Carcinogenic, Non-carcinogenic and Dermal Sensitization Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Liquid and Solid Lipsticks Highly Used in Kashan, Iran
محورهای موضوعی :
Fahimeh Karamali
1
(
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences Kashan, Iran
)
Gholamreza Hoseindoost
2
(
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences Kashan, Iran|Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
)
Gholam Reza Mostafaii
3
(
Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Faculty of Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences Kashan, Iran|Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
)
Golmabas Mousavi
4
(
Department of Statistics and Public Health, Faculty of Health, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
)
Reza Sharafati Chaleshtori
5
(
Research Center for Biochemistry and Nutrition in Metabolic Diseases, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Lipstick, Heavy metals, Carcinogenic risk, Non-Carcinogenic, Dermal sensitization,
چکیده مقاله :
The present study aimed to investigate the levels of lead (Pb), nickel (Ni), cadmium (Cd), and chromium (Cr) in highly used lipsticks in Kashan, Iran. The average concentrations of metals in lipsticks were lower than the maximum admissible limits determined by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The highest and lowest levels of systematic exposure dose (SED) were found for Cr and Pb metals, respectively. However, the SEDs of all metals were less than the reference doses (RFD). The hazard index (HI) of non-carcinogenic risk for all metals was less than 1 and there is no threat to consumers in the concentrations of the metals in the lipsticks. Also, for all metals, the margin of exposure (MoE) and the lifetime cancer risk (LCR) were higher and lower than 104 and 10-6, respectively. Therefore, the possibility of carcinogenic risks of these metals due to the use of lipsticks is low. The results showed that the dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (SQRA) for Ni was greater than 1 and no dermal sensitization risk is observed.
1. Al-Saleh I., Al-Enazi S., Shinwari N., 2009. Assessment of lead in cosmetic products. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 54(2), 105-113.
2. Nnorom I., Igwe J., Oji-Nnorom C., 2005. Trace metal contents of facial (make-up) cosmetics commonly used in Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol. 4(10), 1133-1138.
3. Chauhan S. B., Chandak A., Agrawal S., 2014. Evaluation of heavy metals contamination in marketed lipsticks. Int J Adv Res. 2(4), 257-262.
4. Wang J., Kay A.B., Fletcher J., Formica M.K., McAlindon T. E., 2008. Is lipstick associated with the development of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)? Clin Rheum. 27(9), 1183-1187.
5. Ward M.M., 2004. Prevalence of physician-diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus in the United States: results from the third national health and nutrition examination survey J Women Health. 13(6), 713-718.
6. Hepp N.M., 2012. Determination of total lead in 400 lipsticks on the US market using a validated microwave-assisted digestion, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometric method. J Cosmet Sci. 63(3), 159-176.
7. Ziarati P., Moghimi S., Arbabi-Bidgoli S., Qomi M., 2012. Risk assessment of heavy metal contents (lead and cadmium) in lipsticks in Iran. Int J Chem Eng Appl. 3(6), 450-452.
8. Gondal M., Seddigi Z., Nasr M., Gondal B., 2010. Spectroscopic detection of health hazardous contaminants in lipstick using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. J Hazard Mater. 175(1-3), 726-732.
9. Batista É.F., dos Santos Augusto A., Pereira-Filho E.R., 2016. Chemometric evaluation of Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Ni
(inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry) and Pb (graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry) concentrations in lipstick samples intended to be used by adults and children. Talanta. 150, 206-212.
10. Piccinini P., Piecha M., Torrent S.F., 2013. European survey on the content of lead in lip products. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 76, 225-233.
11. Nourmoradi H., Foroghi M., Farhadkhani M., Vahid Dastjerdi M., 2013. Assessment of lead and cadmium levels in frequently used cosmetic products in Iran. J Environ Res Public Health. 2013, 962727. doi.org/10.1155/2013/962727.
12. Gao P., Liu S., Zhang Z., Meng P., Lin N., Lu B., Cui F., Feng Y., Xing B., 2015. Health impact of bioaccessible metal in lip cosmetics to female college students and career women, northeast of China. Environ Pollut. 197, 214-220.
13. Liu S., Hammond S.K., Rojas-Cheatham A., 2013. Concentrations and potential health risks of metals in lip products. Environ Health Perspect. 121(6), 705-710.
14. Khalid A., Bukhari I.H., Riaz M., Rehman G., Ain Q., Bokhari T.H., Rasool N., Zubair M., Munir S., 2013. Determination of lead, cadmium, chromium, and nickel in different brands of lipsticks. International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and Allied Sciences. 1(2), 263-271.
15. Al-Saleh I., Al-Enazi S., 2011. Trace metals in lipsticks. Toxicol Environ Chem. 93(6), 1149-1165.
16. Meyer P.A., Brown M.J., Falk H., 2008. Global approach to reducing lead exposure and poisoning. Mutat Res. 659(1-2), 166-175.
17. Monnot A.D., Christian W.V., Abramson M.M., Follansbee M.H., 2015. An exposure and health risk assessment of lead (Pb) in lipstick. Food Chem Toxicol. 80, 253-260.
18. Alissa E.M., Ferns G.A., 2011. Heavy metal poisoning and cardiovascular disease. J Toxicol. 2011, 870125. doi: 10.1155/2011/870125.
19. Duruibe J.O., Ogwuegbu M., Egwurugwu J., 2007. Heavy metal pollution and human biotoxic effects. Int J Phys Sci. 2(5), 112-118.
20. Thyssen J.P., Johansen J.D., Menné T., 2007. Contact allergy epidemics and their controls. Contact Derm. 56 (4), 185-195.
21. Mohammadi A.A., Zarei A., Majidi S., Ghaderpoury A., Hashempour Y., Saghi M.H., Alinejad A., Yousefi M., Hosseingholizadeh N., Ghaderpoori M., 2019 .Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals in drinking water of Khorramabad, Iran. MethodsX, 6, 1642-1651.
22- Kamarehie B., Jafari A., Zarei A., Fakhri Y., Ghaderpoori M., Alinejad A., 2019. Non-carcinogenic health risk assessment of nitrate in bottled drinking waters sold in Iranian markets: A Monte Carlo simulation. Accredit Qual Assur, 24(6), 417-426.
23- Jafari A., Ghaderpoori M., Kamarehi B., Abdipour H., 2019. Soil pollution evaluation and health risk assessment of heavy metals around Douroud cement factory, Iran. Environ Earth Sci, 78(8), 250. doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8220-5.
24- Karami M.A., Fakhri Y., Rezania S., Alinejad A.A., Mohammadi A.A., Yousefi M., Ghaderpoori M., Saghi M.H., Ahmadpour M., 2019. Non-carcinogenic health risk assessment due to fluoride exposure from tea consumption in Iran using Monte Carlo simulation. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16(21), 4261. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214261.
25. El-Aziz R.A., Abbassy M.M., Hosny G., 2017. Health risk assessment of some heavy metals in cosmetics in common use. International journal of Environment Science and Toxicology Research, 5 (3), 53-62.
26. Lim D.S., Roh T.H., Kim M.K., Kwon Y.C., Choi S.M., Kwack S.J., Kim K.B., Yoon S., Kim H.S., Lee B.M., 2018. Non-cancer, cancer, and dermal sensitization risk assessment of heavy metals in cosmetics. J Toxicol Env Heal A. 81 (11), 432-452.
27. Massadeh A., El-Khateeb M., Ibrahim S., 2017. Evaluation of Cd, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Pb in selected cosmetic products from Jordanian, Sudanese, and Syrian markets. Public health, 149, 130-137.
28. USEPA (United States. Environmental Protection Agency), 1989. Office of water regulations and standard. assessing human health risks from chemically contaminated fish and shellfish: a guidance manual, 89 (2). doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.4187.
29. SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consume r Safety), 2012. The SCCS’s notes of guidance for the testing of cosmetic substances and th eir safety evaluation–8th revision. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_commi ttees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_s_006 .pdf Available 2019.01.02.
30. USFDA, (United State Food and Drug Adminstration), 2011. United State Food Drug & Cosmetic Act on Hazardous Chemicals in Cosmetics. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/cosmetics/productsingredients/ingredients/default.htm
31. Nduka J.K., Odiba I.O., Aghoghome E.I., Umedum N.L., Nwosu M.J., 2016. Evaluation of harmful substances and health risk assessment of mercury and arsenic in cosmetic brands in Nigeria. Int J Chem. 8 (1), 178-187.
32. Bernauer U., Bodin L., Chaudry Q., Coenraads P.J., Dusinska M., Ezendam J., Gaffet E., Galli C.L., Granum B., Panteri E., Rogiers V., 2019. Opinion on skin sensitisation Quantitative Risk Assessment for fragrance ingredients (QRA2)-Submission I SCCS/1589/17–Final Opinion (Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, Luxembourg).
33. Api A.M., Basketter D.A., Cadby P.A., Cano M.F., Ellis G., Gerberick G.F., Griem P., McNamee P.M., Ryan C.A., Safford R., 2008. Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 52 (1), 3-23.
34. Safford R., 2008. The dermal sensitisation threshold—a TTC approach for allergic contact dermatitis. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 51 (2), 195-200.
35. FDA, Food and Drug Administration, 2013. Title 21—Food and Drugs. Chapter I – Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. Part74 – Listing of Color Additives Subject to Certification. Sec. 74.1306 D&C Red No.6. Available at: <http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=74.1306
36. FDA, Food and Drug Administration, 2012. Color additives and cosmetics. Available
at: <http://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/ColorAdditives/ Color Additivesin Specific Products /In Cosmetics / ucm 110032.html>.
37. Malakootian M., PourshaabanMazandarany M., Eskandari M., Pourmahyabady R., 2012. Determination of lead concentration in solid and liquid lipsticks available in Iran-Kerman. J Hormozgan Univ Med Sci. 16 (3), 241-246.
38. Adepoju-Bello A., Oguntibeju O.O., Adebisi R., Okpala N., Coker H., 2012. Evaluation of the concentration of toxic metals in cosmetic products in Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol. 11 (97), 16360-16364.
39. CPHR, Report for a survey of low cost cosmetics (lipstick) for the Ministry of Health, Centre for Public Health Research, New Zealand, Massey University, Wellington,, 2011.
40. Grosser Z., Davidowski L., Thompson L., Food T., 2011. The determination of metals in cosmetics. PerkinElmer Appl. Note, 1, 1-6.
41. Zakaria A., Ho Y.B., 2015. Heavy metals contamination in lipsticks and their associated health risks to lipstick consumers. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 73 (1), 191-195.
42.Gilmour N., Kimber I., Williams J., Maxwell G. 2019. Skin sensitization: Uncertainties, challenges, and opportunities for improved risk assessment. Contact Derm. 80(3), 195-200.
43. Iwegbue C.M., Bassey F.I., Obi G., Tesi G.O., Martincigh B.S., 2016. Concentrations and exposure risks of some metals in facial cosmetics in Nigeria. Toxicol Rep. 3, 464-472.
44. Soo Lim D., Min Choi S., Kim K.B., Yoon K., Kacew S., Sik Kim H., Lee B.M. 2018. Determination of fragrance allergens and their dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) in 107 spray perfumes. J Toxicol Env Heal A. 81(22), 1173-1185.
