تدوین مدل ساختاری بهزیستی ذهنی بر اساس سرزندگی تحصیلی و خودناتوان سازی تحصیلی با میانجیگری ادراک نوجوان از شیوه های تربیتی والدین
محورهای موضوعی : تکتونواستراتیگرافی
سهیلا سبزی چی
1
(دانشجوی دکتری گروه مشاوره، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اراک. اراک. ایران.)
ذبیح الله پیرانی
2
(استادیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اراک. اراک. ایران.)
فیروزه زنگنه مطلق
3
(استادیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده علوم انسانی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد اراک. اراک. ایران.)
کلید واژه: بهزیستی ذهنی, سرزندگی تحصیلی, خودناتوانسازی تحصیلی, ادراک نوجوان از شیوه‌های تربیتی والدین,
چکیده مقاله :
پژوهش حاضر با هدف تدوین مدل ساختاری بهزیستی ذهنی دانش‌آموزان براساس سرزندگی تحصیلی و خودناتوانسازی تحصیلی با میانجیگری ادراک نوجوان از شیوه‌های تربیتی والدین و با روش تحلیل مسیر انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری شامل تمامی دانش‌آموزان دختر و پسر در سال تحصیلی 99-1400 ناحیه 1 و 2 شهر اراک بود که در دوره دوم متوسطه مدارس دولتی رشته‌های ریاضی، تجربی و انسانی تحصیل می‌کردند و با روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای چند مرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند. تعداد افراد نمونه با در نظر گرفتن احتمال افت و نقص در تکمیل پرسشنامه‌ها، در نهایت 719 دانش‌آموز در نظر گرفته شد. ابزارهای گردآوری داده‌ها شامل پرسشنامه‌های سرزندگی تحصیلی حسین‌چاری و دهقانی‌زاده، خودناتوانسازی تحصیلی(ASHS) ﺷﻮﯾﻨﮕﺮ و اﺳﺘﯿﻨﺴﻤﺮ ﭘﻠﺴﺘﺮ ، بهزیستی ذهنی(SWS) کییز و ماگیار و جین ادراک نوجوان از شیوه‌های تربیتی والدین(pops) رابینز بود. داده‌های به دست آمده با روش مدل معادلات ساختاری از نوع متغییر مکنون مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. یافته‌ها نشان داد سرزندگی و خودناتوانسازی تحصیلی بر بهزیستی ذهنی و ادراک نوجوان از شیوه‌های تربیتی والدین اثر مستقیم و معناداری دارند. همچنین اثر مستقیم متغیر میانجی بر بهزیستی ذهنی تایید شد. نتایج نشان داد که مدل ساختاری بهزیستی ذهنی دانش آموزان براساس سرزندگی و خودناتوانسازی تحصیلی با میانجیگری ادراک نوجوان از شیوه‌های تربیتی والدین، بهترین مدل برازش یافته با شاخص‌های برازش بکار رفته جهت استفاده در مدارس و مراکز به منظور افزایش بهزیستی ذهنی و سلامت روان می‌باشد.
The aim of this study was to develop a structural model of students' mental well-being based on academic buoyancy and academic self- handicapping with the mediation of adolescent perception of parental educational methods and path analysis. The statistical population included all male and female students in the academic year 2020-2021 in districts 1 and 2 of Arak city who were studying mathematics, experimental and humanities in the second year of public high schools and were selected by multi-stage cluster sampling method. The number of sample people, considering the possibility of failure in completing the questionnaires, was finally considered 719 students. Data collection tools included Hossein Chari and Dehghanizadeh Academic buoyancy Questionnaire, Academic Self- handicapping (ASHS), Keys and Magyarmo SWS (subjective well-being) and Robert J. Robbins Adolescent Perception of Parenting Methods (Pops). The obtained data were analyzed by the structural equation model of latent variable type. Findings showed that academic buoyancy and self- handicapping have a direct and significant effect on subjective well-being and adolescent perception of parenting educational methods. The direct effect of mediator variables on subjective well-being was also confirmed. The results showed that the structural model of students' subjective well-being based on buoyancy and academic self- handicapping mediated by adolescents' perception of parents' educational methods is the best fitted model with fit indicators used for use in schools and centers to increase subjective well-being and mental health.
Refrences
1- Nikrahan G, Ghasemi T. Determining the Effectiveness of Lyubomirsky's Happiness Training Program on Happiness, Hope, General Health and Life Satisfaction among Female High School Students Studying Child Development and Psychology. 2019, 12(46), 29-45.
2- Sánchez X, Bailey C, Arcos E, Muñoz LA, González L, Miranda R. Subjective well-being and the perception of health opportunities: The case study of senior citizens of the neighborhood of Playa ancha. World development perspectives, 2017, 5, 7-9.
3- Song Y, Zhou A, Zhang M, Wang H. Assessing the effects of haze pollution on subjective well-being based on Chinese General Social Survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 235, 574-582.
4- Zeidner M. “Don’t worry—be happy”: The sad state of happiness research in gifted students. High Ability Studies, 2021, 32(2), 125-142.
5- Diener E, Subjective well-being. The Science of Well-Being. Social Indicators Research Series,2009, 37, 11-58.
6- Ryff CD. Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and psychosomatics, 2014, 83(1), 10-28.
7- Akhlaghi M, Ganji AM. Studying the Relationship between the Quality of School Life and Academic Buoyancy of Second Grade Students of High School. Specialty Journal of Knowledge Management, 2019, 4(2), 14-19.
8- Comerford J, Batteson T, Tormey R. Academic buoyancy in second level schools: insights from Ireland. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 197, 98-103.
9- Putwain DW, Gallard D, Beaumont J. Academic buoyancy protects achievement against minor academic adversities. Learning and Individual Differences, 2020, 83, 101936.
10- Hoferichter F, Hirvonen R, Kiuru N. The development of school well-being in secondary school: High academic buoyancy and supportive class-and school climate as buffers. Learning and Instruction, 2021, 71, 101377.
11- Yu J, McLellan R. Beyond academic achievement goals: The importance of social achievement goals in explaining gender differences in self-handicapping. Learning and Individual Differences, 2019, 69, 33-44.
12- Rissanen I, Kuusisto E, Tuominen M, Tirri K. In search of a growth mindset pedagogy: A case study of one teacher's classroom practices in a Finnish elementary school. Teaching and teacher education, 2019, 77, 204-213.
13- Jensen LE, Deemer ED. Attachment style and self-handicapping: The mediating role of the imposter phenomenon. Social Psychology of Education, 2020, 23(5), 1259-1276.
14- Cano F, Martin AJ, Ginns P, Berbén ABG. Students’ self-worth protection and approaches to learning in higher education: predictors and consequences. Higher Education,2018, 76(1), 163-181.
15- Gupta S. Academic Self-Handicapping Scale: Development and Validation in Indian Context. International Journal of Instruction, 2020, 13(4), 87-102.
16- Gomez V, Krings F, Bangerter A, Grob A. The influence of personality and life events on subjective well-being from a life span perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 2009, 43(3), 345-354.
17- Jámbori S, Kőrössy J. Differences in Retrospective Perceptions of Parenting Among Adolescents and Young Adults. Journal of Relationships Research, 11. 2020.
18- Shenaar-Golan V, Goldberg A. Subjective well-being, parent–adolescent relationship, and perceived parenting style among Israeli adolescents involved in a gap-year volunteering service. Journal of Youth Studies, 2019, 22(8), 1068-1082.
19- Grolnick WS, Deci EL, Ryan RM. Internalization within the family: The self-determination theory perspective. Parenting and children’s internalization of values: A handbook of contemporary theory, 135-161. 1997.
20- Gaspar T, Matos MG. Parenting practices: Parent’s perception of the impact in children psychological wellbeing. SM Journal of Family Medicine, 2017, 1(1).
21- Ebabush Yerdaw Kassa TV, Rao A. Parenting Styles and Psychological Well-Being: The Mediating Role of Academic Achievement. Journal of Advances and Scholarly Researches in Allied Education [JASRAE], 2019,16(1), 28-36(9).
22- Smokowski PR, Evans CB, Cotter KL, Webber KC. Ethnic identity and mental health in American Indian youth: examining mediation pathways through self-esteem, and future optimism. Journal of youth and adolescence, 2014, 43(3), 343–355.
23- Anlı İ, Karslı TA. Perceived parenting style, depression and anxiety levels in a Turkish late-adolescent population. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2010, 2(2), 724-727.
24- Francis A, Pai MS, Badagabettu S. Psychological well-being and perceived parenting style among adolescents. Comprehensive child and adolescent nursing, 2021, 44(2), 134-143.
25- Thomas V, Muls J, De Backer F, Lombaerts K. Middle school student and parent perceptions of parental involvement: Unravelling the associations with school achievement and wellbeing. Educational Studies, 2020, 46(4), 404-421.
26- Abubakar A, Van de Vijver FJ, Suryani A O, Handayani P, Pandia WS. Perceptions of parenting styles and their associations with mental health and life satisfaction among urban Indonesian adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 2015, 24(9), 2680-2692.
27- Dishion TJ, Nelson SE, Bullock BM. Premature adolescent autonomy: Parent disengagement and deviant peer process in the amplification of problem behaviour. Journal of adolescence, 2004, 27(5), 515-530.
28- Mobini S, Ghanbari Panah A, Madanipour N. Psychometric properties of the Parental Perception Perception Scale and its relationship with parental authority. Humanities and Psychology, First International Conference on Social-Educational Sciences,(July). 2017.
29- Nezami Ranjbar T KK. Predicting students' mental well-being based on social problem solving ,social health and parental differentiation. Journal of New Advances in Psychology, Educational Sciences and Education, 2019, 2(12), 73-91.
30- Renshaw TL, Long AC, Cook CR. Assessing adolescents’ positive psychological functioning at school: Development and validation of the Student
Subjective Wellbeing Questionnaire. School psychology quarterly, 2015, 30(4), 534.
31- Franko A. Sahlberg, P.(2011). Finnish lessons: what can the world learn from educational change in Finland?. New York: Teachers College Press.[Book review]. CEPS Journal, 2011, 1(3), 167-170.
32- Tough P. How children succeed: Grit, curiosity, and the hidden power of character. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 2012.
33- Keyes CL, Magyar-Moe JL. The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being. edited by S. J. L. Lopez and R. snyder, Washington ed. Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures. DC: American Psychological Association. 2003.
34- Hajihasani S, Salehi M, Emamipour S. Mental Well-being Modeling Based on Educational, Social, Emotional, Physical, and Security Climate of School through Mediation of Academic Resilience. Social Welfare Quarterly, 2019, 19(73), 221-255.
35- Schwinger M, Stiensmeier-Pelster J. Prevention of self-handicapping—The protective function of mastery goals. Learning and Individual Differences, 2011, 21(6), 699-709.
36- Allipour Birgani S, Maktabi GH, Shehni Yailagh M, Mofradnejad N. The Relationship of Personality Traits with Academic Self Handicapping and the Comparison of Parenting Styles in Regard of the Later Variable in High School Students in Behbahan. Journal of Psychological Achievements, 2011, 18(2), 135-154.
37- Dehghanizadeh MH, Hosein-chari M. Academic vitality and perception of family communication patterns, the mediating role of self-efficacy. J of Teach and Learn Studies, 2012, 63(2), 22-47.
38- Martin AJ, Marsh HW. Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 2006, 43(3), 267-281.
39- Martin AJ, Ginns P, Brackett MA, Malmberg LE, Hall J. Academic buoyancy and psychological risk: Exploring reciprocal relationships. Learning and Individual Differences, 2013,27, 128-133.
40- Robbins RJ. An assessment of perceptions of parental autonomy support and control: Child and parent correlates. Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Rochester.1994.
41- Babakhani N, Hejaze Moghani E, Pashasharifi H. Teens perception scale standardization of practices by parents, and compared the relationship between the girls and boys in Tehran. PSYCHOMETRY, 2017, 5(20), 61-83.
42- Esfidani MR, Mohsenin Sh. Structural equation modeling with the help of LISREL software (educational and practical). 2: Mehraban Book Publishing Institute. 336.
2014.
43- Golestaneh SM, Behzadi A. Effectiveness of Positive Psychology Intervention training on increasing well-being, academic buoyancy and academic achievement in
female students. Quarterly of Applied Psychology, 2019, 13(2), 187-208.
44- Luthar SS, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child development, 2000, 71(3), 543-562.
45- Solberg PA, Hopkins WG, Ommundsen Y, Halvari H. Effects of three training types on vitality among older adults: A self-determination theory perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2012, 13(4), 407-417.
46- Shields CD. The relationship between goal orientation, parenting style, and self-handicapping in adolescents. The University of Alabama. 2007.
47- Lyddon WJ, Bradford E, Nelson JP. Assessing adolescent and adult attachment: a review of current self‐report measures. Journal of Counseling & Development, 1993, 71(4), 390-395
