The impact of place attachment on pro-environmental behavior in educational spaces based on Seamon's theory (Case study: Girls' schools in Urmia)
Furugh Mirzaalipour
1
(
Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran, Iran
)
Razieh Labibzadeh
2
(
Department of Architecture, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University,Tehran, Iran
)
Babak Motiei
3
(
Department of Architecture, Urmia Branch, Islamic Azad University, Urmia, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Place attachment, environmentally friendly behavior, educational environment, girls' school, high school, Seamon’s theory, environment,
چکیده مقاله :
In today's global society, the environment is considered one of the most important components for human communities. The interactions between humans and the environment, which occur continuously, influence human behavior towards the environment and shape environmentally friendly or supportive behaviors. Place attachment as a key structure for explaining environmental behaviors has been identified; however, the precise power of its impact has not been documented. The primary research question is how place attachment influences environmentally friendly behavior, and whether, in general, place attachment can significantly impact environmentally friendly behavior or not? This study aims to investigate Seamon’s theory as one of the influential theories in the perspective of place attachment to identify the main factors. Then, based on these main factors with an impact on place attachment, interventions will be conducted to examine their influence on environmentally friendly behavior. To achieve the objectives, two steps are taken. In the first step, a descriptive-analytical research method is employed to examine Seamon’s theory through a library study and extract influential components. Then, a semi-experimental design of pre-test-post-test with three-month follow-up was conducted with the intervention group. The results indicated that training in environmentally friendly behavior and environmental advocacy was effective in the post-test phase, and environmental conservation changes continued during the follow-up phase. Additionally, the results showed that even the control group attempted to preserve and maintain plants and the physical structure of classrooms and schools upon observing these changes in the experimental group during the implementation of green spaces and gardening in the classrooms. This demonstrates that strengthening environmental factors increases place attachment, consequently positively influencing environmentally friendly behavior. Given the effectiveness of the interventions, environmentally friendly behaviors can be incorporated into school-based programs to preserve the environment and the future of the world.
چکیده انگلیسی :
In today's global society, the environment is considered one of the most important components for human communities. The interactions between humans and the environment, which occur continuously, influence human behavior towards the environment and shape environmentally friendly or supportive behaviors. Place attachment as a key structure for explaining environmental behaviors has been identified; however, the precise power of its impact has not been documented. The primary research question is how place attachment influences environmentally friendly behavior, and whether, in general, place attachment can significantly impact environmentally friendly behavior or not? This study aims to investigate Seamon’s theory as one of the influential theories in the perspective of place attachment to identify the main factors. Then, based on these main factors with an impact on place attachment, interventions will be conducted to examine their influence on environmentally friendly behavior. To achieve the objectives, two steps are taken. In the first step, a descriptive-analytical research method is employed to examine Seamon’s theory through a library study and extract influential components. Then, a semi-experimental design of pre-test-post-test with three-month follow-up was conducted with the intervention group. The results indicated that training in environmentally friendly behavior and environmental advocacy was effective in the post-test phase, and environmental conservation changes continued during the follow-up phase. Additionally, the results showed that even the control group attempted to preserve and maintain plants and the physical structure of classrooms and schools upon observing these changes in the experimental group during the implementation of green spaces and gardening in the classrooms. This demonstrates that strengthening environmental factors increases place attachment, consequently positively influencing environmentally friendly behavior. Given the effectiveness of the interventions, environmentally friendly behaviors can be incorporated into school-based programs to preserve the environment and the future of the world.
1. Abedi-Sarvestani, A., & Shahvali, M. (2009). The role of agricultural extension in promoting environmental ethics of farmers. Journal of Ethics in Science & Technology, 4, 120-130. (In Persian)
2. Boldero, J. (1995). The prediction of household recycling of newspapers: The role of attitudes, intentions, and situational factors 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(5), 440-462.
3. Bronfman, N. C., Cisternas, P. C., López-Vázquez, E., De la Maza, C., & Oyanedel, J. C. (2015). Understanding attitudes and pro-environmental behaviors in a Chilean community. Sustainability, 7(10), 14133-14152.
4. Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European journal of social psychology, 30(6), 745-778.
5. Carrus, G., Scopelliti, M., Fornara, F., Bonnes, M., & Bonaiuto, M. (2014). Place attachment, community identification, and pro-environmental engagement. Place attachment. Advances in theory, methods and applications, 154-164.
6. Daryanto, A., & Song, Z. (2021). A meta-analysis of the relationship between place attachment and pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Business Research, 123, 208-219.
7. De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of environmental psychology, 42, 128-138.
8. Davis, G., O'callaghan, F., & Knox, K. (2009). Sustainable attitudes and behaviours amongst a sample of non‐academic staff: A case study from an Information Services Department, Griffith University, Brisbane. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(2), 136-151.
9. De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Morin, A. J., & Schmidt, P. (2014). Gender differences in psychosocial determinants of university students’ intentions to buy fair trade products. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 485-505.
10. Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro‐environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International journal of psychology, 49(3), 141-157.
11. Halpin, D. (2007). Utopian spaces of “robust hope”: The architecture and nature of progressive learning environments. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(3), 243-255.
12. Junot, A., Paquet, Y., & Fenouillet, F. (2018). Place attachment influence on human well‐being and general pro‐environmental behaviors. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 2(2), 49-57.
13. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?. Environmental education research, 8(3), 239-260.
14. Koven, C. D., Knox, R. G., Fisher, R. A., Chambers, J. Q., Christoffersen, B. O., Davies, S. J., ... & Xu, C. (2020). Benchmarking and parameter sensitivity of physiological and vegetation dynamics using the Functionally Assembled Terrestrial Ecosystem Simulator (FATES) at Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biogeosciences, 17(11), 3017-3044.
15. Kelsey, R., Kor, A., & Cordano, F. (1995). Hematogenous osteomyelitis of the calcaneus in children: surgical treatment and use of implanted antibiotic beads. The Journal of foot and ankle surgery, 34(6), 547-555.
16. Lee, K. (2009). Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers' green purchasing behavior. Journal of consumer marketing, 26(2), 87-96.
17. Lee, T. H., Jan, F. H., & Yang, C. C. (2013). Conceptualizing and measuring environmentally responsible behaviors from the perspective of community-based tourists. Tourism Management, 36, 454-468.
18. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?. Journal of environmental psychology, 31(3), 207-230.
19. Meinhold, J. L., & Malkus, A. J. (2005). Adolescent environmental behaviors: Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference? Environment and behavior, 37(4), 511-532.
20. Moser, G., & Uzzell, D. (2003). Environmental psychology. Comprehensive handbook of psychology, 5, 419-445.
21. Mtutu, P., & Thondhlana, G. (2016). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: Energy use and recycling at Rhodes University, South Africa. Habitat International, 53, 142-150.
22. Newhouse, N. (1990). Implications of attitude and behavior research for environmental conservation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 22(1), 26-32.
23. Palupi, T., & Sawitri, D. R. (2018). The importance of pro-environmental behavior in adolescent. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 31, p. 09031). EDP Sciences.
24. Song, Z., & Soopramanien, D. (2019). Types of place attachment and pro-environmental behaviors of urban residents in Beijing. Cities, 84, 112-120.
25. Ramkissoon, H., & Mavondo, F. T. (2017). Proenvironmental behavior: Critical link between satisfaction and place attachment in Australia and Canada. Tourism Analysis, 22(1), 59-73.
26. Ramkissoon, H., Smith, L. D. G., & Weiler, B. (2013). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment and its relationships with place satisfaction and pro-environmental behaviours: A structural equation modelling approach. Tourism management, 36, 552-566.
27. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2013). Personally relevant climate change: The role of place attachment and local versus global message framing in engagement. Environment and Behavior, 45(1), 60-85.
28. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(1), 1-10.
29. Seamon, D. (2012a), “Place, place identity, and phenomenology: a triadic interpretation based on JG Bennett’s systematics”, The Role of Place Identity in the Perception, Understanding, and Design of the Built Environment, Bentham Science Publishers, London, pp. 3-21.
30. Seamon, D. (2012b), “Place, place identity, and phenomenology”, in Caskin, H. and Bernardo, F. (Eds), The Role of Place Identity and Perception, Understanding and Design of the Built Environment, Bentham Science Publishers, London, pp. 3-21.
31. Seamon, D. (2014), “Place attachment and phenomenology: the synergistic dynamism of place”, in Manzo, L. and Devine-Wright, P. (Eds), Place Attachment: Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications, Routledge, London, pp. 11-22.
32. Seamon, D. (2015), “Understanding place holistically: cities, synergistic relationality, and space syntax”, The Journal of Space Syntax, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 19-33.
33. Seamon, D. (2018), Life Takes Place: Phenomenology, Lifeworlds, and Place Making, Routledge, New York, NY.
34. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424.
35. Stedman, R. C. (2002). Toward a social psychology of place: Predicting behavior from place-based cognitions, attitude, and identity. Environment and behavior, 34(5), 561-581.
36. Stoknes, P. E. (2017). What we try to think about when we try not to think about global warming.
37. Takahashi, B., & Selfa, T. (2015). Predictors of pro-environmental behavior in rural American communities. Environment and Behavior, 47(8), 856-876.
38. Ting, D. H., & Cheng, C. F. C. (2017). Measuring the marginal effect of pro-environmental behaviour: Guided learning and behavioural enhancement. Journal of hospitality, leisure, sport & tourism education, 20, 16-26.
39. Tonglet, M., Phillips, P. S., & Read, A. D. (2004). Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour to investigate the determinants of recycling behaviour: a case study from Brixworth, UK. Resources, conservation and recycling, 41(3), 191-214.
40. Walker, I., Leviston, Z., Price, J., & Devine‐Wright, P. (2015). Responses to a worsening environment: relative deprivation mediates between place attachments and behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 833-846.
41. White, M. P., Pahl, S., Ashbullby, K., Herbert, S., & Depledge, M. H. (2013). Feelings of restoration from recent nature visits. Journal of environmental psychology, 35, 40-51.
42. Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O., & Guillaumie, L. (2020). Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 155, 104660.
43. Zhang, H., Cai, L., Bai, B., Yang, Y., & Zhang, J. (2023). National forest park visitors’ connectedness to nature and pro-environmental behavior: The effects of cultural ecosystem service, place and event attachment. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 42, 100621.
