مطالعه تطبیقی جرائم تروریستی از منظر جرم شناختی در حقوق کیفری ایران و فقه اسلامی
محورهای موضوعی : جامع الفقهیه
توفیق سبحانی اصل
1
,
سید حسن حسینی
2
,
عیسی بنی نعیمه
3
1 - 1. دانشجوی دکتری، گروه حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، پردیس علوم و تحقیقات خوزستان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران. / 2. دانشجوی دکتری، گروه حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، واحد اهواز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اهواز، ایران.
2 - استادیار، گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد رامهرمز، رامهرمز، ایران (نویسنده مسئول).
3 - استادیار، گروه حقوق جزا و جرم شناسی، واحد آبادان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آبادان، ایران.
کلید واژه: جرائم تروریستی, جرم شناختی, حقوق کیفری ایران, فقه اسلامی,
چکیده مقاله :
The study of war and terrorism, along with their developments and legal elements, provides the necessary basis for comparing these two executive titles. A comparison that, by identifying the differences and similarities between these two titles, can also compare and evaluate the methods adopted by these two countries in dealing with acts that have the main goal of creating public terror. And these two criminal titles at the level of the criminal policies governing them show that both criminal titles have been the subject of a policy of conceptual expansion and expansion. In addition, since there are different inspirations in many legal texts of crimes against security, it provides the basis for differences of opinion and also creates the basis for issuing different opinions on the same issues in judicial practice, which can make it difficult for the court to determine the correct opinion.The study of war and terrorism, along with their developments and legal elements, provides the necessary basis for comparing these two executive titles. A comparison that, by identifying the differences and similarities between these two titles, can also compare and evaluate the methods adopted by these two countries in dealing with acts that have the main goal of creating public terror. And these two criminal titles at the level of the criminal policies governing them show that both criminal titles have been the subject of a policy of conceptual expansion and expansion. In addition, since there are different inspirations in many legal texts of crimes against security, it provides the basis for differences of opinion and also creates the basis for issuing different opinions on the same issues in judicial practice, which can make it difficult for the court to determine the correct opinion.
