طراحی پروفیل ریسک محصول خربزه شهرستان مشهد

محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه علمی -پژوهشی تحقیقات اقتصاد کشاورزی

سیما غضنفری ¹ (گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد. ایران)
محمد قربانی ² (گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد. ایران)
ارش دوراندیش ³ (گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده اقتصاد و توسعه کشاورزی، دانشگاه تهران. ایران)

تاریخ دریافت : 1398/06/12 تاریخ پذیرش : 1400/07/19 تاریخ انتشار : 1400/11/01

کلید واژه: خربزه, ریسکِ تولید, ماتریس ریسک. معیار طبقه بندی,

چکیده مقاله :

مقدمه و هدف: بخش کشاورزی و فعالیت­های مرتبط با آن دارای ویژگی­های خاصی است، که آن را به شدت در معرض خطرات و آسیب­های متعدد و غیرقابل پیش­بینی و در نتیجه خسارات و مشکلات فراوان قرار داده است.  بنابراین، شناسایی و ارزیابی این خطرات و آسیب­­ها می­تواند کشاورزان را در اتخاذ تصمیم­گیری­ صحیح یاری نماید. هدف از مطالعۀ حاضر، شناسایی و ارزیابی ریسک­های تولید محصول خربزه و تهیۀ پروفیل ریسک­هایِ تولید این محصول می­باشد. مواد و روش­ها: برای ارزیابی خسارت هر یک از ریسک­هایِ تولید از دو معیار فراوانی وقوع و میزان اثر ریسک و در نهایت از ماتریس ریسک استفاده شده است. حجم نمونۀ مورد مطالعه با استفاده از نمونه­گیری تصادفی ساده تعیین و اطلاعات از طریق مصاحبۀ حضوری با 50 کشاورز خربزه­کار شهرستان مشهد در سال 1398 جمع­آوری گردید. یافته­ها: نتایج حاصل نشان می­دهد بزرگترین ناحیۀ ریسکی از لحاظ فراوانی ریسک و اثر ریسک به ناحیۀ پنجم شامل ریسک خشکسالی، آفات، بیماری­های مختلف، پرندگان و مگس خربزه و سپس ناحیۀ اول با 4 ریسک و ناحیۀ دوم و سوم هر کدام با 1 ریسک اختصاص دارد. بحث و نتیجه­گیری: استفاده از پروفیل ریسک برای طراحی الگوها و پوشش بیمه­ای متناسب با ریسک­ها برای کاهش زیان وارده به صندوق بیمه و تحت پوشش قرار گرفتن ریسک­های اصلی و مهم در تولید خربزه برای افزایش تقاضای بیمه پیشنهاد شد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Introduction: The agricultural sector and its related activities have certain characteristics, which expose it to numerous unforeseen risks and damages, resulting in multiple losses and problems. Therefore, identifying and evaluating these risks and damages can help farmers make the right decisions. The purpose of the present study is to identify and evaluate melon crop production risks, and to prepare risk profiles for this crop.
Materials and Methods: Two criteria of frequency of occurrence and extent of risk, and finally risk matrix were used to assess the damage of each production risks. The sample size was determined based on simple random sampling procedure and the data were collected through face-to-face interviews with 50 melon farmers in Mashhad in 2019.
Findings: Study findings suggest that the largest risk area in terms of risk frequency and risk effect is assigned to the fifth area including drought risk, pests, various illnesses, birds and melon fly, following by the first area with 4 risks and the second and third areas with 1 risk.
Conclusion: We highly recommend the use of risk profiles to design patterns and insurance coverage which fits various risks. As a result, losses of insurance fund will mitigate and major and important risks in melon production will be covered, and thus, insurance demand will increase.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Aditto S, Gan C, Nartea GV. Sources of risk and risk management strategies: the case of smallholder farmers in a developing economy. 2012; [DOI.org/10.5772/50392]


2. Akbari A, Shahikitash MN, Yazdani F. Factor affecting pistachio production uncertainty in Sirjan (Using Tobit regression. 2014; 6(3): 175-190. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=416947


3. Amouzad khalili M, Gholami ZA, Ghalee P, Poortrogeni M. Investigating the effective factors on encouraging farmers to insure rice crop in Behshahr city. 2013; https://civilica.com/doc/284675/


4. Alimi T, Wall A. Risk and risk management strategies in onion production in Kebbi state of Nigeria. 2005; 10 (1): 1-8. [DOI:1080/09718923.2005.11892452]


5. Alizadeh E, Sheykhi M. Factors Affecting Farmers' Desire to Insure Agricultural Products (Case Study: Ramhormoz County). 2017; https://civilica.com/doc/808084/


6. Azam Rahmati E, Kohansal MR, Ghorbani M. Survay of willing to participate wheat farmers of mashhad city in new method of agricultural insurance. 2015; 23(91): 135-158. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspxid=299207


7. Aziz Nasiri S. Agricultural risk management using agricultural insurance based on climate indicators. 2011; (161): 34-48.

 http://noo.rs/WgTIb

8. Bardhan DY, Dabas PS, Tewari SK. Kumar A. An assessment of risk attitude of dairy farmers in Uttaranchal (India). 2006; 12-18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23511336


9. Boyd M, Pai J, Zhang Q, Holly Wang H, Wang K. Factors affecting crop insurance purchases in China: 2011; 3(4): 441-450.

[DOI.org/10.1108/17561371111192301]

10. Ghasem Sh, Yavari K, Mahmoudvand R, Sahabi B, Naeimi A. New Method for Determining Insurability of Risks in Gas Refineries Using the Failure Mode and Effect Analysis Method. 2015; 7(13):1-26.

www.magiran.com/p1413000

11. Ghorbani M. Principles of agricultural insurance. 2018; Ferdowsi University Press, Mashhad. https://profdoc.um.ac.ir/book-abstract-223768.html


12. Ghorbani M, Jafari F. Role of RAIN-FED LENTIL risk profile in designing of insurance model (case study: Dry lentils North Khorasan province(. 2010; 1(1):85-100. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=115238


13. Ghorbani M, Koochaki A, Kohansal MR, Jafari F. Application of risk profile in crop products risk management of north Khorasan province (case study of sugar beet(. 2009; 3(3):31-48. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=122012


14. Girdziute L. Risks in agriculture and opportunities of their integrated evaluation. 2012; 62: 783-790. [DOI:org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.132]


15. Hewett CJM. Quinn PF, Whitehead PG, Heath waite AL, Flynn NJ. Towards a nutrient export risk matrix approach to managing agricultural pollution at source. 2004; 8(4): 834-845. [DOI:5194/hess-8-834-2004]


16. Jabal Amelli M, Rezaei­far A, Chaei Bakhsh Langeroudi A. Ranking project risks using MADM methodologies. Tehran Univ. 2008; 41(7): 863-871. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=72711


17. Karbasi A. Survey of farmers' attitudes and factors affecting the acceptance of agricultural insurance. 2000; http://www.sbkiran.ir/sites/default/files/pdf/6.pdf


18. Keegan M. The Orange Book: Management of risk - Principles and Concepts. 2004; 1-52. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/191513/The_Orange_Book.pdf


19. Klein JH, Cork RB. An approach to technical risk assessment. 1998; 16(6): 345-351.

[DOI.org/10.1016/S02637863(98)00006-4]

20. Mc Dermott RE, Mikulak RJ, Beauregard, MR. The basic of FMEA. Quality Resources. 1996; 12. https://elsmar.com


21. Meshkouh R, Mohammadi F, Rahimi S. The role of risk profiles in risk management of agricultural products insurance fund. 2011; https://www.symposia.ir/INSD18.


22. Mousavi M. Ghanian M. Risk and risk management in agriculture with emphasis on agricultural insurance. 2012; http://research.asnrukh.ac.ir/webdocument/load.action?webdocument_code=3000&masterCode=93002011


23. Murray SL, Grantham K, Damle SB. Development of a generic risk matrix to manage project risks. 2011; 5(1): 35-51.

http://www.jise.ir/article_4040.html

24. Nejatianpour E, Ghodoosi M, Hasanpour J. Application of Risk Profile in Saffron Risk Management. 2018; 6 (4): 513-528.

[DOI:10.22048/jsat.2018.92906.1249]

25. Niyakan L. What is risk management? 2013; (186): 16-25. http://ensani.ir/fa/article/327400


26. Qing-Song WANG. The farmers behavior in agricultural insurance under the Von Neuman-Morgenstern utility model. 2010; 1: 226-229.

[DOI:10.1016/j.aaspro.2010.09.028]

27. Rahimi H, Kakhki A, Rahimi H, Araghi M. Dadmand M. Effecting of traps plants to reduce infestation of pests melon in Khorasan Razavi province. 2015; 83(2):268-266. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=529843


28. Razzaghi Borkhani F, Rezvanfar A, Movahed Mohammadi H. Hejazi, Y. Mechanisms of reducing natural disasters and risk management to the sustainable of citrus garden in Mazandaran province. 2017; 4(3):35-52. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=334675


29. Segal S. Risk Identification: A critical First Step in Enterprise Risk Management. 2008; 29-32. https://web.actuaries.ie/sites/default/files/erm-resources/rmn-2008-iss13-segal.pdf


30. Sherafat S, Ghanbari F, Hoseini Risk and Water Management. 2014; 1(2): 15-21

 [DOI:10.22067/jwsd.v1i2.39596]

31. Statistics of Khorasan Razavi Agricultural Jihad Organization. 2018; https://koaj.ir/modules/showframework.aspx?RelFacilityId=1241&ObjectID=851&FrameworkPageType=SEC


32. Statistical Yearbook of Agriculture Department of Khorasan Razavi Province. 2017;

https://khrazavi.mporg.ir/Portal/View/Page.aspx?PageId=6281233c-30bf-45df-8d6b-c8d227c77628&t=29

33. Stoneberner G, Goguen A, Feringa A. Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems. 2002; [DOI:6028/NIST.SP.800-30]


34. Sundar J, Ramakrishnan L. A study on farmers’ awareness, perception and willing to join and pay for crop insurance. 2013; 2(1): 48-54. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321376326


35. Teymouri M. Mikaeili M. Investigating the factor affecting the acceptance of agriculture products insurance (case study of South Fendersk village of Ramyan city) .2013; https://elmnet.ir/article/20145321-51282


36. Wang M, Ye T, Shi P. Factors affecting farmers’ crop insurance participation in China. 2016; 64(3): 479-492. [DOI:1111/CJAG.12088]


37. Yaghoubi A, Chizari M, Feli S, Pezeshki Rad Factors Influencing Risk Management among the Farmers of the Rain fed Wheat: Tafresh Region Case Study. 2011; 6(1):91-101. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=138217


38. Yan J. Disaster Risk Assessment. Training workshop on trought risk assessment for the agriculture sector.  2010; http://www.wamis.org/agm/meetings/slovenia10/S5-2b-GRIP_Understanding_Risk_Assessment.pdf


39. Yearbook of Agricultural Jihad of Khorasan Razavi Province. 2015;

https://koaj.ir/modules/showframework.aspx?RelFacilityId=1241&ObjectID=851&FrameworkPageType=SEC

40. Zamani GHA, Karami EA, Yazdanpanah M. Factors effecting farmers crop insurance satisfaction. 2009; 4(2): 53-65. https://www.sid.ir/fa/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=111445