The Effect of Online Language Learning on ESP Learners' Autonomy: Exploring Students' Perceptions of Using Adobe Connect Breakout Rooms
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه تخصصی زبان، فرهنگ، و ترجمه (دوفصلنامه)
Maryam Najafi
1
,
Mohammad Ali Heidari Shahreza
2
,
Saeed Ketabi
3
1 - Department of English, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
2 - Department of English, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
3 - Department of English, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
کلید واژه: Online synchronous learning, ESP, Learner autonomy, Collaborative language learning,
چکیده مقاله :
Online instruction utilizes emerging technologies to help language learners improve learner-related factors like autonomy, which can affect the language acquisition process. As online education programs increase, autonomous learning becomes more necessary for academic success. This explanatory sequential mixed-method study aimed at examining the effect of online (synchronous) language learning and gender on ESP learners' autonomy and exploring their perceptions of the utility of this kind of instruction in improving their autonomy. Through convenience sampling, 60 ESP learners were selected from Kashan University of Medical Sciences after checking homogeneity regarding English proficiency level. Then, they were randomly assigned to the experimental (Adobe Connect breakout rooms) and control (in-person) groups. During 13 treatment sessions, the researcher used Adobe Connect breakout rooms to provide learners with a collaborative language learning task. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using Zhang and Li's Learner Autonomy Questionnaire and a semi-structured interview, and then they were analyzed using two-way ANCOVA and thematic analysis, respectively. The quantitative findings indicated a positive effect of virtual learning on learners' autonomy, and female learners demonstrated greater gains in autonomy within the virtual learning context. Additionally, participants praised virtual instruction for its role in fostering learner autonomy through independent learning, better decision-making, and enhanced creativity. The results may provide ESP teacher educators and curriculum developers with guiding principles regarding the utility of virtual language instruction in ESP contexts.
Online instruction utilizes emerging technologies to help language learners improve learner-related factors like autonomy, which can affect the language acquisition process. As online education programs increase, autonomous learning becomes more necessary for academic success. This explanatory sequential mixed-method study aimed at examining the effect of online (synchronous) language learning and gender on ESP learners' autonomy and exploring their perceptions of the utility of this kind of instruction in improving their autonomy. Through convenience sampling, 60 ESP learners were selected from Kashan University of Medical Sciences after checking homogeneity regarding English proficiency level. Then, they were randomly assigned to the experimental (Adobe Connect breakout rooms) and control (in-person) groups. During 13 treatment sessions, the researcher used Adobe Connect breakout rooms to provide learners with a collaborative language learning task. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected using Zhang and Li's Learner Autonomy Questionnaire and a semi-structured interview, and then they were analyzed using two-way ANCOVA and thematic analysis, respectively. The quantitative findings indicated a positive effect of virtual learning on learners' autonomy, and female learners demonstrated greater gains in autonomy within the virtual learning context. Additionally, participants praised virtual instruction for its role in fostering learner autonomy through independent learning, better decision-making, and enhanced creativity. The results may provide ESP teacher educators and curriculum developers with guiding principles regarding the utility of virtual language instruction in ESP contexts.
Adnan, A., Marlina, L., & Shawfani, A. (2020). Listening anxiety experienced by advanced listening class students of English Department UNP Padang. English Language and Teaching, 5, 87-98.
Astuti, E., & Anjarwati, R. (2021). Teaching online classes during Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 13(1), 66-84.
Audi, R. (1991). Autonomy, reason, and desire. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 72 (4), 247–271.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology, 9(1), 3.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th Ed.). New York: Pearson.
Bugel, K. & Buunk, B. P. (1996). Sex differences in foreign language text comprehension: The role of interests and prior knowledge. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 15-31.
Chuang, H. H., Weng, C. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Which students benefit most from a flipped classroom approach to language learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56–68.
Dafei, D. (2007). An exploration of the relationship between learner autonomy and English proficiency. In P. Robertson, P. & R. Nunn (Eds.), Asian EFL Journal: Teaching Articles 2007 (pp. 1-23). Busan: Asian EFL Journal Press. Retrieved from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com
Doumanis, I., Economou, D., Sim, G., & Porter, S. (2019). The impact of multimodal collaborative virtual environments on learning: A gamified online debate. Computers & Education, 130, 201-223.
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St. John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Facer, K., & Selwyn, N. (2021). Digital technology and the futures of education: Towards ‘Non-Stupid’optimism. Futures of Education initiative, UNESCO.
Farivar, A., & Rahimi, A. (2015). The Impact of CALL on Iranian EFL Learners' Autonomy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 644-649.
Gulbinskienė, D., Masoodi, M., & Šliogerienė, J. (2017). Moodle as virtual learning environment in developing language skills, fostering metacognitive awareness and promoting learner autonomy. Pedagogy, 127(3), 176–185.
Halstead, J.M., & Zhu, C.(2009). Autonomy as an element in Chinese educational reform: a case study of English lessons in a senior high school in Beijing. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(4), 443-456.
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
Lee, L. (2016). Autonomous learning through task-based instruction in fully online language courses. Language Learning & Technology, 20(2), 81–97.
Liguori, E., & Winkler, C. (2020). From offline to distance Challenges and opportunities for entrepreneurship education following the Covid-19 pandemic. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 3(4), 346–351.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Lo, Y. Y., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2019). Teaching, learning and scaffolding in CLIL science classrooms. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 7(2), 151–328.
Ludwig, C., & Tassinari, M. G. (2023). Foreign language learner autonomy in online learning environments: the teachers’ perspectives, Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 217–234.
Mashhadi, J. (2022). Investigating the efficacy of flipped learning on autonomy and skill-learning of Iranian EFL learners. Two Quarterly Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning University of Tabriz, 14(30), 137–148.
Mısır, H., Koban Koç, D., & Engin Koç, S. (2018). An analysis of learner autonomy and autonomous learning practices in massive open online language courses. Arab World English Journal, 4(4-Special Issue), 24–39. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3226679
Monica, H. & Peter. R (2014). How flipped classrooms can benefit the development of autonomous learning? The Kyushu Academic Society of English Language Education, 42, 56–68.
Nosratinia, M., & Hossaini, F. A. (2017). Self-Efficacy and Critical Thinking as the Predictors of Autonomous Language Learning in EFL Contexts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(1), 64-72
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, U. A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Paradowski, M. B., & Jelińska, M. (2023). The predictors of L2 grit and their complex interactions in online foreign language learning: motivation, self-directed learning, autonomy, curiosity, and language mindsets. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-38.
Parvaneh, H., Zoghi, M., & Asadi, N. (2020). Flipped classroom approach: Its effect on learner autonomy and language anxiety of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 10(2), 330–347.
Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and asynchronous e-language learning: A case study of virtual university of Pakistan. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21-39.
Peyvandi, G., Azarnoosh, M., & Siyyari, M. (2021). The effect of negotiated syllabus on autonomy of ESP students: A mixed methods study. Journal of Language and Translation, 11(3), 135-155.
Piaget, J. (1955). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
Rezabeigi, M., Maftoon, P., & Abbasian, G. (2021). On the effect of EFL teachers’ autonomy-supportive behaviors on EFL learners’ readiness for autonomy. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 11(1), 81–97.
Schoonenboom, J. (2014). Using an adapted, task-level technology acceptance model to explain why instructors in higher education intend to use some learning management system tools more than others. Computers & Education, 7(1), 247–256.
Sadaghian, S., & Marandi, S. S. (2016). Using WebQuests as idea banks for fostering autonomy in online language courses. In S. Papadima-Sophocleous, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds), CALL communities and culture – short papers from EUROCALL 2016 (pp. 403-407). https://doi:10.14705/rpnet.2016. eurocall2016.596
Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 38–61.
Stephen, J. S., Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., & Dubay, C. (2020). Persistence model of non-traditional online learners: Self-efficacy, self-regulation, and self-direction. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(4), 306–321.
Susanti, A., Rachmajanti, S., & Mustofa, A. (2023). Between teacher ‘roles and students’ social: Learner autonomy in online learning for EFL students during the pandemic. Cogent Education, 10(1), 220–238.
Tsai, Y. R. (2019). Promotion of learner autonomy within the framework of a flipped EFL instructional model: Perception and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34, 979–1011.
Vu, T. T., & Bui, D. B. H. (2021). EFL Teaching and Learning via Zoom during COVID-19: Impacts of Students’ Engagement on Vocabulary Range and Reading Comprehension Skills. English as a Foreign Language International Journal, 1(2), 79–95.
Wenden, A. (1998). Learner strategies for learner autonomy. Great Britain:
Prentice-Hall.
Willis, J. (1996). A flexible framework fir task-based language learning. In J. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp. 52-62). Oxford: Heinemann.
Yang, Y. F. (2016). Self-directed learning to develop autonomy in an online ESP community. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(7), 1629–1646.
Zainuddin, Z. & Perera, C.J. (2019). Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 115–126.
Zhang, L. X., & Li, X. X. (2004). A comparative study on learner autonomy between Chinese students and west European students. Foreign Language World, 4, 15-23.
Zhong, Q. M. (2021). Fostering group autonomy through collaborative learning in an online environment. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 12(1), 79–91.
