مقایسه مؤلفه‌های روابط موضوعی و خودشناسی انسجامی در زوج‌های با ازدواج‌ سفید و رسمی

محورهای موضوعی : روان درمانگری

محمد احمدوند شاهوردی ¹ , فریده رمضانی مقدم آرانی ²

1 - کارشناس ارشد روان ‌شناسی عمومی دانشگاه تهران
2 - دکتری روان ‌شناسی سلامت دانشگاه تهران

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/10/12 تاریخ پذیرش : 1401/10/12 تاریخ انتشار : 1401/04/01

کلید واژه: روابط موضوعی, خودشناسی انسجامی, ازدواج سفید,

چکیده مقاله :

هـدف ایـن پژوهـش مقایسـۀ مؤلفه‌هـای روابـط موضوعـی و خودشناسـی انسـجامی در زوج‌هـای ازدواج سـفید و ازدواج رسـمی بـود. روش پژوهـش از نـوع علی-مقایسـه‌ای و جامعـۀ آمـاری آن زوج‌هـای ازدواج سـفید و ازدواج رسـمی ۲۰ تـا ۴۰سـال‌های بـود کـه در سـال ۱۴۰۰ در ایـران سـکونت داشـتند. ۱۲۰ نفـر زن و مـرد به‌صـورت نمونه‌بـرداری داوطلـب انتخـاب شـدند و سـیاهۀ روابـط موضوعـی بـل (بـل، ۲۰۰۷) و مقیـاس خودشناسـی انسـجامی (قربانـی، واتسـون و هارگیـس، ۲۰۰۸) را تکمیـل کردنـد. در پایـان، بـرای تحلیـل داده‌هـا از تحلیـل واریانـس چندمتغیـری اسـتفاده شـد. نتایـج نشـان داد کـه تفـاوت معنـاداری در مؤلفه‌هـای روابـط موضوعـی و خودشناسـی انسـجامی در زوجهـای ازدواج سـفید و ازدواج رسـمی وجـود نـدارد. در مجمـوع، یافته‌هـای ایـن پژوهـش می‌توانـد بـه درک روانشـناختی دقیق‌تـر از ایـن پدیـدۀ اجتماعـی نوظهـور در جامعـۀ درحال‌گـذار ایـران کمـک شـایانی کنـد، تضـاد میـان برخـی یافته‌هـای پژوهش‌هـای گذشـته را تـا حـدی برطـرف سـازد و بـه پژوهش‌هـای آینـده جهـت دهـد.

چکیده انگلیسی:

This study aimed to compare the Object Relations and Integrative Self-knowledge between officially married couples and cohab- itants. The statistical population of this causal-comparative study included all officially married and cohabitant couples between 18 to 40 years old living in Iran in 2021. 120 men and women were selected by convenience sampling method and filled out Bell Object Relations Inventory (Bell, 2007) and Integrative Self-knowledge Scale (Ghorbani, Watson & Harges, 2008). To analyze the data of this study, multivariate analysis of variance was applied. The results indicated that there was no significant difference in Object Relations and Integrative Self-knowledge components between cohabitants and officially married couples. Findings of this study can contribute to better psychological understanding of this emerging phenomenon in the transitional society of Iran, resolve partly the basic contradictions in the results of recent researches and open new horizons for future studies.

منابع و مأخذ:

Agh Atabay, S. (2015). Investigating the moderating role of self-knowledge processes on the relationship of transliminality with narcissism, psychopathy and mental health. Master’s thesis, University of Tehran. [In Persian].

Ahmadi, S., Azadfallah, P., & Farahani, H. (2018). The assessment of prevalent relationship patterns among Iranian couples, according to core conflictual relation- ship theme: A qualitative study. Clinical Psychology Studies, 8(32), 67-92. [In Persian].

Ahmadvand Shahverdi, M., Pourhosein, R., & Gholamali Lavasani, M. (2022). A phenomenological exploration of cohabitation (Case study: Youth in Tehran). Rooyesh-e-Ra- vanshenasi Journal, 10(11), 39-50. [In Persian].

Akbarzadeh, F. & Hashemianfar, S. (2020). From con- ventional ethics to post-conventional ethics: Typology of commitment experience in cohabitation. Journal of Sociology of Social Institutions, 6(14), 177-206. [In Persian].

Azad Armaki, T., Sharifi Saee, M., Isari, M., & Tale- bi, S. (2012). Cohabitation; The new family pattern in Tehran. Sociological Cultural Studies, 3(1), 43-77. [In Persian].

Bartolf, L. K. (1991). A concurrent validity study of the Comprehensive Object Relations Profile relative to the Ego Function Assessment Questionnaire-Revised. Doctoral dissertation, School of Psychology, Biola University.

Bell, M. D. (2007). Bell Object Relations and Reality Testing Inventory: BORRTI. Western Psychological Services.

Carr, D. (2011). Premarital sex in America: How young Americans meet, mate, and think about marriage by Mark Regnerus and Jeremy Uecker. American Journal of Sociology, 117(3), 295-309.

Ebrahimi, M. (2019). A study on the causes, areas and im- plications of the youth tendency to cohabitation (Case study: Youth in Tehran). Strategic Studies on Youth and Sports, 18(45), 127-148. [In Persian].

Farahmand, M., Javaherchian, N., & Javaherchian, L. (2014). Globalization of culture and rethinking of sexual interactions: A case study of the youth in Yazd. Strategic Studies of Public Policy, 5(14), 175-204. [In Persian].

Ghorbani, N., Christopher, J., Cunningham, C., & Wat- son, P. J. (2010). Comparative analysis of integrative self-knowledge, mindfulness. International Journal of Psychology, 42(2), 147- 154.

Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., Bing, M. N., Davison, H. K., & LeBreton, D. L. (2003). Two faces of self-knowl- edge: Cross-cultural development of measures in Iran and United States. Genetic, Social, and General Psy- chology Monographs, 129, 238-268.

Ghorbani, N., Watson, P. J., & Hargis, M. B. (2008). In- tegrative self-knowledge scale: Correlations and incre- mental validity of a cross-cultural measure developed in Iran and United States. The Journal of Psychology, .395-412 ,142

Golchin, M. & Safari, S. (2017). Tehran metropolis and the emergence of symptoms of new form of the male-female relationships: The study of the fields, processes and consequences of cohabitation. Jour- nal of Iranian Cultural Research, 10(1), 29-57. [In Persian].

Goldman, G. A., & Anderson, T. (2007). Quality of object relations and security of attachment as predictors of early therapeutic alliance. Journal of Counseling Psy- chology, 54(2), 111-117.

Karimiyan, N., & Zarei, E. (2016). A qualitative study: The effect of opposite-sex premarital cohabitation on women’s life status. Quarterly Journal of Women and Society, 7(26), 39-68. [In Persian].

Kelly, F. D. (2014). The assessment of object relations phenomena in adolescents: Tat and Rorschach Measure. New York: Routledge.

Khalajabadi Farahani, F., Kazemipour, S., & Rahimi, A. (2013). The influence on premarital heterosexu- al relationships on marital timing and marital desire among college students in Tehran. Journal of Family Research, 9(1), 7-28. [In Persian].

Kuperberg, A. (2019). Premarital cohabitation and direct marriage in the United States: 1956–2015. Marriage & Family Review, 55(5), 447-475.

Marković, Z. (2000). Psychoanalytic conception of mar- riage and marital relationships. The Scientific Journal Facta Universitatis, 2(7), 379-389.

Mesgarian, F., Azadfallah, P., Farahani, H., & Ghorba- ni, N. (2017). Psychometric properties of Bell Object Relations Inventory (BORI). Clinical Psychology and Personality, 15(2), 193-204. [In Persian].

Moeinipour Z. (2021). Comparison of relaxed lifestyle, family functioning and spouses’ sense of happiness among white, traditional and modern married couples. Rooyesh-e-Ravanshenasi Journal, 10(1), 35-52. [In Persian].

Razeghi, N., Mazaheri, M. A., & Ahadi, H. (2005). The role of attachment styles in mate selection preferenc- es. Developmental Psychology: Iranian Psychologists, 11(44), 405-415. [In Persian].

Rosenfeld, M. J., & Roesler, K. (2019). Cohabitation ex- perience and cohabitation’s association with marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and Family, 81(1), .42-58

Sant Clair, M. (2011). An Introduction to thematic relation- ship and psychology itself. Teanslated by A. Tahmasb & A. Aghaee, Tehran: Ney Publication. [In Persian].

Sefidgar, F. (2017). The relationship between social or- der and cohabitation among youth in Tehran. Master’s thesis, Shahid Beheshti University. [In Persian].

Sohrabzadeh, M., Norozi, M., & Asghari Kaviri, A. (2017). Cohabitation, motivations and contexts. Sociology and Lifestyle Management, 3(9), 189-249. [In Persian].

Winnicott, D. W. (1965). The maturational processes and the facilitating environment: Studies in the theory of emotional development. New York: International Universities Press

Zhang, Y. (2017). Premarital cohabitation and marital dissolution in postreform China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 79(5), 1435-1449.