کیفیت و اثربخشی در رسیدگی‌های کارشناسان رسمی دادگستری در رشته حسابداری و حسابرسی
محورهای موضوعی : حسابداری و حسابرسی
حسین صالحی
1
,
سید یوسف احدی سرکانی
2
,
محمدجواد شیخ
3
1 - گروه حسابداری، واحد تهران شمال، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران.
2 - گروه حسابداری، واحد فیروزکوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، فیروزکوه، ایران.
3 - گروه حسابداری، دانشکده علوم مالی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران.
کلید واژه: کیفیت, اثربخشی, رسیدگی‌های کارشناسی, حسابداری و حسابرسی,
چکیده مقاله :
هدف: هدف از این مطالعه شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر کاهش کیفیت و اثربخشی رسیدگی‌های انجام‌شده توسط کارشناسان رسمی دادگستری در رشته حسابداری و حسابرسی از طریق شناخت، تحلیل و ارزیابی رسیدگی‌ها از دیدگاه خبرگان و به‌منظور بازنگری در فرآیند کارشناسی می‌باشد.
روش‌شناسی پژوهش: داده‌ها در مطالعه‌ای تفسیرگرایانه از حیث فلسفه معرفت‌شناسی و با استفاده از رویکرد پژوهش کیفی و ضمن مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته و عمیق با خبرگان و نمونه‌گیری هدفمند در مقطع زمانی سال 1402 گردآوری و تحلیل شده‌اند.
یافته‌ها: بر اساس یافته‌ها، ماهیت پرونده‌ها از حیث تنوع و پیچیدگی، عدم به‌کارگیری فنون نوآورانه و محدودیت‌های موجود در حوزه‌های کارشناسی بیش‌ترین تأثیر را بر کاهش کیفیت و اثربخشی رسیدگی‌ها دارا می‌باشند. نبود استانداردهای حرفه‌ای و فقدانِ مهارت لازم، محدودیت دسترسی به اسناد و کمبود زمان، به ترتیب در اولویت‌های بعدی قرار می‌گیرند. سایر زمینه‌ها در کنار عوامل مداخله‌گر همچون عوامل مربوط به قضات، کارشناسان و قوانین از جمله عواملی هستند که مدیریت آن‌ها دستیابی به سازوکارهای مناسب جهت استحکام جایگاه کارشناسان، کاهش زمان دادرسی، امنیت اجتماعی، کاهش وقوع جرم و هزینه‌های اجتماعی و حفظ امنیت روابط تجاری را در پی دارد.
اصالت / ارزش‌افزوده علمی: جامع‌نگری پیرامون علل آثار کاهش کیفیت و اثربخشی رسیدگی‌ها، بصیرت‌افزایی و تقویت ادراکات حرفه‌ای و ضرورت به‌کارگیری نتایج حاصله از جمله مهم‌ترین جنبه‌های نوآورانه پژوهش را تشکیل می‌دهد.
Objective: This study aims to identify factors affecting the reduction in quality and effectiveness of proceedings conducted by official judicial experts in accounting and auditing through recognition, analysis, and evaluation of proceedings from experts' perspectives, with the purpose of reviewing the expert examination process.
Research Methodology: Data was collected and analyzed in an interpretive study from an epistemological philosophy perspective, using a qualitative research approach through semi-structured and in-depth interviews with experts and purposive sampling during the 2023-2024 time period.
Findings: According to the findings, the nature of cases in terms of diversity and complexity, lack of innovative techniques implementation, and existing limitations in expert examination domains have the most significant impact on reducing the quality and effectiveness of proceedings. The absence of professional standards, lack of necessary skills, limited access to documents, and time constraints are the next priorities respectively. Other areas, alongside intervening factors such as those related to judges, experts, and laws, are among factors whose management leads to achieving appropriate mechanisms for strengthening experts' position, reducing trial duration, social security, crime reduction, social costs, and maintaining security in commercial relationships.
Originality/Scientific Value Added: Comprehensive examination of causes and effects of reduced quality and effectiveness in proceedings, enhancement of insight, strengthening professional perceptions, and the necessity of implementing the resulting outcomes constitute the most important innovative aspects of this research.
Albrecht, C. O., Holland, D. V., Skousen, B. R., & Skousen, C. J. (2018). The significance of whistleblowing as an anti-fraud measure. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, 10(1), 1-13.
Allen, M., Kitt, G., Howells, G., & Kajrukszto, M. (2012). Global construction disputes. Disputeboardsmena.
Al-Rabiah. (2006). 45% of the litigation cases within the Shari’ah courts and the Board of Grievances were concerned with construction disputes. ALEQT.
Alshahrani, S. (2017). Development the a dispute resolution framework to improve the efficiency of dispute resolution in Saudi construction projects. University of Salford (United Kingdom).
Alsharani, S. (2017). Overview of disputes in the context of Saudi construction industry. IJSBAR, 33, 54-67.
Aminian, A., & Tahriri, A. (2022). Presenting an Interpretive Structural Model of Factors Affecting the Forensic Accounting Quality in Iran. International Journal of Finance & Managerial Accounting, 7(25), 81-100. [In Persian]
Awolowo, I. (2019). Financial statement fraud: The need for a paradigm shift to forensic accounting. Sheffield Hallam University (United Kingdom).
Bakhshian, A., Heyrani, F., & Taftiyan, A. (2024). Assessing the credibility of auditors using artificial neural network. Advances in Finance and Investment, 5(1), 1-28. [In Persian]
Brennan, N. M. (2005). Accounting expertise in litigation and dispute resolution. Journal of Forensic Accounting, VI(2), 13-35.
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. pearson.
Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: the art of making quality certain. McGraw-Hill.
Davila, C. (2015). Factors Influencing Criminal Case Processing Time in McLean County Courts. Illinois State University.
De Meyst, K. J., Lowe, D. J., Peecher, M. E., Pickerd, J., & Reffett, A. (2021). Factors affecting the outcomes of legal claims against auditors. Current Issues in Auditing, 15(2), 10-16.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis: quality, productivity and competitive position. Cambridge University Press.
DiGabriele, J. A. (2008). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the private company discount: An empirical investigation. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(8), 1105-1121.
DiGabriele, J. A., Heitger, L. E., & Riley Jr, R. (2020). A synthesis of non-fraud forensic accounting research. Journal of Forensic Accounting Research, 5(1), 257-277.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Sociology Press.
Hashemi Bajegani, S. J., & Sobhani, M. (2022). Value and Validity of Expert Theory in Iranian and French Law. Fares Law Research, 5(10), 193-209. [In Persian]
Heath, R. L., & Palenchar, M. J. (2008). Strategic issues management: Organizations and public policy challenges. Sage Publications.
Heidari, Y., Abdi, R., Mazraeh, Y. A., & Jafari, A. (2023). The effect of behavioral accounting components on the development of the understanding of justice and organizational commitment. Advances in Finance and Investment, 4(4), 93-116. [In Persian]
Javan, S., Shahbazi Nia, M., & Majid, G. (2023). Access to court and information and communication technology. The Quarterly Journal of Judicial Law Views, 22(79), 121-148. [In Persian]
Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1998). Juran's Quality Handbook. McGraw-Hill.
Katsikea, E., Theodosiou, M., Perdikis, N., & Kehagias, J. (2011). The effects of organizational structure and job characteristics on export sales managers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 221-233.
Luke, O. O. (2013). Application of forensic accounting: a tool for confidence in auditors’ reports. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(17), 105-110.
Mashayekhi, B., & Ajang, A. (2014). Forensic Accounting and Justice. Hesabdar, 36-39. [In Persian]
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2010). Essentials of nursing research: Appraising evidence for nursing practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Sarkhosh, J., & Safanejad, H. (2018). Investigating the position of expert theory in criminal proceedings. International Conference on Islamic Law and Jurisprudence. [In Persian]
Savu, A. C., & Badalau, L. (2021). The Role of Accounting in Conducting Judicial Accounting Expertises and their Evolution in the Digital Era. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 21(2), 1131-1137.
Sexton, D. J., & Spelman, D. (2003). Current best practices and guidelines: assessment and management of complications in infective endocarditis. Cardiology clinics, 21(2), 273-282.
Singleton-Green, B. (2015). Public policy and accounting research: What is to be done? Accounting in Europe, 12(2), 171-186.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.
Suleiman, N., & Othman, Z. (2016). Forensic Accounting Investigation for fighting public sector corruption in Nigeria: A conceptual paper. In Proceedings of the Qualitative Research Conference (QRC), 194-202.
Vasile, E., & Croitoru, I. (2021). The Role Of Judicial Accounting Expertise On Accounting Information. Internal Auditing & Risk Management, 16(4).
Zhang, M., Li, H., & Wei, J. (2008). Examining the relationship between organizational culture and performance: The perspectives of consistency and balance. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 2, 256–276.
