تأثیر استفاده از نرم‎افزار کیف‎الکترونیکی بر انگیزش‎تحصیلی دانش‎آموزان دوره متوسطه

محورهای موضوعی : فن‎آوری اطلاعات

زهرا قندالی ¹ , فروزان ضرابیان ² , فتانه حسنی جعفری ³ , حسن تاجیک فیلستان ⁴

1 - دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد برنامه‌ریزی درسی، دانشگاه پیام نور، شهر ری، ایران
2 - استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
3 - استادیار گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
4 - دانشجوی کارشناسی آموزش ابتدایی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، شهر ری، ایران

تاریخ دریافت : 1393/04/17 تاریخ پذیرش : 1393/09/25 تاریخ انتشار : 1393/11/12

کلید واژه: انگیزش‎تحصیلی, نرم‎افزار کیف‎الکترونیکی, دانش‌آموزان,

چکیده مقاله :

مطالعات نشان می‎دهد که در میان عوامل متعدد و گوناگون تأثیرگذار بر یادگیری و پیشرفت تحصیلی یاد‎‎گیرندگان، انگیزش نقش برجسته و بلکه، مهم‎تری را ایفا می‌نماید. لذا، شناخت و تحلیل مناسب انگیزش فراگیران برای کارآیی و اثربخشی فعالیت‌های یاددهی و یادگیری اهمیت زیادی دارد. پژوهش حاضر، با هدف بررسی تأثیر استفاده از نرم‎افزار کیف‎الکترونیکی بر انگیزش‎تحصیلی درس زیست‎شناسی دانش‎آموزان دختر پایه دوم دوره متوسطه که در مدارس هوشمند و عادی شهرستان پاکدشت در سال تحصیلی 93-1392 مشغول به تحصیل بودند، انجام شده است. پژوهش از نوع کاربردی است و به روش شبه‎آزمایشی با پیش‎آزمون و پس‎آزمون انجام شد. جامعه آماری، کلیه دانش‎آموزان دختر پایه دوم رشته علوم‎تجربی بود. نمونه‎ آماری شامل 120 نفر بود که با روش نمونه‎گیری تصادفی خوشه‎ای در دو گروه گواه و آزمایش در قالب 60 دانش‎آموز از مدارس هوشمند و 60 دانش‎آموز از مدارس عادی انتخاب شدند. ابزار مورد ‎استفاده در این پژوهش، پرسش‌نامه انگیزش‎تحصیلی بود. گروه آزمایش به مدت سه ماه از نرم‎افزار کیف‎الکترونیکی استفاده نمود در حالی که گروه گواه، به روش سنتی آموزش دیدند. داده‌ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل ‎واریانس ‎چندمتغیری و کوواریانس تجزیه و تحلیل گردیدند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که پس از استفاده از نرم‎افزار کیف‎الکترونیکی تفاوت معناداری بین نمرات انگیزش‎تحصیلی دانش‎آموزان در گروه آزمایش در مقایسه با گروه گواه مشاهده شد. نتایج این پژوهش بیانگر نقش مثبت استفاده از نرم‎افزار کیف‎الکترونیکی در یادگیری بهتر و تعمیق اثر آموزش درس زیست‎شناسی در دانش‎آموزان بود.

چکیده انگلیسی:

Studies showed that among a variety of factors effective on learning and learners’ academic achievement, motivation plays a prominent and perhaps more important role. So, a proper identification and analysis of learners’ motivation are highly significant in the effectiveness of teaching-learning activities. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of E-bag software usage on the academic motivation of female second grade high school students in biology course in Pakdasht Town in both intelligent and ordinary schools in 2013-14. It was an applied research and was done in quasi-experimental method with pre-test and post-test. The statistical population was all the female students in second grade high school in experimental sciences field. This research has been done through cluster random sampling with 120 students in two experimental and control groups. A framework was used in which 60 students from the intelligent schools and 60 students from ordinary schools were selected. The tool used in this study was academic motivation questionnaire. The experimental group has used the E-bag software for a period of three months while the control group was trained in a traditional method. The data was analyzed using multivariate variance and covariance analysis. The results of the study showed that after using the E-bag software a significant difference in the academic motivation scores of the students in experimental group was seen compared with the control group. The results indicated the positive role of using the E-bag software in better learning and deepening the impact of teaching biology course in the students.

منابع و مأخذ:

1. Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computer & Education Journal, 39(4), 395-414.


2. Bohrani‚ M. (2005). A study on secondary students motivation of Fars province and coherence factors. Social and Human Science Journal of Shiraz University, 22(4(45)), 104-115. (in Persian).


3. Bruyn, E. H., Dekovi, M., & Meijnen, G. W. (2003). Parenting, goal orientations, classroom behavior, and school success in early adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(4), 393-412.


4. Busato, V. V., Prinsb, F. J., Elshouta, J. J., & Hamakera, C. H. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences‚ 29(6), 1057-1068.


5. Daeizade‚ H., Hosseinzade‚ B., & Ghazanavi‚ M. (2010). A survey on the role of ICT on secondry students performance. Leadership and Management, 4(4), 81-97. (in Persian).


6. Deyreh‚ E., & Banijamali‚ Sh. A. S. (2009). The contribution of motivation factors on the use of cognitive strategies in the learning process. Journal of Psychology‚ 5(3), 47-62. (in Persian).


7. Ebrahimzade‚ I. (2006). Instruction and education based on information and communication technology: Conceptual essays. Peyke Nour Quarterly‚ 4(4), 76-93. (in Persian).


8. Education Administration of Tehran. (2011). Smart school schemata. Tehran: Vice Secondary Education. (in Persian).


9. Emami Gharehajlu‚ J. (2003). A survey on determinative motives of educational progress at English language high school students from aspect of teachers and students in 2002-03. M.A. Thesis‚ Islamic Azad University, Sari Branch. (in Persian).


10. Eysink, T. H., Jong, T. D., Berthold, K., Kolloffel, B., & Opferman, M. (2009). Learner performance in multimedia learning arrangement: An analysis across instructional approaches. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1107-1149.


11. Fahimifar, F., & Ghaebi, A. (2009). E-book from the perspective information professionals working in the central library University of Tehran. Journal Information Science Technology, 1(2), 79-115. (in Persian).


12. Feyizi, K., & Rahmani, M. (2004). E-learning in Iran, issues and solutions with emphasis on excellent teaching. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 33(1), 99-120. (in Persian).


13. Gates, B., & Rinearson, P. (1999). The road ahead. England: Pearson Education Limited (with Association with Penguin Books Ltd.).


14. Ghasemi‚ A. (2009). The role of ICT with regard of GUEP2 software on teaching math. M. A Thesis. Rajaei Teacher Training University. (in Persian).


15. Hadjerrouit, S. (2010). Developing web-based learning resources in school education: A user-centered approach. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning andLearning Objects, 6, 115-135.


16. Heydari‚ Gh., Madanloo‚ Y., Niazazari‚ M., & Jafarigaluche‚ A. (2010). Comparing the effect of English language teaching by instructional softwares and classical method on students academic achievement. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences‚ 1(1), 103-115. (in Persian).


17. Horton, W., & Horton, K. (2008). E-learning tools and technologies (First Edition). USA: Wiley publishing.


18. Javaheri‚ J. (2004). The effect of using PowerPoint software at improving qualities geometry acquisition. Collection of Abstracts Seventh Articles Math Education Conference. Sanandaj: Kordestan Educational Organization. (in Persian).


19. Jegede, J. O. (1994). Influence of motivation and gender on secondary school students’ academic performance in Nigeria. The Journal of Social Psychology, 13(5), 695-697.


20. Kadivar‚ P. (2009). Psychology of learning. Tehran: SAMT. (in Persian).


21. McInerney, D. M., Roche, L. A., McInerney, V., & Marsh, W. H. (1997). Cultural perspectives on school motivation: The relevance and application of goal theory. American Educational Research Journal, 34(1), 207-236.


22. Najafi‚ H. (2008). The effect of information technology on students’ educational progress of Ardebil high schools in 2005-06. Peyke Noor‚ 93(3), 6-82. (in Persian).


23. Owusu‚ K. A., Monney, J. Y.‚ & Wilmot‚ E. M. (2010). Effect of computer-assisted instruction on performance of senior high school biology students in Ghana. Computers and Education‚ 55(2), 904-910.


24. Pakniya‚ L., Nadi‚ M., Safari‚ Y., & Mahdizade‚ H. (2014). The design of educational software for the fifth-grade sciences course based on metacognition and reviewing its impact on the motivation and academic achievement of students. Journal Research in curriculum planning, 10(12), 24-35. (in Persian).


25. Parishani‚ N., Jafari‚ E., & Abedi‚ A. (2011). The Effect of educational technology on student’s motivation at Biology. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 1-16. (in Persian).


26. Rahimi, M., & Yadollahi, S. (2009). A study of computer anxiety of high school students and the relationship between use of computer and ownership of personal computers. Proceedings of the 4th Electronics Conference, University of Science and Technology, Tehran. (in Persian).


27. Ritzhaupt, A., Martin, F., & Daniels, K. (2010). Multimedia competencies for an educational technologist: A survey of professionals and job announcement analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(4), 421-449.


28. Rogers, C. G., Galloway, D., Armstrong, D., & Leo, E. (1998). Gender differences in motivational style: A comparison of measures and curriculum area. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 189-202.


29. Sadra Rahami‚ S. (2006). A survey on the effect of new method of teaching geometry on girls students motivation and attitude in Tiran & Krun Town in 2005-06. M. A. Thesis. Islamic Azad University, Educational Science College, Khurasgan Branch. (in Persian).


30. Saffarian‚ S., Fallah‚ V., & Mirhoseyni‚ H. (2010). Comparing the effect of educational software teaching with traditional teaching method on teaching Math. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Science‚ 36(2), 1-21. (in Persian).


31. Satari‚ S., & Mohammadi‚ P. (2011). Survey of relation between application of information technology and high school academic achievement. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences‚ 1(4), 81-96. (in Persian).


32. Sheikhzade‚ M., & MehrMohammadi‚ M. (2004). The effect of math educational software of elementary school based on structural approach and measuring it’s effectiveness. Educational Innovative‚ 3(9), 32-48. (in Persian).


33. Snyder, C. R., Hal, S., Shorey, J. Ch., Kimberley, M. P., Virgil, H. A., & Cynthia, W. (2002). Hope and academic success in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 820-826.


34. Soleimanpur‚ J., Khalkhali‚ A., & Fallah‚ L. (2010). The effect of ICT- based teaching methods in creating sustained learning in experimental science course in third grade secondary school students. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Science‚ 1(2), 77-93. (in Persian).


35. Tucker, C. M., Zayco, R. A., & Herman, K. C. (2002). Teacher and child variables as predictors of academic engagement among low income Africa American children. Psychology in the School, 39(4), 477-488.


36. Watt, C. D., Greeley, S. A., Shea, J. A., & Ahn, J. (2005). Educational views and attitudes, and career goals of MD-PhD students at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine. Acad Med, 80(2), 193-198.


37. Willemes, M. (2005). Values in education: A challenge for teacher educator. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 205-210.


38. Yousefi‚ A., Ghasemi‚ Gh.‚ & Firoznia‚ S. (2009). The Relation of motivation with educational progress on medical students at Isfahan university. Iranian Journal of Medical Education‚ 9(1), 79-85. (in Persian).


39. Zamani‚ E., Abedi‚ A., Soleimani‚ N., & Amini‚ N. (2010). A survey on the process of Isfahan secondry schools teachers’ interest to information and communication technology based on Hard and Hall Interesting Theory. Education and Learning Studies, 2, 132-107. (in Persian).


40. Zameni‚ F., & Kardan‚ S. (2010). The Effect of information and communication technology on math. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences‚ 1(1), 23-38. (in Persian).


41. Zarei Zavaraki, E. (2008). Evaluating electronic learning. Higher Education Letter, 1(3), 73-88. (in Persian).


42. Zarghami, S., Attaran, M., Naqibzadeh, A. H., & Bagheri, K. H. (2007). Examined the ratio of philosophical views about technology and education. Journal of Educational Innovation, 19, 10-29. (in Persian).