Determination of Mercury in Fish (Otollithes ruber) and Canned Tuna Fish Marketed in Khuzestan and Shiraz,

محورهای موضوعی :

A. Behzadnia ¹ ( M.Sc, Food Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran )
E. Rahimi ² ( Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahrekord Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord, Iran )

تاریخ دریافت : 1390/12/20 تاریخ پذیرش : 1397/08/07 تاریخ انتشار : 1390/12/20

کلید واژه: Iran, fish, Mercury, Canned tuna fish,

چکیده مقاله :

In this study mercury was determined in canned tuna fish produced and distributed in Iran after digestion by the standard methods of AOAC. Mercury contents in fish and canned tuna fish were determined by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The metal contents expressed in mg/kg wet weight for mercury varied from 0.017 to 0.394 (average of 0. 089) and 0.023 to 0.529 (average of 0.146) in fish and canned tuna fish, respectively. The values were comparable and in the range of with the literature valves. The results of this study indicate that fish and tuna fish of produced and marketed in Iran have concentrations well below the standards FAO/WHO levels of these toxic metals and only one tuna samples exceeded the European dietary limit of 0.5 mg Hg/kg.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Agusa, T., T. Kunito, G. Yasunga, H. Iwata, A.
2. Subramanian, A. Ismail and S. Tanabe, 2005.
3. Concentration of trace elements in marine fish
4. and its risk assessment in Malaysia. Mar.
5. Pollut. Bull., 51, 896-911.
6. Andrée, S., W. Jira, K. H. Schwind, H. Wagner and
7. F. Schwägele, 2010. Chemical safety of meat
8. and meat products. Meat Sci., 86, 38ââ‚‌“48.
9. Ashraf, W., Z. Seddigi, A. Abulkibash and M.
10. Khalid, 2006. Levels of selected metals in
11. canned fish consumed in Kingdom of Saudi
12. Arabia. Environ. Monit. Assess., 117, 271-279.
13. Ashraf, W. 2006. Levels of selected heavy metals
14. in tuna fish. Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 31, 89-92.
15. Burger, J. and M. Gochfeld, 2005. Heavy metals in
16. commercial fish in New Jersey. Environ. Res.,
17. , 403ââ‚‌“412.
18. Codex Committee on Food Additives and
19. Contaminants, 2001. Comments submitted on
20. draft maximum levels for lead and cadmium.
21. Agenda 16c/16d, Joint FAO/WHO Food
22. Standards Programme, Thirty-third Session,
23. The Hague, The Netherlands, 12-16 March
25. Commission of the European Communities, (2001).
26. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 221/2002 of
27. February 2002 amending regulation (EC)
28. NO. 466/2002 setting maximum levels for
29. certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Official
30. Journal of the European Commucities,
31. Brussels, 6 February 2002.
32. Committee for Inland Fisheries of Africa, 1992.
33. Report of the third session of the working party
34. on pollution and fisheries. FAO Fisheries
35. Report No. 471. Food and Agriculture
36. Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
37. De Marco, S.G., S.E. Botte and J.E.
38. Marrcovecchio, 2006. Mercury distribution in
39. biotic and biological compartments within
40. several estuarine systems from Argentina,
41. -2005 periods. Chemosphere, 65, 213-
43. Emami Khansari, F., M. Ghazi-Khansari and M.
44. Abdollahi, 2005. Heavy metals content of
45. canned tuna fish. Food Chem., 93, 293-296.
46. Food and Drug Administration, 2004. Mercury
47. levels in commercial fish and shellfish.
48. Available: http://vm.cfsan.fda.gov/_frf/seamehg.
49. html. (accessed 5 January 2005).
50. Guallar, E., M. I. Sanz-Gallardo, P. vanââ‚‌™t Veer, P.
51. Bode, A. Aro, J. Gomez-Aracena, J. D. Kark,
52. R. A. Riemersma, J. M. Martín-Moreno and F.
53. J. Kok, 2002. Heavy metals and Myocardial
54. Infarction Study Group: mercury, fish oils, and
55. the risk of myocardial infarction. N. Engl. J.
56. Med., 347(22),1747−1754.
57. Hajeb, P., S. Jinap, A. Ismail, A.B. Fatimah, B.
58. Jamilah and M. Abdul Rahim, 2009.
59. Assessment of mercury level in commonly
60. consumed marine fishes in Malaysia. Food
61. Control, 20, 79-84.
62. Hamilton, M.A., P.W. Rode, M.E. Merchant and J.
63. Sneddon, 2008. Determination and comparison
64. of heavy metals in selected seafood, water,
65. vegetation and sediments by inductively
66. coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry
67. from an industrialized and pristine waterway in
68. Southwest Louisiana. Microchemical J., 88,
69. ââ‚‌“55.
70. Hightower, J.M. and D. Moore, 2003. Mercury
71. levels in high-end consumers of fish. Environ.
72. Health Persp., 111, 604ââ‚‌“608.
73. Hites, R.A., J.A. Foran, D.O. Carpenter, M.C.
74. Hamilton, B.A. Knuth, and S.J. Schwager,
75. Global assessment of organic
76. contaminants in farmed salmon. Science, 303,
77. ââ‚‌“229.
78. Houseuova, P., V. Kuban, S. Kracmar and J. Sitko,
79. Total mercury and mercury species in
80. birds and fish in an aquatic ecosystem in the
81. Czech Republic. Environ. Poll., 145,185-192.
82. Ikem, A. and N.O. Egiebor, 2005. Assessment of
83. trace elements in canned fishes (Mackerel,
84. Tuna, Salmon, Sardines and Herrings)
85. marketed in Georgia and Alabama (United
86. States of America). J. Food Comp. Anal.,
87. ,771-787.
88. Kagi, J.H. and A. Schaffer, 1998. Biochemistry of
89. metallothionein. Biochemistry, 27, 8509-8515.
90. Rice, G., J. Swartout, K. Mahaffey and R.
91. Schoeny, 2000. Derivation of US EPSââ‚‌™s oral
92. Reference Dose (RfD) for methylmercury.
93. Drug Chem. Toxicol., 23, 41ââ‚‌“54.
94. Porto, J.I.R., C.S.O. Araujo and E. Feldberga,
95. Mutagenic effects of mercury pollution
96. as revealed by micronucleus test on three
97. Amazonian fish species. Environ. Res., 97,
98. -292.
99. Rahimi, E., M. Hajisalehi, H.R. Kazemeini, A.
100. Chakeri, A. Khodabakhsh, M. Derakhshesh,
101. M. Mirdamadi, A.G. Ebadi, S.A. Rezvani and
102. M. Fallah Kashkahi, 2010. Analysis and
103. determination of mercury, cadmium and lead
104. in canned tuna fish marketed in Iran. Afr. J.
105. Biotechnol., 9(31), 4938-4941.
106. Soegiantoa, A. and M. Hamami, 2007, Trace Metal
107. Concentrations in Shrimp and Fish Collected
108. from Gresik Coastal Waters, Indonesia. Sci.
109. Asia, 33, 235-238.
110. Storelli, M.M., R. Giacominelli-Stuffler and G.O.
111. Marrcotrigiano, 2002. Total and
112. methylmercury residues in cartilaginous fish
113. from Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Poll. Bull., 44,
114. -1358.
115. Suppin, D., R. Zahlbruckner, C.H. Krapfenbauer-
116. Cermak, C.H. Hassan-Hauser and F.J.M.
117. Smulders, 2005. Mercury, lead and cadmium
118. content of fresh and canned fish collected from
119. Austrian retail operations. Nutrition, 29, 456-
121. Tuzen, M. and M. Soylak, 2007. Determination of
122. trace metals in canned fish marketed in
123. Turkey. Food Chem., 101, 1378-1382.
124. Tucker, B.W., 1997. Overview of current seafood
125. nutritional issues: Formation of potentially
126. toxic products. In: Shahidi F, Jones Y, Kitts
127. DD, editors. Seafood safety, processing and
128. biotechnology. Technomic Publishing Co. Inc.
129. p. 5-10.
130. Voegborlo, R.B., A.M. El-Methnani and M.Z.
131. Abedin, 1999. Mercury, cadmium and lead
132. content of canned tuna fish. Food Chem.,
133. :341-345