Discrepancies between the Speech of Male and Female in Lecturing: Language Management in Focus
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه تخصصی زبان، فرهنگ، و ترجمه (دوفصلنامه)زهره جراح زاده 1 , محمد حشمدار 2
1 - دانشجوی دکترای گروه مترجمی و آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد کرج، کرج، ایران
2 - استادیار گروه مترجمی و آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه ازاد اسلامی واحد کرج، کرج، ایران
کلید واژه: speech, academic settings, Gender discrepancies, Language management, Presenting lecture,
چکیده مقاله :
The purpose of this case study is to shed light on differences between the speech of male and female students in presenting a lecture in academic settings. It also aimed to discover which gender more follow essential steps in line with language management. This qualitative study discussed the discrepancies from multiple perspectives containing standard form, using grammar, pronunciation and intonation, using synonyms, expanding the topics, and conversational style. In addition, to consider these components, this research attempts to discover which gender follows different phases to prepare a lecture before presenting it. This qualitative study was conducted throughout observation protocol, writing diary, and semi-structured interviews consisting of seven Iranian participants who have General English course with ages ranging from 19-25. To sum up, the researchers concluded that female students outperformed in the whole process of this inquiry. The study tries to provide insight to genders to understand each other's discrepancies which is a need and act as a key to better communication.
The purpose of this case study is to shed light on differences between the speech of male and female students in presenting a lecture in academic settings. It also aimed to discover which gender more follow essential steps in line with language management. This qualitative study discussed the discrepancies from multiple perspectives containing standard form, using grammar, pronunciation and intonation, using synonyms, expanding the topics, and conversational style. In addition, to consider these components, this research attempts to discover which gender follows different phases to prepare a lecture before presenting it. This qualitative study was conducted throughout observation protocol, writing diary, and semi-structured interviews consisting of seven Iranian participants who have General English course with ages ranging from 19-25. To sum up, the researchers concluded that female students outperformed in the whole process of this inquiry. The study tries to provide insight to genders to understand each other's discrepancies which is a need and act as a key to better communication.
References
Angrosino, M.V. (2007). Doing ethnographic and observational
research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Besnier, N. (2007). Language and gender research at the intersection of
the global and the local. Gender and Language, 1(1), 67-78.
Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (2006). Education research (3rd Ed.). Boston:
Pearson Education Inc.
Blakemore, J. E. O., and Centers, R. E. (2005). Characteristics of boys
‘and girls’ toys. Sex Roles 53, 619–633. Doi: 10.1007/s11199-005-
7729-0
Bonvillian, N. (2000). Language, Culture, and Communication: The
meaning of messages. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Chinomso P. Dozie, Chioma N. Chinedu-Oko, Patricia N. Anyanwu,
Ijeoma C. Ojilere, Richard C. Ihejirika, Emeka J.& Otagburuagu, O.
(2020). Gender and politeness/hedging strategies in English among
Igbo native speakers in Nigeria: A difference in conversational
styles. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies, 11(3).
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and
mixed methods approach (4 Ed.). Sage
Creswell, J.W. & Poth, Ch. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research
design. Sage
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: quantitative,
qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Eshghinezhad, Sh. & Raouf Moini, M. (2016). Politeness strategies used
in text messaging: pragmatic competence in an asymmetrical power
relation of teacher-students. Doi: 10.1177/21582440 16632288.
SAGE
Freeman, R., & McElhinny, B. (1996). Language and gender. In S. L.
McKay & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language
teaching pp.218-280. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher
education: Student perspectives on learning with cell phones,
smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education,
19, 18-26.
Guiso L, Monte F, Sapienza P, et al. (2008) Culture, gender, and math.
Science, 320 (5880):1164–1165.
Inoue, M. (2007). Language and gender in an age of neoliberalism.
Gender and Language, 1(1), 79-91.
Johnson, S., & Meinhof, U. H. (1996). Language and masculinity. Oxford,
UK: Blackwell.
Jarrahzade, Z. & Hashamdar, M./ Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 4(2) (2022), 66–87
86
Kim, D., Rueckert, D., Kim, D. J., & Seo, D. (2013). Students’ perceptions
and experiences of mobile learning. Language, Learning &
Technology, 17(3), 52-73.
Kollmayer, M., Schulte, M.-T., Schober, B., Hodosi, T., and Spiel, C.
(2018). Parents’ judgments about the desirability of toys for their
children: associations with gender role attitudes, gender-typing of
toys, and demographics. Sex Roles 79, 329–341. Doi:
10.1007/s11199-017-0882-4
Korlat S, Kollmayer M, Holzer J, Lüftenegger M, Pelikan ER, Schober B
and Spiel ,(2021).Gender Differences in Digital Learning During
COVID-19: Competence Beliefs, Intrinsic Value, Learning
Engagement, and Perceived Teacher Support.
Marriott, H., Nekvapil. J., (2012). Language management approach:
Probing the concept of "noting". Journal of Asian Pacific
Communication, 22 (2).
McElhinny, B., & Mills, S. (2007). Launching studies of gender and
language in the 21 st century. Gender and Language, 1(1), 1-13.
Meyerhof, M. (2006). Introducing sociolinguistics. USA & Canada:
Routledge.
Motiwalla, L. F. (2007). Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation.
Computers & Education, 49, 581-596.
Nemati, A & Bayer, J. M. (2007) Gender differences in the use of
linguistic forms in the speech of men and women: A Comparative
Study of Persian and English.
Nurjanah, O.W, Santosa, R. & Rochsantiningsih, D. (2017). Male and
Female linguistic politeness in speaking classroom. International
Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 1(2).
Nollenberger N, Rodrıguez-Planas N and Sevilla, A (2016). The math
gender gap: The role of Culture. American Economic Review
Papers & Proceeding, 106(5): 257–261.
Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data
analysis using SPSS for windows (4th ed.). Crows Nest NSW 2065:
Australia.
Rodrıguez-Planas N and Nollenberger N (2018). Let the girls learn! It is
not only about Math...It’s about gender social norms. Economics of
Education Review, 62: 230–253.
Sadiqi, F. (2003). Women, gender, and language in Morocco. Boston,
MA: Brill.
Shuy, D. (1969). A Cultural Approach to Male-Female
Miscommunication. London: Routledge
Jarrahzade, Z. & Hashamdar, M./ Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 4(2) (2022), 66–87
87
Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook
(4th Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stockwell, G. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. Contemporary
Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 16(3), 24-31.
Subon, F. (2013). Gender Differences in the Use of Linguistic Forms in
the Speech of Men and Women in the Malaysian Context. Journal
of Humanities and Social Science, 13(3), PP 67-79.
Tannen, D. (2005). Conversational style. New York, NY: Oxford
University Press.
Wang, S., & Smith, S. (2013). Reading and grammar learning through
mobile phones. Language Learning and Technology, 17(3), 117-
134.
Wardhaugh, R. (2010). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Malden, MA:
Wiley-Blackwell.
Xia, X. (2013). Gender Differences in Using Language. Theory and
Practice in Language Studies, 3(8), pp. 1485-1489.
Yasuda H (2015) The gender differences of test scores in the fourth-grade
university students. Journal of Tokyo Keizai University:
Economics285: 127–153 (In Japanese).
Zhang Y and Tsang M (2015). Gender gap in the National College
Entrance Exam performance in China: A case study of a typical
Chinese municipality. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(1): 27–36.
