The comparative effect of direct corrective feedback and recast in a critical thinking setting on EFL learners’ reading comprehension
محورهای موضوعی : Curriculum Research
Mehrdad Rezaee
1
(Department of English Language, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran)
Maryam Baghi
2
(Safir Language Academy)
Elaheh Faramarzi
3
(Safir Language Academy)
کلید واژه: Corrective Feedback, Recast, Critical Thinking, EFL Learners, Reading Comprehension,
چکیده مقاله :
The aim of present study was to explore the comparative effect of direct corrective feedback and recast on EFL learners’ reading comprehension in a critical thinking (CT) context. Sixty female EFL learners were selected from a larger group of 85 learners through convenience sampling and were given a Preliminary English Test (PET) to assess their proficiency levels. As the next step, the participants formed two random experimental groups. The reading comprehension abilities of both groups were measured before and after the treatment through administration of reading section of two separate versions of PET. Both groups received 12 sessions of the treatment. Two paired samples t-tests were utilized, both of which proved significant improvement for both groups from pretest to posttest. Then, the posttest scores of the two groups using an independent samples t-test were compared. Based on the results, the difference between the two groups turned out to be significant indicating superiority of the effect of the recast. This study can have important implications for the stakeholders in foreign language (FL) education.
The aim of present study was to explore the comparative effect of direct corrective feedback and recast on EFL learners’ reading comprehension in a critical thinking (CT) context. Sixty female EFL learners were selected from a larger group of 85 learners through convenience sampling and were given a Preliminary English Test (PET) to assess their proficiency levels. As the next step, the participants formed two random experimental groups. The reading comprehension abilities of both groups were measured before and after the treatment through administration of reading section of two separate versions of PET. Both groups received 12 sessions of the treatment. Two paired samples t-tests were utilized, both of which proved significant improvement for both groups from pretest to posttest. Then, the posttest scores of the two groups using an independent samples t-test were compared. Based on the results, the difference between the two groups turned out to be significant indicating superiority of the effect of the recast. This study can have important implications for the stakeholders in foreign language (FL) education.
Ackerman, D. S., & Gross, B. L. (2010). Instructor feedback: How much do students really want? Journal of Marketing Education, 32(2), 172-181.
Alenizi, M. A. K. (2019). Understanding of reading among teachers and learners: A descriptive study of pre-university English language teaching/learning in Saudi Arabia. Arab World English Journal, 10. https://doi.org/10.2139/ ssrn.3418530.
Alfallaj, F. S. S. (2017). Reading competence of the Saudi EFL learner: Empowering the teachers through linguistics. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(3), 12-17. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.3p.12.
Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171-184.
Alizamani, H., Khodabandehlou, M., & Mobashernia, R. (2013). The effects of teaching critical thinking strategies on Iranian EFL learner’s reading comprehension ability: The case of Padideh Language Center. Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 3(3), 133-141.
Al-Kindi, N., & AL-Mekhlafi, A. (2017). The practice and challenges of implementing critical thinking skills in Omani Post-basic EFL classrooms. English Language Teaching, 10 (12), 116-133. Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/safeer/Downloads/The_Practice_and_ Challenges_of_Implementing_Critic.
Anderson, N. J. (2003). Scrolling, clicking, and reading English: Online reading strategies in a second/foreign language. The Reading Matrix, 3(3), 1-33.
Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the “passé compose” and the “imparfait”. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2),226–243. doi: 10.6111/modl.2001.85.issue-2
Banaruee, H., & Askari, A. (2016). Typology of corrective feedback and error analysis. Sana Gostar Publications.
Basri, H., Purwanto, As’ari, A. R., & Sisworo. (2019). Critical thinking skills, critical reading and foreign language reading anxiety in Iran context. International Journal of Instruction,12(3), 219-238. doi:10.29333/iji.2019. 12414a.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2008). The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students. Language Teaching Research Journal, 12(3), 409–431.
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2),193-214.
Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 18(2), 136-140.
Cheng, S. Y., Lin, C. S., Chen, H. H., & Heh, J. S. (2005). Learning and diagnosis of individual and class conceptual perspectives: an intelligent systems approach using clustering techniques. Computers & Education, 44(3), 257-283.
Daneshvar, E., & Rahimi, A. (2014). Written corrective feedback and teaching grammar. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136(3), 217–221. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.317
Elder, L., & Paul, R. (2004). Critical thinking and the art of close reading (part IV). Journal of Developmental Education, 28(2), 36-37.
Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the shortand long-term effects of written error correction. In K. Hyland and F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Context and issues (pp. 81-104). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in the L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
Florea, N., &Hurjui, E. (2016). Critical thinking in elementary school children. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 18 (2), 565 - 572. Retrieved from: file:///C:/Research%20methodology/critical%20t hinking%20in%20elementary%20school.
Gallego Betancur, M., & Hoyos Florez, A. M. (2016). The library and reading comprehension processes of childhood. Infancias Imagenes, 15(2), 253-261.
Gholizade, R. (2013). The investigation of differential effects of recast and metalinguistic feedback on accuracy, fluency, and complexity of speaking performance of male and female EFL learners. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 2(9), 417-428.
Giancarlo, C. A., & Facione, P. A. (2001). A look across four years at the disposition toward critical thinking among undergraduate students. The Journal of General Education, 50(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2001.0004
Grami, M. A. (2005). The effect of teachers’ written feedback on ESL students’ writing: A study on a Saudi ESL University-level context. Language Teaching, 2(2), 9-22.
Hashemifardnia, A., Namaziandost, E., & Sepehri, M. (2019). The effectiveness of giving grade, corrective feedback, and corrective feedback-plus-giving grade on grammatical accuracy. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 8(1), 15-27.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.
Javed, M., Eng, L. S., Mohamed, A. R., & Ismail, S. A. M. M. (2016). Identifying reading strategies to teach literal, reorganization and inferential comprehension questions to ESL students. Journal of Asia TEFL, 13(3), 204.
Johnston, T. C., & Kirby, J. R. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 19, 339-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-4644-2
Kamali, Z., & Fahim, M. (2011). The relationship between critical thinking ability of Iranian EFL learners and their resilience level facing unfamiliar vocabulary items in reading. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 2(1),104-111
Latham-Koenig, C., Oxenden, C., & Seligson, P. (2008). American English file (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Li, H. (2020). Recasts and negotiated prompts: How do Chinese L2 learners perceive them? RELC Journal, 003368821989974. doi:10.1177/0033688219899741.
Long, M. H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L. (1998). The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82(2), 357-371.
Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback explicitness. Language Learning, 59(2), 411–452. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00511.x
Nassaji, H. (2017). The effectiveness of extensive versus intensive recasts for learning L2 grammar. Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 353–368.
Nejati, R., & Molaee, A. (2015). The role of Iranian EFL students’ feedback on teaching in their reading achievement. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 5(2), 233.
Oliver, R. (2000). Age difference in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50(2), 119-151.
Petrucco, C., & Ferranti, C. (2017). Developing critical thinking in online search. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 13(3). 1-11.
Rassaei, E., & Moinzadeh, A. (2011). Investigating the effects of three types of corrective feedback on the acquisition of English Wh-Question forms by Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 97-106.
Ruegg, R. (2018). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy. The Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 87-102.
Saleh, E. S. (2019). Critical thinking as a 21st century skill: Conceptions, implementation and challenges in the EFL classroom. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4 (1), 1-16.
Shokrpour, N., Sadeghi, A., & Seddigh, F. (2013). The effect of summary writing as a critical reading strategy on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Studies in Education, 3(2), 127-138.
Silagi, M. L., Radanovic, M., Conforto, A. B., Mendonça, L., & Mansur, L. L. (2018). Inference comprehension in text reading: Performance of individuals with right- versus left-hemisphere lesions and the influence of cognitive functions. PLoS One, 13(5).
Sloat, E. A., Beswick, J. F., & Willms, D. J. (2007). Using early literacy monitoring to prevent reading failure. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(7), 523-529. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com.
Suarman, A. (2013). The effect of feedback on student’s writing accuracy. ELTIN Journal, 1(2), 44-55.
Suk, N. (2016). The effects of extensive reading on reading comprehension, reading rate, and vocabulary acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 73-89. doi: 10.1002/rrq.152
Wong, B., & Butler, D. (2013). Learning about learning disabilities. Burlington: Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2011-0-69718-2.
