میزان اجرای ویژگی های بوروکراسی و تمایلات دیوان سالارانه مدیران مدارس شهر تهران

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

صدرالدین ستاری ¹ (استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اردبیل،گروه علوم تربیتی)
یوسف نامور ² (استادیار دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اردبیل،گروه علوم تربیتی)
اعظم راستگو ³ (مربی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد اردبیل گروه علوم تربیتی)

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/09/10 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/09/10 تاریخ انتشار : 1390/10/01

کلید واژه: نظریه بوروکراسی, تمایلات دیوان‌سالارانه, مدارس شهر تهران,

چکیده مقاله :

هدف اصلی این پژوهش، بررسی میزان اجرای ویژگی‌های سازمان بوروکراسی و تمایلات دیوان‌سالارانه‌ی مدیران مدارس شهر تهران بوده است. روش تحقیق حاضر از لحاظ هدف، تحقیق کاربردی و از لحاظ نحوه‌ی گردآوری داده‌ها، تحقیق توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی مقطعی می‌باشد. جامعه‌ی آماری مورد مطالعه در این پژوهش شامل کلیه‌ی مدیران مدارس مقطع راهنمایی و دبیرستان پسرانه‌ی شهر تهران بوده که به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی خوشه‌ای، تعداد 154 نفر به‌عنوان گروه نمونه انتخاب و داده‌های مورد نیاز به‌وسیله‌ی پرسشنامه‌ی محقق ساخته جمع‌آوری گردید. روایی ابزار مورد استفاده، با استفاده از روایی محتوا و نظر متخصصین و پایابی ابزار نیز با روش ضریب آلفای کرونباخ به‌دست آمده است. نتایج تحلیل داده‌های جمع‌آوری شده، حاکی از آن است که ویژگی‌های سازمان بوروکراسی در حد متوسط اجرا می‌شود و میزان تمایلات دیوان-سالارانه‌ی مدیران در حد زیاد می‌باشد و بین ویژگی‌های شخصی مدیران(سن، سابقه‌ی کاری، سابقه‌ی مدیریت و ... ) با تمایلات دیوان‌سالارانه رابطه‌ی معنی‌داری وجود ندارد. از نتایج این تحقیق می‌توان در اصلاح و بهبود ساختار سازمانی نظام آموزشی استفاده کرد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The aim of this research was to assess the degree to which the characteristics of bureaucratic organization were implemented and bureaucratic orientation of school principals in Tehran. This research was an applied study in terms its goal and a descriptive survey in terms of research method. The population of research was all school principals in Tehran. A sample of 154 respondents was selected employing cluster random sampling method. The Instrument utilized to collect the data was a researcher-made questionnaire. Its validity was established through experts’ views and its reliability was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha. The results of the study indicated that bureaucracy characteristics were moderately implemented and that the principals’ bureaucratic orientation was high. It was also revealed that there were not any significant relationships between personal characteristics and the principals’ bureaucratic orientation. The results of this research can be used to amend and to improve organizational structure of educational system.

منابع و مأخذ:

Adler, P.S.& Borys, B.(1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and

coercive, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 41, pp.61–89.

Alageband, A. (2005). Basic educational management. Tehran: Ravan

press.

Alageband, A. (2008). Theoretical foundations and principles

of educational management. Tehran: Ravan press.

Alimardani, M.; Ghahramani, M.; Abolgasemi, M. (2010). Survey the

relationship between organizational structure and organizational

entrepreneurship(Shahid Beheshti University), Quarterly Journal of

new approaches in educational administration, 1, 129-142.

Appelbaum, E.& Batt, R. (1994). The New American Workplace:

Transforming Work Systems in the United States. ILR Press, Ithaca,

NY.

Barati Marmarani, A.; Torani, S.; Zahiri, M. (2006). Designing

organization structure of Entrepreneurship centers at the country

medical Universities, Health Management Journal, 50, 23-41.

Blau, P.M. (1996). Bureaucracy in modern society. New York: Random

House.

Bothe, J. (2001). School Bureaucracy and Student Performance at the

local level. Public Administration review,61.

Conger, J.A.& Kanungo, R.N. (1988). The empowerment process:

Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13,

471–482.

Daneshfard, K. (2007). Relationship between Bourocracy Model and

Universities Health management. Modern thought in educational

sciences, 54, 41-86.

Faraji Armaki, A. (1998). Cultural barriers of using Max Weber's

theory of bureaucracy in Iraneducationaladministration with using Tehr

an's educational principals viewpoints in the academic year 77-78.

Master Degree Dissertation, Tehran University.

Farbodi, Y. (1989). Recognition of Social disease of bureaucracy.

Management Knowledge, 4. 62-70.

Gholshan, M. R. (1986). Disease of bureaucracy. Research journal, 1, 15-

22.

Gizir, S. & H. Simsek (2005). Communication in an academic

context. Higher Education, 50: 197-221.

Hall, R.(1987).Organizational structures, processes, and outcomes,

Fourth edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Irannazad Parizi, M. & Sasan Gohar, P. (1994). Organization and

management: from theory to practice. Tehran: Iran Banking press.

Kia, M. (1994). Management theories and organization models. Tehran:

Governmental management training center.

Kordnaeij, A.; Ahmadpour Darbani, M. ; Shams, S. (2005). Designing

the center's organizational structure and entrepreneurship centers in

the country. Human Sciences MODARES, 2, 119-153.

Naderi, R. (1998). Evaluation of principal's bureaucratic tendencies and

professional trends of teachers and their relationship with Saggez

schools effectiveness in the academic year 76-75. Unpublished Master

degree dissertation, Tehran university.

Naeli, A. (translator). (1991). Educational management and

organizational behavior, By Mark Hansen. Ahvaz: Shahid Chamran

University press.

Nelson, D.L & Campbell Quick(2008). Organization behavior, 5th

edition, Thomson, South Western.

Safi, A. (1987). Bureaucracy theory and It's implication on education

organization. Education Journal. 3, 7-17.

Sarmad, Z.; Bazargan, A. & Hejazi, E. (2003). Research methods in

educational sciences. Tehran: Agah Press.

Shirazi, A. (1993). Educational management. Mashhad: Academic jihad

press.

Song, Y. (2008). Bureaucracy versus high performance: Work

reorganization in the 1990s, The Journal of Socio- Economics, 37, pp.

1825–1845, Available at: www.elsevier.com/locate/econbase

Stefen, R. (2008). Does bureaucracy kill individual initiative? The impact

of structure on organizational citizenship behavior in the hospitality

industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 27, pp.179–

186. Available at: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhosman.

Wagoner, R; Metcalfe, S & Olaore,I(2005).Physical reality and academic

quality :part –time faculty and the challenge to organizational culture at

community college ,community collegian. Journal of research and

practice, the university of Arizona, USA, 29, P.25-44.