Investigation molecular mechanism of sensitive and tolerant barley cultivars under different times of salinity stress exposure using proteome analysis
محورهای موضوعی : Plant Physiology
Mohammad Reza Naghavi
1
,
Marouf Khalili
2
,
Abolfazl Tavassoli
3
,
Fatemeh Rastegaripour
4
1 - Assistant Professor, Agriculture Department, Payame Noor University, Iran
2 - Associate Professor, Department of Agriculture, Payame Noor University (PNU), Iran
3 - Assistant Professor, Agriculture Department, Payame Noor University, Iran
4 - Assistant Professor, Department of agriculture, University of Torbat Heydarieh
کلید واژه: Stress, barley, gene, Tolerance, proteomic,
چکیده مقاله :
To evaluate the protein response of barley cultivars under salinity stress, leaf samples were prepared at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 days after the tillering stage. Following two-dimensional electrophoresis, 153 and 141 protein spots were identified in tolerant (Afzal) and sensitive cultivars (Macouei), respectively. In total, 21 and 17 spots with significant induction factor (IF) were revealed in Afzal and Macouei, respectively. Most common proteins between two cultivars were involved in the removal of antioxidants (five proteins), and for each protein group including heat shock, proton transfer, Calvin cycle and photosynthesis optical reaction proteins, a protein was detected. Also, 12 protein spots were exclusively present in tolerant cultivar (Afzal), most of them involved in the elimination of antioxidants, and eight protein spots were found exclusively in sensitive cultivar (Macouei), which was also largely involved in the removal of antioxidants. Lower expression of these proteins in the susceptible cultivar compared to tolerant cultivar resulted in decreased homeostasis in susceptible cultivar under salinity stress. Also, for most proteins, the highest and lowest protein expression levels occurred in tolerant and susceptible cultivars at 12 and 9 days after initiation of salinity stress.
Abdi, N., S.Wasti, A. Slama, M. B. Salem, M. E. Faleh, and E. Mallek-Maalej. 2016. Comparative Study of Salinity Effect on Some Tunisian Barley Cultivars at Germination and Early Seedling Growth Stages. Journal of Plant Physiology & Pathology, 4:3-15.
Aghaei, K., A. A. Ehsanpour, and S. Komatsu. 2008. Proteome analysis of potato under salt stress. Journal Proteome Research, 7:4858-4868.
Al-Karaki, G. N. 2001. Germination, sodium, and potassium concentrations of barley seeds as influenced by salinity. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 24:511-522.
Albertin, W., O. Langella, J. Joets, L. Negroni, M. Zivy, C. Damerval, and H. Thiellement. 2009. Germination, sodium, and potassium concentrations of barley seeds as influenced by salinity. Proteomics, 9:793-799.
Babakov, A. V., V. V. Chelysheva, O. I. Klychnikov, S. E. Zorinyanz, M. S. Trofimova, and A. H. de Boer. 2000. Involvement of 14-3-3 proteins in the osmotic regulation of H+- ATPase in plant plasma membranes. Planta, 211:446-448.
Boehlein, S. K., A. K. Sewell, J. Cross, J. D. Stewart, and L. C. Hannah. 2005. Purification and characterization of adenosine diphosphate glucose pyrophosphorylase from maize/potato mosaics. Plant Physiology, 138:1552-1562.
Borland, A., S. Elliott, S. Patterson, T. Taybi, J. Cushman, B. Pater, and J. J. Barnes. 2006. Are the metabolic components of crassulacean acid metabolism up-regulated in response to an increase in oxidative burden? Experimental Botany, 57:319-328.
Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 72:248-254.
Cakmak, I. 2005. The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition Soil Science, 168:521-530.
Caruso, G., C. Cavaliere, C. Guarino, R. Gubbiotti, P. Foglia, and A. Lagana. 2008. Identification of changes in Triticum. durum L. leaf proteome in response to salt stress by two-dimensional electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 391:381-390.
Cheng, Y., Y. Qi, Q. Zhu, X. Chen, N. Wang, X. Zhao, H. Chen, X. Cui, L. Xu, and W. Zhang. 2009. New changes in the plasma-membrane-associated proteome of rice roots under salt stress. Proteomics, 9:3100-3114.
El Kasmi, F., C. Krause, U. Hiller, Y. D. Stierhof, U. Mayer, L. Conner, L. Kong, I. Reichardt, A. A. Sanderfoot, and G. Jürgens. 2013. SNARE complexes of different composition jointly mediate membrane fusion in Arabidopsis cytokinesis. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 24:1593-1601.
Fatehi, F., A. Hosseinzadeh, H. Alizadeh, T. Brimavandi, and P. C. Struik. 2012. The proteome response of salt-resistant and salt-sensitive barley genotypes to long-term salinity stress. Molecular Biology Reports, 39:6387-6397.
Fischer, G., B. Wittmann-Liebold, K. Lang, T. Kiefhaber, and F. X. Schmid. 1989. Cyclophilin and peptidyl-prolyl cistrans isomerase are probably identical proteins. Nature, 337:476-478.
Ganeteg, U., A. Strand, P. Gustafsson, and S. Jansson. 2001. The properties of the chlorophyll a/b binding proteins Lhca2 and Lhca3 studied in vivo using antisense inhibition. Plant Physiology, 127:150-158.
Guan, H. P., and P. L. Keeling. 1998. Starch Biosynthesis: Understanding the functions and interactions of multiple isoenzymes of starch synthase and branching enzyme. Trends in Glycoscience and Glycotechnology, 10:307-319.
Guo, G., P. Ge, , C. Ma, X. Li, D. Lv, S. Wang, W. Ma, and Y. Yan. 2012. Comparative proteomic analysis of salt response proteins in seedling roots of two wheat varieties. Journal of Proteomics, 75:1867-1885.
Hashiguchi, A., N. Ahsan, and S. Komatsu. 2010. Proteomics application of crops in context of climatic changes. Food Research International, 43:1803-1813.
Hashimoto, M., M. Toorchi, K. Matsushita, Y. Iwasaki, and S. Komatsu. 2009. Proteome analysis of rice root plasma membrane and detection of cold stress responsive proteins. Protein and Peptide Letters, 16:685-697.
Heide, H., H. M. Kalisz, and H. Follmann. 2004. The oxygen evolving enhancer protein 1 (OEE) of photosystem II in green algae exhibits thioredoxin activity. Journal of Plant Physiology, 161:139-149.
Ifuku, K., S. Ishihara, S. Shimamoto, K. Ido, and F. Sato. 2008. Structure, function, and evolution of the PsbP protein family in higher plants. Photosynthesis Research, 98:427-437.
Ifuku, K., T. Nakatsu, R. Shimamoto, Y. Yamamoto, S. Ishihara, H. Kato, and F. Sato. 2005. Structure and function of the PsbP protein of photosystem II from higher plants. Photosynthesis Research, 84:251-255.
Joseph, B., and D. Jini. 2010. Proteomic analysis of salinity stress-responsive proteins in plants. Asian Journal of Plant Science, 9:307-313.
Kausar, R., M. Arshad, A. Shahzad, and S. Komatsu. 2013. Proteomics analysis of sensitive and tolerant barley genotypes under drought stress. Amino Acids, 44:345-359.
Khalili, M., A. Pour-Aboughadareh,and M. R. Naghavi. 2013. Screening of drought tolerant cultivars in barley using morpho-physiological traits and Integrated Selection Index under water deficit stress condition. Environmental and Experimental Biology, 14:33-41.
Kidou, S., M. Umeda, A. Kato, and H. Uchimiya. 1993. Isolation and characterization of a rice cDNA similar to the bovine brain-specific 14-3-3 protein gene. Plant Molecular Biology, 21:191-194.
Komatsu, S., A. H. M. Kamal, and Z. Hossain. 2014. Wheat proteomics: proteome modulation and abiotic stress acclimation. Frontiers in Plant Science, 5:684-689.
Komatsu, S., and N. Tanaka. 2004. Rice proteome analysis: A step toward functional analysis of the rice genome. Proteomics, 4:938-949.
Li, Q., J. Liu, D. Tan, A. C. Allan, Y. Jiang, X. Xu, Z. Han, and J. Kong. 2013. A genome-wide expression profile of salt-responsive genes in the apple rootstock. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 14:21053-21070.
Liu, G., L. Ma, W. Duan, B. Wang, J. H. Li, H. G. Xu, X. Q. Yan, B. F. Yan, S. H. Li, and L. J. Wang. 2014. Differential proteomic analysis of grapevine leaves by iTRAQ reveals responses to heat stress and subsequent recovery. BMC Plant Biology, 4:110-119.
Martinez, J. P., L. Stanley, and A. Schanck. 2004. Is osmotic adjustment required for water stress resistance in the Mediterranean shrub Atriplex halimus L.? Journal of Plant Physiology, 161:1041-1051.
McEvoy, J. P., and Brudvig, G. W. 2006. Brudvig Water-splitting chemistry of photosystem II. Chemical Reviews, 106: 4455-4483.
Michaletti, A., M. R. Naghavi, M. Toorchi, L. Zolla, and S. Rinalducci. 2018. Metabolomics and proteomics reveal drought-stress responses of leaf tissues from spring-wheat. Scientific Report, 8: 5710.
Nelson, N., and C. F. Yocum. 2006. Structure and function of photosystem I and II. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57:521-565.
Peng, Z., M. Wang, F. Li, H. Lv, C. Li, and G. Xia. 2009. The proteome of maize leaves: use of gene sequences and expressed sequence tag data for identification of proteins with peptide mass fingerprints. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 8:2676-2686.
Sharma, R., De D. Vleesschauwer, M. K. Sharma, and P. C. Ronald. 2013. Recent advances in dissecting stress-regulatory crosstalk in rice. Molecular Plant, 6:250-260.
Spreitzer, R. J., and M. E. Salvucci. 2002. Rubisco: structure, regulatory interactions, and possibilities for a better enzyme. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 53:449-475.
Sun, Y., R. A. Ahokas, S. K. Bhattacharya, I. C. Gerling, L. D. Carbone, and K. T. Weber. 2006. Oxidative stress in aldosteronism. Cardiovascular Research, 71:300-309.
Tanaka, N., S. Mitsui, H. Nobori, K. Yanagi, and S. Komatsu. 2005. Expression and function of proteins during development of the basal region in rice seedlings. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 4:796-808.
Toorchi, M., K. Yukawa, M. Z. Nouri, and S. Komatsu. 2009. Proteomics approach for identifying osmotic-stress-related proteins in soybeans roots. Peptides, 30:2108-2117.
Von Ballmoos, C., and P. Dimroth. 2007. Two distinct proton binding sites in the ATP synthase family. Biochemistry, 46:11800-11809.
Wan, X.Y., and J. Y. Liu. 2008. Comparative proteomics analysis reveals an intimate protein network provoked by hydrogen peroxide stress in rice seedling leaves. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 7:1469-1488.
Wang, W., B. Vinocur, O. Soseyov, and A. Altman. 2004. Role of plant heat-shock proteins and molecular chaperones in the abiotic stress response. Trends in Plant Science, 9:244-252.
Wang, X., P. Fan, H. Song, X. Chen, X. Li, and Y. Li. 2009. Comparative proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in shoots of Salicornia europaea under different salinity. Journal of Proteome Research, 8:3331-3345.
Yadav, S. K., S. L. Singla-Pareek, M. Ray, M. K. Reddy, and S. K. Sopory. 2005. Methylglyoxal levels in plants under salinity stress are dependent on glyoxalase I and glutathione. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 337:61-67.
Zellerhoff, N. A., A. Himmelbach, W. B. Dong, S. Bieri, U. Schaffrath, and P. Schweizer. 2010. Nonhost resistance of barley to different fungal pathogens is associated with largely distinct, quantitative transcriptional responses. Plant Physiology, 152:2053-2066.
Zhang, L., S. Xiao, W. Li, W. Feng, J. Li, Z. Wu, X. Gao, F. Liu, and M. Shao. 2011. Overexpression of a Harpin-encoding genehrf1 in rice enhances drought tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62:4229-4238.
