مدل بالندگی اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه پیام نور مبتنی بر یادگیری غیررسمی با استفاده از نظریه داده بنیاد
محورهای موضوعی : آموزش و پرورشنجمه سلطانی پرشکفتی 1 , پریوش جعفری 2 , نادرقلی قورچیان 3 , مهدی باقری 4
1 - دانشجو دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد بندرعباس
2 - دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات
3 - استاد گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات
4 - دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد بندر عباس
کلید واژه: یادگیری, بالندگی اعضای هیات علمی, یادگیری غیررسمی,
چکیده مقاله :
بالندگی اعضای هیات علمی در طی فرآیند یادگیری رخ می‌دهد، یادگیری حاصل دانش آشکار و ضمنی است که از طریق آموزش، پژوهش، تعامل و تجربه به دست می‌آید. این پژوهش به صورت کیفی با هدف مدل بالندگی اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه پیام نور مبتنی بر یادگیری غیررسمی با استفاده از نظریه داده بنیاد در چارچوب گراندد تئوری طراحی گردیده است. ابتدا عوامل اولیه با مرور پیشینه پژوهش استخراج گردیده، درادامه با انجام مصاحبه‌های نیمه ساختاریافته با 30 نفر از اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه پیام نور هرمزگان داده‌ها گردآوری شده‌اند. با نظم دادن مفهومی داده‌ها؛ معانی و ویژگی‌های بالندگی اعضای هیات علمی از طریق یادگیری غیررسمی در سه مرحله کدگذاری شناسایی، استخراج و در نهایت مدل تحقیق ارائه گردیده است. پایایی و قابلیت اعتماد مصاحبه ها از روش‌های پایایی بازآزمایی و توافق درون موضوعی تایید شده است. نتایج تحلیل داده‌ها حاکی است که پدیده بالندگی از طریق یادگیری غیررسمی شامل دو مقوله 1- حوزه‌های یادگیری ضمنی شامل: مقوله‌های آموزشی، اخلاقی، سازمانی و 2- مقوله قلمرو یادگیری شامل: مقوله‌های فردی، دانشگاهی و فرادانشگاهی است. علاقه و روحیه، چالشگری و توان برقراری ارتباط، شرایط علّی خرد و سیاست‌های ارتقا و ترفیع، شرایط کلان را تشکیل می‌دهند. شرایط مداخله‌گر به سطح علمی دانشجویان، سیاست‌ها و قوانین دانشگاه، زیرساخت فناوری و وضعیت معیشت اشاره دارند. سرمایه اجتماعی، ارتباطات سازمانی، حجم کاری و ... شرایط زمینه‌ای را به وجود آورده‌اند. راهبردها روش‌های مبتنی بر تعاملی و جمعی، تاملی و مستقل، مبتنی بر فناوری و روش های تعاونی و کمک رسانی را شامل می‌شوند. پیامدهای تقویت یادگیری مادام العمر، خودکارآمدی بالاتر و ارتقای شایستگی‌های فردی دارای دامنه اثرگذاری محتمل محدود و ایجاد اجتماعات یادگیری، افزایش اعتماد اجتماعی پیامدهایی با دامنه اثرگذاری محتمل وسیع هستند.
The development of faculty members during the learning process, learning is the result of explicit and implicit knowledge through education, research, interaction, and experience. This qualitative research was designed with the aim of The model for the development of faculty members of Payame Noor University based on informal learning using the foundation data theory in the grounded theory framework. Initially, the factors were extracted by reviewing the research history. Finally, data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 30 faculty members at Payame Noor University of Hormozgan. By defining the concept of data, the faculty members' meanings and facial features are extracted through informal learning in three stages of coding, and, finally, a research model is presented. The reliability and reliability of the interviews are confirmed by the reliability of the retest and inter-subject agreement. The results of data analysis indicate that the phenomenon of development through informal learning consists of two categories: the implicit learning areas including: educational, ethical, organizational categories; and 2) the domain of learning including individual, academic and meta-class. Interest and morale, challenge and ability to communicate, the condition of wisdom, and promotion and promotion policies are the great conditions. Intervener conditions refer to the students' academic level, university policies and regulations, technology infrastructure, and livelihood status. Social capital, organizational communication, workload and ... ground conditions. Strategies include collaborative, collaborative, and independent methods based on technology and cooperative and relational methods. The implications of enhancing lifelong learning, higher self-efficacy and promoting individual competencies with limited potential impact domains and creating learning communities, increasing social confidence, are implications for a broad range of possible impacts.
- Abtahi, S.H., & Torabiyan, M. (2010). Analysis of higher education goal achievement in twenty-year perspective by AHP method. Quarterly Journal of Research in Educational System, (8) (in Persian).
- Alonderiene, R. (2010). “Enhancing informal learning to improve job satisfaction: perspective of SMEs managers in Lithuania”. Baltic Journal Management, 5(2), 257-287.
- Aeenesaz, Hamed (2010). Designing an Informal Learning Model for Entrepreneurs. master thesis. Faculty of Entrepreneurship: Tehran University.
- Bergquist, William H. & Steven R. Philips (1975). “Components of an Effective FD Program”. The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 46. No. 2: 177-211. pp. 23-27 Ohio State University Press.
- Brian Lee, Ang, Sin Sing(2013),Social media as an informal learning platform:Case study on adult learning at SIM University, Singapore. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 93 (2013) 1158 – 1161.
- Brody, C. and Scholar, F. (2007); “Success Factors for Faculty Development in Thailand Higher Education”; TUSEF, Available at:http://www.fulbrightthai.org.
- Calik, T. and F. Sezgin, (2005). "Globalization, Information Society and Education", Kastamonu Education Journal, Vol. 13, No, 1, pp, 55-66.
- Centra, John A. (1978). “Types of Faculty Development”. The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 94. No. 2: 151-162.
- Choi, Woojae M.A. (2009), Influences of formal learning, personal characteristics, and work environment characteristics on informal learning among middle managers in the Korean banking sector
- Coombs, P.H. and M. Ahmad, AttackingRural Poverty: How Non- formal Education Can Help, Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press, 1974.
- Coombs, P.H., World Educational Crisis: A Systems Approach, New York: Oxford University Press, 1968.
- Coun. Eur, Council of Europe Report Doc 8595 Non- Formal Education, December1999.
- Diamond, R. (2002) ; “Faculty, Instructional and Organizational Development: Options and Choices”; In K. H. Gillespie, L. R. Hilsen,and E. C. Wadsworth (Eds.), A Guide to Faculty Development: Practical Advice; Bolton MA: Anker.
- Dave, R.H, (1973). Lifelong Education and School Curriculum, UNESCO institute for Eduction, Hamburg.
- Duda, R.B. (2004). Faculty development programs promote the Academic advancement of the faculty. Current Surgery, Elsevier, 61(1), 73-79.
- Ejtehadi, M.,Ghorchian, N., Parsley, P., Shafizadeh, H (2012). Identification of the faculty members' dimensions and components to provide a conceptual model. Research and Planning in Higher Education; 17 (4): 21-26.
- Eslampanah, G. (2004); Study of Attracting, Retaining and Promoting University Faculty Members and Provide a Suitable Model to Improve the Situation; Doctoral Dissertation, Tehran: Islamic Azad University,Science and Research(in Persian).
- Farasatkhah, M. (2009); University and Higher Education; Tehran: Ney Publication(in Persian).
- Freire, P., Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Harmonds Worth. Penguin, 1972.
- Gandolfo, A. (1997); “Identifying Lurking Alligators: An Essay on the Ethical Dimensions of Faculty Development”; Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 22-25.
- Gharoun, M. (1994); “An Analysis of Transformations in the Payment of Salaries and Benefits for Faculty Members”; Journal of Research.
- Harvard University (2008). Faculty Development& diversity. Available At: www.Faculty.Harvard.edu.
Hosseini, M, (1997). Strategies and methods for promoting and developing the capabilities and skills of faculty members in Iranian universities
- Jamshidi, L. (2007). Study of the faculty members' faculty at Shahid Beheshti University and provide a model for continuous improvement. Master's Thesis. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University.
- Jamil Abd. Baser, Azman Hasan, Razali Hassan, Junita Sulaiman,Mohd Yusop Ab Hadi , Yahya Buntat(2013).Relationship between informal learning cultures in teachers organization and students' academic achievements. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 93 (2013) 719 – 723.
- Jeon & Kim (2012), How to organization and task factors influence informallearning in the workplace?
- Karashki, H. (2008). The role of self-regulation in informal learning. Proceedings of the first informal education and learning conference. Mashhad: School of Educational Sciences and Psychology: Ferdowsi University.
Kvale, S.(1996), Dominance Through Interviews and Dialogues
- Kerimi, Y. (2010) Educational Psychology. C11.Thran: Arasbaran Publishing.
- Marzban, Z. (2009); Study of Necessity of Establishing the Faculty Development Center in Shahid Beheshti University; MA Dissertation, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University (in Persian).
- Marie-Louise Schreurs, Wilma Huveneers & Diana Dolmans) 2016(. Communities of teaching practice in the workplace: Evaluation of a faculty development program. Medical Teacher, 38:8, 808-814.
- Marsick, V & Watkins, K. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. New York.
- Marsick, V.J. and Volpe, M. (1999), “The nature and need for informal learning”, Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-9.
Mohebzadegan, H. et al., (2012). Formulating a model for faculty members with a foundation-based theory approach.
- Najafi, T. Atashi, H. Jafari, A. (2013). comparative Study of formal and informal learning and their resources: (case study students of Imam Ali University of Medical Sciences). Quarterly Journal of Research in Military Management, No. 48, p. 197 - 226.
-Nave ebrahim, A., Poorkarimi, j. (2008). A Conceptual Model for Improvement of Faculty Members of Universities and Higher Education Centers
- Pourkarimi, J. (2010). "Pattern of professional development of faculty members of research organizations", Human Resource Management Research, Imam Hossein University of Medical Sciences, second year.
- Pourkarimi, J. (2009); Design a Model for Faculty Development in Jahad Daneshgahi; Doctoral Dissertation, Tehran: Tarbiat Moalem University (in Persian).
- Reinsch, E.(2007), The Relationship Among Lifelong Learning, Emotional intelligence and Life Satisfaction for Adults 55 Years of Age OR Older; Doctorate Thesis. University of Illinois.
- Rogers, A. (2004). Looking Again at Non –formal and Informal Eduction- towards a New Paradugm, http://www. Infed, org/biblio/non-formal- paradigm. Htm, 2004.
- Resnik, D.B. (1983); The Ethics of Science; NY: Rutledge
- Safari, Sana (2009). Modeling the Educational Assessment of Faculty Members in Their Convergence. Master's Thesis. Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University.
- Stanley, C.A. (2001); “The Faculty Development Portfolio: A Framework For Documenting the Professional Development of Faculty Developer”; The Journal of Innovative Higher Education, Vol. 26, No.1, pp. 111-118.
- Shah Pasand, M.R. et al. (2007); “Study of Component Content of the Professional Development of Teachers' Training Centers, Ministry of Agriculture”; Journal of Iran Agricultural Sciences, Vol. 38. No. 2, pp.253-262 (in Persian).
- Shelley A. Berg and Seung Youn (Yonnie) Chyung (2008), Factors that influence informal learning in the workplace (Journal of workspace learning)
- Scott, O. (1987); A Study to Design and Recommend a Faculty Development Model for Promoting Professional Growth and Instructional Change; Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pepperdine.
- Wen Pin Chen, David E. Millard, Gary B. Wills )2007(. Mobile VLE vs. Mobile PLE: How Informal is Mobile Learning? Learning Societies Lab, School of Electronics and Computer Science,University of Southampton, Southampton.
- William Feeler (2012), Being There: A grounded-theory study of student perceptions of instructor resence in online classes
Zeraatkar,S( 2015), Modeling the informal learning patterns of HR managers in large organizations of the country using a narrative approach.
_||_