اثربخشی آموزش امید درمانی شناختی بر احساس شرم و گناه زنان شهر گرمسار

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه زن و جامعه

اکرم ملک زاده ¹ (" گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه پیام نور ، ص.پ.4697-19295تهران، ایران ".)
الهه اسلمی ² (" گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه پیام نور ، ص.پ.4697-19295تهران، ایران ".)
شهرزاد بختیاری ³ (کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی، دانشگاه پیام نور،تهران ، ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1400/10/12 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/09/01 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/11/01

کلید واژه: امید درمانی شناختی, احساس شرم, احساس گناه,

چکیده مقاله :

مقدمه:احساس شرم و گناه دو هیجان منفی است که به نظر می رسد روبرو شدن با این هیجانات برای زنان، به دلیل عوامل فرهنگی غیر قابل اجتناب می‌باشد و لازم است تدابیری برای کاهش این هیجانات اندیشیده شود. بر همین اساس پژوهش حاضر، با هدف بررسی اثربخشی آموزش امیددرمانی شناختی بر احساس شرم و گناه زنان انجام شد.
روش: پژوهش حاضر از نوع پژوهش های شبه آزمایشی و طرح تحقیق شامل پیش آزمون– پس آزمون تک گروهی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش، زنان شهر گرمسار در سال 1400 بودند که حداقل 5 سال سابقه زندگی مشترک داشته اند. حجم نمونه تعداد 30 نفر به روش نمونه گیری هدفمند و بصورت داوطلبانه تعیین شد. ابزار پژوهش پرسشنامه حالت شرم و گناه مارشال، سافتز و تانگنی (1994) بود.
یافته‌ها: با استفاده از نرم افزار SPSS و انجام آزمون t زوجی، نتایج نشان داد که تفاوت معناداری بین نمرات شرم و گناه در پیش آزمون و پس آزمون گروه در سطح 01/0 وجود داشت.
نتیجه‌گیری: می‌توان نتیجه گرفت امیددرمانی شناختی با تکنیک‌های مختلف می‌تواند منجر به کاهش هیجانات منفی شده از جمله احساس شرم و گناه در زنان شود.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Abstract
Introduction: Feelings of shame and guilt are two negative emotions that it seems to women to face these emotions due to cultural factors is inevitable and it is necessary to think of measures to reduce these emotions accordingly. The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of cognitive hope therapy training on feelings of shame and guilt in women in Garmsar city.
Materials and Method: In the present study, a single-group pretest-posttest design was used. The statistical population of the study was women in Garmsar city in 1400 who had at least 5 years of cohabitation. The sample size was 30 people. Available sampling method was determined voluntarily. The group received an online cognitive hope therapy program for two months. The research instrument was Marshal, Softs and Tangni (1994) Shame and Sin Questionnaire.
.
Results: The data analysis method was paired sample T test. The results showed that there was a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test scores of the group at the level of 0.001.
Conclusion Therefore, it can be concluded that cognitive hope therapy with different techniques can reduce negative emotions and ultimately reduce women's shame and guilt.

منابع و مأخذ:

. Mbonile M, Mbonile M, & Kengeta K. Factors Influencing Marriage nstabilities in Kisarawe district, Coastal Region, Tanzania. Journal of the Geographical Association of Tanzania, 2020. 38(1).

https://jgat.udsm.ac.tz/index.php/jgat/issue/view/16

2. Clout D, Brown R. Marital relationship and attachment predictors of postpartum stress, anxiety, and depression symptoms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2016, 35(4), 322-341.

[Doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2016.35.4.322]

3. Rothenberg WA, Hussong AM, Chassin L. Modeling trajectories of adolescent‐perceived family conflict: Effects of marital dissatisfaction and parental alcoholism. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2017, 27(1), 105-121.

[Doi.10.1111/jora.12259]

4.Tegegne A, Molla A, Wonde D, Jibat N. MaritalDissatisfaction,Coping Mechanisms, and the Likelihood of Divorce among Selected Districts of Jimmy Zone, South Western Ethiopia. Global Journal of Human-Socıal Scıence, 2015, 15(10), 22-30.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331326508

5. Mohsenian M, Karamloo S, Gamjoo A. The Relationship between Self-Differentiation and Emotional Intelligence in Divorce Applicants. Family Research Quarterly of Shahid Beheshti University,2007, 3 (12). 22-37.

https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=106597

6. Dalton E, Dales L. Online konkatsu and the gendered ideals of marriage incontemporary Japan. Japanese Studies 2016, 36(1): 1–19.

[Doi.org/10.1080/10371397.2016.1148556]

7.Rayamo J, M Uchikshi, Marriage intentions, desires, and pathways to laterand less marriage in Japan. Journal of population scinences,2021, 44(3).67-98.

[Doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2021.44]

8. Lundberg S, Pollak RA, Stearns J. Family inequality: Diverging patterns in marriage, cohabitation, and childbearing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2016, 30(2): 79–102. [Doi:10.1257/jep.30.2.79]


9. Sohrabi R, Asadi M, Habibollahzade H, PanaAli A. Relationship between self-differentiation in bowen's family therapy and psychological health. Proceeded -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2013, 84, 1773-1775.

 [Doi.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.030]

10.Yalcin BM, Karahan TF.. Effects of a couple communication program on marital adjustment. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 2007, 20(1), pp.36-44.

[Doi.10.3122/jabfm.2007.01.060053]

11.Bernstein FH, Bernstein MB. Communication-Therapeutic Behavior from a Behavioral Perspective(Translated by Hamid Reza Sohrabi). 2003.

12. Cattell HE. "The structure of phenotypic personality traits": Comment.1993.

[Doi.10.1037/0003-066X.48.12.1302]

13. Sovatsky S. The path to enlightenment of sacred married home life: Grihasthya dharma as a guiding ideal for the transpersonal marriage therapist. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 2019, 38(1), advance publication.

http://www.sutrajournal.com

14. Loevinger J. Construct validity of the sentence completion test of ego development. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1979, 3(3), 281-311.

[Doi.10.1177/014662167900300301]

15. Fukuda S, Raymo JM, Yoda S. Revisiting the educational gradient in marriage in Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 2020, 82(4): 1378–1396.

[Doi.10.1111/jomf.12648]

16. Syed M, Seiffge-Krenke I. (2013). Personality development from adolescence to emerging adulthood: Linking trajectories of ego development to the family context and identity formation. Journal of personality and social psychology, 104(2), 371.

[Doi.10.1037/a0030070]

17. Cornwell LM. Ego development or ego denial: Is there a Christian case for a healthy ego? (Doctoral dissertation, King's College London). 2018,

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

18. Volpe K. Discovering Psychology, Then and Now. APS Observer, 16(8). 2003,

https://www.psychologicalscience

19.Elkind D, dower R. Imaginery audience behavior in children and adolescents. Development psychology, 1979, 15(1). 38-44.38-44. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0012-1649.15.1.38

20.Greene K, Rubin DL, Hale JL, Walters LH. The utility of understanding adolescentegocentrism in designing health promotion messages. HealthCommunication, 1996, 8(2), 131-152.

 [Doi.10.1207/s15327027hc0802_2 ]

21. Aghayoosefi A, Zare H, Poorbaferani S. Calculation primary reliability and validity personal fable and new imaginary audience scale to evaluate egocentrism among adults. Social Cognition, 2(3). 2013,

http://sc.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_1496_c7e90d19c89e83f1be4bf472fa3b8078

22. Hauser ST. Loevinger's model and measure of ego development: A critical review. Psychological bulletin, 1976, 83(5), 928.

[https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-909.83.5.928

23.Lianos M. L’INDIVIDU MODULAIRE I. De la socialité directe à la socialité institutionnelle/THE MODULAR INDIVIDUAL I. From direct sociality to institutional sociality. Cartografie sociali. Rivista di sociologia e scienze umane, 2017, (3).24.

https://universitypress.unisob.na.it/ojs/index.php/cartografiesociali/article/view/421/93

24 Worley SM, Schwebel AI. The effect of cooperation on egocentrism indivorce mediation: A simulation study. Journal of Divorce,1985, 8(3-4), 151-165.

[Doi.10.1300/J279v08n03_11]

25.Lin P. Risky behaviors: Integrating adolescent egocentrism with the theory of planned behavior. Review of General Psychology, 2016, 20(4), 392-398.

[Doi.10.1037/gpr0000086]

26.Boger K. Deconstructing Egocentrism through Critical Thinking in the Communication Classroom. Communication Center Journal, 2019, 5(1), 184-186.

[Doi.10.1384/j.tics.2019.03.106]

27. 27. Looft WR. Egocentrism and social interaction across the life span. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 78(2), 73.

[Doi.10.1037/h0033012]

28.Enright RD, Lapsley DK, Shukla DG. Adolescent egocentrism in early and late adolescence. Adolescence, 1979, 14(56), 687.

[Doi.10.1896/S0272-7358(995478-4]

29. Adams GR, Jones RM. Adolescent egocentrism: Exploration into possible contributions of parent-child relations. Journal of Youth andAdolescence, 1982, 11(1), 25-31.[Doi.10.1007/BF01537814]


30. 30. Simmons RG, Rosenberg Sex, sex roles, and self-image. Journal of youth and adolescence, 1975, 4(3), 229-258.

[Doi.10.1007/BF01537165]

31. Jowkar B, Noorafshan L. Gender different between Imaginary Audience and Personal Fable with Resilience among Male and Female. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2011, 29, 422-425.

[Doi.10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.258]

32.Rodríguez-González M, Skowron EA, Cagigal de Gregorio V, Muñoz San Roque I. Differentiation of self, mate selection, and marital adjustment: Validity of postulates of Bowen theory in a Spanish sample. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 2016, 44(1), 11-23.

[Doi.10.1080/01926187.2015.1099415]

33. Khodayari Fard M, Abedini Y. Theories and Principles of Family Therapy. Tehran: Tehran University Press,2.,2010.

34.Skowron EA. The role of differentiation of self in marital adjustment.Journal of counseling Psychology, 47(2), 229.2000,

[Doi.10.1037/0022-0167.47.2.229]

35. Hosseinizadeh M. Examine the relationship between differentiation of self-component and social and behavioral sciences 113,84-90. 2014.

[Doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.014]

36. Murdock NL, Gore, PA. Stress, coping, and differentiation of self: A test of Bowen theory. Contemporary Family Therapy, 2004, 26(3), 319-335.

[Doi.10.1023/B:COFT.0000037918.53929.18]

37. Elkind D. Egocentrism in adolescence. Child development, 1967, 1025-1034. [Doi.10.2307/1127100]


38. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications,8., 2015.


39. Agha Yousefi A, Zare, Vapour H, Bagherani S. Preliminary assessment of the validity and reliability of the Personal Mythology and New Imagination Scale: Scales for measuring self-esteem among adults. Journal of Social Cognition, 2013, 2(2)52-68.

https://doaj.org/article/8da9d9aa52224a2aa6f7754676b3e021

40. Hooman HA. Structural equation modeling using LISREL software. Tehran: Organization for the Study and Compilation of Humanities Books, Samat,3. 2005.


41. Street A. Family Counseling. translated by Mostafa Tabrizi and Ali Levinia, Tehran: Faravan Publications,6. 2003.


42. 42. Najaflooi, Fatemeh. (1385). The role of self-differentiation in marital relationships. New educational ideas. 2 (4), 27- 37.

[D0i.10.22051/jontoe.2006.292]

43.Bollen KA. Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects. Psychological bulletin, 1990, 107(2), 256.

[Doi. /10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.256]

44.Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions ,154. 1993.

[Doi.10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.256]

45. Wheaton B, Muthen B, Alwin DF, Summers GF. Assessing reliabilityand stability in panel models. Sociological methodology,1997. 8, 84-136.

[DOi.10.2307/270754 ]

46. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS, Ullman JB. Using multivariate statistics . Boston, MA: Pearson,4. 2007.

47.Kaveh Farsani Z, Ahmadi SA, Fatehizadeh MS. The effect of life skills training on marital satisfaction and adjustment of married women in rural areas of Farsan. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy, 2012, 2(3), 373-387

48. yers Lawrence S, Gamest G, Garino AG. Applied multivariate research (Hassan Pasha Sharifi et al., Translator). Tehran: Roshd,2. 2012.


49. 49. Carpendale JI, Racine TP. Inter subjectivity and egocentrism: Insights from the relational perspectives of Piaget, Mead, and Wittgenstein. New Ideas in Psychology, 2011, 29(3), 346-354.

[Doi.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.005]

50. Kruger J, Burrus J. Egocentrism and focalism in unrealistic optimism (and pessimism). Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2004, 40(3), 332-340.

[Doi.10.1016/j.jesp.2003.06.002]

51.Kruger J, Windschitl, PD, Burrus J, Fessel F, Chambers JR. The rational side of egocentrism in social comparisons. Journal of experimental social psychology, 2008, 44(2), 220-232.

 [Doi.10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.001]

52. Stuewig J, Tangney JP. Shame and guilt in antisocial and risky behaviors. The self-conscious emotions: Theory and research, 2007, 371 -388.


53. Ausubel, DP. Relationships between shame and guilt in the socializing process. Psychological review, 1955, 62(5), 378.https://psycnet.apa.org

[doi/10.1037/h0042534]

54. Wright F, O'Leary J, Balkin J. Shame, guilt, narcissism, and depression: Correlates and sex differences.  Psychoanalytic Psychology, 6(2), 1989, 217.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0736-9735.6.2.217.


55. Rabbani Khorasgani A, Kianpour M. Sociology of Emotions. Journal of Applied Sociology, 2009, 2, 35-62

www.sid.ir