Navigating Turn-Taking System in an Online Synchronous Course: The Case of Gender and Language Proficiency
محورهای موضوعی : نشریه تخصصی زبان، فرهنگ، و ترجمه (دوفصلنامه)
1 - دانشیار گروه زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد خوراسگان اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
2 - دکترای آموزش زبان انگلیسی، گروه زبان انگلیسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد خوراسگان اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران
کلید واژه: gender differences, conversation analysis, Level of proficiency, Turn-Taking, Online Synchronous Classrooms,
چکیده مقاله :
English learners' turn-taking system has been impacted due to the sudden shift from traditional face-to-face classes to virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of the study was to obtain a closer understanding of how students and teachers constructed turns during their interactions. The data were collected from the audio transcripts of 55 students of two intermediate and two advanced EFL classrooms that were held on the Zoom platform. After collecting the data, they were transcribed through the modified version of Sacks, Schegloff, and Jefferson's Model and analyzed by the SPSS, through the Chi-Square tests. The results showed that the students were mostly addressed by their teachers. Moreover, the male students took more turns, and there was a meaningful difference in the turn-taking system of the intermediate and advanced EFL learners. Therefore, both gender and the level of proficiency influenced the patterns of turn-taking in online classrooms. The results might contribute to raising teacher awareness towards the preferred turn-taking patterns in a virtual synchronous classroom.
English learners' turn-taking system has been impacted due to the sudden shift from traditional face-to-face classes to virtual learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of the study was to obtain a closer understanding of how students and teachers constructed turns during their interactions. The data were collected from the audio transcripts of 55 students of two intermediate and two advanced EFL classrooms that were held on the Zoom platform. After collecting the data, they were transcribed through the modified version of Sacks, Schegloff, and Jefferson's Model and analyzed by the SPSS, through the Chi-Square tests. The results showed that the students were mostly addressed by their teachers. Moreover, the male students took more turns, and there was a meaningful difference in the turn-taking system of the intermediate and advanced EFL learners. Therefore, both gender and the level of proficiency influenced the patterns of turn-taking in online classrooms. The results might contribute to raising teacher awareness towards the preferred turn-taking patterns in a virtual synchronous classroom.
References
Amani, M. H. (2020). Turn-taking and gender dominance issue.
International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and
Humanities. 10(2), 172-177.
Amir, S. H. & Jakob, C. J. (2020). Male and female teachers' turn taking
strategies in EFL classroom interaction. International Journal of
Progressive Sciences and Technologies. 19(1), 176-182.
https://doi.org/10.52155/IJPSAT.V19.1.1626
Ansori, M. (2019). English teachers' efficacy in using pedagogical
techniques to promote higher order thinking skills. Celtic: A Journal
of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature, and Linguistics,
6(2), 1-13.https://doi.org/10.22219/CELTIC.V612 .9860
Azhar, A. K. & Iqbal, N. (2018). Turn-taking and gender differences in
language classroom. Journal of Nelta, 23, 54-67.
Brooks, C. F. (2016). Role, power, ritual, and resistance: A critical
discourse analysis of college classroom talk. Western Journal of
Communication, 80(3), 384-369.https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 1946
3014.2020.1761847
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive
approach to language pedagogy (3d ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall Regents.
Chalak, A. & Karimi, M. (2017). Analysis of turn taking and repair
strategies among male and female Iranian intermediate EFL
learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research.
4(2), 1-9.
Coates, J. (1998). Language and gender: A reader. Blackwell Publishing.
Darhower, M. (2002). International features of synchronous computermediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A
sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19(2), 249-277.
Dewi, F. R., Suharsono, S., & Munir, A. (2018). Turn taking strategies
and it relations to the learners' personality and power in the
interaction of English conversation class. Eternal, 4(2), 288-305.
https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V42.2018.A12
Evnitskaya, N., & Berger, E. (2017). Learners' multimodal displays of
willingness to participate in classroom interaction in the L2 and
CLIL contexts. Classroom Discourse, 8(1), 71-49.
https://10.1080/19463014.2016.1272062
Karimi, M. & Chalak, A. / Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 4(2) (2022), 107-129
127
Galaczi. D. E. (2013). Interactional competence across proficiency levels:
How do learners manage interaction in paired speaking teats?
Applied Linguistics, 1-33. Doi: 10.1093/applin/amt017
Garton, S. (2012). Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacherfronted classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse, 3(1), 29-45.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19343014.2012.666022
Ghilzai, A. Sh. & Baloch, M. (2016). Conversational analysis of turn
taking behavior and gender difference in multimodal conversation.
Perspectives in Language, Linguistics and Media, 1(2016), 1-13.
Gorjian, B., & Habibi, P. (2015). The effect of conversation strategies on
the classroom interaction: The case of turn taking. Journal of
Applied Linguistics and Language Learning, 1(1), 14-23.
https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jalll.20150101.03
Gregoria, B. L., Escandallo, C. J., & Suan, G. E. (2021). Language of
Adam and Eve: A comparative analysis on linguistic representation
of gender. International Journal of Innovative Science and
Research Technology,6(7), 605-656.
Greller, W., & Drachsler, H. (2012). Translating learning into numbers:
A generic framework for learning analytics. Journal of Educational
Technology and Society, 15(3), 42-57.
Hellum, M., & Olah, L. S. (2018). Doing gender and gender equality
through emotional expressions during a research interview. Views
of highly educated Swedish young adults. Journal of Gender
Studies, 28(3), 304-317.https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080 /0958 9236.20
18.1441018
Heritage, J. (1984). Introduction. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.),
structure of social action (pp. 1-15). Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Hook, C. (1981). Studying classrooms. Deakin University Press.
Hussein, M. A. turn-taking and gender dominance issue. International
Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(2), 172-
177.
Jocuns, A., Shi, L., Zhang, L., Yin, T., Gu, X., Huang, X., Zhang, Y., &
Zhang, Y. (2020). Translocating classroom discourse practices
during the Covid-19 pandemic in China: A reflective nexus analysis
account. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(3),
121-142. https://doi.org/10.30466/ijltr.2020.120937
Kelly, A. (1988). Gender differences in teacher-pupil interactions: A
meta-analytic review. Research in Education, 39, 1-23.
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and women's place. Cambridge University
Press.
Karimi, M. & Chalak, A. / Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 4(2) (2022), 107-129
128
Lee, L. (2007). Fostering second language oral communication through
constructivist interaction in desktop video conferencing. Foreign
Language Annals, 40(4), 635-649.
Lehtimaja, I. (2011). Teacher-oriented address terms in students' reproach
turns. Linguistics and Education, 22, 348-363.
Lerner, G. H. (2004). Conversation analysis: studies from the first
generation. John Benjamin Publishing.
Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
Nicholls, J. (1993). Exchange structure in the EDL classroom: Q-A-C and
Q-CQ-A-C sequences in small group interaction. Pragmatics and
Language Learning, 4, 183-191.
Paoletti, I., & Fele, G. (2004). Order and disorder in the classroom.
International Pragmatics Association. Pragmatics, 14(1), 69-85.
Puri, G. (2012). Critical success factors in E-learning-an empirical study.
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(1), 149-161.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1987). A simplest
systematics for the organization of turn taking for Conversation.
Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction, 7-55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-623550-0.50008-2
Sadkar, D. (1999). Gender equity: still knocking at the classroom door.
Educational Leadership, 56(7), 6-22.
Sari, C. C. (2020). Conversation analysis: Turn-taking mechanism and
power relation in classroom setting. A Journal of Culture, English
Language Teaching, Literature, & Linguistics, 7(2), 118-136.
https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v7i2.12598
Seedhouse, P. (2005). Conversation analysis and language learning.
Language Teaching, 38, 165-187.
Seuren, M. L., Wherton, J., Greenhalgh, T., & Shaw, E. S. (2020). Whose
turn is it anyway? Latency and the organization of turn-taking in
video-mediated interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 172(2021), 63-
78.
Sunderland, J. (1989). Girls being quiet: a problem for foreign language
classrooms? Language Teaching Research, 2(1), 48-82.
Racheva, V. (2018). Social aspects of synchronous virtual learning
environments. AIP Conference Proceedings.https://doi.org/10.
1063/1.5082050.
Rashidi, N., & Rafiee rad, M. (2010). Analyzing patterns of classroom
interaction in EFL classrooms in Iran. The Journal of Asia TEFL,
7(3), 93-120.
Karimi, M. & Chalak, A. / Journal of Language, Culture, and Translation 4(2) (2022), 107-129
129
Radhidi, N., & Naderi, S. (2012). The effect of gender on the patterns of
classroom interaction. Education, 3(13), 30-36. https:// doi. org/
10.4923/J.EDU.20120203.02
Rezai, A., & Zafari, N. (2010). The impact of synchronous computermediated communication (SCMC) on the oral proficiency of Iranian
EFL learners. IJAL, 13(2), 101-119.
Rymes, B. (2009). Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical
reflection. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Rahmatika, L. & Malikatul, L. (2021). Discourse structure of classroom
session during Covid-19 pandemic. Ethical Lingua, 8(1), 218-227.
https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.257
Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An introduction to sociolinguistics. Blackwell
Publishing.
Wut, T, M., & Xu, J. (2021). Person-to-person interactions in online
classroom settings under the impact of COVID-19. Asia Pacific
Education Review, 22, 371-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-
021-09673-1
Yarahamdi, M., & Sadeghi, M. (2012). Iranian EFL learners' turn taking.
Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(1), 874-877.
Yakushkina, M. (2018). Gender performance through turn-taking
organization in a foreign language classroom. The Language
Learning Journal, 49, 176-188. https:// doi. Org /10.1 080/095
71736.2018.1520915
Yoshida, R. (2008). Overt and covert participation of learners in
Japanese language classroom (doctoral dissertation). University of
New South Wales, Sydney.
