Exogenous application of medicinal plant extracts improved productivity and qualitative traits of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under drought stress
محورهای موضوعی : Plant Physiology
Majid Bagnazari
1
,
Hadis Hasanbeigi
2
1 - Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture, Ilam University , Ilam, Iran.
2 - Department of Horticultural Sciences, College of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.
کلید واژه: Antioxidants, Biostimulant, Cotton fiber quality, Drought stress, Fiber length,
چکیده مقاله :
Drought is a major factor that limits agricultural productivity worldwide. Several approaches have been used to help plants improve their performance under drought stress. However, the external application of medicinal plant extracts as biostimulants is a promising strategy that is still in its early stages. To mitigate the adverse effects of drought on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), a field experiment was conducted using a split-plot design based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The first factor was the application of 0%, 10%, and 15% Camellia sinensis (Cs) and Rosmarinus officinalis (Ro) methanolic extracts. The second factor was the frequency of the irrigation cycle, which was conducted every 10, 15, and 20 days (W10, W15, and W20). The best outcomes were observed with the 10% Ro extract under the W10 irrigation cycle, which resulted in the highest plant height (99.99 cm), fresh (3.32 g) and dry weight (0.46 g) of leaves, fiber strength (7.86%), elasticity (26.06 g·tex⁻¹), and color brightness (80.76 Rd). The best results for the total number of bolls (26.77), wool (5.24 g), boll weight (14.10 g), fiber length (32.10 mm), length uniformity (87.33%), and the minimum electrolyte leakage (30.33%), leaf particles in fibers (0.52), and short fiber index (10.14%) were found with 15% Ro extract under the W10 irrigation cycle. Both methanolic extracts, particularly 15% Ro, have shown promising results in most measured traits and could be a superior strategy for sustainable cotton production under drought stress.
Drought is a major factor that limits agricultural productivity worldwide. Several approaches have been used to help plants improve their performance under drought stress. However, the external application of medicinal plant extracts as biostimulants is a promising strategy that is still in its early stages. To mitigate the adverse effects of drought on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), a field experiment was conducted using a split-plot design based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. The first factor was the application of 0%, 10%, and 15% Camellia sinensis (Cs) and Rosmarinus officinalis (Ro) methanolic extracts. The second factor was the frequency of the irrigation cycle, which was conducted every 10, 15, and 20 days (W10, W15, and W20). The best outcomes were observed with the 10% Ro extract under the W10 irrigation cycle, which resulted in the highest plant height (99.99 cm), fresh (3.32 g) and dry weight (0.46 g) of leaves, fiber strength (7.86%), elasticity (26.06 g·tex⁻¹), and color brightness (80.76 Rd). The best results for the total number of bolls (26.77), wool (5.24 g), boll weight (14.10 g), fiber length (32.10 mm), length uniformity (87.33%), and the minimum electrolyte leakage (30.33%), leaf particles in fibers (0.52), and short fiber index (10.14%) were found with 15% Ro extract under the W10 irrigation cycle. Both methanolic extracts, particularly 15% Ro, have shown promising results in most measured traits and could be a superior strategy for sustainable cotton production under drought stress.
Abdelraheem, A., N. Esmaeili, M. O’connell and J. Zhang. 2019. Progress and perspective on drought and salt stress tolerance in cotton. Industrial Crops and Products, 130, 118-129.
Ahmadi, M. and M. Aghaalikhani. 2012. Analysis of Energy Consumption of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L) in the province to provide a solution for increasing productivity of resources. Journal of Agricultural Ecology, 4, (2) 151-158.
Al-Sereiti, M., K. Abu-Amer and P. Sena. 1999. Pharmacology of rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis Linn.) and its therapeutic potentials.
Allen, R. D. and L. Aleman. 2011. Abiotic stress and cotton fiber development. Stress physiology in cotton, 149.
Awan, S. A., I. Khan, M. Rizwan, X. Zhang, M. Brestic, A. Khan, M. A. El‐Sheikh, M. N. Alyemeni, S. Ali and L. Huang. 2021. Exogenous abscisic acid and jasmonic acid restrain polyethylene glycol‐induced drought by improving the growth and antioxidative enzyme activities in pearl millet. Physiologia Plantarum, 172, (2) 809-819.
Bakhsh, A. and T. Hussain. 2015. Engineering crop plants against abiotic stress: Current achievements and prospects. Emirates Journal of Food & Agriculture (EJFA), 27, (1).
Balkcom, K. S., D. W. Reeves, J. N. Shaw, C. H. Burmester and L. M. Curtis. 2006. Cotton yield and fiber quality from irrigated tillage systems in the Tennessee Valley. Agronomy Journal, 98, (3) 596-602.
Chastain, D. R., J. L. Snider, G. D. Collins, C. D. Perry, J. Whitaker and S. A. Byrd. 2014. Water deficit in field-grown Gossypium hirsutum primarily limits net photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal conductance, increasing photorespiration, and increasing the ratio of dark respiration to gross photosynthesis. Journal of plant physiology, 171, (17) 1576-1585.
Chaudhry, M. R. 2010. Cotton production and processing. Industrial Applications of Natural Fibres: Structure, Properties and Technical Applications: John Wiley and Sons Ltd Chichester, 219-220.
Chen, Y.-L., Y.-T. Shi, J.-J. Luo, D. Wang, Y. Hou, Z. Li and B. Zhang. 2012. Screening of drought tolerant agronomic trait indices of colored cotton varieties (lines) in gansu province. Acta Agron Sin, 38, 1680-1687.
Cruz De Carvalho, M. H. 2008. Drought stress and reactive oxygen species: production, scavenging and signaling. Plant signaling & behavior, 3, (3) 156-165.
El-Tayeb, M. 2005. Response of barley grains to the interactive e. ect of salinity and salicylic acid. Plant growth regulation, 45, 215-224.
El Sabagh, A., A. Hossain, M. S. Islam, C. Barutcular, D. Ratnasekera, O. Gormus, K. Amanet, M. Mubeen, W. Nasim and S. Fahad. 2020. Drought and heat stress in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.): Consequences and their possible mitigation strategies. Agronomic Crops: Volume 3: Stress Responses and Tolerance, 613-634.
Fang, Y., K. Liao, H. Du, Y. Xu, H. Song, X. Li and L. Xiong. 2015. A stress-responsive NAC transcription factor SNAC3 confers heat and drought tolerance through modulation of reactive oxygen species in rice. Journal of experimental botany, 66, (21) 6803-6817.
Fang, Y. and L. Xiong. 2015. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cellular and molecular life sciences, 72, 673-689.
Galmés, J., J. Flexas, R. Savé and H. Medrano. 2007. Water relations and stomatal characteristics of Mediterranean plants with different growth forms and leaf habits: responses to water stress and recovery. Plant and Soil, 290, 139-155.
Horváth, E., G. Szalai and T. Janda. 2007. Induction of abiotic stress tolerance by salicylic acid signaling. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 26, 290-300.
Iqbal, N., S. Hussain, M. A. Raza, C.-Q. Yang, M. E. Safdar, M. Brestic, A. Aziz, M. S. Hayyat, M. A. Asghar and X. C. Wang. 2019. Drought tolerance of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) by improved photosynthetic characteristics and an efficient antioxidant enzyme activities under a split-root system. Frontiers in physiology, 10, 786.
Ksouri, R., W. Megdiche, A. Debez, H. Falleh, C. Grignon and C. Abdelly. 2007. Salinity effects on polyphenol content and antioxidant activities in leaves of the halophyte Cakile maritima. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 45, (3-4) 244-249.
Kumar, B., D. Pandey, C. Goswami and S. Jain. 2001. Effect of growth regulators on photosynthesis, transpiration and related parameters in water stressed cotton. Biologia Plantarum, 44, 475-478.
Kumaran, A. 2006. Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of an aqueous extract of Coleus aromaticus. Food chemistry, 97, (1) 109-114.
Kuromori, T., T. Miyaji, H. Yabuuchi, H. Shimizu, E. Sugimoto, A. Kamiya, Y. Moriyama and K. Shinozaki. 2010. ABC transporter AtABCG25 is involved in abscisic acid transport and responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, (5) 2361-2366.
Li, Z., J. Liu, M. Kuang, C. Zhang, Q. Ma, L. Huang, H. Wang, S. Fan and J. Peng. 2022. Improvement of plant tolerance to drought stress by cotton tubby-like protein 30 through stomatal movement regulation. Journal of Advanced Research, 42, 55-67.
Loka, D. A., D. M. Oosterhuis and G. L. Ritchie. 2011. Water-deficit stress in cotton. Stress physiology in cotton, 7, 37-72.
Lv, S., A. Yang, K. Zhang, L. Wang and J. Zhang. 2007. Increase of glycinebetaine synthesis improves drought tolerance in cotton. Molecular Breeding, 20, 233-248.
Mahmood, T., S. Khalid, M. Abdullah, Z. Ahmed, M. K. N. Shah, A. Ghafoor and X. Du. 2019. Insights into drought stress signaling in plants and the molecular genetic basis of cotton drought tolerance. Cells, 9, (1) 105.
Manavalan, L. P., S. K. Guttikonda, L.-S. Phan Tran and H. T. Nguyen. 2009. Physiological and molecular approaches to improve drought resistance in soybean. Plant and cell physiology, 50, (7) 1260-1276.
Moragne, W., T. Orr and T. B. Orr. 2009. New Jersey. Marshall Cavendish.Muhammad Aslam, M., M. Waseem, B. H. Jakada, E. J. Okal, Z. Lei, H. S. A. Saqib, W. Yuan, W. Xu and Q. Zhang. 2022. Mechanisms of abscisic acid-mediated drought stress responses in plants. International journal of molecular sciences, 23, (3) 1084.
Nag, A. and S. Das. 2013. Improving ambient temperature stability of probiotics with stress adaptation and fluidized bed drying. Journal of functional foods, 5, (1) 170-177.
Nakashima, K., K. Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and K. Shinozaki. 2014. The transcriptional regulatory network in the drought response and its crosstalk in abiotic stress responses including drought, cold, and heat. Frontiers in plant science, 5, 170.
Noreen, S., H. U. R. Athar and M. Ashraf. 2013. Interactive effects of watering regimes and exogenously applied osmoprotectants on earliness indices and leaf area index in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) crop. Pak J Bot, 45, (6) 1873-1881.
Popova, L., T. Pancheva and A. Uzunova. 1997. Salicylic acid: properties, biosynthesis and physiological role. Bulg J Plant Physiol, 23, (1-2) 85-93.
Rai, E. 2011. Mechanism of drought tolerance in cotton-Response of cotton cultivars to irrigation in the Texas high plains. Master of Science, Texas Tech University USA pp, 97,
Ratnayaka, H. H., W. T. Molin and T. M. Sterling. 2003. Physiological and antioxidant responses of cotton and spurred anoda under interference and mild drought. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, (391) 2293-2305.
Sairam, R., P. Deshmukh and D. Shukla. 1997. Tolerance of drought and temperature stress in relation to increased antioxidant enzyme activity in wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 178, (3) 171-178.
Shaar-Moshe, L., E. Blumwald and Z. Peleg. 2017. Unique physiological and transcriptional shifts under combinations of salinity, drought, and heat. Plant physiology, 174, (1) 421-434.
Shi, X., C. Wang, J. Zhao, K. Wang, F. Chen and Q. Chu. 2021. Increasing inconsistency between climate suitability and production of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in China. Industrial Crops and Products, 171, 113959.
Stoilova, I., A. Krastanov, A. Stoyanova, P. Denev and S. Gargova. 2007. Antioxidant activity of a ginger extract (Zingiber officinale). Food chemistry, 102, (3) 764-770.
Tripathy, B. C. and R. Oelmüller. 2012. Reactive oxygen species generation and signaling in plants. Plant signaling & behavior, 7, (12) 1621-1633.
Ullah, A., H. Sun, X. Yang and X. Zhang. 2017. Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop. Plant biotechnology journal, 15, (3) 271-284.
Valentovic, P., M. Luxova, L. Kolarovic and O. Gasparikova. 2006. Effect of osmotic stress on compatible solutes content, membrane stability and water relations in two maize cultivars. Plant Soil and Environment, 52, (4) 184.
Zhang, D., J. Tong, X. He, Z. Xu, L. Xu, P. Wei, Y. Huang, M. Brestic, H. Ma and H. Shao. 2016. A novel soybean intrinsic protein gene, GmTIP2; 3, involved in responding to osmotic stress. Frontiers in plant science, 6, 1237.
Zhang, L., J. Peng, T. Chen, X. Zhao, S. Zhang, S. Liu, H. Dong, L. Feng and S. Yu. 2014. Effect of drought stress on lipid peroxidation and proline content in cotton roots. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 24, (6)
