Investigation and Comparison of Four Different Discourses in Sociology and Iranian Society

محورهای موضوعی : Middle East Political Review

Ebrahim Ekhlasi ¹ , Maryam Khaleghinezhad Khaleghinezhad ²

1 - Ph.D. Candidate for Political Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 - Ph.D. in Political Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1402/07/03 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/07/03 تاریخ انتشار : 1402/06/10

کلید واژه: Hermeneutics, Sociology, Discourses, Iran society, Laclau, Mouffe’s,

چکیده مقاله :

The emergence of hermeneutics and the significance of meaning in the social sciences opened new horizons for the state and society. This study aims to compare the established discourses in sociology and Iranian society as, on the one hand, the emergence of discourse theory and the emphasis on the fluidity of meaning and action has led to the formation of four discourses in sociology, and on the other hand, there is no comprehensive study of the Iranian society in the context of the mentioned discourses. As shown by the characteristics and analysis of these four different periods, the constitutional era was introduced as having a strong society and a weak government. Then the nationalization of the Iranian oil industry, the reign of Reza Shah, and the contemporary era were introduced as periods with strong state and society, weak society and strong state, and small state and active society, respectively. It is noteworthy that all the salient features of strength (active) and weakness (passive) are considered to achieve more objective analyses.

منابع و مأخذ:

References

• Bammad, Badr al-Maluk (1347). Iranian women from the constitutional revolution to the white revolution, volume two, Tehran: Ibn Sina.


• Brown, Edward (1376). Iran's constitutional revolution, translator: Mehri Qazvini, Tehran, Nash Kavir.


• Saussure, Ferdinand Do (1378). General linguistics course, translated by Koresh Safavi, Tehran, Hermes.


• Kasraei, Mohammad Salar (1388). Lacla and Mufe's theory of discourse is an effective tool in understanding and explaining political phenomena, Politics Quarterly, Volume 39, Number 3, pp. 339-360.


• Rajaei, Ahmad Ali and Sarvari, Mahin (2004). The documents speak, first volume, Qalam Publications.


• Sadra, Muhammad (1386). Discourse theories from linguistics to political science, Islamic Revolution Studies, numbers 9 and 10, summer and autumn, pp. 171-208).


• Bashiriyeh, Hossein (2014). Reason in politics, Tehran, Shabak: Contemporary view.


• McDonnell, Diane (1380). An introduction to the theories of discourse, translated by Hossein Ali Nozari, Tehran, Farhang Gahdman, first edition.


• Moghadami, Mohammad Taghi (2018). Lacla and Moff's theory of discourse analysis and its critique, Social Cultural Knowledge, second year, second issue, Spring, pp. 124-91.


• Moshirzadeh, Hamira (2012). Analytical framework for explaining the constitutional revolution, examining the intellectual and social foundations of constitutionalism in Iran, Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies.


• Mirahamdi, Mansour and Jabari Nasir, Hassan (2009). The theoretical model of the absolute state and the emergence of the quasi-modern absolute state in Iran, Journal of Political Science, Year 6, Number 1, Winter, pp. 167-199.


• Nafisi, Saeed (1345). Contemporary history of Iran from the third coup d'Esfand 1299 to Shahrivar 1320, Tehran: Foroughi.


• Yazdan Panah, Shahnaz (2014). A review of the ups and downs of Iran's constitutional revolution (1293-1284). Available at http://www.iichs.org/PDF_files/A_Faraz.Foroud_mashrute.pdf

Hamraz, Vida (1376). Cultural end in the reign of Reza Shah, Contemporary History of Iran, first year, first issue, Spring,