چکیده مقاله :
The strategic planning of marketing and the application of marketing strategies for achieving sustainable competitive advantages are of the factors that help the survival of producers of agricultural organic products. Although, there are evidences of the growth of organic farming in Iran but, there are no useful information and proposals for making marketing strategies in organic production holdings for producers and traders. For this, we assessed the influence of three effective elements include marketing approach, pricing and the sale of organic products in Iran. The study was based on the factor analysis, explorative interview and structured questionnaire. The study population was composed of 20 experienced experts and 118 organic agricultural producers from the various regions include Tehran, Khorasan-e Razavi, Guilan, Khoozestan, Kerman, Kordestan, Qazvin and Isfahan for the periode of Jan 2014 to June 2015. It was found out that the main barriers to the development of organic products and their markets include inappropriate packaging, high transportation costs, the lack of unit manager and inconsistent strategy, market-making and customer-orientation, weak public advertisement, the lack of trust to organic brands at national level, and weak state support.
منابع و مأخذ:
1- Arabska, E. (2014). Marketing Strategies in Organic Production in Bulgaria. Discourse Journal of Agriculture and Food Science, 2(2), 76-84.
2- Arabska, E. (2013a). Investigation of behaviour, wish and opportunities of operators and consumers for organic production development in Bulgaria, International conference (ICRAE 2013) Research and education - challenges toward future; Faculty of Education Sciences, University of Shkodra Luigj Gurakuqi” in Shkoder; 24 – 25 May 2013, Albania.
3- Arabska, E. (2013b). Sustainable rural development through organic production encouragement in state and local strategies in Bulgaria, 4th International Conference of Economic Sciences Quality of Life, Sustainability and Locality; 9-10 May 2013 – Kaposvar
University - Kaposvar – Hungary, 518-527.
4- Arshad, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Market orientation, firm performance and the mediating effect of corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 28 (5), 851-860.
5- Buil, I., Chernatony, L. D., & Martinez, E. (2013). Examining the role of advertising and sales promotions in brand equity creation. Journal of Business Research, 66 (1), 115-122.
6- Dehtashti –Shahrokh Z. & Pourhosseini A. H. (2013). Model of the effect of the sale and marketing strategies on the sale performance. The Journal of the Business Management, 5(1), 61-84.
7- Demiyurek, K. (2010). Analysis of information systems and communication networks for organic and conventional hazelnut producers in the Samsun province of Turkey. Agricultural Systems, 103 (7), 444-452.
8- Deshpande, R. and Farley, J. (1998). Measuring Market Orientation: Generalization and Synthesis. Journal of Market Focused Management, 12 (2), 213-232.
9- Ebrahimi A., & Rezapanah, M. R. (2010). Strategy Plan for the development of Organic Agriculture in Iran. Ministry of Jihad-e Agriculture, Agricultural Research, Education and Extention Organization, Tehran, Iran. ICS: 67.020; 65.020; 55.020.pp. 402.
10- Enamorado, A. (2012). Economic viability. Guidelines for organic agriculture. Project Innovation based organic farming through user friendly training tools, 2010-1-BG1-LEO05-03091. p. 105 – 113.
11- Hilman, H., & Kaliappen, N. (2014). Market Orientation Practices and Effects on Organizational Performance. SAGE Open, 4(4), 2158244014553 590.
12- Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1990). Market orientation: Review, refinement and road map. Journal of Market Focused Management, 23 (5), 56-78.
13- Karimi-Harissi S., & Mira, S., Abolghasem. (2012). The effect of mass media and non-media on the brand equity (case study: Pars-khazar brand). Journal of Business Management, 4(4): 107-26.
14- Kayryakov, N. (2010). Development of organic farming in Bulgaria. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 8 (3), 147-152.
15- Keller K. L. (2007). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand eq-uity. 3rd Eds. New York: Prentice Hall.
16- Narver, J. C., & Stanley, F. (1990). The effects of market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing, 54, 20-35.
17- Nikolova, M. (2012). Organic production in Bulgaria - an innovative solution for creating entrepreneurial initiatives in rural regions. Scientific and applied international conference Development of agribusiness and rural regions in Bulgaria and EU - perspectives 2020, University of Economics - Varna, 2012.
18- O'Cass, A., & Ngo, L. V. (2007). Balancing external adaptation and internal effectiveness: Achieving better brand performance. Journal of Business Research, 60, 11-20.
19- Ogbonna, B., & Ogwo, O. E. (2013). Market orientation and corporate performance of insurance firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 5 (3), 104-116.
20- Raju, P. S., Lonial, S. C., & Crum, M. D. (2011). Market orientation in the context of SMEs: A conceptual framework. Journal of Business Research, 64 (12), 1320-1326.
21- Rossetto, L. (2002). Marketing Strategies for Organic Wine Growers in the Veneto Region. AgEcon Search at http://agecon.lib.umn.edu.
22- Shehu, A. M., & Rosli, M. (2014). Market orientation and firm performance among Nigerian
SMEs: The moderating role of business environment. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (23), 158-164.
23- Slater, S., & Narver, J. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation performance relationship? Journal of Marketing, 58, 46-55.
24- Srinivasan S, Vanhuele M, Pauwels K. (2010). Mindset metrics in market response models: an integrative approach. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(4), 284–672.
25- Trehan, M. & Trehan, R. (2007). Advertising and Sales Management. New Delhi: India enterprise.
26- Wilson, G. A., Perepelkin, J., Di Zhang, D., & Vachon, M. A. (2014). Market orientation, alliance orientation, and business performance in the biotechnology industry.
Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 20 (2), 32-40.