A comparative study of terrorist crimes from a criminological perspective in Iranian criminal law and Islamic jurisprudence.
Subject Areas : All jurisprudential issues
Tofigh Sobhani
1
,
Seyed Hasan Hoseyni
2
,
Eisa Baninaeimeh
3
1 - 1. PhD student, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Khuzestan Science and Research Campus, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran. / 2. PhD student, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran.
2 - Islamic Jurisprudence Department.Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences. Islamic Azad University . Ramhormoz . Iran
3 -
Keywords: Terrorist crimes, criminology, Iranian criminal law, Islamic jurisprudence,
Abstract :
The study of war and terrorism, along with their developments and legal elements, provides the necessary basis for comparing these two executive titles. A comparison that, by identifying the differences and similarities between these two titles, can also compare and evaluate the methods adopted by these two countries in dealing with acts that have the main goal of creating public terror. And these two criminal titles at the level of the criminal policies governing them show that both criminal titles have been the subject of a policy of conceptual expansion and expansion. In addition, since there are different inspirations in many legal texts of crimes against security, it provides the basis for differences of opinion and also creates the basis for issuing different opinions on the same issues in judicial practice, which can make it difficult for the court to determine the correct opinion.The study of war and terrorism, along with their developments and legal elements, provides the necessary basis for comparing these two executive titles. A comparison that, by identifying the differences and similarities between these two titles, can also compare and evaluate the methods adopted by these two countries in dealing with acts that have the main goal of creating public terror. And these two criminal titles at the level of the criminal policies governing them show that both criminal titles have been the subject of a policy of conceptual expansion and expansion. In addition, since there are different inspirations in many legal texts of crimes against security, it provides the basis for differences of opinion and also creates the basis for issuing different opinions on the same issues in judicial practice, which can make it difficult for the court to determine the correct opinion.
