تعیین ویژگی های برنامه ریزی و مدیریت شهری کارآمد در کنترل تغییرات اقلیمی(نمونه مورد مطالعه: شهرداری مشهد)
محورهای موضوعی : برنامه ریزی شهری
1 - گروه برنامه ریزی شدانشیار گروه جغرافیا و برنامهریزی شهری، دانشکده حقوق و علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایرانهری دانشگاه پیام نور
کلید واژه: تغییرات اقلیمی, مدیریت شهری, شهرداری, هوشمندی, مشهد.,
چکیده مقاله :
مهم‌ترین سیستمی که تغییرات اقلیمی را مدیریت میکند، شهرداری از طریق سیستم شهرسازی است. به همین دلیل باید مشخص شود که این سیستم دارای ویژگیهای لازم در این زمینه است یا خیر. به همین منظور، این بررسی برای ارزیابی سیستم برنامهریزی شهری شهرداری مشهد به انجام رسید. روش از نوع توصیفی-اکتشافی انتخاب گردید. وضعیت شهرداری مشهد در ارتباط با بهکارگیری عوامل موثر در کنترل تغییرات اقلیمی با نمونهای در حد 385 نفر، ارزیابی شد. دادههای بخش کیفی با نرمافزار Atlas.tiv و شیوه شناسهگذاری تحلیل گردید. نتایج نشان داد که در این زمینه، مجموعاً 30 عامل ذینقش هستند که مهم‌ترین آنها آیندهنگری، مدیریت هوشمند و زیرساخت تکنولوژیک میباشند. نتایج مرحله دوم مشخص کرد که ده گروه اصلی در این حوزه اثرگذاری مشخص و مستقیمی دارند. چنانچه این عوامل به طور دقیق در مدیریت و برنامهریزی شهری مدنظر قرارگیرند، ممکن است بخش زیادی از پیامدهای نامناسب تغییرات اقلیمی کنترل و مدیریت گردد.
Due to the accumulation of the largest population and wealth in urban areas, climate change has had the highest consequences in these areas. The most important system that manages these changes is the municipality through the urban planning system; for this reason, it should be determined whether this system has the necessary characteristics in this field or not. The descriptive-exploratory research method was chosen. In the exploratory stage, all the experts working in the departments of crisis management, municipality, environment, and regional water were the effective factors in urban planning through Delphi. Among this group, 30 of them were selected by purposeful sampling. In the second stage, the situation of Mashhad municipality was carefully evaluated with a sample of 385 people to evaluate the basic components of an efficient system through exploratory factor analysis. For data analysis, factor analysis, variance analysis, and Bonferroni post hoc test were used. The results showed that a total of 30 factors are involved in this field, the most important of which are foresight, smart management, and technological infrastructure. The results of the second stage determined that ten main groups have a clear and direct influence in this area, which are, in order of importance: strategic, organizational, technological, information, academic, cultural, social, human, competitive, and environmental dimensions. According to the evaluations conducted in this study, it was found that these indicators collectively explained 62% of the total variance, and the rest was related to factors and contexts that were not considered in this study. Of course, there are clear differences among the factors and indicators mentioned, and therefore, conditions must be created for their activity and effectiveness, considering the priorities set for each of them. To achieve cities that are environmentally sustainable, socially inclusive, and economically vibrant, urban planning must consider strategic, organizational, and technological dimensions in a way that works in tandem and reinforces each other. In this situation, while providing social platforms to reduce the consequences of climate change, the ability to adapt will also increase significantly. In this sector, cultural dimensions are the most influential. Because these conditions prepare society mentally and intellectually to coexist with such changes. Despite the fact that the managerial, informational, and competitive dimensions are in completely different positions, the results of this study showed that these dimensions can have a significant impact on the appropriate performance of the municipality in utilizing urban planning knowledge to control and manage the consequences of climate change. In order to control and manage climate change through urban planning, it is necessary to somehow create a consensus among the elites. Therefore, if these factors are carefully considered in urban management and planning, a large part of the inappropriate consequences of climate change will be controlled and managed. This study is one of the few studies that have been carried out in the field of the climate change-urban planning conundrum and corresponding responses. The findings of this research can help ensure that physical developments don't take place in flood-prone areas and buildings meet the requirements of city authorities to improve risk management and enhance response to disasters.
1. خالصی، بهاره؛ و سروری، هادی. (1401). شناسایی ارتباط میان شهر هوشمند و تغییرات اقلیمی. هفتمین کنفرانس بین¬المللی پژوهش در علوم و مهندسی و چهارمین کنگره بین¬المللی عمران، معماری و شهرسازی آسیا، تهران. اردیبهشت 6.(ص 111-101). تهران: دانشگاه آزاد.
2. خسروی، کوروش؛ و بازوند، سجاد. (1397). شهرها و تغییرات اقلیم جهانی. تهران: انتشارات انتخاب.
3. ذوقی، محمود؛ و امیری، محمدجواد. (1402). تعیین آستانه و ارزیابی حساسیت شاخص پوشش گیاهی اکوسیستم¬های شهری در مواجهه با شوک¬های اقلیمی، مطالعه موردی: منطقه شهری گرگان. پژوهش¬های جغرافیایی برنامه¬ریزی شهری، 11(2)، 114-97https://jurbangeo.ut.ac.ir/article_94602_280965c624664e20ce61fd2f1c21f97a.pdf
4. زیاری، کرامت¬اله؛ منصوری، ابوالفضل؛ و محمدی یل¬سوری، مهرداد. (1401). بررسی و تحلیل نقش تاب‌آوری نهادی در مواجهه با اثرات تغییرات اقلیمی بر شهرها (مورد پژوهی: شهر مشهد). جغرافیا و توسعه فضای شهری، انتشار آن¬لاین، https://doi.org/10.22067/jgusd.2022.78089.1237
5. قاسمی، سجاد، هادیانی، زهره؛ و حمیدیان¬پور، محسن. (1403). شناسایی پیشران¬های کلیدی موثر بر آینده تغییر اقلیمی و تاب¬آوری شهر اصفهان. چشم¬انداز شهرهای آینده، 1(5). http://jvfc.ir/article-1-293-fa.html
6. مالکی، لادن؛ ماجدی، حمید؛ و زرآبادی، زهرا. (1400). تحلیل نقش رویکردهای شهری در پاسخ به تغییرات اقلیمی با تاکید بر شهرسازی بیوفیلیک، مورد پژوهی: شهر تنکابن. دانش شهرسازی، 5(1)، 163-147. https://doi.org/10.22124/upk.2020.13045.1211
7. Almulhim, A. I., & Cobbinah, P. B. (2024). Framing resilience in Saudi Arabian cities: On climate change and urban policy, Sustainable Cities and Society, 101, 105172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2024.105172
8. Amoako, C., & Cobbinah, P. B. (2011). Slum improvement in the Kumasi metropolis: Review of results and approaches, Journal of Sustainable Development in Africa,13(8), 150–170. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232957170
9. Aulakh, R. (2013). Natural disasters forced 32 million people from their homes last year the star Canada, Accessed at http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/independent_reviews/stern on 23/09/2018.
10. Chen, M. F., & Tung, P. J. (2010). The moderating effect of perceived lack of facilities on consumers' recycling intentions, Environment and Behavior, 42, 824–844. doi/10.1177/0013916509352833
11. Cobbinah, P. B., & Anane, G. K. (2016). Climate change adaptation in rural Ghana: Indigenous perceptions and strategies, Climate & Development. 8(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2015.1034228
12. Cobbinah, P. B., Asibey, M. O., Opoku-Gyamfia, M., & Peprah, C. (2016). Urban planning and climate change in Ghana, Journal of Urban Management, 8(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103950
13. Costello, A., Abbas, M., Allen, A., Ball, S., Bell, S., Bellamy, R. (2009). Managing the health effects of climate change, The Lancet, 373(9676), 1693–1733. https://www.thelancet.com/pb/assets/raw/Lancet//pdfs/climate-article.pdf
14. Darkwah, R. M., Cobbinah, P. B., & Anokye, P. A. (2018). Contextualising urban resilience in Ghana: Local perspectives and experiences, Geoforum, 94, 12–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.09.005
15. Easton, D. (1953). The political system: An inquiry into the state of political science, Alfred A. Knopf xiii, New York. https://www.amazon.com/Political-System-Inquiry-State-Science/dp/B000R0E50O
16. Ghasemi, S., Hadiani, Z., & Hamidianpour, M.(2024), Identifying key drivers affecting the future of climate change and resilience of Isfahan city. Vision of Future Cities, 1(5), Online Publication. [In Persian] http://jvfc.ir/article-1-293-en.html
17. Government of Ghana (GoG) .(2012). National urban policy framework, Ministry of local Government and Rural Development Accra, May, 2012. http://refhub.elsevier.com/S2226-5856(18)30185-7/sref30
18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). In S. Solomon, D. Qin,, M. Manning, Z. Chen,, M. Marquis,, & K. B. Averyt, (Eds.). Climate change 2007:The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental Panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/wg1/
19. Khan, A. Z. (2012). Climate change: Cause & effect, Journal of Environment and Earth Science. 2(4), 48–53. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEES/article/view/1779
20. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
21. Korah, P. I., Cobbinah, P. B., Nunbogu, A. M. & Gyogluu, S. (2017). Spatial plans and urban development trajectory in Kumasi, Ghana, Geojournal. 82(6), 1113–1134. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45117464
22. Maleki, L., Majdi, H., & Zarabadi, Z. (2022), analysis of the role of urban approaches in response to climate changes with an emphasis on biophilic urbanism, case study: Tankabon city. Danesh Shahr Sazi, 5(1), 147-163. [In Persian] https://upk.guilan.ac.ir/article_3993.html?lang=en
23. Macarthy, J. M. (2012). Integrating climate change consideration in planning for urban development in Sierra Leone: The case study of freetown. A thesis submitted for Doctoral degree at the Newcastle University. http://hdl.handle.net/10443/1405
24. Ng, A. S., Lwin, M. O., & Pang, A. (2017). Toward a theoretical framework for studying climate change policies: Insights from the case study of Singapore. Sustainability. 9(1167), 1–21. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i7p1167-d103553.html
25. Pankaja, M. S., & Nagendra, H. N. (2015). Green city concept: A new paradigm in urban planning. International Journal of Engineering Science. 4(10), 55–60. https://www.theijes.com/papers/v4-i10/Version-3/H04103055060.pdf
26. Parmesan, C., & Yohe, G. (2003). A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural. Systems Nature. 421, 37–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature01286
27. Saberifar, R. (2023). Climate Change and Water Crisis (Case Study, Mashhad in Northeastern Iran), Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 32(1), 705-716. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/151988
28. Sarpong, D., & Anyidoho, N. A. (2012). Climate change and agricultural policy processes in Ghana. Future Agricultures Consortium, Working Paper 045. https://www.future-agricultures.org/publications/research-and-analysis/working-papers
29. Stott, P. A., Stone, D. A., & Allen, M. R. (2004). Human contribution to the European heat wave of 2003. Nature, 432, 610–614. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03089
30. UN-Habitat. (2024). Increasing the resilience of both displaced persons and host communities to climate change-related water challenges in Jordan and Lebanon. https://unhabitat.org/af-lebanon-jordan
31. World Health Organisation (WHO) (2013). Health effects of particulate matter: Policy implications for countries in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and central Asia. 122-131. https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/344854
32. Yeboah, E., & Obeng-Odoom, F. (2010). We are not the only ones to blame: District Assemblies' perspectives on the state of planning in Ghana, Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance. 2, 79–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i7.1893
