سنتز پژوهی مؤلفه های دانشگاه نسل چهارم

محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورش

نسرین عیدی ¹ (دانشجوی دکتری برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران، برگرفته از رساله دکتری.)
محمد نوریان ² (دکتری برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران.)
جمشید مقدسی ³ (دکتری مهندسی نفت، دانشیار گروه مهندسی نفت دانشکده نفت اهواز، اهواز، ایران.)

تاریخ دریافت : 1399/05/03 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/11/08 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/12/01

کلید واژه: دانشگاه نسل چهارم, ثروت آفرینی, مهارت محوری, بین‌المللی‌سازی آموزش و پژوهش, ارتباط با صنعت و بازار کار منطقه‌ای,

چکیده مقاله :

مقدمه و هدف: امروزه دانشگاه­های مدرن  باید با رقابت جهانی روبه­رو شوند و آن­ها باید بتوانند به طور مؤثری فرایندهای اقتصادی و اجتماعی منطقه را که در آن  قرار دارند، تحت تأثیر قرار دهند. این فرایندها و تأثیرات می­توانند به رقابتی شدن منطقه  از طریق سیستم­های پیچیده مستقیم و غیرمستقیم کمک کنند؛ که در مقیاس­های  مختلفی  با سطوح مختلف توسعه مرتبط می باشند. این پژوهش با هدف مطالعه نظامند و ارائه فرا ترکیبی از پژوهش های انجام شده توسط محققان داخلی و خارجی در مورد مؤلفه­های دانشگاه نسل چهارم به مرحله اجرا در آمد.
روش شناسی پژوهش: روش بررسی این پژوهش،کیفی و از نوع سنتز پژوهی بوده و در این رابطه از  بین کلیه پژوهش های انجام شده در بیست سال اخیر پیرامون موضوع، به عنوان جامعه مورد مطالعه پژوهشگر با 63 پژوهش به سطح اشباع داده­ای رسید. که به صورت هدفمند به عنوان حجم نمونه مورد استفاده  قرار گرفتند. در مراحل بعدی، کدگذاری و طبقه­بندی اطلاعاتی از پژوهش انجام شده صورت گرفته که 18 طبقه به منظور تحقق هدف پژوهش بدست آمد..
یافته ­ها: فعالیت ورزشی هوازی منجر به افزایش معنی­دار HDL و کاهش LDL، VLDL، TGو Cho شد (05/0≥P)، 15 روز مکمل دهی دارچین اثر معنی­داری بر افزایش HDL و کاهش LDL، TG و Cho در پاسخ به یک جلسه فعالیت ورزشی داشت (05/0≥P) با این وجود اثر معنی داری بر VLDL نداشت (05/0≤P).
بحث و نتیجه­ گیری: نتایج این تحلیل و سپس ترکیب آن­ها 4 درونمایه است که عبارتند از : 1- ثروت آفرینی2- مهارت محوری3- بین المللی سازی آموزش و پژوهش 4- ارتباط با صنعت و بازار کار منطقه­ای.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Introduction: Today, modern universities must face global competition, and they must be able to effectively influence the economic and social processes of the region in which they are located. These processes and influences can contribute to the competitiveness of the region through complex direct and indirect systems that are associated with different levels of development at different scales.
research methodology: The research method of this research is qualitative and research synthesis type, and in this regard, among all the researchers conducted in the last twenty years on the subject as the community studied by the researcher, it reached the level of data.
Findings: Aerobic exercise significantly increased HDL and decreased LDL, VLDL, TG, and Cho (P≤ 0.05), 15 days cinnamon supplementation had a significant effect on the increase of HDL and decrease of LDL, TG, and Cho in response to one session of aerobic exercise (P≤ 0.05, though, had no significant effect on VLDL (P≥ 0.05).
Conclusion: In the past, science was seen as separate from wealth, as the famous proverb "science is better" or "wealth" is a good example of this type of thinking, but today we know that universities should complement the chain of science and wealth. To achieve this goal, entrepreneurship and innovation centers have been formed next to universities. Investing in human capital skills training leads to the progress of economic development. If the university students apply the knowledge and skills learned in the industry during their studies, in addition to the fact that the graduates will be competent and skilled, they will promote the economic development of the regional market and generate wealth. In order to expand the international fields of education and research in the fourth-generation universities, it is better to include the recruitment of elites, the exchange of students and international faculty members, the creation of research and research centers as well as international campuses, and the expansion of research and research. international courses, revised curricula based on what is in the content of international courses, provided international conferences and gatherings, created international research journals and shared international study opportunities for students and professors.
 

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Abdi H, Mirshah Ja’fari SE, Nili MR, Rajaei Pour S. (2017). An Explanation of the Future Curricula toward Realizing the Visions and Missions of Iranian Higher Education in Horizon of 2025. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studiesl,8 (16):59-88. [in Persian].


2. Ahmadipour, L, Yousefi, G. (2014). Core skills in employing labor, social, economic, scientific and cultural monthly magazine of work and society, 172. 78-72. [in Persian].


3. Alipour A, Enayati T. (2017). Fourth Generation Universities Research Commercialization. Interdisciplinary Studies on Strategic Knowledge. 7(26): 53 – 76. [in Persian].


4. ‎Baghdadi M, Shaverdi M. (2013). Successful Technology Commercialization Through Team Approach.Roshd-E-Fanavari. 9(33):37-45. [in Persian].


5. Bagheshah, F., Rasouli, R., Daraei, M. (2020). Synthesizing Research of Key Components and Indicators of Human Resources Competencies in Executive Systems: A Qualitative Study. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration.42(11).73-88. [in Persian].


6. Bajmócy Z. (2006). Possibilities of university business incubation in underdeveloped areas. Space and Society. 3, 31-47.


7. Behnam Far R. (2012). Relationship between teaching and research; Teacher or researcher? Journal of Educational Strategies, 4 (5): 217-215. [in Persian].


8. Caufman, R., & Herman, J. (1996). Strategic Planning in the Educational System (Reflection, Restructuring, Reprocessing).


9. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. Elsevier Science Regional Sales, 665 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10010 (paperback: ISBN-0-08-0433545; hardcover: ISBN-0-08-0433421, $27).


10. Clark, B. R. (2000). Collegial entrepreneurialism in proactive universities: lessons from Europe. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 32(1), 10-19.


11. Di Battista, S., Pivetti, M., & Berti, C. (2014). Engagement in the university context: Exploring the role of a sense of justice and social identification. Social Psychology of Education, 17(3), 471-490.


12. Di Berardino, D., & Corsi, C. (2018). A quality evaluation approach to disclosing third mission activities and intellectual capital in Italian universities. Journal of Intellectual Capital.


13. Dill, D. D. (1995). University-industry entrepreneurship: the organization and management of American university technology transfer units. Higher education, 29(4), 369-384.


14. Estermann, T., & Nokkala, T. (2009). University autonomy in Europe I. Brussels. Brussels: European University Association.


15. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social science information, 42(3), 293-337.


16. Etzkowitz, H. (2016). The entrepreneurial university: vision and metrics. Industry and Higher Education, 30(2), 83-97.


17. Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Innovation Lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 122-129.


18. Farastkhah (2017). Occasional University in Iran; New and critical discussions on academic research, science studies and higher education. Tehran: Agah, Press 2. [in Persian].


19. Fazel A, Kamalian AR, Rowshan SA. (2018). Identification of effective Dimensions and Components on Academic Human Recourses Empowerment, Emphasizing the Third and Fourth Generation of universities with Fuzzy Delphi Approach: Presenting a Conceptual Model Educational Strategies.10 (6): 455 – 468. [in Persian].


20. Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher education, 56(3), 325.


21. Ghaffari, A. (2017). Why aren't universities rich? Analytical news site Asr Khabar. [in Persian].


22. Gagnidze, I. (2016). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Universities on the Innovative Development of Economy.


23. Goodarzi A, Al-Rasool, S Alaeipour A. (2005). An overview of the functions and challenges of higher education. [in Persian].


24. Goudarzvand Chegini M. (2018). The fourth-generation university labor; and action approach (case studies: Cambridge, Stanford, and Harvard universities. Iranian Journal of Engineering education. 20 (78): 1-16. [in Persian].


25. Hosseinzadeh F, Firoozi H, Syaehposht Khachki A. (2014). Towards the third generation of medical universities. JMed Edu Dev. 12(4): 239-45. [in Persian].


26. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288.


27. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Sage.


28. Jamshidi L, Zainabadi HR. (2012). Privatization of Public Higher Education and Skill Training: Case Study of University of Applied Science and Technology, Journal of skill Training. 1 (1):33 – 47. [in Persian].


29. Jenkins, A., & Healey, M. (2005). Institutional strategies to link teaching and research. York: Higher Education Academy.


30. Jimoh,O., A. Danlami Sani (2012) European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, ISSN 1450-2275 Issue 32.


31. Karimian Z, Sabbaghian Z, Saleh Sedighpour B. (2013). Investigating the Barriers and Challenges of Research and Production of Science in Medical Sciences Universities, Two Quarterly Journal of the Iranian Higher Education Association,3 (4): 63-36. [in Persian].


32. Khalili E, Khorsandi A,  Ghiasi  S,  Arasteh  HA. (2019). Understanding Power Practice in University Autonomy in Higher Education System of Iran: A Critical Discourse Analysis, Journal of Research in Educational Systems, 12(43): 7-24. [in Persian].


33. Khorsandi Taskooh, A. (2017). Fourth Generation University. Community Mission, University Press Today, 2: 11-10. [in Persian].


34. Kretek, P. M., Dragšić, Ž., & Kehm, B. M. (2013). Transformation of university governance: on the role of university board members. Higher Education, 65(1), 39-58.


35. Knight, J. (2003). Updated definition of internationalization. International higher education, (33).


36. Kirby, D. A. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: can business schools meet the challenge? Education+ training.


37. Kitagawa, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial universities and the development of regional societies: a spatial view of the Europe of knowledge. Higher Education Management and Policy, 17(3), 65.


38. Kotosz, B. G., Gaunard-Anderson, M. F., & Lukovics, M. (2015). The local economic impact of universities: an international comparative analysis.


39. Kyrö, P., & Mattila, J. (2012). Towards future university by integrating Entrepreneurial and the 3rd Generation University concepts. In 17th Nordic Conference on Small Business Research. Helsinki, Finland.


40. Lombardi JV, Capaldi ED, Reeves K R, Craig D D, Gater DS, Rivers D. (2004). The top American research universities: An annual report from the Lombardi program on measuring university performance. The Center at the University of Florida.


41. Lukovics M, Zuti B. (2013). Successful Universities towards the Improvement of Regional Competitiveness: ‘Fourth Generation Universities. 31-27.


42. Lukovics, M., & Zuti, B. (2017). New functions of universities in century XXI towards “fourth generation” universities. academia. edu, 9.


43. Mehdi R. (2016). Skill Training Position in the Third Generation Universities. Journal of Skill Training. 4(14)103 – 117. [in Persian].


44. Mehdi R, Shafiee M. (2017). Role-playing and capacity building of fourth generation Universities for local and regional development, Industry and University Quarterly. 10(35,36):1-22. [in Persian].


45. Mehrmohammadi M. (2014) Teacher Education Curriculum and Its Collaborative Implementation Model: A Transformative Strategy for Teacher Education in Iran. CSTP. 1 (1):5-26. [in Persian]


46. Mohammadzadeh A,  Sotudeh Gharebagh  R(2019). Soft skills for engineering students and graduates. Engineering Education Quarterl.20 (80):1-29. [n Persian].


47. Mok, K. H. (2005). Fostering entrepreneurship: Changing role of government and higher education governance in Hong Kong. Research Policy, 34(4), 537-554.


48. Moru, E. K. (2009). Epistemological obstacles in coming to understand the limit of a function at undergraduate level: A case from the National University of Lesotho. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 431-454.


49. Mousavi F, Moghaddam Nia N, Sahra Navard B. (2015). How to turn knowledge into wealth, the first scientific research conference on strategies for the development and promotion of science in Iran. [in Persian].


50. Naderi A. (2015). Higher education production function: applications, challenges, and prospects. IRPHE, 21 (3):1-29. [in Persian].


51. Nameni A.(2019).  Explaining the characteristics of the University transition period from the second generation to the third generation Case study: One of Engineering Universities in the country, Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems. 12 (22):  47 – 68. [in Persian].


52. Nourian M. (2017). Practical Guide to Narrative Research (along with workshop activities), First Edition, Tehran: Shura. [in Persian].


53. Osterlinck A, Leuven KU. (2002). Knowledge management in post-secondary education: Universities. Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Nederlands. http://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/46/21/2074921. pdf (current on 3/5/2003).


54. Paleari, S., Donina, D., & Meoli, M. (2015). The role of the university in twenty-first century European society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(3), 369-379.


55. Pawłowski, K. (2009). The ‘fourth generation university ‘as a creator of the local and regional development. Higher Education in Europe, 34(1), 51-64.


56. Pejman Sani M, Gharibpour M. (2015). Third Generation University Management: Entrepreneurial University. 3rd International Conference on Applied Research in Management and Accounting, Iran, Tehran. Shahid Beheshti University. [in Persian].


57. Pourezzat AA, Heidari E. (2011). Studying and Sorting the Challenges and Barriers of Knowledge Commercialization Using Q-Methodology. Journal of Science and Technology Policy4(1):49-62. [in Persian].


58. Rakhshani M, Shams A. (2015). Relationship between Research and Teaching Performance of Agricultural Faculty Members (at the University of Zanjan), Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research, 6(31):3-17. [in Persian].


59. Rezaei, M. (2019). Analyzing and Explaining the Functions of University Ethics, Culture Strategy,12(47): 126-109. [in Persian].


60. Rhodes FHT. (2004). “Reinventing the university”. In: Weber LE, Duderstadt JJ. Editors. Reinventing the University. London: Economica,3-13.


61. Robles, M. M. (2012). Executive perceptions of the top 10 soft skills needed in today’s workplace. Business communication quarterly, 75(4), 453-465.


62. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university.


63. Shabani Varaki B, Hosseingholizadeh R. (2006). Evaluation of College Teaching Qualities. IRPHE, 12 (1) :1-21. [in Persian].


64. Sutcliffe H. A (2013). Report on Responsible Research and Innovation. Matter, London.


65. Torighi J, Mahboubeh A. Yamani Douzi Sorkhabi M,  Marjaei (2017). Comparative Study of Institutional Research: Presenting Matrix of Institutional Research. Scientific Journal Management System.  6, (11): 33-53. [in Persian].


66. Torkzadeh J, Sabaghian Z,  Yamami Douzi Sorkhabi M,  Delavar A. (2008)Evaluation of the Organizational Development Status of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology in  Tehran Universities. Iranian of Higher Education, 1 (2): 31 – 50. [in Persian].


67. Towne, L., & Shavelson, R. J. (2002). Scientific research in education. National Academy Press Publications Sales Office.


68. Van Vught, F. (2003). Innovative universities Tertiary education and management, 5:347-354.


69. Vilmányi, M. (2011). From the point of view of university-industry collaborations and relationship marketing. Management Science - Budapest Management Review, 42 (1). 52-63.


70. Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible research and innovation. Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, 51-74.


71. Wissema, J. G. (2009). Towards the third-generation university: Managing the university in transition. Edward Elgar Publishing.


72. World Conference UNESCO (1998). Higher Education in 21st Century. Thematic Debates in Brief. UNESCO Paris .1998 5-9 October; Volume I: Final Report.


73. Xue, L. (2006). “Universities in Chain’s National Innovation System”. Presented at the Second International Colloquium on Research and Higher Education Policy UNESCO Headquarters. Paris.


74. Yahyapoor O, Qasem Nejad, M. (2012). Cultural Foundation in Entrepreneurial University, Journal of Community Work. 57: 141-51. [in Persian].


75. Yemeni Douzi Sorkhabi (2009). Compatible University; A complex process in: New approaches and perspectives in higher education (collection of articles). By Mohammad Yemeni. Tehran: Cultural and Social Studies Research Institute. [in Persian].


76. Yemeni Dozi Sorkhabi M, Samari, E. (2011). Image of students from Payame Noor University and its functions (the case of Payame Noor University in the center of Tehran), Iranian Higher Education Journal,3 (3): 37-1. [in Persian].


77. Zakeri M, Asadi E. (2016). Study on Missions and Functions of Iranian Higher Education in Implementation of Resistant Economy Based on Supreme Leader's Viewpoint, The Islamic Revolution Approach. 10(35):47-66. [in Persian].