Expression of Suppression of Mite Reproduction in Drone Brood Cells of Honey Bees of Different Genotypic Groups in East Azarbaijan Province of Iran
محورهای موضوعی : CamelM. Elmi 1 , S.A. Rafat 2 , S. Alijani 3 , G. Tahmasbi 4 , A. Javanmard 5
1 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
2 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
4 - Department of Honeybee, Animal Science Research Institute of Iran (ASRI), Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran
5 - Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
کلید واژه: Reproduction, Honey bee, Infestation, East Azarbaijan Province, Drone, suppres-sion of mite reproduction, <i>Varroa destructor</i>,
چکیده مقاله :
Varroa destructor is an ectoparasitic mite of the honey bee and is a primary cause of colony loss of apiculture in the world. The aim of this study was to determine infestation levels and the suppression of mite reproduction in drone brood cells of independent colonies. A number of East Azarbaijan native honey bee colonies were isolated for three years without treating against varroa. Then, seven genotypic groups were prepared with three colonies in each group: native survivors, F1 generation of Carniolan colonies, H1 generation of survivor × commercial, H1 generation of Carniolan × survivor and commercial native colonies originated from three different regions of Maragheh, Bostan-Abad, and Varzeghan in the East Azarbaijan province. A total of 3268 fifteen to eighteen-days old drone pupae from twenty-one colonies were assessed for infestation and suppression of mite reproduction. The mean of drone pupae infestation percentage, reproducing mite percentage, mites reproducing more than three offsprings percentage, and fecundity number were found to be 45.20%, 76.13%, 40.69%, and 2.215, respectively. Significant differences were observed in the four studied traits between the understudy groups. The survivor group had the lowest mite infestation level and fertility (14.2% and 68.6%, respectively). Native commercials originated from the above three mentioned regions in the East Azarbaijan province had lower fecundity and lower number of mites reproducing more than three offsprings than other groups. Our results suggest that establishing varroa surviving colonies from native colonies can reduce varroa infestation and enhance the levels of suppression of mite reproduction (SMR). Moreover, a significant variation was observed within and between understudy groups in the colonies. Therefore, it can be concluded that selective breeding programs can enhance the levels of SMR.
Alattal Y., Alghamdi A., Single A., Ansari M.J. and Alkathiri H. (2017). Fertility and reproductive rate of varroa mite, Varroa destructor, in native and exotic honey bee, Apis mellifera, colonies under Saudi Arabia conditions. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 24, 992-995.
Behrens D., Huang Q., Geßner C., Rosenkranz P., Frey E., Locke B., Moritz R.F.A. and Kraus F.B. (2011). Three QTL in the honey bee, Apis mellifera suppress reproduction of the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. Ecol. Eevol. 1(4), 451-458.
Bocking O. and Genersch E. (2008). Varroosis—the ongoing crisis in beekeeping. J. Verbraucher. Lebensmittel. 3, 221-228.
Calderon R.A., Urena S. and van Veen J.W. (2012). Reproduction of Varroa destructor and off-springs mortality in worker and drone brood cells of Africanized honey bees. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 56, 297-307.
De Guzman L.I., Rinderer T.E. and Frake A.M. (2008). Comparative reproduction of Varroa destructor in different types of Russian and Italian honey bee combs. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 44, 227-238.
Delaplane K.S. and Hood W.M. (1999). Economic threshold for Varroa jacobsoni Oud in the southeastern USA. Apidologie. 30, 383-395.
Dietemann V., Nazzi F., Martin S.J., Anderson D.L., Locke B., Delaplane K.S., Wauquiez Q., Tannahil C., Frey E., Ziegelmann B., Rosenkranz P. and Ellis J.D. (2013). Standard methods for varroa research. J. Apic. Res. 52(1), 1-47.
Donzé G., Herrmann M., Bachofen B. and Guerin P.M. (1996). Effect of mating frequency and brood cell infestation rate on the reproductive success of the honeybee parasite Varroa jacobsoni. Ecol. Entomol. 21, 17-26.
Elmi M. and Rafat S.A. (2011). Varroa sensitive hygienic honey bees. Iranian Honey Bee Sci. Technol. 3, 34-44.
Elmi M., Baybordi S., Bahreyni R. and Asghar Rezayi A. (2015). Survey on Honey Bee Pests and Predators in East Azarbayjan. Research Report of Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.
Fries I., Camazine S. and Sneyd J. (1994). Population dynamics of Varroa jacobsoni: A model and a review. Bee World. 75, 5-28.
Garrido C. and Rosenkranz P. (2004). Volatiles of the honey bee larva initiate oogenesis in the parasitic mite Varroa destructor. Chemoecology. 14, 193-197.
Harbo J.R. and Harris J.W. (2004). SMR: This Honey of a Trait Protects Bees from Deadly Mites. Agricultural Research. Available at: https://agresearchmag.ars.usda.gov/ar/archive/2004/may/bees0504.pdf.
Harbo J.R. and Hoopingarner R.A. (1997). Honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the United States that express resistance to Varroa jacobsoni (Mesostigmata: Varroidae). J. Econ. omic Entomol. 90, 893-898.
Harris J.W. (2007). Bees with varroa sensitive hygiene preferentially remove mite infested pupae aged five days post capping. J. Apic. Res. 46, 134-139.
Huang Z. (2012). Varroa mite reproductive biology. American Bee J. 152, 981-985.
Kavinseksan B., Wongsiri S. and Chotkitnusorn A. (2016). Reproduction of the bee mite, Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman (Acari: Varroidae), in worker brood cells of Primorsky and Thai commercial honey bees (Apis mellifera). Basic Res. J. Agric. Sci. Rev. 5(2), 37-46.
Lee K.V., Moon R.D., Burkness E.C., Hutchison W.D. and Spivak M. (2010). Practical sampling plans for Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) in Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies and apiaries. J. Econ. Entomol. 103(4), 1039-1050.
Locke B. (2016). Inheritance of reduced varroa mite reproductive success in reciprocal crosses of mite-resistant and mite-susceptible honey bees (Apis mellifera). Apidologie. 47, 583-588.
Locke B. and Fries I. (2011). Characteristics of honey bee colonies (Apis mellifera) in Sweden surviving Varroa destructor infestation. Apidologie. 42, 533-542.
Martin S.J. (1994). Ontogenesis of the mite Varroa jacobsoniOud in worker brood of the honeybee Apis mellifera under natural conditions. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 18, 87-100.
Martin S.J. (1995a). Ontogenesis of the mite Varroa jacobsoniOud in drone brood of the honeybee Apis mellifera under natural conditions. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 19, 199-210.
Martin S.J. (1995b). Reproduction of Varroa jacobsoniin cells of Apis mellifera containing one or more mother mites and the distribution of these cells. J. Apic. Res. 34, 187-196.
Martin S.J. (1998). A population model for the ectoparasitic mite Varroa jacobsoni in honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies. Ecol. Mod. 109, 267-281.
Martin S.J., Holland K. and Murray M. (1997). Non-reproduction in the honeybee mite Varroa jacobsoni. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 21, 539-549.
Oddie M.A.Y., Dahle B. and Neumann P. (2018). Reduced postcapping Period in Honey Bees Surviving Varroa destructor by means of natural selection. Insects. 9(4), 149-155.
Rosenkranz P. (1999). Honey bee (Apis mellifera) tolerance to Varroa jacobsoni Oud in South America. Apidologie. 30, 159-172.
Rosenkranz P. and Engels W. (1994). Infertility of Varroa jacobsoni females after invasion into Apis mellifera worker brood as a tolerance factor against varroatosis. Apidologie. 25, 402-411.
Rosenkranz P., Aumeier P. and Ziegelmann B. (2010). Biology and control of Varroa destructor. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 103, 96-119.
SAS Institute. (2003). SAS®/STAT Software, Release 9.1. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC. USA.
Villa J.D., Danka R.G. and Harris J.W. (2009). Simplified methods of evaluating colonies for levels of varroa sensitive hygiene (VSH). J. Apic. Res. 48(3), 162-167.
