Enhancing Reading Comprehension through Visual Narrative Strategies among Iranian EFL Learners: A Multi-Level Proficiency Approach
Mustafa Fakher
1
(
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
)
Nesa Nabifar
2
(
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
)
Davud Kuhi
3
(
Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran
)
کلید واژه: Visual Narrative Strategies, Reading Comprehension, Multimodal Literacy, EFL Learners, Iranian Education, Proficiency Levels,
چکیده مقاله :
This study investigates the efficacy of Visual Narrative Strategies (VNS), a pedagogical model integrating visual content with learner interaction, on reading comprehension outcomes among Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Specifically targeting pre-intermediate and upper-intermediate proficiency levels, the research examines how personalized interpretation and dialogic engagement with visuals can enhance comprehension. A cohort of 120 learners aged 13–20 from two private language institutes in Urmia, Iran, was randomly divided into experimental and control groups across the two proficiency tiers. The experimental groups participated in ten VNS-based sessions incorporating image-rich texts, guided group discussions, and reflective tasks. Reading comprehension was measured using the Preliminary English Test (PET) and Oxford Placement Test (OPT), both pre- and post-intervention. Paired t-tests and Two-Way ANOVA analyses revealed statistically significant gains in the experimental groups' post-test scores across both proficiency levels, with no significant interaction effects between treatment and proficiency. These findings substantiate the role of VNS in facilitating cognitive engagement and textual understanding. The study aligns with current trends in multimodal literacy and offers practical implications for curriculum designers, language educators, and EFL policy makers seeking to promote effective and inclusive language instruction.
چکیده انگلیسی :
This study investigates the efficacy of Visual Narrative Strategies (VNS), a pedagogical model integrating visual content with learner interaction, on reading comprehension outcomes among Iranian English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners. Specifically targeting pre-intermediate and upper-intermediate proficiency levels, the research examines how personalized interpretation and dialogic engagement with visuals can enhance comprehension. A cohort of 120 learners aged 13–20 from two private language institutes in Urmia, Iran, was randomly divided into experimental and control groups across the two proficiency tiers. The experimental groups participated in ten VNS-based sessions incorporating image-rich texts, guided group discussions, and reflective tasks. Reading comprehension was measured using the Preliminary English Test (PET) and Oxford Placement Test (OPT), both pre- and post-intervention. Paired t-tests and Two-Way ANOVA analyses revealed statistically significant gains in the experimental groups' post-test scores across both proficiency levels, with no significant interaction effects between treatment and proficiency. These findings substantiate the role of VNS in facilitating cognitive engagement and textual understanding. The study aligns with current trends in multimodal literacy and offers practical implications for curriculum designers, language educators, and EFL policy makers seeking to promote effective and inclusive language instruction.
Afflerbach, P., Cho, B. Y., Kim, J. Y., Crassas, M. E., & Doyle, B. (2015). Reading comprehension. Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension, 3–24. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315761436
Ajayi, L. (2011). Multimodal texts and new pedagogies: Implications for English language teaching. English Language Teaching, 4 (2), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p215
Azadi, H., Tahririan, M. H., & Hashemi, M. R. (2018). The effect of multimodal instruction on EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9 (6), 1189–1196. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0906.06
Beavis, C., Dezuanni, M., O'Mara, J., & Rowsell, J. (2022). Digital literacies, learning and the arts: Reimagining meaning making in schools. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003164999
Brumberger, E. R. (2011). The rhetoric of visual literacy: Exploring the role of visuals in professional communication pedagogy. Technical Communication, 58 (2), 141–154.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Harvard University Press.
Chun, D. M. (2016). Multimedia applications. In F. Helm & L. Ortega (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language research (pp. 355–372). Routledge.
Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3 (3), 149–210. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01669798
Dalton, B., & Grisham, D. L. (2011). eVoc strategies: 10 ways to use technology to build vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 64 (5), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.5.6
Fathi, V., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). Enhancing Iranian EFL learners' reading comprehension through task-based instruction. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 12 (4), 669–684. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-09-2019-0178
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Hsin, C.-T., Tsai, M.-J., & Chen, S.-C. (2021). Effects of multimedia annotation modes on EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension. Language Learning & Technology, 25 (1), 1–18. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/102303
Jewitt, C. (2020). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Jian, I.-L., & Ko, Y. (2017). Picture-word integration in text processing: Evidence from eye movements. Reading in a Foreign Language, 29 (1), 1–19. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2017/jian/jian.pdf
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press.
Ko, Y., & Wang, Y. (2018). Using digital storytelling to enhance EFL learners’ English proficiency and motivation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31 (3), 217–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1370004
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2020). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Lau, K. (2016). Investigating the relationship between reading strategy use and reading comprehension in Chinese EFL learners. System, 60 , 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.05.002
Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108975487
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2010). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38 (1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_4
Naderi, M., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2019). The impact of multimodal input on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Instruction, 12 (2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12210a
Nasri, M., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2019). The effect of pictorial input on speaking fluency and lexical retrieval of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Instruction, 12 (1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12109a
Nation, I. S. P. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Newfield, D., & Stein, P. (2020). Multimodal pedagogies in diverse classrooms: Representation, relations and re-design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003025069
Nikolova, O. (2020). The effects of visual aids on vocabulary retention and recall in EFL classrooms. RELC Journal, 51 (1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688219896214
OECD. (2021). PISA 2018 results (Volume V): Effective policies, successful schools. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5cac1dc-en
Paivio, A. (2014). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical perspective. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813039
Renkl, A., & Scheiter, K. (2017). Learning with texts and pictures: Hypertext and multimedia environments. Educational Psychologist, 52 (2), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1262270
Rowsell, J., & Walsh, M. (2020). Multimodal literacy: Researching classroom practices. Teachers College Press.
Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2013). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813039
Sadeghi, K., Fazilatfar, A. M., & Karbalaei, A. (2022). Reading comprehension difficulties in Iranian EFL contexts: A review of challenges and solutions. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 7 (1), 1–11.
Schrader, P. G., & Rapp, D. N. (2016). Integrating visual and linguistic knowledge during reading. Discourse Processes, 53 (1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2014.996312
Serafini, F. (2014). Reading the visual: An introduction to teaching multimodal literacy. Teachers College Press.
Shariati, M., & Barabadi, E. (2019). The effectiveness of using authentic materials in improving EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10 (4), 693–702. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1004.03
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2015). Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093119
Tsai, M.-J., Hsu, C.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2021). Scientific reading comprehension performance and behavioral patterns of students in different online inquiry learning environments. Computers & Education, 165, 103803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103803
UNESCO. (2022). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.
Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33 (3), 211–224.
