رابطه سبکهای یادگیری با غلبه طرفی مغز دانشجویان بمنظوراستفاده در طراحیهای آموزشی

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

مرضیه امینی ¹ , احمد علی پور ² , بهمن زند ³ , عیسی ابراهیم زاده ⁴ , مهران فرج الهی ⁵

1 - عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد مرودشت، مرودشت، ایران
2 - - استاد دانشگاه پیام نور
3 - - دانشیار دانشگاه پیام نور
4 - - دانشیار دانشگاه پیام نور
5 - استادیار دانشگاه پیام نور

تاریخ دریافت : 1394/09/29 تاریخ پذیرش : 1394/09/29 تاریخ انتشار : 1391/07/01

کلید واژه: لبه طرفی مغز, شیوههای درک, شیوههای پردازش داده ها, سبک همگر, سبک واگرا,

چکیده مقاله :

مهمترین هدف این پژوهش مطالعه و بررسی عوامل مرتبط با توفیق یادگیری دانشجویان مهندسی و پزشکی بود. به همین منظور، دو عامل سبک های یادگیری و غلبه طرفی (برتری نیمکره های مغزی) در دانشجویان دختر و پسر دراین دو رشته تحصیلی مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. مطالعه ازنوع همبستگی بوده و پژوهشگر به مقایسه 178 نفر ازکل دانشجویان دختر و پسر مشغول 89 رشتههای پزشکی و مهندسی دو دانشگاه شیراز و علوم - به تحصیل در نیمسال نخست 88 پزشکی شیراز پرداخت. در این پژوهش از شیوه نمونه گیری خوشه ای استفاده شد و دانشجویان دو پرسشنامه استانداردِ سبک های یادگیری کُلب و غلبه طرفی مغز سیلبر را تکمیل نمودند. تحلیل SPSS وآزمون خی دو و با بکارگیری نرم افزار 17 t آماری داده ها با استفاده از آمار توصیفی، آزمون صورت گرفت. نتایج بدست آمده از این پژوهش حاکی از آن است که دانشجویان دو رشته مهندسی و پزشکی از لحاظ شیوههای درک و پردازش داده ها با یکدیگر تفاوت دارند. همچنین، یافتههای مربوط به سبکهای یادگیری نشان دادند که دانشجویان رشته پزشکی بیشتر از سبک واگرا استفاده می کنند در حالی که دانشجویان رشته مهندسی گرایش بیشتری به سبک همگرا دارند. همچنین، در مقایسه شیوه های یادگیری دختران و پسران دانشجو نتایج نشان دادند که دختران شیوه تجربه عینی را بیشتر بکار میگیرند. در ارتباط با غلبه طرفی مغز بیشتر دانشجویان هر دو رشته تحصیلی از هر دو نیمکره مغز برای درک و پردازش اطلاعات استفاده می نمایند. همچنین، یافتهها حاکی از رابطه بین سبک یادگیری و غلبه طرفی، جنسیت و رشته تحصیلی میباشد  

چکیده انگلیسی:

The main goal of the present research was to investigate factors related to learning success of medical and engineering students. In this regard, two factors, i.e. learning styles and hemispheric dominance of male and female students in these two majors were studied. The study had a comparative nature; for that reason, one hundred and seventy eight medical and engineering students of Shiraz University and Shiraz School of Medical Sciences studying in the first semester of 1388-1389 were compared with each other regarding their learning styles and hemispheric dominances. In this study, cluster sampling was employed to select the participants; then, the selected students completed two standard questionnaires, that is, Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (1985a) and Silber’s Hemispheric Dominance questionnaire. Statistical analyses (descriptive statistics, t-test, and chi-square) were performed using SPSS software (17th version). Findings of the current study indicate that medical and engineering students are different from each other regarding their methods in perceiving and processing information. With regard to findings of learning styles, it was revealed that medical students mostly used divergent learning style while engineering students were more inclined to employ convergent learning style. Moreover, male and female students were compared regarding their learning styles. This indicated that females utilized concrete experimentation more than males. As regards brain hemispheric dominance, it was observed that most students in the two majors employed both hemispheres of their brains in perceiving and processing information. Besides, the results depicted an association among students’ learning style, hemispheric dominance, gender, and field of study  

منابع و مأخذ:

Alport, G, W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New

York: Holt & Co.

Amini, M. (2009). Learning styles and hemispheric dominance in Iranian

gifted students. Paper presented at 17th biennial conference in gifted and

talented children. Vancouver, Canada.

Azizi, F, Khanzadeh, A, Hosseini, M. (2002). A survey on learning styles

of medical students (based on Kolb’s theory) in Qazvin. Iranian Journal of

Medical Education, 2, 16-18. 

Boyle, R, & Honigsfeld, A. (2005). In response to the remarks by

Lawrence H.Summers, presenting empirical data on the differences in

learning styles between males and females, Cardozo Women’s L.J, 11(3).

Caine, R., & Caine, G. (1990). Understanding a brain-based approach to

learning and teaching. Educational Leadership, 48, 66-70.

Campbell, K. (2000). Gender and educational technologies: Relational

framework for learning design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and

Hypermedia, 9(2), 131-149.

Caplan, D. (1981). Prospect of neurolinguistic theory. Cognition, 10 (13),

59-64.

Cassidy, S. (2004).Learning styles: An overview of theories, models, and

measures. Educational Psychology, 24(4), 419-444.

Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning styles theory and

constructs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American

Educational Research Association. ERIC document No. ED 235- 185.

Dean, R.S., & Reynolds, C.R. (1997). Cognitive processing and selfreport

of lateral preference. Neuropsychology Review, vol. 7, No.3, 127-

137.

Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching students through their individual

learning styles. Reston Va: Preston Co.

Dunn, R .(1980). Learning: A matter of style. Educational Leadership, 44,

18-23.

Entwistle, N. (1981). Styles of learning and teaching. New York: John

Wiley and Sons.

Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning.

London, GroomHelm.

Felder, R., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning styles and teaching styles

in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78 (7), 674-681.

Felder, R, & Spurlin, J,.(2005). Application, reliability and validity of the

index of learning styles. International Journal of Engineering Education,

21(1), 103-112.

Grasha, A, F. (1996). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing

learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. San Bernardino, CA:

Alliance Publishers.

Grigorenko, E. L. & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). ”thinking Styles”, in D.

Saklofske & Zeidner (ed.), International Handbook of Personality and

Intelligence, New York, Plenum, 205-229.

Harris, A. J. (1975). Lateral Dominance, directional confusion and

reading ability. Journal of Psychology, 44, 283-294.

Haghani,F.,Aminian, B., Kamali, f., Jamshidian, S. (2011). Critical

thinking skills and their relationship with emotional intelligence in medical 

150 رابطه سبک های یادگیری با غلبه طرفی مغز دانشجویان بمنظوراستفاده در...

students of Introductory Clinical Medicine (ICM) course in Isfahan

University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education,

10(5), 21-28.

Hiscock, M. (1987). Specialization of the cerebral hemispheres:

Implication for learning. Journal of Learning Disability,20(3).,130-143.

Hosseyni Largani, M., Saif, A.,A. (2001). The comparison of the students

learning styles by gender, academic level and fields of studies. Journal of

Research and Planning in Higher Education, 7(1(19)), 43-60.

Hosseininasab, S, D., Roein, H., Soltanghoraei, KH. (2006). Investigation

the relation between cognitive style and personality factors in C.A students

of Tabriz University. Journal of Psychology(Tabriz University) ,1(2-3), 87-

121.

Hunt, L., Eagle, L., Kitchen, P.J. (2004). Balancing marketing education

and information technology: Matching needs or needing a better match?

Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 70-88.

Hyland, K. (1993). Culture and learning: A study of learning styles of

Japanese students. RELC Journal, 24(2), 69-91.

James, W.B. Gardner, D.L. (1995). “Learning Styles: implications for

distance learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 67,

19-32.

Kalbasi, S., Naseri ,M.,Sharifzadeh, G. ,Poursafar, A. (2008). The study

of medical students learning styles in Birjand University. Journal of Medical

Education Development, 5(1), 10-16.

Kalsbeek, D. H. (1989).Linking learning style theory with retention

research: The trails project. The Association for Institutional Research 32.

Kayes, D.C. (2005).International validity and reliability of Kolb’s

learning style inventory version 3 (1999). Journal of Business and

Psychology, 20(2), 249-257.

Keefe, J.W. (1979). Learning styles: An overview in student learning

styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs, edited by J. Keefe, pp1-

15.Reston VA: National association of secondary school principals.

Keefe, J. W. (1991).Learning style: Cognitive and thinking skills. Reston,

VA: National association of secondary school principals.

Kolb, D.A. (1984).Experiential learning: experience as the sources of

learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Kolb, D. (1985a). Learning style Inventory. Boston, MA: Hay Group,

Hay Resources Director.

Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., and Mainemelis, C. (2002). Experiential

learning theory: Previous research and new directions, in Sternberg R. J., and

Zhang L. F., (Eds.). Perspectives on Cognitive, learning, and Thinking

Styles. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 

Levy, J. (1983). Research synthesis on right and left hemisphere: we

think with both side of the brain. Educational Leadership, 40, 66-71.

Messick, S. (1976). Individuality in Learning. San Francisco: JosseyBass.

 

Moore, M. ,G . (ED). (2007).The Handbook of Distance Education.,

Second Edition, Mahvah N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Minakari, M. (2006). Investigating psychometric characteristics of

ISALEM-97 and comparison of cognitive learning styles in university

students. Contemporary Psychology, 1(1), 29-39.

Nelson, G.L. (1995). Cultural differences in learning styles in the

ESL/AFL classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle, 3-18.

Peirce, W. (2000). Understanding students, difficulties in reasoning, Part

Tow: The perspective from research in learning style [online]. Retrieved

from: http://academic.pg.cc.md.us/ peirce/ MCCCTR/diffpt2.html.

Rahmani Shams, H. (2000). The relationship of learning style and

personality characteristics of medical, engineering and art students. M.A

Dissertation , Allameh Tabataba’i University.

Restak, R. (1984). The Brain. New York: Bantam.

Riding, R. & Cheema, I. (1991). ” Cognitive Styles: an overview and

integration, Educational Psychology: An International Journal of

Experimental Educational Psychology, 11(3-4), 193-215.

Roy, M., & Chi, M.T. C. (2003). Gender differences in pattern of

searching the web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29 (3), 335-

348.

Saeedian, M. (2006). The study of relationship between hemispheric

dominance and leadership styles among Shiraz Medical School’s

Administrators. MA Dissertation, Shiraz Islamic Azad University.

Silber, L. (1998). Time management for the creative person: Right Brain

Strategies. Three Rivers Press: New York.

Sousa , D.,A. (1995). How the Brain Learns. Virginia: NASSP.

Sperry, R.W. (1964). The great cerebral commissure. Scientific

American, 210(1), 425-427.

Springer, S., P.& Deutsch, G. (2002). Left-Brain, Right-Brain. New

York, N.Y:W.H. Freeman & Company.

Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking Styles. USA, Cambridge University

Press.

Sternberg, R.J., and Zhang, Li-Fong.(2000). Styles of thinking as basis of

differentiated instruction. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 245-253.

Sudman, S. (1976). Applied Sampling. New York: Academic Press. 

Valizadeh, L., Fathiazar, E., Zamanzadeh, V. (2006). Nursing and

Midwifery students’ learning styles in Tabriz Medical University. Iranian

Journal of Medical Education, 6(2), 136-140.

Veres, J. G., Sims, R.R., & Locklear, T.S. (1991).Improving the

reliability of Kolb’s revised learning style inventory. Educational and

Psychological Measurement, 51: 143-150.

White, J. A., & Anderson, P. (1995). Learning by internal medicine

residents: differences and similarities of perceptions by residents and faculty.

Journal of Gen Items Med, 10, 126-132.

Yarmohammadi, V., M. (2000). The comparison of learning styles in

Teachers and Students of different schools. M.A. Dissertation , Allameh

Tabatabae’i University.(in Persian)

Yazdi, S., M. (2009). The study and comparison of learning styles and

learning modes of students in different School of Alzahra University. New

Thoughts on Education, 5(2), 123- 142. (in Persian)