Designing a Smart Specialization Model for Innovation Development in the Provinces of Iran: Case Study of East Azerbaijan Province

Subject Areas : Strategic Management Researches

mahdi  pakzad ¹ (PhD in Science and Technology Policy, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran)
seyed sepehr  ghazi noori ² (Professor, Faculty of Management and Economics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran)
mahdi  mohammadi ³ (Assistant Professor, School of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran)

Received: 2021-02-16 Accepted : 2020-11-30 Published : 2020-11-21

Keywords: Smart specialization, Regional innovation policy, Policy mix, Multi Grounded Theory (MGT) method,

Abstract :

Innovation is a process dependent on geography and region in which local capacities such as resources, institutions, public and cultural values are the main drivers. Interactions between different sectors of the region, including technical, commercial, legal, social and financial sectors, contribute to the development, protection, financing or regulation of innovation and technology. The dependence of innovation on the characteristics of regions has made it impossible to provide a single model for the development of innovation in the regions, and in fact, a diverse set of institutional capacities, tools and characteristics is needed for the development and management of present and future knowledge. Also important are factors such as regional production, regional environment, system of academia and research in the region, public management and the capabilities of private and business firms. Given the differences in the state of innovation in the provinces of Iran, this study seeks to present a smart specialization for the development of regional innovation ecosystem in Iran. To this end, by studying and reviewing previous studies and research, the requirements and components of smart a smart specialization have been identified and based on them an initial framework has been designed for smart regional eco-innovation development policies. Then, in order to present a native model for intelligent policy package design, East Azerbaijan Province, which has been institutionalized in science and technology policy discussions among the province's actors and activists, was selected and with using Multi Grounded Theory (MGT) method and using interviews with provincial managers, trade unions, industrial cluster and technology managers. The identified requirements and components were initialized in a local and regional context. The proposed model of smart specialization for formulating regional innovation development policies includes three stages: preparing the vision and priority areas of the region, analyzing the innovation ecosystem of selected areas, formulating a policy mix and implementing planning along with considering process considerations

References:

پاکزاد، مهدی؛ قاضی نوری، سپهر؛ محمدی، مهدی؛ مختارزاده، نیما (1399). تخصصی سازی هوشمند: راهبردی برای سیاست گذاری منطق های نوآوری ، پژوهش های مدیریت عمومی،در نوبت انتشار.
ریاحی، پریسا، قاضی نوری، سید سپهر، حاجی حسینی، حجت اله (1392). گونه شناسی رفتارنوآوری استان های ایران با تاکید برعوامل اجتماعی ، مجله سیاست علم و فناوری، 5 ( 4 )،47-61
نقی زاده، رضا، الهی، شعبان؛ منطقی، منوچهر، قاضی نوری، سپهر (1393). فراترکیب مدل های نوآوری منطق های: مروری بر سال-های 2013-1990 .مدیریت  نوآوری، 3(4) ،56-25.
محسنی کیاسری، مصطفی، محمدی، مهدی؛ جعفرنژاد، احمد، مختارزاده، نیما، اسدیفر، رضا (1396) .دسته بندی ابزارهای سیاست نوآور تقاضامحور با استفاده از رویکرد فراترکیب. مدیریت،(2)6، 138-109 

Adner, R (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard business review, 84(4), 98

Adner, R & Kapoor, R (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic management journal, 31(3), 306-333.

Amin, A (1999). An institutionalist perspective on regional economic development. International journal of urban and regional research, 23(2), 365- 378

Boekholt, P (2010). The Evolution of Innovation Paradigms and their Influence on Research, Technological Development and Innovation Policy Instrument; In Smits, R. E., Kuhlman, S. and Shapira, P., "The theory and practice of
innovation policy", Edward Elgar Publishing Inc. USA

Borrás, S & Edquist, C (2013). The choice of innovation policy instruments. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(8), 1513-1522

Bramwell, A., Hepburn, N & Wolfe, D. A (2012). Growing innovation ecosystems: University-industry knowledge transfer and regional economic development in Canada. Knowledge Synthesis Paper on Leveraging Investments in HERD. Final Report to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada

Caloffi, A & Mariani, M (2018). Regional policy mixes for enterprise and innovation: A fuzzy-set clustering approach. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(1), 28-46

Chrysomallidis, C. and A. Tsakanikas (2017). "The implementation of smart specialization strategy in Greece: Rebalancing  governance between the central state and the regions." Regional Science Policy & Practice

Fabbri, E (2016). Strategic planning and foresight: the case of Smart Specialisation Strategy in Tuscany. Foresight, 18(5), 491-508

Foray, D., Morgan, K & Radosevic, S (2018). The role of smart specialization in the EU research and innovation policy landscape. Brussels: European Commission. Режим доступа: http://ec. europa. eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/brochure/smart/role_smartspecialisation_ ri. pdf, дата обращения, 13, 2019.

Goldkuhl, G & Cronholm, S (2010). Adding Theoretical Grounding to Grounded Theory: Toward Multi-Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 9(2),  187-205.

Gulc, A (2015). Analysis of methodological approach to identify smart specialization on the example of Polish regions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 213: 817-823

Hepburn, N. C (2014). Minding the Gap between Promise and Performance: The Ontario Liberal Government’s Research and Innovation Policy, 2003-2011 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto).

Kern, F & Howlett, M (2009). Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 391- 408

Kotnik, P, & Petrin, T(2017). Implementing a smart specialisation strategy: an evidence-based approach. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(1), 85-105

Mercan, B & Goktas, D (2011). Components of innovation ecosystems: A cross-country study. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 76, 102-112.

Midtkandal, I & Sörvik, J (2012). What is smart specialisation. Nordregio News, 5, 2012-2013

Paliokaitė, A., Martinaitis, Ž & Sarpong, D (2016). Implementing smart specialisation roadmaps in Lithuania: Lost in translation?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 143-152

Radej, B., Jazbinesk, K. Ž & Dolinsek, M (2015). Measuring Smartness of Innovation Policy. Slovenian Evaluation Society, 8(1), 1-22

Reimeris, R (2013). Preparation of Smart specialisation strategy: The Lithuanian case. European Structural and Investment Funds Journal, 1(1), 47- 52

Sjoer, E., Nørgaard, B., & Goossens, M. (2012). Opportunities and Challenges in the Implementation of the Knowledge Triangle. 40th annual conference of Societe Europeenne pour la Formation des Ingenieurs (SEFI), 23-26

Uyarra, E., (2019). Smart Specialization as Place-based Policy: Lessons Learnt?  Regional Insights. 2019: 1–6 

Woronowicz, T., Boronowsky, M., Wewezer, D., Mitasiunas, A., Seidel, K & Cotera, I. R (2017). Towards a regional innovation strategies modelling. Procedia Computer Science, 104, 227-234

Yegorov, I & Ryzhkova, Y(2018). Innovation policy and implementation of smart specialisation in Ukraine. Economy and Forecasting, (3), 48-64