Enhancement of Iranian EFL University Students’ Reading Comprehension through Explicit and Implicit Strategy Instruction

محورهای موضوعی : نشریه زبان و ترجمه

Guiti Mortazavizadeh ¹ , Mohammad Golshan ² , Mohammad Javad Rezai ³

1 - Department of English Language, Maybod Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maybod, Iran
2 - English Department, Maybod Branch, Islamic Azad University, Maybod, Iran
3 - Department of English Language, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran

تاریخ دریافت : 1401/12/23 تاریخ پذیرش : 1402/02/07 تاریخ انتشار : 1403/05/23

کلید واژه: metacognitive reading strategies, explicit strategy instruction, implicit strategy instruction, reading comprehension,

چکیده مقاله :

The role of metacognitive processing in learning different language skills has been considered by scholars in the field of English Language Teaching. The present quasi-experimental study sought to investigate the effect of explicit and implicit strategy instruction on reading comprehension among Iranian university students. A total of 119 male and female English as a foreign Language (EFL) university students aged 20-28, enrolled in three reading courses, were selected conveniently from a university in the central part of Iran. The three classes were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: explicit group (n=37), implicit group (n=39), and control group (n=43). The experimental groups received treatment in the form of explicit and implicit strategy instruction while the control group followed the conventional course of instruction. Two different validated reading comprehension tests were used to collect measures of reading ability, and some reading texts taken from Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Old School were used as the materials of the study. Data analysis using ANOVA showed that although the reading scores of both experimental groups improved from pretest to posttest, the explicit strategy instruction group outperformed the implicit group in reading comprehension. Pedagogic implications stemming from the findings are discussed.

چکیده انگلیسی:

The role of metacognitive processing in learning different language skills has been considered by scholars in the field of English Language Teaching. The present quasi-experimental study sought to investigate the effect of explicit and implicit strategy instruction on reading comprehension among Iranian university students. A total of 119 male and female English as a foreign Language (EFL) university students aged 20-28, enrolled in three reading courses, were selected conveniently from a university in the central part of Iran. The three classes were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: explicit group (n=37), implicit group (n=39), and control group (n=43). The experimental groups received treatment in the form of explicit and implicit strategy instruction while the control group followed the conventional course of instruction. Two different validated reading comprehension tests were used to collect measures of reading ability, and some reading texts taken from Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Old School were used as the materials of the study. Data analysis using ANOVA showed that although the reading scores of both experimental groups improved from pretest to posttest, the explicit strategy instruction group outperformed the implicit group in reading comprehension. Pedagogic implications stemming from the findings are discussed.

منابع و مأخذ:

Afflerbach, P., & Cho, B. Y. (2009). Identi-fying and describing constructively responsive comprehension strategies in new and traditional forms of read-ing. Handbook of research on read-ing comprehension, 4, 69-90.
Ajideh, P., Zohrabi, M., & Pouralvar, K. (2018). The effect of explicit instruc-tion of metacognitive reading strate-gies on ESP reading comprehension in academic settings. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(4), 77-86.
Almasi, J.F. (2003). Teaching strategic pro-cesses in reading. Guilford.
Almasi, J. F., & Fullerton, S. K. (2012). Teaching strategic processes in read-ing. Guilford Press.
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Arasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom’s taxonomy of educational ob-jectives. Longman.
Anderson N. J. (2012). Metacognition: Awareness of language learning. In: Mercer S., Ryan S., Williams M. (E) Psychology for Language Learning (pp. 169-187). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137032829_12
Anderson, N. J. (2013). Teaching reading. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English language teaching (pp. 67-86): McGraw-Hill Publishers.
Ardasheva, Y., Wang, Z., Adesope, O. O., & Valentine, J. C. (2017). Exploring effectiveness and moderators of lan-guage learning strategy instruction on second language and self-regulated learning outcomes. Review of Educa-tional Research, 87(3), 544-582.
Arslan, S. (2015). Investigating the predic-tive role of critical thinking on meta-cognition with structural equation modeling. MOJES: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 1-10.
Bachman, L. F. & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world. Oxford University Press.
Bouchard, M. (2005). Comprehension strategies for English language learners. Scholastic Inc.
Brevik, L. M. (2019). Explicit reading strat-egy instruction or daily use of strate-gies? Studying the teaching of reading comprehension through naturalistic classroom observation in English L2. Reading and Writing, 32(9), 2281-2310.
Çakici, D. (2018). Metacognitive awareness and critical thinking abilities of pre-service EFL teachers. Journal of Edu-cation and Learning, 7(5), 116-129.
Carrell, P. L. (1998). Metacognitive aware-ness and second language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.
Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Addison Wesley Longman.
Chen, S., & McDunn, B. A. (2022). Meta-cognition: History, measurements, and the role in early childhood devel-opment and education. Learning and Motivation, 78, 101-786.
Choy, S. C., & Cheah, P. K. (2009). Teach-er perceptions of critical thinking among students and its influence on higher education. International Jour-nal of teaching and learning in High-er Education, 20(2), 198-206.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.
Daradkeh, A. A. (2020). The use of reading strategies in predicting reading com-prehension: A case study of EFL uni-versity Saudi students. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature
Donker, A. S., De Boer, H., Kostons, D., Van Ewijk, C. D., & van der Werf, M. P. (2014). Effectiveness of learning strategy instruction on academic per-formance: A meta-analysis. Educa-tional Research Review, 11, 1-26.
Duffy, G. G., Roeher, L. R., Sivan, E., Rackliffe, G., Book, C., Meloth, M. S., Vavrus, L. G., Wesselman, R., Putnam, J., & Bassiri, D. (1987). Ef-fects of explaining the reasoning as-sociated with using reading strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 347-368.
Fathi, J., & Afzali, M. (2020). The effect of second language reading strategy in-struction on young Iranian EFL learn-ers' reading comprehension. Interna-tional Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 475-488.
Fathi, J., & Shirazizadeh, M. (2020). The effects of a second language reading strategy instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ reading comprehension and reading anxiety. Language Related Research, 11(4), 267-295.
Ghaith, G., & El-Sanyoura, H. (2019). Reading comprehension: The mediat-ing role of metacognitive strategies. Reading in a Foreign Language, 31(1), 19-43.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Ernst Klett Sprachen.
Grabe, W. (2014). Key issues in L2 reading development. In Proceedings of the 4th CELC symposium for English lan-guage teachers-selected papers (pp. 8-18). NUS
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching: Reading. Routledge.
Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D.S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading com-prehension strategies: Theories, in-terventions, and technologies (pp. 3–26). Erlbaum.
Gurcay, D., & Ferah, H. O. (2018). High school students' critical thinking relat-ed to their metacognitive self-regulation and Physics self-efficacy beliefs. Journal of Education and training Studies, 6(4), 125-130.
Gutierrez, A. P., & Schraw, G. (2015). Ef-fects of strategy training and incen-tives on students’ performance, con-fidence, and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(3), 386-404.
Indriyana, B. S., & Kuswandono, P. (2019). Developing students' higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in reading: English teachers' strategies in selected junior high schools. Journal of Eng-lish Teaching, 5(3), 204-216.
Iwai, Y. (2011). The effects of metacogni-tive reading strategies: Pedagogical implications for EFL/ESL teachers. The Reading Matrix 11(2), 150, 159.
Iwai, Y. (2016). Promoting strategic readers: Insights of preservice teachers’ un-derstanding of metacognitive reading strategies. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 100-104.
Javadi, M., Keyvanara. M., Yaghoobbi, M., Hassanzade, A., and Ebadi, Z. (2010). The Relationship between metacogni-tive awareness of reading strategies and students’ academic status in Isfa-han University of Medical Sciences. Iranian medical science journal, 3(10), 246-254.
Kuhn, D., & Dean, Jr, D. (2004). Metacog-nition: A bridge between cognitive psychology and educational prac-tice. Theory into practice, 43(4), 268-273.
Limbach, B., & Waugh, W. (2010). Devel-oping higher level thinking. Journal of instructional pedagogies, 3, 1-9.
Maeng, U. (2014). The effectiveness of reading strategy instruction: A meta-analysis. ENGLISH TEACHING, 69(3), 105-127.
Magno, C. (2010). The role of metacogni-tive skills in developing critical think-ing. Metacognition and Learn-ing, 5(2), 137-156.
Mehrpour, S., Sadighi, F., & Bagheri, Z. (2012). Teaching reading comprehen-sion strategies to Iranian EFL pre-university students. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS) 4 (1), 66/4.
Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the metacogni-tive awareness of the Reading strate-gies inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219–246 https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.3
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Jour-nal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259. DOI: 10.1037//0022- 0663.94.2.249
Navarro, Z. I. T. (2021). Metacognitive strategies for reading comprehension in basic education students. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 9, 34-46. DOI: 10.9734/ajess/2021/v14i430362
Nietfeld, J. L., & Schraw, G. (2002). The effect of knowledge and strategy training on monitoring accuracy. The Journal of Educational Re-search, 95(3), 131-142.
Okkinga, M., van Steensel, R., van Gelderen, A. J., van Schooten, E., Sleegers, P. J., & Arends, L. R. (2018). Effectiveness of reading-strategy interventions in whole class-rooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4), 1215-1239.
Oxford, R. (2011). Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Lan-guage Teaching, 44(02), 167 - 180.
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis us-ing IBM SPSS. Routledge.
Pearson, P. D. (1994). Assessment and di-versity. In L. Darling-. Hammond (Ed.), Review of Research in Educa-tion, 20, 337-392.
Peña-Ayala, A. (2015). Metacognition: fun-daments, applications, and trends (p. 362). Springer.
Piaget, J. (1953). The origin of intelligence in the child. Routledge.
Plonsky, L. (2011). The effectiveness of second language strategy instruction: A meta‐analysis. Language learning, 61(4), 993-1038.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Ver-bal protocols in reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Erlbaum.
Pressley, M., & Gaskins, I. W. (2006). Met-acognitively competent reading com-prehension is constructively respon-sive reading: How can such reading be developed in students? Metacogni-tion and Learning, 1(1), 99-113.
Schraw, G., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2015). Met-acognitive strategy instruction high-lights the role of monitoring and con-trol processes. In Metacognition: Fundaments, applications, and trends (pp. 3-16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11062-2_1
Setyarini, S., Muslim, A. B., Rukmini, D., Yuliasri, I., & Mujianto, Y. (2018). Thinking
critically while storytelling: Improving children’s HOTS and English oral competence. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 189-197.
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differ-ences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449.
Soodmand Afshar, H., & Bayat, M. (2021). An Investigation into the Impact of Language Learning Strategy Instruc-tion on the Less Successful Iranian EFL Learners’ L2 Achievement. 12(3), 1-23.‎ DOI: https://doi.org/10.29252/LRR.12.3.1
Sunggingwati, D., & Nguyen, H. T. M. (2013). Teachers' questioning in read-ing lessons: A case study in Indone-sia. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 80-95.
Tavakoli, H., & Koosha, M. (2015). The effect of explicit metacognitive strat-egy instruction on reading compre-hension and self-efficacy beliefs: The case of Iranian university EFL stu-dents. PortaLinguarum, 25, 119-133.
Vandergrift, L. (1999). Facilitating second language listening comprehension: Acquiring successful strategies. ELT Journal, 53 (3), 168-176.
Vijayaratnam, P. (2012). Developing higher order thinking skills and team com-mitment via group problem solving: A bridge to the real world. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 53-63.
Yapp, D., de Graaff, R., & van den Bergh, H. (2021). Effects of reading strategy instruction in English as a second lan-guage on students’ academic reading comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 154-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820985236
Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacogni-tive strategy use and academic read-ing achievement: Insights from a Chi-nese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Languages Teaching, 10(1), 54-69.