights how digital tools and social media amplify and polarize discourses, influencing public sentiment and policy debates. By addressing gaps in the literature concerning Arab media’s linguistic strategies and digital affordances, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the interplay between language, power, and ideology in conflict representation. Implications extend to both academic discourse and practical applications, providing a framework for policymakers, peacebuilding organizations, and journalists to critically engage with and promote balanced conflict narratives. This interdisciplinary approach underscores the evolving role of digital media in shaping political realities, offering a nuanced lens for future research on conflict discourse.
Abdullah, M. (2020). Framing media narratives in conflict zones: Insights from Arab newspapers. Journal of Media Studies, 4(1), 132–150. [DOI if available]
Abdullah, M. (2024). Media representation of geopolitical conflicts: A comparative study of Arab and Western perspectives. Journal of Global Communication, 12(3), 45–67.
Al-Mahmood, A. (2022). Digital media and conflict framing in Arab contexts: A linguistic analysis. Arab Journal of Media Studies, 18(2), 202–223.
Almeharish, A., Assiri, A. M., Alfattani, A., & De Vol, E. (2020). Coping with the COVID-19 pandemic’s unique challenges associated with medical research: A Saudi institution approach. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 13, 3173–3178. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S283975
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Media narratives and ideology: Insights from critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(4), 453–468. https://doi.org
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
Hasan, M. (2022). Analyzing Arab media's linguistic strategies in geopolitical contexts. Middle Eastern Studies Quarterly, 25(3), 150–170.
Khalil, A. (2023). Narrative framing in Arab-English newspapers: Impacts on public opinion. Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 30(2), 102–118.
Kopytowska, M. (2019). Digital media narratives and their role in conflict zones. Media and Conflict Studies Review, 15(1), 33–55. https://doi.org
Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Affective publics: Sentiment, technology, and politics. Oxford University Press.
Patel, R. (2024). The role of metaphors in framing Middle Eastern conflicts. International Journal of Conflict and Media Studies, 9(1), 45–61. [
Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
Tandoc, E. C., Jr., et al. (2021). Algorithmic framing in digital news platforms: Challenges and implications. Digital Media Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 255–273. https://doi.org
van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In C. Schaffner & A. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace (pp. 17–33). Dartmouth.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). Sage.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2021). Digital affordances and discourse: Emerging trends in CDA. Discourse Studies, 22(2), 199–215.
Zayani, M. (2023). Shaping public opinion in digital media: A critical perspective on Arab narratives. Arab Media Journal, 19(4), 88–112.
