List of Articles Risk identification

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Identification and Evaluation of the Risks of Information and Communication Technology Projects
  Maryam Teimoorirad Ali Reza Azizi
  Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - Risks Identification & Analysis in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems in upstream steel industries
  Fatemeh Abbasi Jalal haghighat Monfared Jamshid Edalatian Shahriary
  Need to create within organizational and inter-organizational integration in the supply chain environment and extensive changes in the field of technology and information systems have been the main factors in the formation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. More

  Need to create within organizational and inter-organizational integration in the supply chain environment and extensive changes in the field of technology and information systems have been the main factors in the formation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems. One of the factors for the success of the implementation of these systems and also the main purpose of this study is to correctly identify the risks in the three phases before, during and after the implementation of ERP systems in the study industry, then evaluate the risks obtained and it is appropriate to respond them. Literature reviewed and 52 factors were identified as failure factors of ERP projects. Then, with purposive sampling methodology were interviewed by six experts in the field of ERP systems, which adjusted the risk indicators and achieved 40 risk indicators. A questionnaire was used to collect data to analyze the risk values and data were analyzed by SPSS and Excel software. This paper examines a practical approach to using the risk matrix to assess the risks of ERP implementation in the upstream steel industry. This approach supports key project stakeholders such as the employer, contractor and consultant to meet their obligations and minimize the negative effects on ERP project performance in terms of cost, time and quality objectives . Finally, the risks were divided into three levels: Critical (unacceptable), High (significant) and Medium, and the strategy for dealing with them was described in three categories: Risk avoidance, Active acceptance and Transfer. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  3 - Risk Assessment in Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems implementation in upstream steel industries
  Fatemeh Abbasi Jalal Haghighat Monfared Jamshid Edalatian Shahryari
  Risks and uncertainty can potentially have serious consequences for enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation. This paper examines a practical approach to ERP implementation risk assessment in upstream steel industries that supports important project stakeholder More

  Risks and uncertainty can potentially have serious consequences for enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementation. This paper examines a practical approach to ERP implementation risk assessment in upstream steel industries that supports important project stakeholders such as the customer, contractor or developer, consultant and supplier to fulfill their obligations and the negative effects on ERP project performance in relation to the objectives cost, time and quality are minimize. In this study, after registering the risks and their initial qualitative analysis using the risk matrix, in order to analyze the data more accurately and reduce the volume of variables, using exploratory factor analysis in SPSS software, the risks were categorized into 7 groups, then using confirmatory factor analysis in AMOS software was used to check the validity of the obtained model, and after removing 4 risks, the validity of the model was found to be satisfactory. For the quantitative analysis of the model using the FMEA method, it was shown that the risks related to the project management factor have the highest score, i.e. the highest risk, and the factor related to the internal people of the organization has the lowest risk score with a very small difference from the process factor. Manuscript profile