Effect of Multiple Intelligence-based Activities on Iranian EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Performance
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه زبان و ترجمه
Mozhgan Madhkhan
1
,
Hadi Salehi
2
,
Omid Tabatabaei
3
,
Mohammad Reza Talebinejad
4
1 - English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
2 - English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
3 - English Department, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
4 - English Department, Shahreza Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shahreza, Iran
کلید واژه: EFL Learners, MIBAs, Multiple Intelligence, Vocabulary Skill,
چکیده مقاله :
This study examined the impact of Multiple Intelligence-based activities (MIBAs) on male and female EFL students’ vocabulary performance. To meet this objective Oxford Placement Test (OQPT), vocabulary pre-posttests, and questionnaires were spread among 60 Iranian male and female EFL students in two groups studying at Jahad Daneshgahi of Isfahan University of Technology. They were separated into control and experimental groups, and the oxford vocabulary level test was applied both as the pretests and posttests to evaluate students’ vocabulary performance. The participants in the control group were engaged in repetition drills, reading aloud, and task completion, whereas those in the corresponding experimental group were involved with completing crossword puzzles, designing alphabetic codes, and using maps to study geographical locations. The instruction lasted for 12 weeks, two hours each week, and after that, the posttests were applied. Data were evaluated using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The outcomes specified that multiple intelligence-based activities for teaching improved the experimental group’s vocabulary performance based on their posttest scores. There was a statistically significant dissimilarity amongst word marks of the students of the experimental group in the post-test. There was a significant difference between male and female learners in vocabulary scores in that males had a higher score after being exposed to alphabetical coding and crossword puzzles. The findings postulated that teachers need to follow guidelines that can help them to enhance learners’ awareness of their multiple intelligences through intelligence activity-based approaches while teaching vocabulary.
This study examined the impact of Multiple Intelligence-based activities (MIBAs) on male and female EFL students’ vocabulary performance. To meet this objective Oxford Placement Test (OQPT), vocabulary pre-posttests, and questionnaires were spread among 60 Iranian male and female EFL students in two groups studying at Jahad Daneshgahi of Isfahan University of Technology. They were separated into control and experimental groups, and the oxford vocabulary level test was applied both as the pretests and posttests to evaluate students’ vocabulary performance. The participants in the control group were engaged in repetition drills, reading aloud, and task completion, whereas those in the corresponding experimental group were involved with completing crossword puzzles, designing alphabetic codes, and using maps to study geographical locations. The instruction lasted for 12 weeks, two hours each week, and after that, the posttests were applied. Data were evaluated using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The outcomes specified that multiple intelligence-based activities for teaching improved the experimental group’s vocabulary performance based on their posttest scores. There was a statistically significant dissimilarity amongst word marks of the students of the experimental group in the post-test. There was a significant difference between male and female learners in vocabulary scores in that males had a higher score after being exposed to alphabetical coding and crossword puzzles. The findings postulated that teachers need to follow guidelines that can help them to enhance learners’ awareness of their multiple intelligences through intelligence activity-based approaches while teaching vocabulary.
Abdulkader, F. A., Gündogdu, K., & Mourad,
A. E. (2009). The effectiveness of a
multiple intelligence-based program on
improving certain reading skills in 5thyear primary learning disabled students.
Ahour, T., & Abdi, M. (2015). The
relationship between EFL learners'
multiple intelligences and vocabulary
learning strategies use with a focus on
gender. Theory and Practice in
Language Studies, 5(4), 800.
Akçin, S., & ÇETİNKAYA, Y. B. 2014). The
effects of using activities based on
Multiple Intelligence Theory on 11th
grade students’ learning and retention of
English vocabulary (. Batı Anadolu
Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(9), 71-88.
Allen, V. F. (1983). Techniques in Teaching
Vocabulary: ERIC.
Anderson, M. (1998). Mental retardation
general intelligence and modularity.
Learning and individual differences,
10(3), 159-178.
Armstrong, T. (2009). Multiple intelligences in
the classroom: Ascd.
Arnold, J., & Fonseca, M. C. (2004). Multiple
intelligence theory and foreign language
learning: A brain-based perspective.
International journal of English studies,
4(1), 119-136.
Barrington*, E. (2004). Teaching to student
diversity in higher education: How
multiple intelligence theory can help.
Teaching in higher education, 9(4),
421-434.
Baş, G., & Beyhab, Ö. (2010). Effects of
multiple intelligences supported
project-based learning on students’
achievement levels and attitudes
towards English lesson. International
Electronic Journal of Elementary
Education, 2(3), 365-386.
Boonkongsaen, N., Nakaved, P., & Pranarach,
M. (2020). The Link between Thai EFL
Students’ Multiple Intelligences and
Use of Vocabulary Learning Strategies.
Journal of Studies in the English
Language, 15(2), 130-153.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R.
(2000). How people learn (Vol. 11):
Washington, DC: National academy press.
Bümen, N. (2002). Çoklu zeka uygulamaları. .
Calik, B., & Birgili, B. (2013). Multiple
intelligence theory for gifted education:
Criticisms and implications. Journal for
the Education of Gifted Young
Scientists, 1(2), 1-12.
Celce-Murcia, M. (1990). Discourse analysis
and grammar instruction. Annual review
of applied linguistics, 11, 135-151.
Chen, S.-F. (2005). Cooperative learning,
multiple intelligences and proficiency:
Application in college English
language teaching and learning. ACU
Research Bank.
12 Effect of Multiple Intelligence-based Activities on Iranian EFL …
Christison, M. A. (1998). Applying Multiple
Intelligences Theory in Preservice and
Inservice TEFL Education Programs.
Paper presented at the Forum.
Cohen, A. D., Weaver, S. J., & Li, T.-Y.
(1996). The impact of strategies-based
instruction on speaking a foreign
language: Center for Advanced
Research in Language Acquisition.
Currie, K. L. (2003). Multiple intelligence
theory and the ESL classroom--
preliminary considerations. The Internet
TESL Journal, 4(4), 263-270.
Curtin, E. (2005). Instructional Styles Used by
Regular Classroom Teachers while
Teaching Recently Mainstreamed ESL
Students: Six Urban Middle School
Teachers in Texas Share Their
Experiences and Perceptions.
Multicultural Education, 12(4), 36.
Dajani, D., & McLaughlin, S. (2009). Implementing the first Palestinian English
language curriculum: A need for teacher
empowerment.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teacher learning that supports student learning.
Teaching for intelligence, 2(1), 91-100.
Farjami, H. (2002). The applications of MI
theory in designing activities and for
teaching English. Unpublished master’s
thesis). University of Semnan, Semnan,
Iran.
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of
engineering education, 94(1), 57-72.
Gaines, D., & Lehmann, D. (2002). Improving
Student Performance in Reading Comprehension through the Use of Multiple
Intelligences.
Gardner, H. E. (1983). Frames of mind: The
theory of multiple intelligences: Basic
books.
Gouws, F. (2007). Teaching and learning
through multiple intelligences in the
outcomes-based education classroom.
Africa Education Review, 4(2), 60-
74.
Hajebi, M., Taheri, S., & Noshadi, M. (2018).
The relationship between interpersonal
intelligence, reading activity and vocabulary learning among Iranian EFL
learners. Int. J. Engl. Lang. Transl. Stud,
6, 48-56.
Hajhashemi, K., Ghombavani, F., & Yazdi
Amirkhiz, S. Y. (2011). The relationship between Iranian EFL high school
students’ multiple intelligence scores
and their use of learning strategies. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 214-222.
Haji, H. G. R., & Baleghizadeh, S. (2004). A
Comparison Between The Effects Of
The Teaching Method Based On Gardner's Theory And The Traditional Ones
On The Students'performance In Mathematics.
Hall, J. (2004). Business intelligence: The
missing link in your CRM strategy. Information Management, 14(6), 36.
Harmer, J. (2007). The practice of English
language teaching: Pearson longman.
Hashemian, M., & Adibpour, M. (2012). Relationship between Iranian L2 learners’
multiple intelligences and language
learning strategies. Journal of Research
in Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 25-43.
Hoerr, T. R. (2000). Becoming a multiple intelligences school: ASCD.
Hornby, A. S. (1956). The advanced learner s
dictionary of current english: Oxford.
Jiang, X., & Zhou, L. (2020). Application of
Multiple Intelligences Theory to English
Vocabulary Teaching in College. Frontiers in Educational Research, 3(1).
Kornhaber, M. L., Fierros, E. G., & Veenema,
S. A. (2004). Multiple intelligences:
Best ideas from research and practice:
Allyn & Bacon.
Lai, Y.-L. (2005). Teaching vocabulary learning strategies: Awareness, beliefs, and
practices. A survey of Taiwanese EFL
senior high school teachers. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, University
of Essex, England.
Lee, K. R., & Oxford, R. (2008). Understanding EFL learners’ strategy use and strategy awareness. Asian EFL Journal,
10(1), 7-32.
Linse, C. T., & Nunan, D. (2005). Practical
English language teaching. Young
Learners,(McGrawHill, 2006), 47.
Meller, E. M. (1999). Multiple intelligences: a
workshop for teachers. Lethbridge, Alta.:
Journal of language and translation, Volume 14, Number 3, 2024 13
University of Lethbridge, Faculty of
Education, 1999,
Merve, C. (2018). Effect of nature-activities
education program on the multiple intelligence level of children in the age
group of 8 to 12 years. Educational Research and Reviews, 13(10), 365-374.
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2019).
Second language learning theories:
Routledge.
Moran, S., Kornhaber, M., & Gardner, H.
(2006). Orchestrating multiple intelligences. Educational leadership, 64(1),
22.
Nation, I. (2004). A study of the most frequent
word families in the British National
Corpus. Vocabulary in a second language: Selection, acquisition, and testing, 10, 3-13.
Nolen, J. L. (2003). MULTIPLE
INTELLIGENCES IN THE
CLASSROOM. Education, 124(1).
Noor, N. M., & Amir, Z. (2017). The effect of
multiple intelligences on DDL vocabulary learning. International Journal of
Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(2), 182-191.
Oxford, R., Cho, Y., Leung, S., & Kim, H.-J.
(2004). Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An exploratory study.
Palmberg, R. (2002). Catering for multiple intelligences in EFL coursebooks. Humanising
Language Teaching Magazine, 4(1).
Razmjoo, S. A., Sahragard, R., & Sadri, M.
(2009). On the relationship between
multiple intelligences, vocabulary learning knowledge and vocabulary learning
strategies among the Iranian EFL learners. The Iranian EFL Journal Quarterly,
3, 82-110.
Reissman, F. (1996). “Style of Learning” National
Education association Journal 15-17.
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001).
Approaches and methods in language
teaching: Cambridge university press.
Savojbolaghchilar, S., Seifoori, Z., &
Ghafoori, N. (2020). The effect of
multiple intelligence-oriented thematic
clustering on advanced EFL learners’
vocabulary learning. Journal of Teaching
Language Skills, 39(2 (Summer 2020)),
169-201.
Sedita, J. (2005). Effective vocabulary instruction. Insights on learning disabilities,
2(1), 33-45.
Sener, S., & Çokçaliskan, A. (2018). An investigation between multiple intelligences and learning styles. Journal of
Education and Training Studies, 6(2),
125-132.
Servi, M. (2004). The relationship between
learning and teaching vocabulary and
Multiple Intelligences: A comparative
study on Vocabulary Teaching regarding and disregarding Multiple Intelligences. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal
Bilimler Enstitüsü,
Shearer, B. (2004). Multiple intelligences theory after 20 years. Teachers college record, 106(1), 2-16.
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to
language learning: Oxford University
Press.
Sökmen, A. J. (1997). Current trends in teaching second language vocabulary. Vocabulary; description, acquisition and
pedagogy, 152-160.
Thornbury, S. (2006). How to teach vocabulary: Pearson Education India.
Tsai, M.-Y. (2016). Research on multiple intelligences of junior high school students with different background variables. Journal of Modern Education Review, ISSN, 2155-7993.
Ugarte Oteiza, S. (2013). The multiple intelligences theory and language learning strategies: relation and the effect of instruction.
Vincent, A., & Ross, D. (2001). Personalize
training: determine learning styles, personality types and multiple intelligences
online. The Learning Organization.
Wallace, M. (1988). Teaching Vocabulary.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in language
teaching (Vol. 111): Edward Arnold
London.
Wilson, S. D. (2018). Implementing cocreation and multiple intelligence
practices to transform the classroom
experience. Contemporary Issues in
Education Research, 11(4), 127-132.
Research, 11(4), 127-132.
14 Effect of Multiple Intelligence-based Activities on Iranian EFL …
Creative Commons License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike
International License
Yaqubi, B., Rayati, R. A., & Allemzade Gorgi,
N. (2012). The involvement load hypothesis and vocabulary learning: The
effect of task types and involvement index
on L2 vocabulary acquisition. Teaching
English as a Second Language Quarterly
(Formerly Journal of Teaching Language
Skills), 29(1), 145-163.
Zarei, A. A., & Afshar, N. S. (2014). Multiple
intelligences as predictors of reading
comprehension and vocabulary
knowledge. Indonesian Journal of Applied
Linguistics, 4(1), 23-38.
Zheng, S. (2012). Studies and Suggestions on
English Vocabulary Teaching and
Learning. English Language Teaching,
5(5), 129-137.
