تاثیر عوامل جامعه شناختی بر کنش های خشونت آمیز خانگی علیه زنان (مطالعه موردی زنان خشونت دیده مراجعه کننده به مراکز اورژانس اجتماعی بهزیستی استانهای سراسر کشور)

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه زن و جامعه

محمود حسین آبادی ¹ , رحمت اله امیراحمدی ² , علیرضا اسماعیلی ³ , محمد رضا نعیمی ⁴

1 - دانشجوی دکتری جامعه‌شناسی، گرایش مسائل اجتماعی ایران،واحد آزادشهر،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،آزادشهر،ایران
2 - استادیار گروه جامعه‌شناسی، واحد آزادشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آزادشهر، ایران (نویسنده مسئول)
3 - استادیار گروه جامعه‌شناسی، واحد آزادشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آزادشهر، ایران
4 - استادیار گروه جامعه‌شناسی، واحد آزادشهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، آزادشهر، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/01/18 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/05/07 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/05/01

کلید واژه: ایران, زنان, عوامل جامعه شناختی, کنش های خشونت آمیز خانگی,

چکیده مقاله :

خشونت علیه زنان عامل عمده‌ای ‌در ایجاد آسیب‌های جسمی، روحی و روانی بر زنان محسوب می‌شود. هدف شناخت تاثیر عوامل جامعه شناختی برکنش های خشونت آمیز خانگی بر روی زنان است. روش تحقیق پیمایشی است. جامعه آماری پژوهش زنان خشونت دیده مراجعه کننده به اورژانس اجتماعی کشور به تعداد 15721هزار نفربودند. حجم نمونه بر اساس فرمول کوکران به تعداد 389 نفر تعیین و آزمودنی ها به شیوه نمونه گیری تصادفی ساده مورد مطالعه قرار گرفتند. ابزار گرد آوری داده ها پرسشنامه محقق ساخته بود، ضمن این که از ابزار فیش برای جمع آوری آمار و اطلاعات موجود در آرشیو استفاده شد. یافته های حاصل از تحلیل آمار عملکرد اورژانس اجتماعی کشور، وجود فراوانی اعمال خشونت در گروه های سنی 30 تا 39 سال را نشان می دهد. نتایج ضریب همبستگی نشان می دهد خشونت علیه زنان با هنجار ها و ارزش های اجتماعی، ناکامی اجتماعی، پایگاه اقتصادی-اجتماعی زوجین، نگرش های مردسالارانه، منزلت اجتماعی، بیکاری، فقر و اعتیاد رابطه دارد. بیشترین میزان همبستگی مربوط به متغیر مردسالاری با ضریب همبستگی 561 /0 و کمترین آن مربوط به متغیر منزلت اجتماعی با ضریب همبستگی 132/0- می باشد. خشونت علیه زنان عمدتا تحت تاثیر ساختارهای فرهنگی و اجتماعی و بویژه جامعه پذیری جنسیتی صورت می گیرد لذا تغییر نگرش ها، خرده فرهنگ ها، عقاید و باورهای جنسیتی افراد جامعه در کنار آموزش و توانمند سازی زنان و همچنین بهبود وضعیت ساختاری جامعه در حوزه های اقتصادی، اجتماعی ، فرهنگی ، حقوقی و سیاسی موجبات پیشگیری، کنترل و کاهش خشونت های خانگی اهمیت دارد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Violence against women is considered as a major factor in causing physical, mental and psychological damage to women. The aim is to know the impact of sociological factors of domestic violence on women. The research method is survey. The statistical population was 15,721 victims of violence referring to the social emergency in the country. The sample size was determined 389 violent women, according to Cochran's formula and were studied by simple random sampling. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire, while the fish tool was used to collect statistics and information in the archive. The findings of the analysis of the country's social emergency statistics show the prevalence of violence in the age groups of 30 to 39 years old. The results of the correlation coefficient show that violence against women is related to social norms and values, social failure, socio-economic base of couples, patriarchal attitudes, social dignity, unemployment, poverty and addiction. The highest correlation is related to the patriarchy variable with a correlation coefficient of 0.561 and the lowest is related to the social status variable with a correlation coefficient of -0.132. Violence against women is mainly influenced by cultural and social structures and especially gender socialization, therefore changing the attitudes, subcultures, opinions and gender beliefs of the people of the society along with the education and empowerment of women and also improving the structural situation of the society in the economic fields social, cultural, legal and political reasons for preventing, controlling and reducing domestic violence are important

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Talebpour A. Investigating factors affecting domestic violence with an emphasis on spousal abuse case study urban and rural areas of Ardabil province. Quarterly Journal of Contemporary Sociology Research. 2016;6:27-49.


2. Hosseini SH, Mohseni RA, Firoz Jaian AA. Sociological explanation of violence against women: an empirical study. Social Studies and Research in Iran. 2018;8(2).


3. Mechanic MB. The impact of severe stalking experienced by acutely batters woman. Journal of violence victim. 2000(3):443-58.


4. Kirishan SP. Domestic violence and help seeking behaviors among rural woman. Famcommunity health Apr. 2001;24(4):28-33.


5. Dinenemann J. Issues Ment health Nurs. Intimate partner abuse among woman diagnosed with depression. 2000;21(5):513-499.


6. Ramdani M, editor Violence against women. conference on social damage; 2009; South Zagros region.


7. Azazi S. sociology of the family with an emphasis on the role, structure and function of the family in the contemporary. Roshangan Publications and Women's Studies. 2012(8).


8. Ritzer G. Sociological theory in the contemporary era. tehran: Scientific Publications; 1998.


9. Viano EC. Violence among intimates, major issues and approaches. Journal of Marriage and Family. 1992;2(10):148-57.


10. Al Dosary AH. Health Impact of Domestic Violence against Saudi Women. Cross Sectional Study International Journal of Health Science. 2016;10(11):165–73.


11. Song H, Gnawali S, Atteraya M. Factors Associated with Intimate Partner Violence against Married Women in Nepal. Journal Interpers Violence. 2015;30(12):1226- 46.


12. Jahani Janaqard M. Domestic violence against women in Iran. Kanon Yar. 2019;4:897-909.


13. Ghaseminejad A, Mirzaei E, Ayar A. Studying the relationship between women's lifestyle and violence against them in Al-Shatar city. Quarterly Journal of Social Development (formerly Human Development). 2019;16:181-205.


14. Nouri Z, Sohrabzadeh M. Designing a Model of Factors Affecting Violence against Women. Journal of Women and Culture. 2019;12:101-13.


15. Soleimani A, Delpisheh A, Ahmadi AR, Khadami N, Jafarinia B, Sayehmiri K. Investigating the prevalence of violence against pregnant women in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Urmia College of Nursing and Midwifery. 2014;13:973-86.


16. Eftikharzade Z. The lived experience of women in early marriag. Quarterly journal of Social Work. 2014;1(17):54-76.


17. Sharbatian MH, Tavafi P, Danesh P. Sociological analysis of domestic violence against women and its relationship with the feeling of security at home (case study of women aged 18 – 54 years in the city of Mianeh). Strategic Researches on Social Issues of Iran. 2016;16.


18. Derakhshanpour F, Mahbobi H, Keshavarzi S. Prevalence of domestic violence against women in Bandar Abbas. Journal of Medical Sciences in Gorgan University. 2013;16.


19. AghaJani N. The Challenge of Feminism with Gender Justice. Quarterly journal of Women and Family Cultural-Social Council. 2008.


20. Zamani moghadam M, Hasanvandi S. Qualitative study of domestic violence against housewives in Khorramabad city. Journal of Women and Society. 2017;3:145-70.


21. Kelmendi K. Domestic Violence against Women in Kosovo: A Qualitative Study of Women’s Experiences. Journal Interprers Violevce. 2015;30(4):680 -702.


22. Ghazvineh J, Sarokhani B, Shekarbeigi A. Spatial distribution of domestic violence in Kermanshah city. Journal of Geography and sustainability of autumn environment. 2018;4:10-5.


23. Slabbert I. Domestic Violence and Poverty: Some Women’s Experiences. Research on Social Work Practice. 2016;27:223-30


24. Jordan A, Bhandari S. Lived Experiences of South Asian Women Facing Domestic Violence in the United States. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work. 2016.


25. BegRezaei P, Zanjani H, Seifollahi S. Domestic violence against women (case study: women referring to the emergency social service center in Eilam province). Iranian Journal of Social Studies. 2018;3:5-32.


26. Ahmadi B, Suleiman Faqi C. The effectiveness of safety training interventions to prevent domestic violence against women. Social Welfare. 2019;40:237-58.


27. Salari Far MR. Domestic violence against women, investigation of causes and treatment. Tehran: Office of Studies and women's research; 2010.


28. Azamzadeh M, Dehghanfard R. Violence against women in Tehran, the relationship between gender socialization, available resources in the family relationship. Women’s research. 2006;Spring and summer.


29. Hijazi A, Raufian K, Ziaei H, Zarenejad M. Epidemiology of spousal abuse in women referred to forensic medical centers in Mashhad. Journal of Principles of Mental Health. 2013:27-34.


30. Nejadsabzi.P MA. The relationship between family social capital components and domestic violence against women in Khorramabad city. Review of Iran's Social Issues (Social Sciences Letter) Course. 2010;2:31-53.


31. Moazami s. 1383:1383. Violence in family.Faslname pazhooheshe zanan. 2(2): 39-53.


32. Arefi M. Descriptive study of domestic violence against women in in the city of Urmia Women's Studies. 2003;1(2):101- 19.


33. Atef W YH. Investigating the rate of spousal abuse in students of Azad University of Tankabon. Tankabon: university of Tankabon; 2011.


34. Abbaszadeh M, Saadati M, Kasbokar H. Domestic violence, a threat to mental health (a sociological study of married women in Tabriz. tabriz: Social security studies Course; 2012.


35. Saberian M, Atashnafas E, Haghighat S. Investigating the effective factors in the occurrence of domestic violence and the methods of dealing with it from the point of view of women referring to the health centers of Semnan city. Scientific Journal of Forensic Medicine Course. 2013;10(33):30-4.