A Critical Review of Materials Adaptation in English Language Education
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه تخصصی زبان، فرهنگ، و ترجمه (دوفصلنامه)لیلا نیکبخت 1 , فاطمه جهانگیری دهاقانی 2
1 - دانشجو دکتری آموزش زبان انگلیسی، گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهرضا، شهرضا، ایران
2 - دانشجو دکتری آموزش زبان انگلیسی، گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهرضا، شهرضا، ایران
کلید واژه: English language education, Materials adaptation, Materials development,
چکیده مقاله :
Since there should be concordance between the materials and the level of the students, the teachers need to adapt the materials. Adopting a critical perspective, the current review paper found several research studies in the field of language education that have identified areas and trends in materials adaptation research conducted over the past four decades. The numbers of articles, books, and conference PowerPoints were twenty- three, five, and fifteen respectively. The articles were categorized into three areas: reasons for materials adaptation (N = 13), procedures of adaptation (N = 10), and adapting and adopting (N = 4). Furthermore, the reasons for materials adaptation indicated fourteen reasons. The procedures of adaptation included adding, deleting or omitting, modifying, simplifying, and reordering. The third area, the differences between adopting and adapting are essential for teachers and administrators. As a result, because of the fourteen reasons for materials adaptation, adopting and adapting materials are crucial for administrators, teachers, and learners. Reviewing the past study, the current study provided new research lines in materials adaptation for the EFL community.
Since there should be concordance between the materials and the level of the students, the teachers need to adapt the materials. Adopting a critical perspective, the current review paper found several research studies in the field of language education that have identified areas and trends in materials adaptation research conducted over the past four decades. The numbers of articles, books, and conference PowerPoints were twenty- three, five, and fifteen respectively. The articles were categorized into three areas: reasons for materials adaptation (N = 13), procedures of adaptation (N = 10), and adapting and adopting (N = 4). Furthermore, the reasons for materials adaptation indicated fourteen reasons. The procedures of adaptation included adding, deleting or omitting, modifying, simplifying, and reordering. The third area, the differences between adopting and adapting are essential for teachers and administrators. As a result, because of the fourteen reasons for materials adaptation, adopting and adapting materials are crucial for administrators, teachers, and learners. Reviewing the past study, the current study provided new research lines in materials adaptation for the EFL community.
References
Bolster, A. (2014). Materials adaptation of EAP materials by experienced
teachers (Part I). Folio,16(1), 16-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3099.1447
Bolster, A. (2015). Materials adaptation of EAP materials by experienced
teachers (Part II). Folio, 16(2), 16–21.
Browns, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic
approach to program development. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Candlin, C. N., & Breen, M. P. (1980). Evaluating and designing language
teaching materials. Lancaster Practical Papers in English Language
Education, 2, 172-216.
Crawford, J. (1995). The Role of Materials in the Language Classroom:
Finding the Balance. TESOL,5(1).
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Course book. London:
Heinemann.
Nikbakht, L. & Jahangiri Dehaghani, F./ Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 5(1) (2022), 237–
255
254
Cunningsworth, A. (1984). Evaluating and selecting EFL teaching
materials. London, UK: Heinemann.
Ebrahimpourtaher, A., & Hamidi, E. (2015). Authenticity and adaptation
in EFL materials. IAAST, 6(2), 34-39.
http://www.soeagra.com/iaast.html
Grant, N. (1987). Making the most of your textbook. Harlow: Longman.
Islam, C., & Mares. C. (2003). Adapting classroom materials. In B.
Tomlinson (ed.), 86–100.
Jolly, D., & Bolitho. R. (2011). A framework for materials writing. In B.
Tomlinson (ed.), 107–134.
Kitao, K. (1998). Selecting and developing teaching/learning materials.
The Internet TESOL Journal, 5(4). http://iteslj.org/Articles/KitaoMaterials.html
Loh, J., & Renandya, W. A. (2016). Exploring adaptations of materials
and methods: A case from Singapore. The European Journal of
Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 4(2), 93–111.
McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (1993, 2003). Materials and methods in ELT
(2nd ed). Oxford: Blackwell.
McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (1983). Materials and Methods in ELT.
Oxford: Blackwell.
McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2012). Materials and methods
in ELT (3rd ed). Oxford: Blackwell.
McDonough, J., Shaw, C., & Masuhara, H. (2013). Materials and
Methods in ELT: A Teacher's Guide. Oxford: Blackwell.
McGrath, I. (2002). Materials evaluation and design for language
teaching. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
McGrath, I. (2013). Teaching Materials and the Roles of EFL/ESL
Teachers. London: Bloomsbury.
Mishan, F., & Timmis, I. (2015). Materials development for TESOL.
Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Norton, J. (2009). Developing speaking skills: how are current theoretical
and methodological approaches represented in course books? The
European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL,4(2), 53-73.
Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology: A textbook for
teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
O’Neil, R. (1990). Why use textbooks? English Language Teaching
Journal, 36(2), 104-111.
Nikbakht, L. & Jahangiri Dehaghani, F./ Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 5(1) (2022), 237–
255
255
Saraceni, C. (2003). Adapting courses: A critical view. In B. Tomlinson
(ed.), Developing materials for language teaching, 72–85.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474211826.ch-004
Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials Development in Language Teaching (1st
ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2004). Developing language course
materials. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.
Tomlinson, B. (2012a). Materials development for language learning and
teaching. Language Teaching,45(2), 143–179.
Tomlinson, B. (2012b). Applied Linguistics and Materials Development.
London: Continuum.
White, G. (1998). Listening. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow: Longman
Pearson.
