تحلیل اهمیت- عملکرد توانمندسازهای پیاده سازی مدیریت دانش – یک مطالعه ی موردی
محورهای موضوعی : مدیریت صنعتی
وجیهه مسائلی پور
1
(گروه مدیریت، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران)
مسعود براتی
2
(گروه مدیریت، واحد نجف آباد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، نجف آباد، ایران)
کلید واژه: پیاده سازی مدیریت دانش, توانمندساز, فرایند تحلیل سلسله مراتبی, تحلیل اهمیت - عملکرد, شرکت پارس ام سی اس,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف از اين پژوهش، شناسایی و رتبه بندی توانمندسازهای پیاده سازی مدیریت دانش در شرکت پارس ام سی اس است. به این منظور از رویکرد تحلیل اهمیت – عملکرد استفاده شده است. نخست با مطالعه پیشینه پژوهش، توانمندسازهای پیاده سازی مدیریت دانش شامل 7 عامل ساختار سازمانی، فرهنگ سازمانی، فناوری اطلاعات، رویکرد راهبردی، نیروی انسانی، تعهد و حمایت مدیران، و مدیریت منابع انسانی شناسایی شده اند. سپس اهمیت و عملکرد این عوامل مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفته است. به منظور تعیین اهمیت توانمندسازها از رویکرد تحلیل فرایند سلسله مراتبی و نظر 5 خبره دانشگاهی و به منظور تعیین عملکرد توانمندسازها، از نظر 11 نفر از مدیران و سرپرستان شرکت پارس ام سی اس استفاده شده است. سرانجام، با رویکرد اهمیت- عملکرد توانمندسازها دسته بندی شدند. نتایج نشان داد عوامل فرهنگ سازمانی و تعهد و حمایت مدیران در ناحیه وضعیت عالی قرار گرفته اند و تداوم و حفظ وضع موجود آنها توصیه می شود. همچنین، عوامل مدیریت منابع انسانی و رویکرد راهبردی در ناحيه بحراني واقع شده انـد و توجه و سرمايه گذاري شركت در اين عوامل توصيه مي شود.
The purpose of this research is to identify and rank the enablers of implementing knowledge management in the Pars MCS Company. For this purpose, the importance-performance analysis approach has been used. First, by literature review, knowledge management implementation enablers including 7 factors of organizational structure, organizational culture, information technology, strategic approach, people, commitment and management support, and human resource management have been identified. Then the importance and performance of these factors have been evaluated. To determine the importance of enablers, the analytic hierarchy process approach and the opinion of 5 academic experts have been used, and to determine their performance, the opinion of 11 managers and supervisors of Pars MCS Company has been used. Finally, the enablers were categorized by the importance-performance approach. The results showed that the factors of organizational culture and commitment and management support are in the area of excellent status, and it is recommended to continue and maintain their current status. Also, the factors of human resources management and strategic approach are located in the critical area, and the attention and investment of the company in these factors is recommended.
Agrawal, N. (2021). Modeling enablers of knowledge management process using multi criteria decision making approach. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 51(3), 389-417. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2019-0122
Boamah, F.A., Zhang, J., Wen, D., Sherani, M., Hayat, A. & Horbanenko, O. (2022). Enablers of knowledge management: practical research-based in the construction industry. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(1), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-09-2020-0142
del-Castillo-Feito, C., Blanco-Gonz´alez, A. & Hernandez-Perlines, F. (2022). The impacts of socially responsible human resources management on organizational legitimacy. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 174(121274), ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121274
Fatahian, S., Hoveida, R., Siadat, S.A., & Talebi, H. (2015). The Relationship of Knowledge Management Enablers and Processes to University Performance (A Case Study of Selected Sate Universities of Isfahan Province). Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration, 5(20), 1-18. doi: 20.1001.1.20086369.1393.5.20.1.6 [In Persian]
Fiscal, R. (2021). Knowledge Management Enablers and Its Impact on the Performance Outcomes of State Universities in the Philippines. Universal Journal of Management, 9(2), 44-51. DOI: 10.13189/ujm.2021.090203
Ghasemi, B. & Valmohammadi, C. (2021). Identification and prioritization of critical success factors of knowledge management implementation using a novel hybrid group decision-making model. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 53(6), 1086-1118. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-02-2021-0023
Khalilipour, S., & Zarif manesh, H. (2021). Knowledge Management Enablers in the Armed Forces. Strategic Defense Studies, 19(85), 83-124.
Kanyundo, A.J., Chipeta, G.T. & Chawinga, W.D. (2023). An analysis of knowledge management practices at lilongwe university of agriculture and natural resources, Malawi. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8 (100640), ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100640
Khalilipour, S., & Zarif manesh, H. (2021). Knowledge Management Enablers in the Armed Forces. Strategic Defense Studies, 19(85), 83-124. doi: 20.1001.1.20084897.1400.19.85.4.9 [In Persian]
Madhoushi, M., & Noornejad Vanoush, V. (2013). The impact of Knowledge Management Enablers on of SMEs Employees’ Empowerment: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Management Process. Organizational resource management research, 3(2), 91-110. doi: http://ormr.modares.ac.ir/article-28-10247-fa.html [In Persian]
Mahmoudzadeh, S., ZarghamBoroujen, H., & Sedaghat, M. (2014). The Relationship Between Knowledge Management Enablers and Knowledge Management. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 23(73), 145-173. doi: 20.1001.1.22518037.1393.23.73.6.1 [In Persian]
Olfat, L., & Barati, M. (2012). An Importance-Performance Analysis of Supply Chain Relationships Metrics in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Automotive Parts Industry. Industrial Management Journal, 4(2), 21-42. doi: 10.22059/imj.2012.35438 [In Persian]
Roth, S. (2003).Wissensvernetzung und lernende Organisationen in: Bsirske Wissensmanagement, Hamburg: VSA-Verlag, 166-175
Sahibzada, U.F., Latif, K.F. & Xu, Y. (2022). Symmetric and asymmetric modeling of knowledge management enablers to knowledge management processes and knowledge worker productivity in higher education institutes. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(3), 729-756. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-08-2020-0346
Salimi Sobhan, M.R., Yari, M., Heydari, J., & Gharaghozloo, Z. (2015). Analysis of Police Performance and Citizens› Assessment of Security Based on IPA. Societal Security Studies, 2(43), 85-111. doi: SID. https://sid.ir/paper/502600/fa [In Persian]
Shehzad, M.U., Zhang, J., Dost, M., Ahmad, M.S. & Alam, S. (2022). Knowledge management enablers and knowledge management processes: a direct and configurational approach to stimulate green innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(1), 123-152. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2022-0076
Singh, M.D. & Kant, R. (2008). Knowledge management barriers: An interpretive structural modeling approach, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 3(2) , pp 141-150
Valmohammadi, C. and Ghassemi, A. (2016), "Identification and prioritization of the barriers of knowledge management implementation using fuzzy analytical network process: A case study of the Iranian context", VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 319-337
Yadav, D.K., Pant, M. & Seth, N. (2020). Analysing enablers of knowledge management in improving logistics capabilities of Indian organisations: a TISM approach. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(7), 1559-1584. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2019-0535
