Determinants of Farmers’ Participation in Horticulture-based Extension Programs in Iran: Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior
محورهای موضوعی : Environmental policy and managementMorteza Akbari 1 , Farahnaz Rostami 2 , Abdolmotaleb Rezaei 3
1 - Assistant Professor, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, I.R.Iran.
2 - Assistant Professor, Faculty member of Agriculture, Razi University, I.R.Iran.
3 - Assistant Professor, Faculty of Agricultural Economic and Development, University of Tehran, I.R.Iran .
کلید واژه: Theory of Planned Behav-ior, Behavioral Intention, Agricultural Education Programs, participation,
چکیده مقاله :
This paper aims to discover the determinants of farmers’ par-ticipation in horticulture-based Education programs in the Western Azerbaijan province, Iran. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), the study also tries to make a comparison between participants and non-participants, who have achieved in this program. A sample of 231 farmers (137 participants and 94 non-participants) was selected based on a stratified random sampling method. Data gathering instrument was a questionnaire that its validity was approved by a group of experts and its reliability was confirmed by calculating Cronbach's alpha (α=0.71). The results showed that, there were significant differences between participants and non-participants in agricultural education programs in terms of all the TPB contexts. Additionally, the results of the regression analysis showed that attitude to how thinking and decision and subjective norms were the best deter- minants of farmers’ participation.
This paper aims to discover the determinants of farmers’ par-ticipation in horticulture-based Education programs in the Western Azerbaijan province, Iran. Using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), the study also tries to make a comparison between participants and non-participants, who have achieved in this program. A sample of 231 farmers (137 participants and 94 non-participants) was selected based on a stratified random sampling method. Data gathering instrument was a questionnaire that its validity was approved by a group of experts and its reliability was confirmed by calculating Cronbach's alpha (α=0.71). The results showed that, there were significant differences between participants and non-participants in agricultural education programs in terms of all the TPB contexts. Additionally, the results of the regression analysis showed that attitude to how thinking and decision and subjective norms were the best deter- minants of farmers’ participation.
1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 179-211. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
2. Ajzen, I. (2002a). Perceived behavior control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1–20. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
3. Ajzen, I. (2002b). The theory of planned behavior: A bibliography. Retrieved January 14, 2003, from: /http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/tpbrefs.htmlS. | ||||
4. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to Theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. | ||||
5. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. | ||||
6. Armitage, C.J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471-499. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
7. Beedell, J., & Rehman, T. (2000). Using Social-Psychology Models to Understand Farmers' Conservation Behavior. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 117-127. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
8. Bergevoet, R. H. M., Ondersteijn, C. J. M., Saatkamp, H. W., Van Woerkum, C. M. J., & Huirne, R. B. M. (2004). Entrepreneurial behavior of Dutch dairy farmers under a milk quota system: goals, objectives and attitudes. Agricultural Systems. 80, (1(, - 1-21. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
9. Bernat, K., & Roschewitz, A. (2005). Recreational benefits of urban forests: explaining visitors' willingness to pay in the context of the theory of planned behavior. In Asona, Switzerland Centro Stefano Franscini, Monte Verità may - Our Shared Landscape Integrating Ecological, Socioeconomic and Aesthetic Aspects in Landscape Planning and Management. Swiss Federal Institute of Technologyeth Zurich. Nsl City and Landscape Network. | ||||
10. Blue, C.L. (1995). The predictive capacity of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior in exercise research: An integrated literature review. Research in Nursing and Health, 18, 105–121. [DOI via Crossref] [Pubmed] | ||||
11. Conner, M., & Sparks, P. (1996). The theory of planned behavior and health behaviors. In M. Conner and P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting health behavior (pp. 121–162). Buckingham: Open University Press. | ||||
12. Davies, J., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. (2002). Beyond the intention behavior mythology: an integrated model of recycling. Marketing Theory, 21(1), 29–113. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
13. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1002. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
14. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. | ||||
15. Godin, G. 1993. The theories of reasoned action and planned behavior: Overview of endings, emerging research problems and usefulness for exercise promotion. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 5, 141–157. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
16. Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11, 87–98. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
17. Hagger, M.S., Chatzisarantis, M.L.D., & Biddle, S.J.H. (2002). A meta-analytic review of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior in physical activity: Predictive validity and the contribution of additional variables, Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology. 24, - 3–32. | ||||
18. Hattam, C. (2006). Barriers to the adoption of organic agriculture an investigation using the theory of planned behavior. COR, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, 18-20 September; Published in Atkinson, C; Ball, B; Davies, D H K; Rees, R; Russell, G; Stockdale, E A; Watson, C A; Walker, R and Younie, D.(Eds.) Aspects of Applied Biology 79, what will organic farming deliver? COR 2006(pp. 73-73). Association of Applied Biologists | ||||
19. Hausenblas, H.A., Carron, A.V., & Mack, D.E. (1997). Application of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior to exercise behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19, 36–51. | ||||
20. Jacob, S., & Ferrer, M. (2000). Program theory for effective extension program planning. EDIS document [on-line], Retrieved from http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/BODY_FY031. | ||||
21. Jimmieson, Nerina, L., Peach, Megan, & White, Katherine M. (2008). Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior to inform change management: An investigation of employee intentions to support organizational change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 44(2), 237-262. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
22. Karami, E., & Mansoorabadi, A. (2007). Sustainable agricultural attitudes and behaviors: a gender analysis of Iranian farmers. Journal of Environmental Development Sustainable.10, 883-898. DOI 10.1007/s10668-007-9090-7. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
23. Karppinen, H. (2005). Forest owners' choice of reforestation method: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Forest Policy and Economics. 7 (3), 393-409. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
24. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W (1970). Determining sample size for research activities, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. | ||||
25. Liao, C.H., Chen, J.L., & Yen, D. C. (2007). Theory of planning behavior (TPB) and customer satisfaction in the continued use of e-service: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2804–2822. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
26. Madden, T.J., Ellen, P.S., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 3–9. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
27. Manstead, A.S.R., & Parker, D. (1995). Evaluating and extending the theory of planned behaviour. In W. Stroebe and M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 69–95). Chichester: Wiley. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
28. Ministry of Jihad-e- Agricultur. (2008). The statistic journal of Jihad-e- Agriculture. Retrieved from http://www.maj.ir/portal/Home/Default.aspx?CategoryID=20ad5e49-c727-4bc9-9254-de648a5f4d52. | ||||
29. Ouelette, J.A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin. 124(1), 54–74. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
30. Pawlak, R., & Malinauskas, B. (2008). The use of the theory of planned behavior to assess predictors of intention to fruits among 9th-grade students attending two public high schools in eastern eat North Carolina. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal. 37(1), 16-26. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
31. Rehman, T., McKemey, K., Yates, C.M., Cooke, R.J., Garforth, C.J. Tranter, R.B. Park, J.R., & Dorward, P.T. (2006). Identifying and understanding factors influencing the uptake of new technologies on dairy farms in SW England using the theory of reasoned action. Agricultural Systems. 94 (2), 281-293. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
32. Richardson, C.A. (2003). The theory of planned behavior in predicting participation at environmental horticulture extension programs. Unpublished Thesis University of Florida. | ||||
33. Sparks, P. (1994). Attitudes towards food: Applying, assessing and extending the 'theory of planned behaviors'. In D. R. Rutter and L. Quine (Eds.), Social psychology and health: European perspectives (pp. 25–46). Aldershot: Avebury Press. | ||||
34. Terry, D.J., & Hogg, M.A. (1996). Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 776-793. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
35. Terry, D.J., Hogg, M.A., & White, K.M. (1999). The theory of planned behavior: Self identity, social identity, and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225-244. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
36. Van den Putte, B. (1991). 20 years of the theory of reasoned action of Fishbein and Ajzen: A meta-analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Amsterdam. | ||||
37. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. [DOI via Crossref] | ||||
38. White, K.M., Terry, D.J., & Hogg, M.A. (1994). Safer sex behavior: The role of attitudes, norms, and control factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 24, 2164-2192. [DOI via Crossref] |