The Effect of Various Dietary Fibre Sources on Performance, Cecal and Ileal Nutrient Digestibility in Broiler Chickens
محورهای موضوعی :
Y. Mohammadi
1
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran)
A.A. Saki
2
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran)
S. Mirzaei Goudarzi
3
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran)
A. Ahmadi
4
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran)
Z. Bardel
5
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran)
S. Mohammadian
6
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran)
کلید واژه: gastrointestinal tract, insoluble fiber, microbial population, performance, viscosity,
چکیده مقاله :
This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different sources of insoluble fiber on perform-ance, gastrointestinal tract characteristics, and nutrient digestibility in the broiler's ileum, and cecum. A total of 380-day-old chickens of ross 308 unsexed were arranged into 5 treatments, 4 replicates, and 19 chickens in each, by completely randomized design (CRD). Experimental treatments included 1: control (corn-soybean meal) 2: arbocel (synthetic fiber) 1% in diet, 3: sunflower hulls (3% in diet), 4: soybean hull (3% in diet), 5: processed wheat straw (3%in diet). Observed parameter include: performance (feed intake, feed conversion ratio and body weight gain), gastrointestinal pH, gastrointestinal viscosity and digestibility of dry matter and protein in ileum and cecum and microbial population in ileum and cecum. The results have shown that the inclusion of 3% sunflower hulls in diets leads to the higher average feed intake from 1 to 10 days of age rather than control (P<0.05). In comparison between the ileum and cecum showed that the higher viscosity by Arbocel® in the cecum and the lowest viscosity showed by wheat straw in the ileum (P<0.05). On the other hand, the digestibility of protein and dry matter in the ileum was higher than the cecum (P<0.05). According to the results of this study, it could be noted that all fibers are considered in-soluble fibers and their different behavior in the gastrointestinal tract. The diet Arbocel® has generally led to physicochemical changes (digesta pH and viscosity) and microbial populations. It could be the most im-portant reason for these observations which is related to insoluble fiber particle size and their processing. In addition, reduced dry matter and protein digestibility in the cecum in comparison to the ileum status. Fi-nally, digest pH, viscosity, dry matter and protein digestibility were reduced by insoluble fiber in cecum in comparison to ileum.
This experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of different sources of insoluble fiber on perform-ance, gastrointestinal tract characteristics, and nutrient digestibility in the broiler's ileum, and cecum. A total of 380-day-old chickens of ross 308 unsexed were arranged into 5 treatments, 4 replicates, and 19 chickens in each, by completely randomized design (CRD). Experimental treatments included 1: control (corn-soybean meal) 2: arbocel (synthetic fiber) 1% in diet, 3: sunflower hulls (3% in diet), 4: soybean hull (3% in diet), 5: processed wheat straw (3%in diet). Observed parameter include: performance (feed intake, feed conversion ratio and body weight gain), gastrointestinal pH, gastrointestinal viscosity and digestibility of dry matter and protein in ileum and cecum and microbial population in ileum and cecum. The results have shown that the inclusion of 3% sunflower hulls in diets leads to the higher average feed intake from 1 to 10 days of age rather than control (P<0.05). In comparison between the ileum and cecum showed that the higher viscosity by Arbocel® in the cecum and the lowest viscosity showed by wheat straw in the ileum (P<0.05). On the other hand, the digestibility of protein and dry matter in the ileum was higher than the cecum (P<0.05). According to the results of this study, it could be noted that all fibers are considered in-soluble fibers and their different behavior in the gastrointestinal tract. The diet Arbocel® has generally led to physicochemical changes (digesta pH and viscosity) and microbial populations. It could be the most im-portant reason for these observations which is related to insoluble fiber particle size and their processing. In addition, reduced dry matter and protein digestibility in the cecum in comparison to the ileum status. Fi-nally, digest pH, viscosity, dry matter and protein digestibility were reduced by insoluble fiber in cecum in comparison to ileum.
Abdollahi A., Karimi A., Sadeghi A.A., Bedford M.R. and Ashengroph M. (2021). The effects of the fiber source and xy-lanase supplementation on production, egg quality, digestibil-ity, and intestinal morphology in the aged laying hen. Poult Sci. 100, 1-8.
Afra M., Navidshad B., Adibmoradi M., Gheshlagh F.M.A. and Ivarigh N.H. (2017). Effect of dietary inclusion level and par-ticle size of barley hulls on intestinal morphology and bacteria population in broiler chickens. J. Vet. Res. 72(2), 1-7.
Amerah A.M., Ravindran V. and Lentle R.G. (2009). Influence of insoluble fiber and whole wheat inclusion on the performance, digestive tract development, and ileal microbiota profile of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 50, 366-375.
AOAC. (2000). Official Methods of Analysis. 17th Ed. Associa-tion of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Washington, DC., USA.
Appleby P.N., Thorogood M., Mann J.I. and Key T.J. (1999). The Oxford vegetarian study: an overview. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 70, 525-531.
Baurhoo N., Baurhoo B., Mustafa A.F. and Zhao X. (2011). Com-parison of corn-based and Canadian pearl millet-based diets on performance, digestibility, villus morphology, and digestive microbial populations in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 90, 579-586.
Bjerrum L., Pedersen K. and Engberg R.M. (2005). The influence of whole wheat feeding on salmonella infection and gut flora composition in broilers. Avian Dis. 49, 9-15.
Campbell G., Classen H., Reichert R. and Campbell L. (1983). Improvement of the nutritive value of rye for broiler chickens by gamma irradiation induced viscosity reduction. Br. Poult. Sci. 24, 205-212.
Choct M. (1997). Feed non-starch polysaccharides: chemical structures and nutritional significance. Feed Milling Interna-tional. Feed Milling Int. 191(1), 13-26.
Choct M. (2002). Non-starch polysaccharides: Effect on nutritive value. Pp. 221-237 in Poultry Feedstuffs: Supply, Composi-tion, and Nutritive Value. J.M. McNab and K.N. Boorman, Eds., CABI Publishing, Oxan, United Kingdom.
Choct M. and Sinlae M. (2006). Effects of xylanase supplementa-tion on between-bird variation in energy metabolism and the number of Clostridium perfringens in broilers fed a wheat-based diet. Australian J. Agric. Res. 57, 1017-1021.
Debon S.J. and Tester R.F. (2001). In vitro binding of calcium, iron and zinc by non-starch polysaccharides. Food Chem. 73, 401-410.
Engberg R.M., Hedemann M.S., Jensen B.B. and Lesser T.D. (2000). Effect of zinc bacitracin and salinomycin on intestinal microflora and performance of broilers. Poult. Sci. 79, 1311- 1319.
Engberg R.M., Hedemann M.S., Steenfeldt S. and Jensen B.B. (2004). Influence of whole wheat and xylanase on broiler per-formance and microbial composition and activity in the diges-tive tract. Poult Sci. 83, 925-938.
Fengler A.I. and Marquardt R.R. (1988). Water-soluble pentosans from rye: П. Effect on rate of dialysis and on the retention of nutrients by the chick. Cereal Chem. 65, 298-302.
Fenton T.W. and Fenton M. (1979). An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and feces. Cana-dian J. Anim. Sci. 59, 631-634.
Gómez-Ordóñez E., Jiménez-Escrig A. and Rupérez P. (2010). Dietary fiber and physicochemical properties of several edible seaweeds from the northwestern Spanish coast. Food Res. Int. 43, 2289-2294.
González-Alvarado J.M., Jiménez-Moreno E., Lázaro R. and Mateos G.G. (2007). Effect of type of cereal, heat processing of the cereal, and inclusion of fiber in the diet on productive performance and digestive traits of broilers. Poult. Sci. 86, 1705-1715.
González-Alvarado J., Jiménez-Moreno E., Valencia D., Lázaro R. and Mateos G. (2008). Effects of fiber source and heat processing of the cereal on the development and pH of the gastrointestinal tract of broilers fed diets based on corn or rice. Poult. Sci. 87, 1779-1795.
Graham H. and Aman P. (1991). Nutritional aspect of dietary fibers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 32, 143-158.
Guzman P., Saldana B., Mandalawi H.A., Perez-Bonilla A., Lazaro R. and Mateos G.G. (2015). Productive performance of brown- egg laying pullets from hatching to 5 weeks of age as affected by fiber inclusion, feed form, and energy concentra-tion of the diet. Poult. Sci. 94, 249-261.
Hemmati Matin H.R., Shariatmadari F., KarimiTorshizi M.A. and Chiba L.I. (2016). In vitro bile acid-binding capacity of dietary fiber sources and their effects with bile acid on broiler chicken performance and lipid digestibility. Br. Poult. Sci. 57, 348-357.
Hetland H., Svihus B. and Krogdahl A. (2003). Effect of oat hulls and wood shavings on digestion in broilers and layers fed diets based on whole or ground wheat. Br. Poult. Sci. 44, 272-282.
Hubener K., Vahjen W. and Simon O. (2002). Bacterial responses to different dietary cereal types and xylanase supplementation in the intestine of broiler chicken. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 56, 167-187.
Jangiaghdam S., Goudarzi S.M., Saki A.A. and Zamani P. (2022). Growth performance, nutrient digestibility, gastrointestinal tract traits in response to dietary fiber sources in broiler chick-ens. Poult. Sci. J. 10, 185-196.
Jangiaghdam S., MirzaieGoudarzi S., Saki A.A. and Zamani P. (2017). Effect of different sources of insoluble fiber on per-formance and cecal microbial population of broiler chickens. Anim. Prod. 19, 389-401.
Jiménez-Moreno E., Chamorro S., Frikha M., Safaa H.M., Lazaro R. and Mateos G.G. (2011). Effect of increasing levels of pea hulls in the diet on performance and digestive traits of broiler from one to eighteen days of age. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 168, 100-112.
Jiménez-Moreno E., de Coca-Sinova A., Gonzalez-Alvarado J.M. and Mateos G.G. (2016). Inclusion of insoluble fiber sources in mash or pellet diet for broilers. 1. Effects on growth per-formance and water intake. Poult. Sci. 95, 41-52.
Jiménez-Moreno E., González-Alvarado J.M., de Coca-Sinova A., Lázaro R.P., Cámara L. and Mateos G.G. (2019). Insoluble fi-ber sources in mash or pellets diets for young broilers. 2. Ef-fects on gastrointestinal tract development and nutrient di-gestibility. Poult. Sci. 98, 2531-2547.
Jiménez-Moreno E., González-Alvarado J.M., González-Sánchez D., Lázaro R. and Mateos G.G. (2010). Effects of type and particle size of dietary fiber on growth performance and diges-tive traits of broilers from 1 to 21 days of age. Poult. Sci. 89, 2197-2212.
Jiménez-Moreno E., González-Alvarado J., de Coca-Sinova A., Lázaro R. and Mateos G. (2009). Effects of source of fiber on the development and pH of the gastrointestinal tract of broil-ers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 154, 93-101.
Mateos G.G., Jimenez-Moreno E., Serrano M.P. and Lazaro R.P. (2012). Poultry response to high levels of dietary fiber sources varying in physical and chemical characteristics. Poult. Sci. 21, 156-174.
Mathlouthi N., Lallès J.P., Lepercq P., Juste C. and Larbier M. (2002a). Xylanase and β-glucanase supplementation improve conjugated bile acid fraction in intestinal contents and increase villus size of small intestine wall in broiler chickens fed a rye-based diet. J. Anim. Sci. 80, 2773-2779.
Mathlouthi N., Mallet S., Saulnier L., Quemener B. and Larbier M. (2002b). Effects of xylanase and $\beta $-glucanase addi-tion on performance, nutrient digestibility, and physico-chemical conditions in the small intestine contents and caecal microflora of broiler chickens fed a wheat and barley-based diet. Anim. Res. 51, 395-406.
Mc Burney M.I. (2010). Dietary fibre: Insights and opportunities. Pp. 153-166 in Dietary Fibre: New Frontiers for Food and Health. J.W. van der Kemp, J. Jones, B. Mc-Cleary and D. topping, Eds., Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wagenin-gen, the Netherlands.
Mossami A. (2011). Effects of different inclusions of oat hulls on performance, carcass yield and gut development in broiler chickens. MS Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sci-ence, Sweden.
Roma E., Adamidis D., Nikolara R., Constantopoulos A. and Messaritakis J. (1999). Diet and chronic constipation in chil-dren: the role of fiber. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 28, 169-174.
Saki A.A., HematiMatin H.R., Tabatabai M.M., Zamani P. and Naseri Harsini R. (2010). Microflora population, intestinal condition and performance of broilers in response to various rates of pectin and cellulose in the diet. European Poult. Sci. 74, 183-188.
SAS Institute. (2013). SAS®/STAT Software, Release 9.4. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. USA.
Shakouri M.D., Kermanshahi H. and Mohsenzadeh M. (2006). Effect of different non starch polyccharides in semi purified diets on performance and microflora of young broiler chick-ens. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 5, 557-561.
Smits C.H., Veldman A., Verkade H.J. and Beynen A.C. (1998). The inhibitory effect of carboxymethylcellulose with high vis-cosity on lipid absorption in broiler chickens coincides with reduced bile salt concentration and raised microbial numbers in the small intestine. Poult. Sci. 77, 1534-1539.
Tejeda O. and K. Kim W. (2021). Role of dietary fiber in poultry nutrition. Animals. 11, 461-4.
Torok V.A., Allison G.E., Percy N.J., Ophel-Keller K. and Hughes R.J. (2011). Influence of antimicrobial feed additives on broiler commensal posthatch gut microbiota development and performance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 3380-3390.
Urban J., Michalczuk M., Batorska M., Marzec A., Jaroszek A. and Bień D. (2024). Effect of crude fibre additives ARBOCEL and VITACEL on the physicochemical properties of granu-lated feed mixtures for broiler chickens. Anim. Biosci. 37, 274-283
Van Soset P.J., Roberson J.B. and Lewis B.A. (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch poly-saccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74, 3583-3597.
Vander Hoven-Hangoor E., van der Vossen J., Schuren F., Ver-stegen M., de Oliveria J., Motijin R. and Hendriks W. (2013). Ileal microbiota composition of broilers fed various commer-cial diet compositions. Poult. Sci. 92, 2713-2723
Williams B.A., Verstegen M.W.A. and Tamminga S. (2001). Fermentation in the large intestine of single-stomached ani-mals and its relationship to animal health. Nutr. Res. Rev. 14, 207-227.
