نقش میانجی تصمیم‌گیری هوشمند در رابطه بین انعطاف‌پذیری فناوری و تیم پذیری
محورهای موضوعی :
1 - دانش آموخته دکترای مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
2 - دانشیار مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
کلید واژه: انعطاف‌پذیری فناوری, تصمیم‌گیری هوشمند, تیم پذیری.,
چکیده مقاله :
این پژوهش با هدف مطالعه نقش میانجی تصمیم‌گیری هوشمند در رابطه بین انعطاف‌پذیری فناوری و تیم پذیری انجام گرفت. پژوهش از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و از بعد شیوه¬ی اجرا رویکرد مدل‌سازی معادله ساختاری ماتریس همبستگی- کوواریانس محور است. جامعه¬ی پژوهش، کلیه¬ی مدیران مدارس ابتدایی استان کرمانشاه بودند که از این جامعه با روش نمونه¬گیری تصادفی طبقه¬ای نسبتی و بر مبنای فرمول کوکران، نمونه ای به حجم 320 نفر انتخاب شد. ابزارها شامل پرسشنامه های انعطاف‌پذیری فناوری و تصمیم‌گیری هوشمند محقق ساخته و تیم پذیری سلطانی (2008) بود که روایی محتوایی آن ها از نظر متخصصان مورد تایید قرار گرفت. پایایی پرسشنامه¬¬ها از طریق آلفای کرونباخ برای انعطاف‌پذیری فناوری 91/0، تصمیم‌گیری هوشمند 95/0 و تیم پذیری 89/0 محاسبه شد. برای تحلیل داده¬ها از تکنیک¬های تحلیل توصیفی و تحلیل استنباطی با استفاده از نرم¬افزارهای SPSS و LISREL استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد: انعطاف‌پذیری فناوری تأثیر مستقیم بر تیم پذیری و تصمیم‌گیری هوشمند دارد، همچنین تصمیم گیری هوشمند تأثیر مستقیم بر تیم پذیری دارد و در پایان انعطاف‌پذیری فناوری تأثیر غیرمستقیم از طریق تصمیم‌گیری هوشمند بر تیم پذیری دارد.
Abstract This research was conducted with the aim of studying the mediating role of intelligent decision-making in the relationship between technology flexibility and team reception. The research is applied in terms of the objective and in terms of the method of implementation, the structural equation modeling approach of the correlation-covariance matrix is oriented. The research population was all principals of elementary schools in Kermanshah province, and a sample of 320 people was selected from this population by proportional stratified random sampling based on Cochran's formula. The tools include researcher-made technology flexibility and intelligent decision-making questionnaires and Soltani's team reception (2008) whose content validity was confirmed by experts. The reliability of the questionnaires was calculated through Cronbach's alpha for 0.91 technology flexibility, 0.95 intelligent decision making and 0.89 team reception. Descriptive analysis and inferential analysis techniques were used for data analysis using SPSS and LISREL software. The results showed that technology flexibility has a direct effect on team reception and intelligent decision making also, intelligent decision-making has a direct impact on team reception and finally, technology flexibility has an indirect effect on team reception through intelligent decision making.
References
Adam, F., Kuchta, D., & Stanek, S. (Eds.). (2022). Rational Decisions in Organisations: Theoretical and Practical Aspects. CRC Press.
Ahituv, N., & Neumann, S. (2019). Principles of information systems for management. William C. Brown Publishers.
Ahlquist, J. (2014). Trending now: Digital leadership education using social media and the social change model. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 57-60.
Alamandala, S., Prasad, R. S., & Kumar, P. R. (2020). Cost-effective load measurement system for health monitoring using long-period grating as an edge filter. Optical Fiber Technology, 59, 102328.
Almasi, M., Fatemi Far, M., & Nemati L. (2019). The relationship between organizational agility and teamwork on the productivity of human resources with the mediating role of ethical decision-making, Ethics in Science and Technology, (14), 1, 82-88. (In Persian).
Bazrafshan, H., & Mahmoudi, S. M. (2018). The Role of IT Flexibility in IT-Business Strategic Alignment. Journal of strategic management and future studies, 1(1), 103-124. (In Persian).
Behera, T. M., & Mohapatra, S. K. (2021). A novel scheme for mitigation of energy hole problem in wireless sensor network for military application. International Journal of Communication Systems, 34(11), e4886.
Benitez, J., Llorens, J., & Braojos, J. (2018). How information technology influences opportunity exploration and exploitation firm’s capabilities. Information & Management, 55(4), 508-523.
Bjornali, E. S., Knockaert, M., & Erikson, T. (2016). The impact of top management team characteristics and board service involvement on team effectiveness in high-tech start-ups. Long Range Planning, 49(4), 447-463.
Chege, S. M., Wang, D., & Suntu, S. L. (2020). Impact of information technology innovation on firm performance in Kenya. Information Technology for Development, 26(2), 316-345.
Chelliah, Sh., and Kwon, Ch. K. (2019). A study of the relationship between marketing mix and customer retention for herbal coffee in Malaysia. 2nd International conference on Business and Economic Research.
Chiu, C. N., & Yang, C. L. (2019). Competitive advantage and simultaneous mutual influences between information technology adoption and service innovation: Moderating effects of environmental factors. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 49, 192-205.
Choi, E. H., Kim, E. K., & Kim, P. B. (2018). Effects of the educational leadership of nursing unit managers on team effectiveness: mediating effects of organizational communication. Asian nursing research, 12(2), 99-105.
Davodi, R., Mokhtari, M. and Alizadeh, R. (2017). Investigating the role of organizational agility on productivity and organizational productivity, the first national conference on entrepreneurship, Chalos, https://civilica.com/doc/805569. (In Persian).
Doghri, W., Saddoud, A., & Chaari Fourati, L. (2022). Cyber-physical systems for structural health monitoring: sensing technologies and intelligent computing. The Journal of Supercomputing, 78(1), 766-809.
Du, S., Wu, M., Chen, L., Cao, W., & Pedrycz, W. (2020). An intelligent decision-making strategy based on the forecast of abnormal operating mode for iron ore sintering process. Journal of Process Control, 96, 57-66.
Duman, M. C., & Akdemir, B. (2021). A study to determine the effects of industry 4.0 technology components on organizational performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 167, 120615.
Dutton, J. E., Roberts, L. M., & Bednar, J. (2020). Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources. Academy of management review, 35(2), 265-293.
Garud, R., & Kothaba, S. (2020). Using the brain as a metaphor to model flexible production systems. Academy of Management Review, 19(4), 671-698.
Gibson, V. R., & Senn, J. A. (2019). System structure and software maintenance performance. Communications of the ACM, 32(3), 347-358.
Guthrie, K. L., & Meriwether, J. L. (2018). Leadership development in digital spaces through mentoring, coaching, and advising. New directions for student leadership, 2018(158), 99-110.
Haeckel, S. H., & Nolan, R. A. (2020). Managing by wire. Harvard business review, 71(5), 122-132.
Hahnel, U. J. (2022). Consumer awareness of load shapes. Nature Energy, 7(12), 1122-1123.
Han, S. J., Lee, Y., Beyerlein, M., & Kolb, J. (2017). Shared leadership in teams: The role of coordination, goal commitment, and knowledge sharing on perceived team performance. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 24(3/4), 150-168.
Hedberg, B., & Jönsson, S. (2020). Designing semiconfusing information systems for changing organizations. ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 13(2-3), 12-25.
Hedman, E. (2016). Leadership Team Tool for better meaning making: Developing leadership team communication and reflexivity. Journal of management development, 35(5), 592-605.
Howard, M. C., & Holmes, P. E. (2020). Social courage fosters both voice and silence in the workplace: A study on multidimensional voice and silence with boundary conditions. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance.
Huber, G. P., & McDaniel, R. R. (2019). The decision-making paradigm of organizational design. Management science, 32(5), 572-589.
Jankelová, N., Joniaková, Z., & Procházková, K. (2022). The way to business competitiveness: the importance of diversity management and teamwork climate in stabilizing of employees. Journal of Business economics and Management, 1-20.
Jiang, Z., DeHart‐Davis, L., & Borry, E. L. (2022). Managerial Practice and Diversity Climate: The Roles of Workplace Voice, Centralization, and Teamwork. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 459-472.
Kane, G. C., Phillips, A. N., Copulsky, J., & Andrus, G. (2019). How digital leadership is (n't) different. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(3), 34-39.
Keyhan, J., Fardiyan, R., & Zenozi, F. (2023). The relationship between future-oriented leadership and managers' team acceptance: testing the mediating role of open innovation Case of study: principals of elementary school in West Azerbaijan provinc. Research in Elementary Education, 4(8), 87-98.
Khan, A. H., Cao, X., & Li, S. (2020). Management and intelligent decision-making in complex systems: an optimization-driven approach. Springer Nature.
Klimek, J., & Klimek, J. A. (2020). IT and data mining in decision-making in the organization. Education management in the culture of late modernity. Procedia Computer Science, 176, 1990-1999.
Lee, Y. S., & Sasaki, Y. (2018). Information technology in the property market. Information Economics and Policy, 44, 1-7.
Luo, J., Chen, Y., Wu, M., & Yang, Y. (2021). A survey of routing protocols for underwater wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 23(1), 137-160.
Marques, C. M., Moniz, S., & de Sousa, J. P. (2018). Strategic decision-making in the pharmaceutical industry: A unified decision-making framework. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 119, 171-189.
Nadi, M., Ahanchian, M. R., & Noghani dokht bahmani, M. (2017). Qualitative Research of Team Building and Teamwork Status in Public Universities of Iran. Organizational Behaviour Studies Quarterly, 6(1), 81-120. Persian.
Niazazari, M. (2020). The Relationship between knowledge leadership and organizational silence with the mediating role of team reception of school managers. School Administration, 8(4), 361-341. (In Persian).
Olan, F., Liu, S., Neaga, I., & Alkhuraiji, A. (2018). How knowledge sharing and business process contribute to organizational performance: Using the fsQCA approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5222-5227.
Pena-Bello, A., Parra, D., Herberz, M., Tiefenbeck, V., Patel, M. K., & Hahnel, U. J. (2022). Integration of prosumer peer-to-peer trading decisions into energy community modelling. Nature Energy, 7(1), 74-82.
Piraish, R., & Moghadam Zarandi, M. (2015). Smart decision-making in the developing world, the fourth international conference on applied research in management and accounting, Tehran, https://civilica.com/doc/567999. (In Persian).
Pourmohammad Shahini, Kh. (2016). Decision-making methods in organization leadership, success or failure of a case study: management of monitoring construction projects in oil-rich regions, the second national conference on management and humanities research in Iran, Tehran. (In Persian).
Roossien, C. C., de Jong, M., Bonvanie, A. M., & Maeckelberghe, E. L. M. (2021). Ethics in Design and Implementation of Technologies for Workplace Health Promotion: A Call for Discussion. Frontiers in Digital Health, 3, 644539.
Rostami Bashmani, M., & Hafizi, A. (2015). The effect of organizational agility on manpower’s productivity: Case study (Esfahan Governorate). VISI Journal Akademik, 2(9), 84-89. (In Persian).
Seabra, C., & Almeida, A. M. (2015). Project management on Multimedia Projects: preliminary results on communication, interaction and team work dynamics. Procedia Computer Science, 64, 816-823.
Siadat, S. A., & Mokhtaripour, M. (2009). Team Leadership in Organization Based on Organizational Role and National Culture (Case Study: Isfahan State University). Strategic Management Thought, 3(1), 191-219. doi: 10.30497/smt.2009.128. (In Persian).
Soltani, I. (2008). Self-Assessment and Improvement Tools in Human Resource Management. Isfahan. (In Persian).
Sony, M., Antony, J., & Mc Dermott, O. (2022). How do the technological capability and strategic flexibility of an organization impact its successful implementation of Industry 4.0? A qualitative viewpoint. Benchmarking: An International Journal, (ahead-of-print).
Thomas, W. E., Brown, R., Easterbrook, M. J., Vignoles, V. L., Manzi, C., D’Angelo, C., & Holt, J. J. (2017). Social identification in sports teams: The role of personal, social, and collective identity motives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(4), 508-523.
Toprak, M. (2019). An Investigation into Educational Decision-Making in a Centralized Education System: Governance Principles and the Case of National Education Councils (Sûras). International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 15(11), n11.
Upton, D. M. (2019). The management of manufacturing flexibility. California management review, 36(2), 72-89.
Wang, T., Wang, Y., & McLeod, A. (2018). Do health information technology investments impact hospital financial performance and productivity?. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 28, 1-13.
Yi, Y. J. (2016). Effects of team‐building on communication and teamwork among nursing students. International nursing review, 63(1), 33-40.
Zhang, X., Xu, L., Zhang, H., Jiang, Z., & Cai, W. (2021). Emergy based intelligent decision-making model for remanufacturing process scheme integrating economic and environmental factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 291, 125247.
Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2015). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of consumer research, 37(2), 197-206.
Zhu, J., Zhang, B., Xie, M., & Cao, Q. (2022). Digital leadership and employee creativity: The role of employee job crafting and person-organization fit. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 827057.
