Analysis and study of Beveled Rim Bowls (BRB) based on their distribution in Iran
محورهای موضوعی : Archaeology
Amirmasoud Ghaedi
1
,
Rouhollah Yosefi Zoshk
2
,
Bita Sodaei
3
1 - Department of Archaeology, Varamin-pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran
2 - Department of Archeology, Varamin-pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran
3 - Department of Archeology, Varamin-pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran
کلید واژه: Iran, Beveled rim bowl, Uruk, proto Elamite, Distribution,
چکیده مقاله :
From a temporal perspective, we observe the presence and distribution of beveled rim bowls in Iran and Mesopotamia from the mid-fourth millennium BC until the beginning of the Bronze Age. The large production and specific shape of this pottery, alongside its extensive distribution, have prompted many archaeologists to study this subject. Beveled rim bowls is categorized into two types: Uruk and proto Elamite, based on their shape and structure. The geographical conditions in Iran have differentiated the distribution of this pottery compared to Mesopotamia. During this period, the Uruk type gradually changed in structure and transformed into the proto Elamite type. The regions of Khuzestan, Central Zagros, and the Central Plateau have the highest density of sites and pottery in Iran, connecting these centers through intermediary areas. According to the studies conducted, this distribution in Iran has been exported to various other regions by local elites or specific groups of people. Perhaps, this group consisted of local merchants who, through migration, spread the proto Elamite culture in Iran, while the Uruk type of beveled rim bowl was produced and distributed for economic or political purposes in significant sites such as Susa, Chogha Mish, Tepe Yahya, Sefalin, and Godin Tepe.
From a temporal perspective, we observe the presence and distribution of beveled rim bowls in Iran and Mesopotamia from the mid-fourth millennium BC until the beginning of the Bronze Age. The large production and specific shape of this pottery, alongside its extensive distribution, have prompted many archaeologists to study this subject. Beveled rim bowls is categorized into two types: Uruk and proto Elamite, based on their shape and structure. The geographical conditions in Iran have differentiated the distribution of this pottery compared to Mesopotamia. During this period, the Uruk type gradually changed in structure and transformed into the proto Elamite type. The regions of Khuzestan, Central Zagros, and the Central Plateau have the highest density of sites and pottery in Iran, connecting these centers through intermediary areas. According to the studies conducted, this distribution in Iran has been exported to various other regions by local elites or specific groups of people. Perhaps, this group consisted of local merchants who, through migration, spread the proto Elamite culture in Iran, while the Uruk type of beveled rim bowl was produced and distributed for economic or political purposes in significant sites such as Susa, Chogha Mish, Tepe Yahya, Sefalin, and Godin Tepe.
- Abdi, K, 1999. The Beveled-rim Bowls: Function and Distribution, in: The Iranian World: Essays on Iranian Art and Anthropology Presented to Ezat O. Negahban , A. Alizadeh, Y. Majidzadeh, & S. M. ( eds.), Tehran: Iran University Press, pp. 64-85, (Persian, English summary pp. 222-23).
- Alden, John R. (1982b) Trade and Politics in Proto Elamite Iran, Curent Anthropology, Washington DC: Smithsonion, 23: 613-640.
- Alden, John (2002), The Susa III Period, in: Archaeology of Western Iran, Collector, Frank Hall, Translated by Zahra Basti, Tehran, Samt Publications, pp. 316-331.
- Alizadeh, Abbas (2021), The Bowl of the Edge of the Waste: The Chickpea of Every Ash, Journal of Archaeological Research, Vol. 11, No. 12, Spring and Summer (4), pp. 4-6
- Campbell Thompson, R, 1920. “The British Museum Excavations at Abu Shahrain in Mesopotamia IN 1918.” Archaeologia 70, pp 101-44.
-Campbell Thompson, R., and R.,W. Hutchinson 1931. “The Site of the Palace of Ashurnasirpal II at Nineveh, Excaveted in 1929-30”. Annals of Archaeology and Anthropology 18, pp 79-112.
-Campbell Thompson, R. & R. W. Hamilton, 1932. “The British Museum Excavations on the Temple of Ishtar at Nineveh 1930-1931”. LAAA 19, pp 55- 116.
-Campbell Thompson, R. & M. E. L. Mallowan, 1933. “The British Museum Excavations at Nineveh 1931-1932”. LAAA 20, pp71-186.
-Ghirishman, R., 1938. Fouilles de Tape Sialk pres de Kashan. 1933, 1934, 1937, Paris: Geuthner.
- Glats, C., 2022. Revealing invisible stews: new esults of organic residue analyses of Beveled Rim Bowls from the Late Chalcolothic site of Shakhi Kora Kurdistan Region of Iraq .Journal of Archaeological Scinces: Reports, 48
-Le Brun, A. 1980. “Les écuelles grossières. État de la question” in M.-Th. Barrelet (org.), L’Archéologie de l’Iraq du début de l’époque néolithique à 333 avant notre ère. Paris: Editions du Centre national de la recherche scientifique, PP, 59-66.
-Mackay, E. 1931. Report on Excavations at Jemdet Nasr. Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History. Pl.67. pp 22-23.
- Malek Shahmirzadi, Sadegh (1996), The Ancient Foundations of the Iranian Chassis, Mesopotamia and Egypt, Marlik Publications, Tehran, First Edition, Page 307
-McCown, D. E., 1942, The Comparative Stratigraphe of Early Iran, SAOC 23, Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
-Morgan, j. De 1900. Recherchis archeologiques, Ler seris. Fouilles a susa en 1897-1898 et 1898-1899,Paris: Leroux.
-Miller, Anne 1981 Straw Tempered Ware. In An Early Town on the Deh Luran Plain: Excavations at Tape Farukhabad. Henry T. Wright (ed.), PP. 126-30. Ann Arbor Museum of Anthropology Memoir 13.
-Nessen, H. j., 1970. Grabung in den Quadraten K/L XII in Uruk-Warka, BaM 5: pp.101-191.
-Potts, Daniel,(2009)Bevel-rim Bowls and Bakeries: Evidence and Explanations from Iran and the Indo-Iranian Borderlands,journal of Cuneiform Studies 61: 1-23.
- Potts, Daniel (2012), Bowls and Baked Breads: Documents and Interpretations from Iran and the Indo-Iranian Border Lands, Modares Archaeological Research, 3rd & 4th Year, Nos. 6 & 7, Page 63
- Talaei, Hassan (2012), The Bronze Age of Iran, Samt Publications, Fifth Edition, Page 21
- Yousefi Zashak, Ruhollah Zeighami, Majid, Baghizadeh, Saeed (2021), Sepehr Majd (Celebration of Dr. Yousef Majidzadeh), The Central Plateau of Iran in the Second Half of the Fourth Millennium BCE, Publications of the Center for the Great Islamic Encyclopedia, First Edition, Page 166
