Using the Nash Bargaining Method for Performance Evaluation and Target Setting with Grey Data
محورهای موضوعی : فصلنامه ریاضیArezoo Taheri Kamran 1 , Mohsen Rostami 2 , Farhad Hosenzadeh 3
1 - Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 - Department of Mathematics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
کلید واژه: Data Envelopment Analysis, Grey Data, Nash Bargaining, Grey Data Envelopment Analysis.,
چکیده مقاله :
There are numerous Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) applications where the data is not accurate. In many real-world scenarios, data is inaccurate. One type of inaccurate data is grey data, which exists between the fully defined boundaries of structured and unstructured data. This article employs the Nash Bargaining approach for evaluation and target setting. We combine grey data DEA scores with the Nash Bargaining problem to find an equilibrium point between the minimum and maximum efficiency values for each DMU. Based on the bargaining method, the equilibrium point is determined for each of the DMUs as a weighted average or relative equilibrium point between the minimum and maximum efficiency. The proposed approach has been validated on different datasets according to grey data.
There are numerous Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) applications where the data is not accurate. In many real-world scenarios, data is inaccurate. One type of inaccurate data is grey data, which exists between the fully defined boundaries of structured and unstructured data. This article employs the Nash Bargaining approach for evaluation and target setting. We combine grey data DEA scores with the Nash Bargaining problem to find an equilibrium point between the minimum and maximum efficiency values for each DMU. Based on the bargaining method, the equilibrium point is determined for each of the DMUs as a weighted average or relative equilibrium point between the minimum and maximum efficiency. The proposed approach has been validated on different datasets according to grey data.
1. Abdali E., Fallahnejad R., “A bargaining game model for measuring the efficiency of two-stage network DEA with non-discretionary inputs”, International Journal of Computer Mathematics (2020)
2. Boğa m., “A Hybrid Approach of Data Envelopment Analysis Based Grey Relational Analysis: A Study on Egg Yield”, Journal of Zoology (2019)
3. Chen L., Guo M., Li Y., Liang L., Salo A., “Efficiency intervals, rank intervals and
dominance relations of decision-making units with fixed-sum outputs. European Journal
Operation Research, (2021)
4. Contreras I., Lozano S., “Allocating additional resources to public universities. A DEA bargaining approach”, Socioecon Plann Sci (2020)
5. Contreras I., Lozano S., Hinojosa M., “A DEA cross-efficiency approach based on
bargaining theory”, Journal Operation Research Society (2021)
6. Cook A. J., Smith T. K., "Stochastic DEA: A Review", European Journal of Operational Research, (2012)
7. Fukuyama H., Weber W.L., "A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency", Socio Economic Planning Sciences, (2009)
8. Hinojosa M., Lozano S., Mármol A., “Nash decomposition for process efficiency in multistage production systems”, Expert System, (2016)
9. Hsieh D. Y., Tsai C. T., "Interval DEA: A New Approach to Evaluating Decision-Making Units", European Journal of Operational Research, (2006)
10. Huang T. J., Liang T. T., "Fuzzy Data Envelopment Analysis: A Review", Computers & Operations Research, (2010)
11. Lai K. K., Wang H. S., "Robust Data Envelopment Analysis for Handling Uncertain Data", Operations Research Letters, (2014)
12. Liang J. D., L., Chen Y., Cook W. D., Zhu J., “A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures, European Journal Operation Research, (2011)
13. Liu X. Y., Hu H. Z., "A Gray Relational Approach for Performance Evaluation of DMUs in DEA", Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, (2018)
14. Nash JF., “The bargaining problem”, Econometrica, (1950)
15. Salami M., Movahedi Sobhani F., Ghazizadeh M. S., “Multistage Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Malmquist Productivity Index Using Grey's System Theory to Evaluate Performance of Electric Power Supply Chain in Iran”, International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering Vol:13, No:9, (2019)
16. Thomson W., Aumann R., Hart S., Chapter 35, “Cooperative models of bargaining. In: Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications”, 2; (1994)
17. Toninelli R., “Data envelopment analysis: uncertainty, undesirable outputs and an application to world cement industry”, University of Pisa
18. Vaseei M., Daneshmand-Mehr M., Bazrafshan M., Ghane Kanafi A., “A network data envelopment analysis to evaluate the performance of a sustainable supply chain using bootstrap simulation”, Journal of Engineering Research, (2023)
19. Wang C. N., Dang T.T., Nguyen N. A. T. and Le T. T. H., “Supporting Better Decision-Making: A Combined Grey Model and Data Envelopment Analysis for Efficiency Evaluation in E-Commerce Marketplaces”, Sustainability, 12(24), 10385; https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410385, (2020)
20. Wang C.N, Lin H.S., Hsu H.P., Le V. T. and Lin T. F., “Applying Data Envelopment Analysis and Grey Model for the Productivity Evaluation of Vietnamese Agroforestry Industry”, Sustainability, 8(11), 1139; https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111139, (2016)
21. Wang C. N., Yang F. C.; Nhut T. M. Vo; Duong C.T.; Nguyen V. T. T., “Enhancing Operational Efficiency in Industrial Systems: A DEA-Grey Integration”, IEEE, (2024)
22. Zhu Q., Aparicio J., Li F., Wu J., Kou G., “Determining closest targets on the extended facet production possibility set in data envelopment analysis: modeling and computational aspects”, European Journal Operation Research, (2022)
