List of Articles اخباریون

• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  1 - Tafsir-al-Mizan and criteria of criticism
  Seyed Reza Moosavi Meysam Taram
  Tafsir-al-Mizan has been able to explain many ambiguities from the divine verses by use of' 'Qoran by Qoran commentary" and drawing out divine purposes by virtue of compatible verses and dedicate one of the most incomparable commentaries to the world of Islam.One of the More

  Tafsir-al-Mizan has been able to explain many ambiguities from the divine verses by use of' 'Qoran by Qoran commentary" and drawing out divine purposes by virtue of compatible verses and dedicate one of the most incomparable commentaries to the world of Islam.One of the prominent features of " Alrnizan" is Allame Tabatabaei.s criticism methods in comparison to the commentary of the other commentators that in this article the writer has tried to investigate the criticism types by studying more than half of the book.Allame Tabatabaei has criticized the other cornmentator.s outlook and commentative traditions by use of criteria such as.incompatibility with the appearance of the verses.incompatibility with the top and bottom of theverses.use of verse order.use of syntax and etymology rules.use of history.recognizing the origin of the verses (from Mecca and Medina) and critisising absolutism of experimental science. In this text it has been mentioned to Allame.s view point in the case of "Qoran language" as the basic subject in the commentary and criticizing the other views and also to . 'the lack of reasonability of Qoran appearance" that I by mistake.t has been ascribed to all narrators.  Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  2 - a
  یونس سلیمانی گلی گارینه کشیشیان سیرکی
  a

  a Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  3 - The Evolution of the Principle of Innocence from the Point of View of the Fundamentalists
  Hossein Rahimi Vaskasi Hamid Kavianifar Esmat al-Sadat Tabatabaei Lotfi Nasrin Karimi
  10.22034/ijrj.2021.680388
  The principle of innocence from fundamentalist jurists’ viewpoint is as a judgement for not proving the duty for the obligee in case that the principle of the duty is doubtful. Fundamentalist jurists have explained the general conduit of the principle of innocence More

  The principle of innocence from fundamentalist jurists’ viewpoint is as a judgement for not proving the duty for the obligee in case that the principle of the duty is doubtful. Fundamentalist jurists have explained the general conduit of the principle of innocence as doubt in duty and they have considered it currently in all suspicions of sanctions and obligations, in contrast to the Akhbaris, they consider this principle to be current only in suspicions and obligations and also they are cautious in the face of suspicions of sanctions. Attention and contemplation in the view of the jurists in all time showed the evolution in the implementation and citation of this principle in the history of Imami jurisprudence. In the earlier periods of principled jurisprudence, the issue of the principle of innocence was discussed along with the issue of presence and debauchery, but in later periods fundamental jurists focused on these two separate aspects of the principle of innocence. The discussion of the presence and absence of the observer of the wisdom of things in terms of the primary titles has been related to the use of ijtihad arguments, but in contrast to the discussion of the principle of innocence and precaution, the observer of the judgment may doubt in the real judgment.  In general, the authors in this paper studied this issue from the fundamentalist jurists’ viewpoint and contrasted it with other viewpoints. Manuscript profile
• Open Access Article
  • Abstract Page
  • Full-Text
  
  4 - جایگاه اجتهاد و گستره تقلیددرفقه امامیه
  فیروزه حضرتی فهیمه ملک زاده فائزه مقتدائی
  10.30495/alr.2020.673670
  Manuscript profile