Constraint Interaction in Iraqi Arabic Dialects: A Focus on Baghdadi Gilit and Moslawi Qəltu through Optimality Theory
محورهای موضوعی : Applied Linguistics
Abbas Azeez Mohammed Alabid
1
,
Bahram Hadian
2
,
Fatinaz Karimi
3
1 - Department of English, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
2 - 2Assistant Professor, Department of English, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad
University, Isfahan, Iran
3 - Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch
کلید واژه: Assimilation, deletion, ,
چکیده مقاله :
This paper aimed at a descriptive analysis of the phonological processes in two major dialects of Iraqi: Baghdadi Gilit Dialect (BGD) and Moslawi Qəltu Dialect (MQD), within the framework of Optimality Theory (OT). Drawing on a firm corpus of 100 hours of spoken data and recent researches, 2015–2024, the present study probes into important phonological processes like assimilation, deletion, and epenthesis to explore their implications from the sociolinguistic and computational perspectives. These results show that there are significant differences in the constraint hierarchies of the two dialects, reflecting their different sociolinguistic histories. BGD has a greater number of assimilations and deletions, driven by markedness constraints such as HARMONY and PARSIMONY, which reflect Bedouin speech patterns. MQD, on the other hand, is more phonologically conservative, retaining features from Old Arabic, and thus faithfulness constraints such as MAX and IDENT-PLACE, which favor the preservation of input segments, are ranked higher. Comparisons with recent research highlight the continued influence of urbanization and Bedouinization on dialectal phonological variation. The study contributes to Arabic phonology by providing a model that bridges theoretical phonological processes with practical applications in computational linguistics, such as speech recognition and natural language processing systems. Sociolinguistically, the research highlights the complex interplay of demographic, cultural, and historical factors in shaping the phonological patterns across Iraqi Arabic dialects. The implications for Arabic dialectology, language technology, and pedagogical practices are discussed to provide an overall framework for studies that will follow in the variation of dialect.
This paper aimed at a descriptive analysis of the phonological processes in two major dialects of Iraqi: Baghdadi Gilit Dialect (BGD) and Moslawi Qəltu Dialect (MQD), within the framework of Optimality Theory (OT). Drawing on a firm corpus of 100 hours of spoken data and recent researches, 2015–2024, the present study probes into important phonological processes like assimilation, deletion, and epenthesis to explore their implications from the sociolinguistic and computational perspectives. These results show that there are significant differences in the constraint hierarchies of the two dialects, reflecting their different sociolinguistic histories. BGD has a greater number of assimilations and deletions, driven by markedness constraints such as HARMONY and PARSIMONY, which reflect Bedouin speech patterns. MQD, on the other hand, is more phonologically conservative, retaining features from Old Arabic, and thus faithfulness constraints such as MAX and IDENT-PLACE, which favor the preservation of input segments, are ranked higher. Comparisons with recent research highlight the continued influence of urbanization and Bedouinization on dialectal phonological variation. The study contributes to Arabic phonology by providing a model that bridges theoretical phonological processes with practical applications in computational linguistics, such as speech recognition and natural language processing systems. Sociolinguistically, the research highlights the complex interplay of demographic, cultural, and historical factors in shaping the phonological patterns across Iraqi Arabic dialects. The implications for Arabic dialectology, language technology, and pedagogical practices are discussed to provide an overall framework for studies that will follow in the variation of dialect.
Albuarabi, A. (2018). Gender differences in phonological variation in Arabic dialects. *Journal of Linguistic Studies*, 15(2), 45-60.
Alshammari, A. (2023). Phonological simplification in Bedouin dialects: A case study of Iraqi Arabic. *Arabic Linguistics Journal*, 12(1), 23-35.
Bourzeg, M. (2020). The role of epenthesis in urban Arabic dialects: Phonological and sociolinguistic perspectives. *Linguistic Inquiry*, 51(4), 567-589.
Blanc, H. (1964). The Arabic dialects of Iraq: A survey of their phonological features. *Journal of Arabic Linguistics*, 1(1), 33-45.
Habash, N. (2018). Phonological processes in Arabic dialects: A computational approach. *Computational Linguistics*, 44(3), 543-564.
Habash, N., Makhoul, A., & Dyer, C. (2021). Addressing dialectal variation in Arabic speech recognition systems. *Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics*, 59, 1234-1245.
Holes, C. (2007). *Dialect, culture and society in Eastern Arabia*. Brill.
Jasim, H., & Sharhan, S. (2022). Geographical influences on Iraqi Arabic dialects: A phonetic perspective. *Iraqi Journal of Linguistics*, 10(2), 77-90.
Jastrow, O. (1994). The phonology of Iraqi Arabic: A comparative approach. In A. R. B. Al-Ani & M. A. Al-Maamari (Eds.), *Proceedings of the International Conference on Arabic Linguistics* (pp. 115-130). University of Baghdad Press.
Jastrow, O. (2006). Language contact and linguistic change in Iraq: The case of Baghdadi Arabic. *Middle Eastern Studies*, 42(3), 345-360.
Salman, S. (2021). The influence of Bedouin migration on urban speech patterns in Iraq: An analysis of Baghdadi Gilit Dialect. *Journal of Sociolinguistics*, 25(1), 88-102.
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). *Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar*. Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.
Yussif, S., & Mohammed, T. (2023). Sociolinguistic factors influencing phonological variation in Iraqi Arabic dialects: A study of BGD and MQD. *International Journal of Arabic Linguistics*, 18(1), 101-120.
